Tramadol/Diclofenac Fixed-Dose Combination for Acute Pain Management: Bioavailability Assessment of a Generic Product.

The multimodal analgesia strategy for acute pain involves using 2 or more analgesic medications with distinct mechanisms of action. This study assessed the bioavailability and tolerability of 2 tramadol hydrochloride (50 mg)/diclofenac sodium (50 mg) fixed-dose combination formulations under fed conditions to attend the Brazilian regulatory requirements for generic product registration. An open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, 2-way crossover trial was conducted, including healthy subjects of both sexes. Subjects received a single dose of either the test or reference formulation of tramadol/diclofenac fixed-dose combination tablets with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected up to 36 hours after dosing for tramadol and 12 hours for diclofenac and quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Of 56 subjects enrolled, 53 completed the study. The 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration were within acceptable bioequivalence limits of 80%-125%. Considering the results presented in this study, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation and could be interchangeable in medical practice.

Etoricoxib Coated Tablets: Bioequivalence Assessment between Two Formulations Administered under Fasting Conditions.

Etoricoxib is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with high selectivity for cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), exerting a pronounced anti-inflammatory effect with fewer adverse events when compared to COX-1 inhibitors. The present study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between two etoricoxib-coated tablet formulations to meet regulatory requirements for a branded generic product registration in Brazil. A crossover study with an open-label, randomized design and a single-dose regimen with two treatments and two periods was conducted on healthy Brazilians of both genders. Subjects randomly received a single dose of a 90 mg etoricoxib coated tablet of test product Xumer® 90 mg (Adium S.A.) and the reference product Arcoxia® 90 mg (Merck Sharp & Dohme Farmacêutica Ltda.) under fasting conditions separated by a 14-day period. Blood samples were collected sequentially for up to 96 h following drug administration, and the concentrations of etoricoxib in plasma were determined using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed utilizing non-compartmental analysis methods. A total of 32 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 25 subjects completed the study. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf were 103.98% (95.63-113.06), 96.82% (91.82-102.09), and 95.79% (90.70-101.16), respectively. In accordance with regulatory standards, the test formulation (Xumer® 90 mg) has been deemed bioequivalent to the reference product (Arcoxia® 90 mg). As a result, these formulations can be considered interchangeable in clinical practice, with both proving to be safe and well-tolerated. The need for in vivo testing for the Xumer® 60 mg strength was waived due to the proportional similarity of the formulations and the similar in vitro dissolution profiles observed across the various strengths.

Methylphenidate Multiphasic Release Tablet: Bioequivalence Assessment between Two Formulations Administered under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

Methylphenidate hydrochloride is used to treat children, adolescents, and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Multiphasic release formulation has been used to control drug levels, mainly during children's school period. This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between two methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release tablets to meet regulatory requirements for registration in Brazil. Two independent studies (under fasting and fed conditions) designed as open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover trials were conducted in healthy subjects of both genders. Subjects were enrolled and randomly received a single dose of the test formulation methylphenidate hydrochloride 54 mg extended-release tablet (Consiv®, Adium S.A., São Paulo, Brazil) or the reference formulation (Concerta®, Janssen-Cilag Farmacêutica Ltd., São Paulo, Brazil), in each period, with a 7-day washout interval. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 h post dose and methylphenidate plasma concentrations were obtained using a validated LC-MS/MS method. A total of 96 healthy subjects were enrolled in the fasting study, of which 80 completed the study. For the fed study, 52 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 46 subjects completed it. In both studies, 90% confidence intervals for Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and partial AUCs were within the acceptable limits of 80.00 to 125.00%. Thus, according to regulatory requirements, the test formulation (Consiv®) was considered to be bioequivalent to the reference formulation (Concerta®) in both conditions (fasting and fed) and, therefore, it can be considered interchangeable in clinical practice. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated in single-dose administration.

In vitro transdermal drug permeation tests: a regulatory scenario evaluation

SUMMARY Introduction: The Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (TDDS) could circumvent the inconveniences of oral administration, increasing treatment adhesion. Meanwhile, despite being highly widespread systems, there are discrepancies between the performance and quality control methodologies recommended by the leading regulatory agencies, which is an issue for the pharmaceutical industry. Aim: To identify and to compare the requirements for TDDS regulatory approval by important agencies, focusing on the in vitro release and drug permeation studies, which are crucial tests for the evaluation of safety, efficacy, and performance of these systems. Methods: The documents that regulate the scope of TDDS in FDA, EMA and Anvisa were analyze, as well as the contributions of OECD. In addition, an approaching regarding the pharmacopeial requirements was made regarding USA, Europe, and Brazil. Results and conclusion: Concerning the regulatory approval aspects, the FDA is reviewing its documents because the current guidance is not specific to transdermal systems. On the other hand, the EMA presents a unique guideline that includes specific requirements for TDDS. The USA and the European Pharmacopoeias have specific mentions to performance and quality control of TDDS, while the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia does not mention this dosage form. Recently, Anvisa published a guide, which helps Brazilian manufacturers concerning the tests required for the regulatory approval of a new TDDS. The launch of this standardized national statute associated with the use of a validated in vitro release and permeation tests represents a remarkable breakthrough regarding TDDS.

