Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Vasa ; 52(4): 264-274, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37082826

RESUMEN

Background: The marginal vein (MV) is a persisting embryonic vein located at the lateral aspect of the lower limb. The Weber-classification, which was developed on the basis of phlebography in the 1990s, is the only existing classification system for this rare disease. Aim of this study was the structured characterization of the lateral marginal vein (MV) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evaluation of the applicability of the Weber-classification. Patients and methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective, single-center study. All patients who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI (using a prospectively determined protocol) of the untreated MV were included. MV anatomy and associated findings were characterized in a structured way taking into account the criteria of the Weber-classification for MV: inflow, outflow and extension. If three criteria of the Weber-classification were fulfilled the MV was categorized as "classifiable according to Weber". The MV was categorized as "partially classifiable according to Weber", if two criteria were met and as "not classifiable according to Weber" if less than two criteria were applicable. Results: 56 imaging studies of 58 MV (7 thoracoabdominal, 51 lower extremities) were reviewed. 18/51 MV of the lower extremities were "classifiable" according to the Weber-classification. 33/51 lower extremity MV were not definitely categorized according to the Weber-classification: 19/51 MV were "partially classifiable" and 14/51 MV were "not classifiable". 30/51 MV presented with hypoplastic, 1/51 with aplastic deep venous system. 34/51 lower extremity and 6/7 thoracoabdominal MV were associated with an additional vascular malformation (VM). Conclusions: MRI is suitable for detailed anatomic characterization of the MV and reveals additional therapy relevant findings like associated VM. The Weber-classification was not applicable in most cases, reflecting its limits and the heterogeneity of this rare disease. Structured reports rather than an obsolete classification system should be preferred for MRI of the MV.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Vasculares , Malformaciones Vasculares , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Raras , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Flebografía , Vena Safena , Malformaciones Vasculares/terapia
2.
Aorta (Stamford) ; 11(1): 36-39, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36848910

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 52-year-old with a history of aortic valve replacement and replacement of the ascending aorta with the graft inclusion technique presenting with dizziness and collapse. Computed tomography and coronary angiography revealed pseudoaneurysm formation at the anastomotic site causing aortic pseudostenosis. Due to severe calcification of the graft inclusion surrounding the ascending aorta, we performed a redo ascending aortic replacement using a two-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass to avoid deep hypothermic cardiac arrest.

3.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 46(1): 142-151, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36261507

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) as rare diseases are diagnostically and therapeutically challenging. Due to the limited evidence regarding treatment outcome, prospective data are needed on how different treatment regimens affect outcome. The aims of this prospective trial are to determine effectiveness, safety, and clinical outcome of multimodal treatment in patients with extracranial AVMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based diagnosis and informed consent, 146 patients (> 4 years and < 70 years) undergoing multimodal therapy in tertiary care vascular anomalies centers will be included in this prospective observational trial. Treatment options include conservative management, medical therapy, minimally invasive image-guided procedures (embolization, sclerotherapy) and surgery as well as combinations of the latter. The primary outcome is the patient-reported QoL 6 months after completion of treatment using the short form-36 health survey version 2 (SF-36v2) and the corresponding short form-10 health survey (SF-10) for children. In addition, clinical presentation (physician-reported signs), MRI imaging (radiological assessment of devascularization), recurrence rate, and therapeutic safety will be analyzed. Further follow-up will be performed after 12, 24, and 36 months. Moreover, liquid biopsies are being obtained from peripheral blood at multiple time points to investigate potential biomarkers for therapy response and disease progression. DISCUSSION: The APOLLON trial is a prospective, multicenter, observational open-label trial with unequal study groups to generate prospective evidence for multimodal treatment of AVMs. A multicenter design with the potential to assess larger populations will provide an increased understanding of multimodal therapy outcome in this orphan disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (identification number: DRKS00021019) https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00021019 .


Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Calidad de Vida , Niño , Humanos , Terapia Combinada , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/terapia , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Preescolar , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano
4.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 38(3): 181-192, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35038751

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Technical aspects are of utmost significance for an efficient execution in designing perforator flaps with high-resolution color-coded Duplex sonography (CCDS). The following study evaluates decisive factors for a successful microvessel examination conducted by the microsurgeon. METHODS: Technical knowledge presented in this study was based on a series of more than 200 perforator flaps planned with CCDS. Flap reconstructions were performed at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany, from July 2013 to January 2021. Standard high-resolution ultrasound (US) devices with linear multifrequency transducers of 4 to 18 MHz were used. Modes and device settings were evaluated regarding applicability by microsurgeons. Key steps for safe perforator identification and further optional steps for additional assessment should be discriminated. RESULTS: Different US modes including brightness mode (B-mode), color flow (CF), power Doppler (PD), pulse wave (PW), and blood flow (B-Flow) were used. Transducers from 15 MHz and up were favorable to detect microvessels. Knobology of a standard US device regarding buttons, switches, and specific onscreen options with relevance for perforator mapping was subcategorized in four different groups. For qualitative and quantitative evaluation of microvessels, different US modes were tested with respect to their usefulness.Vital elements of the CCDS exam are disaggregated into three key steps for safe perforator identification and three optional steps for further perforator characterization. A standardized protocol for the CCDS exams was applied. Downregulation of pulse-repetition frequency/scale to adapt device sensitivity to slow-flow velocities represented the most important criterion to visualize microvessels.Qualitative microvessel evaluation was performed in B-mode, CCDS, PD mode, and B-Flow mode. Quantitative assessment was executed using PW-mode and CCDS measuring the microvessels' diameter (mm) and flow characteristics. Quantitative information may be obtained using PW-mode and the distance-measuring tool in CF-mode. CONCLUSION: Technical aspects with respect to proper device trimming and application decisively impact CCDS-guided perforator vessel identification and evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Colgajo Perforante , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Microvasos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color
5.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 78(1): 103-116, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33554890

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact and procedural input of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and ultrasound elastography on surgical decision making during the procedure and consequently the outcome after hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 50 consecutive patients, who underwent HPB surgery from 04/2018 to 07/2018 were prospectively collected for this study. During surgery, IOUS with a high-resolution ultrasound device using CEUS after bolus injection of 2.4-5 ml dulphur hexafluoride microbubbles using a 6-9 MHz probe and a share wave and strain elastography was performed by an experienced examiner. Process and time analysis were carried out using mobile phone timer. RESULTS: The IOUS with CEUS and elastography correctly identified 42 malignant tumors and 4 benign lesions. In 3 cases, the examination provided false positive result (identifying 3 benign lesions as malignant) and in 1 case a malignant lesion was incorrectly assessed as benign (sensitivity 97,7%, specificity 57,1%, PPV 93,3% and NPV 80%).The specific question by the surgeon could be answered successfully in 98% of the cases. In 76% of the cases, there was a modification (42%) or a fundamental change (34%) of the planned surgical approach due to the information provided by the IOUS. Within the last group, the IOUS had a major impact on therapy outcome. In 7 patients an additional tumor resection was required, in 5 patients the tumor was assessed as inoperable, and in total in 5 patients an intraoperative RFA (4/5) or postoperative RITA (1/5) was required.Regarding procedural input, there was only a slight, but significant difference between the transport and set-up times before the intraoperative use (mean: 14 min 22 s) and the return transport (mean 13 min 6 s), (p = 0,038). The average examination time was 14 minutes, which makes only one third of the overall time demand. CONCLUSION: Combination of IOUS with CEUS and elastography in oncological HPB surgery provides valuable information that affects surgical decision-making. The procedural input of about 45 minutes seems to be a good investment considering the improvement of the surgical procedure and a significant modification of the therapy approach in the majority of the cases.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/cirugía , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía
6.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 73(6): 1081-1090, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32249187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap is a popular reconstructive tissue transfer. Consistent with the "hot/cold zone" concept for rapid dissection and thin flap harvest, reliable preoperative perforator mapping is mandatory. Color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) has been shown to have the highest pooled sensitivity and positive predictive value to identify ALT perforating vessels. By reviewing this guide, the reader should learn: 1. Probe selection and basic/advanced device settings 2. Interpreting tissue morphology 3. Structured mapping approach 4. Pedicle position planning 5. Safe flap design 6. Assess subcutaneous course and flap's thickness for subfascial/epifascial/suprafascial harvest 7. Implement perforators identified into a tailor-made flap design including chimeric flaps. METHODS: Experiences with ultrasound-guided flap design gained from 125 ALT perforator flap free tissue transfers performed in two reconstructive centers was the basis of our guide. Our structured method comprises standardized markings, patient positioning, and simple ergonomics. Basic and advanced CCDS settings, selection, and conventional probe guidance are outlined for the microsurgeon. RESULTS: Linear multifrequency probes (6-15 MHz) were used. Best preset programs were breast, thyroid, and vascular. Favorable device properties were depth focused to 2-5 cm, pulse repetition frequency (PRF/Scale) set low to 0.5-1.5 kHz/3-10 cm/s, color gain high, and wall filter (WF) low/off (< 50 Hz). Additional parameters were discussed. A 100% concordance rate was seen comparing preoperative perforator visualization with CCDS and intraoperative findings. Detailed picture and video material were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: CCDS is a powerful tool for preoperative perforator mapping in perforator flaps such as the ALT.


Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres/cirugía , Colgajo Perforante/cirugía , Muslo/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Humanos , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/instrumentación , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Muslo/diagnóstico por imagen
7.
Ultraschall Med ; 40(2): 205-211, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30340245

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Assessment of intraoperative quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions (FLLs) during liver surgery using postoperative histopathological results as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US data of 79 consecutive patients with 98 FLLs who underwent liver surgery between 08/2015 - 06/2017 were prospectively acquired and retrospectively analyzed. Multifrequency linear/T-shaped probes (6 - 9 MHz) were used to store cine loops of at least 5 s and images of B-mode, SWE and CEUS. The first CEUS loop was continuously documented over 1 min. in each case. Quantitative SWE analysis of FLLs was performed by placing 5 regions of interest to measure shear wave speed (m/s) and stiffness (kPa). CEUS was evaluated during the arterial, portal venous and late phase after i. v. bolus injections of 2.4 - 10 ml sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles. Postoperative histopathology after tumor resection or intraoperative biopsy was obtained to confirm findings of SWE and CEUS. RESULTS: Of 98 FLLs in 79 patients (mean age: 58 years sd ±â€Š12y) 88 were malignant and 10 were benign ranging from 0.69 to 15.2 cm in size (mean: 2.8 cm, sd ±â€Š2.25 cm). SWE characterized 73/88 FLLs correctly as malignant and 7/10 as benign using a cut-off value of 2.5 m/s/21.3 kPa (p < 0.0005). The sensitivity was 83 %, specificity 70 %, accuracy 82 %. CEUS could correctly identify 86/88 malignant and 8/10 benign FLLs. The sensitivity was 98 %, specificity 80 %, accuracy 96 %. SWE could correctly identify 2 malignant FLLs which CEUS falsely characterized as benign. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative CEUS and SWE are excellent tools for the highly accurate visualization, characterization and malignancy assessment of hepatic tumors during liver surgery.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía
8.
Rofo ; 189(9): 855-863, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834982

RESUMEN

Purpose To determine the value of routine contrast enema of loop ileostomy before elective ileostomy closure regarding the influence on the clinical decision-making. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of contrast enemas at a tertiary care center between 2005 und 2011. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I with ileostomy reversal, group II without ileostomy closure. Patient-related parameters (underlying disease, operation method) and parameters based on the findings (stenosis, leakage of anastomosis, incontinence) were evaluated. Results Analyzing a total of 252 patients in 89 % (group I, n = 225) ileostomy closure was performed. In 15 % the radiologic report was the only diagnostic modality needed for therapy decision; in 36 % the contrast enema and one or more other diagnostic methods were decisive. In 36 % the radiological report of the contrast imaging was not relevant for decision at all. In 11 % (group II, n = 27) no ileostomy closure was performed. In this group in 11 % the radiological report of the contrast enema was the only decision factor for not performing the ileostomy reversal. In 26 % one or more examination was necessary. In 26 % the result of the contrast examination was not relevant. Conclusion The radiologic contrast imaging of loop ileostomy solely plays a minor role in complex surgical decision-making before planned reversal, but is important as first imaging method in detecting complications and often leads to additional examinations. Key points · Contrast enema of loop ileostomy before planned ileostomy closure is a frequently performed examination.. · There exist no general guidelines that give further recommendations on decision-making planning ileostomy closure.. · The radiologic contrast imaging of loop ileostomy solely plays a minor role in decision-making before planned reversal, but is important as first imaging method.. Citation Format · Goetz A, da Silva NP, Moser C et al. Clinical Value of Contrast Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 855 - 863.


Asunto(s)
Enema Opaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Ileostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Compuestos de Bario , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Medios de Contraste , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...