Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Biomech ; 49(2): 244-51, 2016 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26708964

RESUMEN

Measurement of the quality of trunk stabilization is of great interest to identify its role in first occurrence, recurrence or persistence of low-back pain (LBP). Our research group has developed and validated a method to quantify intrinsic and reflex contributions to trunk stabilization from the frequency response function (FRF) of thorax movement and trunk extensor EMG to perturbations applied by a linear actuator. However, the reliability of this method is still unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the between-day reliability of trunk FRFs in healthy subjects and LBP patients. The test-retest ICC׳s in patients were substantial for both admittance and reflex gains (ICC3,1>0.73 and 0.67). In healthy subjects, the reliability of admittance gain was also substantial (ICC3,1 0.66), but the reliability of the reflexive gain was only moderate (ICC3,1 0.44). Although sample sizes were limited (13 healthy subjects and 18 LBP patients), these results show that trunk stabilization can be measured reliably, and represent a promising step towards using this method in further research in LBP patients.


Asunto(s)
Contracción Muscular , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movimiento , Equilibrio Postural , Reflejo/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Torso/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
2.
Anesthesiol Res Pract ; 2011: 159541, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21716721

RESUMEN

A posterior lumbar plexus block or psoas compartment block (PCB) is an effective locoregional anesthetic technique for analgesia and anesthesia of the entire lower extremity including the hip. Since the first description in the early seventies, this technique has been modified based on advanced knowledge of the anatomical localization of the lumbar plexus and the improvement of technical equipment. This paper provides an overview of the history, clinical efficacy, and risk profile of the PCB focused on hip surgery. Current status and future expectations are discussed.

3.
Br J Anaesth ; 101(6): 750-60, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18945717

RESUMEN

Psoas compartment block (PCB) is a potentially useful but controversial technique for lower limb surgery. We have conducted a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of PCB for anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia for hip and knee surgery. Relevant studies were identified within PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The main outcome measure for anaesthesia was anaesthetic efficacy. For postoperative analgesia, the severity of postoperative pain was compared. The data were subjected to meta-analysis using relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for dichotomous variables and weighted mean differences with 95% CI for continuous variables. Thirty publications were included. PCB is an effective intervention for analgesia after hip and knee surgery. It appears superior to opioids for pain relief after hip surgery. This analgesic benefit may be extended beyond 8 h by the use of a catheter technique. Compared with Winnie's 3-in-1 block, PCB is associated with more consistent block of the obturator nerve. PCB may be an alternative to postoperative neuraxial block. Although PCB combined with sciatic nerve block and sedation is an effective technique for minor knee surgery, there is currently insufficient data to recommend the use of this approach for hip and major knee surgery. PCB is a safe and effective alternative for analgesia after hip and knee surgery. More research is required to define its role in the intraoperative setting and confirm potentially beneficial effects on variables such as perioperative haemodynamics and blood loss.


Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Músculos Psoas/inervación , Adulto , Analgesia/métodos , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía
4.
Palliat Med ; 22(7): 796-807, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18838491

RESUMEN

Constipation is one of the most common problems in patients receiving palliative care and can cause extreme suffering and discomfort. The aims of this study are to raise awareness of constipation in palliative care, provide clear, practical guidance on management and encourage further research in the area. A pan-European working group of physicians and nurses with significant experience in the management of constipation in palliative care met to evaluate the published evidence and produce these clinical practice recommendations. Four potentially relevant publications were identified, highlighting a lack of clear, practical guidance on the assessment, diagnosis and management of constipation in palliative care patients. Given the limited data available, our recommendations are based on expert clinical opinion, relevant research findings from other settings and best practice from the countries represented. Palliative care patients are at a high risk of constipation, and while general principles of prevention should be followed, pharmacological treatment is often necessary. The combination of a softener and stimulant laxative is generally recommended, and the choice of laxatives should be made on an individual basis. The current evidence base is poor and further research is required on many aspects of the assessment, diagnosis and management of constipation in palliative care.


