Multicenter External Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Positive Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen/Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Patients with Prostate Cancer Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: A nomogram has recently been developed to predict 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (PSMA-PET) results in recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients. OBJECTIVE: To perform external validation of the original nomogram in a multicentric setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1639 patients who underwent PSMA-PET for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse after radical therapy were retrospectively included from six high-volume PET centers. The external cohort was stratified according to clinical setting categories: group 1: first-time biochemical recurrence (n = 774); group 2: PSA relapse after salvage therapy (n = 499); group-3: biochemical persistence after radical prostatectomy (n = 210); and group-4: advanced-stage PCa before second-line systemic therapies (n = 124). INTERVENTION: PSMA-PET in recurrent PCa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: PSMA-PET detection rate was assessed in the overall population and in each subgroup. A multivariable logistic regression model was produced to evaluate the predictors of a positive scan. The performance characteristics of the model were assessed by quantifying the predictive accuracy (PA) according to model calibration. The Youden's index was used to find the best nomogram's cutoff. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was implemented to quantify the nomogram's clinical net benefit. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In the external cohort, the overall detection rate was 53.8% versus 51.2% in the original population. At multivariate analysis, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group, PSA, PSA doubling time, and clinical setting were independent predictors of a positive scan (all p ≤ 0.02). The PA of the nomogram was identical to the original model (82.0%); the model showed an optimal calibration curve. The best nomogram's cutoff was 55%. In the DCA, the nomogram revealed clinical net benefit when the threshold nomogram probabilities were ≥20%. The retrospective design is a major limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The original nomogram exhibited excellent characteristics on external validation. The incidence of a false negative scan can be reduced if PSMA-PET is performed when the predicted probability is ≥20%. PATIENT SUMMARY: A nomogram has been developed to predict prostate-specific membrane antigen/positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) results for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). The nomogram represents an easy tool in the decision-making process of recurrent PCa.

Reproducibility of Standardized Uptake Values Including Volume Metrics Between TOF-PET-MR and TOF-PET-CT.

Purpose: To investigate the reproducibility of tracer uptake measurements, including volume metrics, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG) obtained by TOF-PET-CT and TOF-PET-MR. Materials and Methods: Eighty consecutive patients with different oncologic diagnoses underwent TOF-PET-CT (Discovery 690; GE Healthcare) and TOF-PET-MR (SIGNA PET-MR; GE Healthcare) on the same day with single dose-18F-FDG injection. The scan order, PET-CT following or followed by PET-MR, was randomly assigned. A spherical volume of interest (VOI) of 30 mm was placed on the liver in accordance with the PERCIST criteria. For liver, the maximum and mean standard uptake value for body weight (SUV) and lean body mass (SUL) were obtained. For tumor delineation, VOI with a threshold of 40 and 50% of SUVmax was used (VOI40 and VOI50). The SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV and TLG were calculated. The measurements were compared between the two scanners. Results: In total, 80 tumor lesions from 35 patients were evaluated. There was no statistical difference observed in liver regions, whereas in tumor lesions, SUVmax, SUV mean, and SUVpeak of PET-MR were significantly underestimated (p < 0.001) in both VOI40 and VOI50. Among volume metrics, there was no statistical difference observed except TLG on VOI50 (p = 0.03). Correlation between PET-CT and PET-MR of each metrics were calculated. There was a moderate correlation of the liver SUV and SUL metrics (r = 0.63-0.78). In tumor lesions, SUVmax and SUVmean had a stronger correlation with underestimation in PET-MR on VOI 40 (SUVmax and SUVmean; r = 0.92 and 0.91 with slope = 0.71 and 0.72, respectively). In the evaluation of MTV and TLG, the stronger correlations were observed both on VOI40 (MTV and TLG; r = 0.75 and 0.92) and VOI50 (MTV and TLG; r = 0.88 and 0.95) between PET-CT and PET-MR. Conclusion: PET metrics on TOF-PET-MR showed a good correlation with that of TOF-PET-CT. SUVmax and SUVpeak of tumor lesions were underestimated by 16% on PET-MRI. MTV with % threshold can be regarded as identical volumetric markers for both TOF-PET-CT and TOF-PET-MR.

