Effect of the application of vermicompost and millicompost humic acids about the soybean microbiome under water restriction conditions.

Humic substances (HSs) are constituent fractions of organic matter and are highly complex and biologically active. These substances include humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (FA), and humin. HS are known to stimulate the root system and plant growth and to mitigate stress damage, including hydric stress. Humic acids have already been reported to increase microbial growth, affecting their beneficial effect on plants. However, there is scarce information on whether HA from vermicompost and millicompost, along with Bradyrhizobium, improves the tolerance of soybean to water restriction. This study aimed to evaluate the responses of soybean plants to the application of vermicompost HA (HA-V) and millicompost (HA-M) along with Bradyrhizobium sp. under water restriction. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, and the treatments received Bradyrhizobium sp. inoculation with or without the application of HA from vermicompost and millicompost with or without water restriction. The results showed that HA provided greater soybean growth and nodulation than the control. The application of HA-M stimulated an increase in the richness of bacterial species in roots compared to the other treatments. After the application of water stress, the difference between the treatments disappeared. Microbial taxa were differentially abundant in plants, with the fungal fraction most affected by HA application in stressed roots. HA-V appears to be more prominent in inducing taxa under stress conditions. Although the results showed slight differences between HA from vermicompost and millicompost regarding plant growth, both humic acids promoted an increase in plant development compared to the control.

Stimulatory effects of defective and effective 3-indoleacetic acid-producing bacterial strains on rice in an advanced stage of its vegetative cycle.

The production of 3-indoleacetic acid (IAA) by plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) stimulates root development and plant growth. In addition, morphological changes such as an increased root ramification and root hair production improves nutrient absorption and biomass accumulation. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of IAA-producing strains on rice in an advanced stage of its vegetative cycle. Rice was inoculated with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PAL 5 and its lao- mutant, deficient in auxin production, Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp 245, and Escherichia coli DH10b. Both the mutant and wild-type G. diazotrophicus stimulated root elongation, area, volume, and diameter. However, the lao- mutant strain was the only one capable of increasing the number of roots. In turn, inoculation with A. baldaniorum had no significant effect on plant development. The inoculation with E. coli led to changes in root volume, area, and diameter, and a response that may be related to the stress caused by its presence. We conclude that the inoculation with G. diazotrophicus stimulates the root system's growth independently of their IAA production ability, suggesting that a metabolite other than IAA is responsible for this effect at advanced stages of the rice's vegetative cycle.

Humic Substances in Combination With Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria as an Alternative for Sustainable Agriculture.

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and humic substances (HSs) are promising options for reducing the use of pesticides and mineral fertilizers. Although many studies have shown the effects of PGPB and HSs separately, little information is available on plant responses to the combined application of these biostimulants despite the great potential for the simultaneous action of these biological inputs. Thus, the objective of this review is to present an overview of scientific studies that addressed the application of PGPB and HSs to different crops. First, we discuss the effect of these biostimulants on biological nitrogen fixation, the various effects of the inoculation of beneficial bacteria combined with the application of HSs on promoting the growth of nonleguminous plants and how this combination can increase bacterial colonization of plant hosts. We also address the effect of PGPB and HSs on plant responses to abiotic stresses, in addition to discussing the role of HSs in protecting plants against pathogens. There is a lack of studies that address the role of PGPB + HSs in biocontrol. Understanding the factors involved in the promotion of plant growth through the application of PGPB and HSs can assist in the development of efficient biostimulants for agricultural management. This approach has the potential to accelerate the transition from conventional cultivation to sustainable agrosystems.