Asunto(s)
Catárticos/uso terapéutico , Estreñimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos , Estreñimiento/inducido químicamente , Estreñimiento/prevención & control , Humanos
5.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 151(30): 1674-9, 2007 Jul 28.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17725255

RESUMEN

The development and treatment ofthe complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) are a subject of much discussion. Using the method for the development ofevidence-based guidelines, a multidisciplinary guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome has been drawn up. The diagnosis of CRPS-I is based on the clinical observation of signs and symptoms. For pain treatment, the WHO analgesic ladder is advised up to step z. In case of pain ofa neuropathic nature, anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants may be considered. For the treatment ofinflammatory symptoms, free-radical scavengers (dimethylsulphoxide or acetylcysteine) are advised. In order to enhance peripheral blood flow, vasodilatory medication may be considered. Percutaneous sympathetic blockades may be used for a cold extremity ifvasodilatory medication produces insufficient effect. To decrease functional limitations, standardised physiotherapy and occupational therapy are advised. To prevent the occurrence of CRPS-I after wrist fractures, the use of vitamin C is recommended. Adequate perioperative analgesia, limitation of operation time and limited use of bloodlessness are advised for the secondary prevention of CRPS-I. Use of regional anaesthetic techniques can also be considered in this connection.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Dolor Regional Complejo/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Acetilcisteína/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiopatología , Síndromes de Dolor Regional Complejo/diagnóstico , Dimetilsulfóxido/uso terapéutico , Depuradores de Radicales Libres/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Países Bajos , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/fisiopatología , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico
6.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 150(48): 2633-6, 2006 Dec 02.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17205938

RESUMEN

Postherpetic neuralgia is a disorder that occurs frequently in the elderly. As the effect of the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia is often disappointing, studies have focussed on the prevention of this complaint. A commonly used preventive intervention is the administration ofa single epidural injection of a local anaesthetic and a corticosteroid, combined with oral antiviral agents and analgesics. In a large, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, the investigators found that the single injection of a corticosteroid and a local anaesthetic had no added value in the prevention of long-term postherpetic neuralgia.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Neuralgia Posherpética/prevención & control , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Epidurales , Neuralgia Posherpética/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Eur J Pain ; 9(1): 49-56, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15629874

RESUMEN

The validity with respect to presence or absence of CRPS I according to Veldman's criteria was assessed for measured pain, temperature, volume differences and limitations in range of motion. Evaluated were 155 assessments of 66 outpatients, initially diagnosed with CRPS I, but many of them not so on follow up visits. Pain was measured with VAS and McGill, temperature by infrared thermometry, volume differences by water displacement volumeters and limitations in range of motion by universal goniometers. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the measurement instruments at different cut-off points was calculated. Combined symptom scores were evaluated in a similar fashion. High sensitivity was found for the VAS, McGill, and range of motion. The specificity was overall lower, but highest values were obtained for volume differences. The positive predictive value was good for all measurement instruments. Negative predictive value was lower, especially for measurement of temperature and volume asymmetries. If sensitivity and specificity are equally important, VAS>3 cm, McGill>6 words, temperature difference>or=0.4 degrees C, volume difference>6.5% and ROM limitation>15% provide the best results. Using these cut off values, the highest value of sensitivity and of sensitivity and specificity combined, was found for a combination of VAS, McGill and ROM. The highest value of specificity was found for different combinations of 3, 4 and 5 instruments, all containing the VAS. We conclude that the measured pain, temperature, volume and range of motion can be used as diagnostic indicators for establishing presence or absence of CRPS I.


Asunto(s)
Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Umbral del Dolor/fisiología , Distrofia Simpática Refleja/diagnóstico , Distrofia Simpática Refleja/fisiopatología , Adulto , Temperatura Corporal/fisiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
9.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 19(6): 457-69, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14594516