Emerging biomarkers in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: tumour mutational burden, PD-L1 expression and APOBEC polypeptide-like signature in a patient with complete response to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor.

Immunotherapy has recently been incorporated into the treatment guidelines for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Nevertheless, the role of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in this setting is not completely defined. To date, PD-L1 expression and a high tumour mutational burden (TMB) seem to predict better responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, but patients without these biomarkers may still respond to immunotherapy. There are some caveats regarding these biomarkers, such as lack of standardisation of techniques, tumour heterogeneity and other factors influencing the tumour microenvironment. Genomic signatures are other promising emerging strategies. We hereby discuss the management of a 70-year-old man with a metastatic recurrence of urothelial carcinoma within 1 year after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy. Tumour next-generation sequencing showed a high TMB and a CD274 (PD-L1) amplification. The patient was treated with pembrolizumab and achieved a complete response.

Nonprostatic diseases on PSMA PET imaging: a spectrum of benign and malignant findings.

PSMA PET imaging was originally used to assess biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa), but its clinical use was promptly extended to detection, staging and therapy response assessment. The expanding use of PSMA PET worldwide has also revealed PSMA ligand uptake in diverse nonprostatic diseases, which raised questions about the specificity of this imaging modality. Although not very common initially, a growing number of pathologies presenting PSMA uptake on PET have been reported in the last few years, and a proper interpretation of PSMA PET imaging findings suddenly became challenging and, to some extent, confusing. Compared to cytoplasmic PSMA expression in nonprostatic cells, the molecular features of apical PSMA expression in PCa cells can help to distinguish these various conditions. Correlations of imaging findings to patient history, to the expected pattern of disease spread and mainly to computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics will reinforce the distinction of lesions that are more likely related to PCa from those that could lead to an incorrect diagnosis. The overall benefits of endothelial PSMA expression, which is associated with the neovasculature of malignant neoplasms, will be highlighted, stating the potential use of PSMA ligand uptake as a theranostic tool. This review aims to cover the collection of nonprostatic diseases, including benign and malignant tumors, in a didactic approach according to disease etiology, with discussion of bone-related conditions and inflammatory and infectious processes.

Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT as an early imaging biomarker for response monitoring after radiochemotherapy using cetuximab in head and heck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether 18 F-PET/CT is able to identify treatment response as early as 1 week after the end of chemoradiotherapy, whether 18 F-PET/CT can identify prognostic markers concerning progression free survival and can identify patients who need additional consolidation therapy. METHODS: A total of 54 patients with head and neck cancer were prospectively enrolled in this single-center, randomized study from 03/2012-04/2015. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging at three predefined time points: pretreatment (PET/CT1), 1 week postprimary radiochemotherapy (PET/CT2) and 3 months postprimary radiochemotherapy (PET/CT3). Tumors were assessed quantitatively based on size and glucose uptake (SUVmax) concerning response at each time point. Response assessment was correlated with progression free survival. All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to find independent predictors for progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Thirty-two (32) patients (64%) overall remained disease free, 11 patients (22%) had recurrence and 7 patients (14%) had persistent disease. There was no significantly different metabolic parameter ratio found concerning responders and nonresponders at posttreatment (PET/CT2 and 3) time points (P > .05) during clinical follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated both SUVmax and diameter assessed at time point PET/CT3 represent independent predictors of progression free survival (PFS). There was also no statistically significant difference in PFS between responders and nonresponders by means of PET/CT2 in both study arms (P > .05). Imaging responders at time point PET/CT3 showed a significantly longer PFS compared to nonresponders after the end of consolidation therapy (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Early response of head/neck cancer after radiochemotherapy can be accurately assessed with PET/CT 1 week after RCT. SUVmax and lesion diameter are independent predictors of PFS at time point PET/CT3. PET/CT2 has no prognostic value concerning PFS and cannot identify high risk patients for consolidation therapy. Imaging responders showed a significantly longer PFS compared to nonresponders and therefore PET/CT might serve as a prognostic biomarker. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT01435252.