Introducción: los sistemas de administración de fármacos transdérmicos (TDDS) podrían sortear los inconvenientes de la administración por vía oral, aumentando la adherencia al tratamiento. Mientras tanto, a pesar de ser sistemas muy extendidos, existen discrepancias entre las metodologías de desempeño y control de calidad recomendadas por las principales agencias reguladoras, lo cual es un problema para la industria farmacéutica. Objetivo: identificar y comparar los requisitos para la aprobación regulatoria de TDDS por parte de las principales agencias reguladoras, enfocándose en los estudios de liberación in vitro y premiación de fármacos. Métodos: se analizaron los documentos que regulan el alcance de la TDDS en la FDA, EMA y Anvisa, así como los aportes de la OCDE. Además, se realizó un planteamiento sobre los requisitos de las farmacopeas de los Estados Unidos, Europa y Brasil. Resultados y conclusión: la FDA está revisando los aspectos de aprobación regulatoria porque la guía actual no es específica para los sistemas transdérmicos. Por otro lado, la EMA presenta una guía única que incluye requisitos específicos para TDDS. Las farmacopeas de los Estados Unidos e Europa tienen menciones específicas al rendimiento y control de calidad de TDDS, mientras que la Farmacopea brasileña no menciona esta forma de dosificación. Recientemente, Anvisa publicó una guía que ayuda a los fabricantes brasileños en cuanto a las pruebas requeridas para la aprobación regulatoria de un nuevo TDDS. El lanzamiento de este estatuto nacional estandarizado asociado con el uso de pruebas validadas de liberación y premiación in vitro representa un avance notable con respecto a TDDS.

Introdução: os sistemas de liberação transdérmica (SLT) são capazes de contornar as desvantagens da administração oral de medicamentos, aumentando a adesão ao tratamento. Entretanto, apesar de serem sistemas difundidos, existem discrepâncias entre as metodologias de desempenho e controle de qualidade recomendadas pelas agências regulatórias, dificultando o desenvolvimento destes pela indústria farmacêutica. Objetivo: identificar e comparar os requisitos para aprovação regulatória de SLT por importantes agências regulatórias, com foco nos estudos de liberação e permeação de fármacos in vitro, testes fundamentais para avaliação da segurança, eficácia e desempenho desses sistemas. Métodos: foram analisados os documentos que regulam o escopo dos SLT publicados pela FDA, EMA e Anvisa e as contribuições da OCDE. Além disso, foi realizada a abordagem sobre os requisitos farmacopeicos nos Estados Unidos, Europa e Brasil. Resultados e conclusão: FDA está revisando os aspectos de aprovação regulatória, pois os documentos atuais não são específicos para os SLT. Em contraponto, a EMA apresenta uma diretriz única que inclui requisitos específicos para estes sistemas. Em relação às farmacopeias, enquanto EUA e Europa apresentam recomendações específicas para desempenho e controle de qualidade dos SLT, a Farmacopeia brasileira não menciona esta forma farmacêutica. Recentemente, a Anvisa publicou um guia com os testes necessários para o registro destes sistemas. O lançamento de tal publicação, associado a ensaios devidamente validados representam um avanço notável no escopo regulatório dos SLT.

Decontamination of Mikania glomerata Leaves by Gamma Irradiation: Coumarin Determination by HPLC-DAD, Microbiological Control and Genotoxicological Studies.

Gamma irradiation as a decontaminating physical agent could be an important tool in the production chain of herbal medicines by improving the microbiological quality of raw materials and the safety of final products. This study was undertaken to investigate the genotoxic potential and eventual chemical modifications of a batch of Mikania glomerata raw material decontaminated by different doses of gamma irradiation (2.0, 3.5, and 5.0 kGy), using a cesium-137 source. DNA damage was assessed in vitro by agarose gel electrophoresis in regard to double-chain breaks of plasmid pUC 9.1 DNA and in vivo by micronucleus test in bone marrow cells of Wistar rats. Cytotoxicity in bone marrows was assessed by scoring polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes ratio. An HPLC-DAD method was adapted and validated for the enhancement of coumarin selectivity from the other matrix constituents. The microbial load was satisfactorily reduced, leading to sterilization at the highest dose. Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects were not increased in the in vitro and in vivo models. The concentration of coumarin and the chromatographic profiles of the hydroalcoholic plant extracts (ethanol 70% v/v) were not modified after such process. Therefore, this work suggests that gamma irradiation of M. glomerata raw material is suitable and safe for microbiological control purposes at the employed doses.