In vitro susceptibility of nonfermenting Gram-negative rods to meropenem-vaborbactam and delafloxacin.

Aim: Meropenem-vaborbactam and delafloxacin activities were not assessed against Achromobacter spp. (Achr), Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Smal). Methodology: A total of 106 Achr, 57 Bcc and 100 Smal were tested with gradient diffusion test of meropenem-vaborbactam, delafloxacin and comparators. Results: Meropenem-vaborbactam MIC50 were 4 µg/ml for Achr, 1 µg/ml for B. cepacia, 2 µg/ml for B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans, and 32 µg/ml for Smal. Delafloxacin MIC50 were 4 µg/ml for Achr, 0.25 µg/ml for B. cepacia and B. multivorans, 2 µg/ml for B. cenocepacia, and 0.5 µg/m for Smal. meropenem-vaborbactam MICs were fourfold lower than meropenem for 28.3% Achr, 77.2% B. cepacia, 53.8% B. cenocepacia and 77.2% B. multivorans. Conclusion: Meropenem-vaborbactam and delafloxacin are in vitro active against Bcc and Achr.

We assess the efficacy of two new antibiotics, meropenem­vaborbactam and delafloxacin, to kill rarely encountered bacteria. These bacteria, Achromobacter, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, mainly cause respiratory tract infections. Both antibiotics are found active against Achromobacter and Burkholderia, but not S. maltophilia.

Evaluation of ceftolozane-tazobactam susceptibility on a French nationwide collection of Enterobacterales.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) proved its efficacy for the treatment of infections caused by non-carbapenemase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Here, we aimed to provide susceptibility data on a large series of Enterobacterales since the revision of EUCAST categorization breakpoints in 2020. METHODS: First, C/T susceptibility was determined on characterized Enterobacterales resistant to third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) (extended spectrum ß-lactamase [ESBL] production or different levels of AmpC overexpression) (n = 213) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) (n = 259), including 170 carbapenemase producers (CPE). Then, 1632 consecutive clinical Enterobacterales responsible for infection were prospectively collected in 23 French hospitals. C/T susceptibility was determined by E-test® (biomérieux) and broth microdilution (BMD) (Sensititre™, Thermo Scientific) to perform method comparison. RESULTS: Within the collection isolates, 88% of 3GC resistant strains were susceptible to C/T, with important variation depending on the resistance mechanism: 93% vs. 13% susceptibility for CTX-M and SHV-ESBL producers, respectively. Only 20% of the CRE were susceptible to C/T. Among CPE, 80% of OXA-48-like producers were susceptible to C/T, whereas all metallo-ß-lactamase producers were resistant. The prospective study revealed that 95.6% of clinical isolates were susceptible to C/T. Method comparison performed on these 1632 clinical isolates demonstrated 99% of categorization agreement between MIC to C/T determined by E-test® in comparison with the BMD (reference) and only 74% of essential agreement. CONCLUSION: Overall, C/T showed good activity against wild-type Enterobacterales, AmpC producers, and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli but is less active against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and CRE. E-test® led to an underestimation of the MICs in comparison to the BMD reference.