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This randomised, multicentre, direct open comparative trial evaluated the efficacy, treatment convenience, tolerability and safety aspects of transdermal therapeutic system (TTS)-fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine (SRM) in both opioid-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain and in patients who had already been using opioids for mild-to-moderate pain. The two treatment groups were run in parallel. Special attention was paid to constipation, nausea/vomiting, drowsiness and respiratory depression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 131 enrolled patients started the 4-week treatment at low doses of opioid (25 microg/h TTS-fentanyl for 3 days or 30 mg SRM every 12 h) and were individually titrated. Tolerability, efficacy and safety were assessed throughout the study period. Frequency of constipation was the primary study variable and accordingly the study was powered for this. Both patients and investigators made a global treatment evaluation. RESULTS: TTS-fentanyl and SRM were shown to be equally effective. Pain control and sleep quality improved with both treatments. None of the patients developed respiratory depression. Statistically significantly more patients in the SRM treatment group discontinued the trial prematurely (59% vs 27%; p < 0.001), particularly due to adverse events (36% vs 4%; p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the TTS-fentanyl than in the SRM treatment group reported constipation during the trial. This finding was statistically significant after 1 week of treatment (27% vs 57%; p = 0.003). The favourable tolerability profile of TTS-fentanyl was also reflected in both the patient and the investigator global evaluation of the treatment. Patient assessment favoured TTS-fentanyl treatment in terms of a significantly lower rate of troublesome side-effects ('quite a bit' to 'very much' troublesome side-effects in 14% vs 36% of patients; p = 0.003) and less interruption of daily activities (absence of any interruption of daily activities in 88% vs 63% of patients; p = 0.012). Investigators scored TTS-fentanyl as significantly better with respect to 'side-effects' (p = 0.039) and 'overall impression' (p = 0.013). Sub-analyses of opioid-naïve users gave similar results. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that TTS-fentanyl, when used as an opioid of first choice in the treatment of cancer-related pain, is as effective as, but better tolerated than, SRM, including in opioid-naïve patients.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Cutánea , Administración Oral , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Fentanilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Dolor/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 46(7): 827-30, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12139538

RESUMEN

Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis resulting in the death of 98% of patients. Pain may be severe and difficult to treat. Management of pain includes chemotherapy, radiotherapy, pharmacologic treatment, and neurolytic celiac plexus block. Recent reviews of the efficacy of neurolytic celiac plexus block however, have reached conflicting conclusions. In this paper, we present two patients with severe pancreatic cancer pain resistant to pharmacologic treatment. Analgesic effect following repeated neurolytic celiac plexus blocks with alcohol was limited in time. Post-mortem neurohistopathologic examination of the celiac plexus revealed an abnormal celiac architecture with a combination of abnormal neurons with vacuolization and normal looking neuronal structures (ganglionic structures and nerve fibers) embedded in fibrotic hyalinized tissue. Our results show that a neurolytic celiac plexus block with alcohol is capable of partially destroying the celiac plexus. These findings may explain the significant but short-lasting analgesic effect following neurolytic celiac plexus block with alcohol.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo , Plexo Celíaco , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Dolor Intratable/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Plexo Celíaco/efectos de los fármacos , Plexo Celíaco/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuronas/efectos de los fármacos , Neuronas/ultraestructura , Dolor Intratable/etiología
11.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 46(4): 447-50, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11952448

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) is based on clinical observation of symptoms. As little information is available on the reliability of CRPS I diagnosis, we evaluated the agreement between therapists with regard to the presence and severity of CRPS I and its symptoms. METHODS: The interrater reliability was evaluated in 37 presumed CRPS I patients by three observers; one consultant anesthesiologist and two resident anesthesiologists. Patients were assessed on the basis of Veldman's CRPS criteria. RESULTS: The interrater reliability for diagnosing CRPS I was good for the majority of observer combinations. The percentage of agreement for the absence or presence of CRPS I was good (88%-100%). Cohen's Kappa's ranged from 0.60 to 0.86. The agreement for the mean symptom score ranged from 70.2% to 88.6%; Kappa's were lower and showed more variation. Interrater reliability for assessment of the severity of CRPS I and its symptoms was poor. Factors influencing the interrater reliability were symptom type, individual observers and sample population. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing CRPS I can be performed on the basis of clinical observation. Further assessment of severity of CRPS I and its symptoms should be performed with reliable and valid measurement instruments.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Dolor Regional Complejo/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anestesiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Dimensión del Dolor
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...