Alectinib activity in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic RET-rearranged non-small cell lung carcinomas: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: to report outcomes of four cases of chemo-refractory RET-rearranged non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) treated with alectinib in a single center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we retrospectively assessed and reported the activity and tolerability of alectinib 600 mg twice daily in advanced and chemo-refractory RET-rearranged NSCLC patients treated in a Brazilian institution. Identification of RET rearrangements was performed using the FoundationOne® next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. RESULTS: The four patients herein reported were white, female and non-smokers, ranging between 59-66 years of age. All patients had been previously treated with chemotherapy and were TKI naïve; three of them presented disease progression to nivolumab as well. Molecular tumor profiling showed a KIF5B-RET fusion in three patients and a CCDC6-RET in the fourth. One patient exhibited disease progression and clinical deterioration two months after treatment initiation. Disease control was documented in two patients with PFS ranging from 4 to 5 months (one partial metabolic response and one stable disease). In one of the cases, which developed oligoprogression on alectinib, radiation therapy plus post-progression alectinib were able to provide additional disease control for 9 more months. No grade 3/4 adverse events, dose reductions or discontinuation due to toxicity were documented. CONCLUSION: Although this is a small single center evaluation, alectinib was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity against advanced RET-rearranged NSCLCs, suggesting its potential role in this specific subset of malignancies. Clinical trials addressing its efficacy and the optimal dosing schedule in the present context are underway, and results are eagerly awaited.

Value of PET/MRI for assessing tumor resectability in NSCLC-intra-individual comparison with PET/CT.

OBJECTIVE:: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI with PET/CT for determining tumor resectability of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS:: Sequential trimodality PET/CT/MRI was performed in 36 patients referred with the clinical question of resectability assessment in NSCLC. PET/CT and PET/MR images including T1 weighted sequence (T1-Dixon) and respiration gated T2 weighted sequence (T2-Propeller) were evaluated for resectability-defining factors; i.e. longest diameter of the tumor, minimal tumor distance to the carina, mediastinal invasion, invasion of the carina, pleural infiltration, pericardial infiltration, diaphragm infiltration, presence of additional nodules. RESULTS:: There was no significant difference of maximal axial diameter measurements of the primary lung tumors and narrow limits of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis ranging from -11.1 mm to + 11.8 mm for T2-Propeller and from -14.3 mm to + 13.8 mm for T1-Dixon sequence. A high agreement of PET/MR with PET/CT for the different resectability-defining factors was observed (k from 0.769 to 1.000). There was an excellent agreement of T2-Propeller sequence and CT for additional pulmonary nodule detection (k of 0.829 and 0.833), but only a moderate and good agreement using T1-Dixon sequence (k of 0.484 and 0.722). CONCLUSION:: In NSCLC the use of PET/MRI, including a dedicated pulmonary MR imaging protocol, provides a comparable diagnostic value for determination of tumor resectability compared to PET/CT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Our findings suggest that whole body PET/MRI can safely be used for the local staging of NSCLC patients. Further studies are warranted to determine whether it is feasible to integrate an imaging sequence in a whole body PET/MRI setting with the potential advantage of detection of liver or brain metastases.

Correction to: impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous 18F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer.

Unfortunately, after publication of this article [1], it was noticed that the name of Urs J. Muehlematter was incorrectly displayed as Urs J. Mühlematter. The corrected author list can be seen above and the original article has been corrected to reflect this.

Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous 18F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is an inherent problem of positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) systems. Simulation studies showed that time-of-flight (TOF) detectors can reduce PET quantification errors in MRI-based AC. However, its impact on lesion detection in a clinical setting with 18F-choline has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, we compared TOF and non-TOF 18F-choline PET for absolute and relative difference in standard uptake values (SUV) and investigated the detection rate of metastases in prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: Non-TOF SUV was significantly lower compared to TOF in all osseous structures, except the skull, in primary lesions of the prostate, and in pelvic nodal and osseous metastasis. Concerning lymph node metastases, both experienced readers detected 16/19 (84%) on TOF PET, whereas on non-TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 11 (58%), and 14 (73%), respectively. With TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 14/15 (93%) and 11/15 (73%) bone metastases, respectively, whereas detection rate with non-TOF PET was 73% (11/15) for reader 1 and 53% (8/15) for reader 2. The interreader agreement was good for osseous metastasis detection on TOF (kappa 0.636, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.453-0.810) and moderate on non-TOF (kappa = 0.600, CI 0.438-0.780). CONCLUSION: TOF reconstruction for 18F-choline PET/MRI shows higher SUV measurements compared to non-TOF reconstructions in physiological osseous structures as well as pelvic malignancies. Our results suggest that addition of TOF information has a positive impact on lesion detection rate for lymph node and bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients.

Pulmonary nodule detection in oncological patients - Value of respiratory-triggered, periodically rotated overlapping parallel T2-weighted imaging evaluated with PET/CT-MR.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the detection and conspicuity of pulmonary nodules in an oncological population, using a tri-modality PET/CT-MR protocol including a respiration-gated T2-PROPELLER sequence for possible integration into a simultaneous PET/MR protocol. METHODS: 149 patients referred for staging of malignancy were prospectively enrolled in this single-center study. Imaging was performed on a tri-modality PET/CT-MR setup and was comprised of PET/CT and 3T-MR imaging with 3D dual-echo GRE pulse sequence (Dixon) and an axial respiration-gated T2-weighted PROPELLER (T2-P) sequence. Images were assessed for presence, conspicuity, size and interpretation of the pulmonary parenchymal nodules. McNemar's test was used to evaluate paired differences in nodule detection rates between MR and CT from PET/CT. The correlation of pulmonary nodule size in CT and MR imaging was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: 299 pulmonary nodules were detected on PET/CT. The detectability was significantly higher on T2-P (60%, p<0.01) compared to T1-weighted Dixon-type sequences (16.1-37.8%). T2-P had a significantly higher detection rate among FDG-positive (92.4%) and among confirmed malignant nodules (75.9%) compared to T1-Dixon. Nodules <10mm were detected less often by MR sequences than by CT (p < 0.01). However, nodules >10mm were detected equally well with T2-P (92.2%) and CT (p >0.05). In a per-patient analysis, there was no significant change in the clinical interpretation of the nodules detected with T2-P and CT. CONCLUSION: Despite the overall lower detection rate compared with CT, the free-breathing respiratory gating T2-w sequence showed higher detectability in all evaluated categories compared to breath-hold T1-weighted MR sequences. Specifically, the T2-P was found to be not statistically different from CT in FDG-positive nodules, in detection of nodules >10mm and concerning conspicuity of pulmonary nodules. Overall, the additional time investment into T2-P seems to be justified since clinical relevant assessment of pulmonary lung nodules can mostly be done by T2-P in a whole body PET/MR staging of oncologic patients.

Reduction of 18F-FDG Dose in Clinical PET/MR Imaging by Using Silicon Photomultiplier Detectors.

Purpose To determine the level of clinically acceptable reduction in injected fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dose in time-of-flight (TOF)-positron emission tomography(PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging by using silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detectors compared with TOF-PET/computed tomography (CT) using Lu1.8Y0.2SiO5(Ce), or LYSO, detectors in patients with different body mass indexes (BMIs). Materials and Methods Patients were enrolled in this study as part of a larger prospective study with a different purpose than evaluated in this study (NCT02316431). All patients gave written informed consent prior to inclusion into the study. In this study, 74 patients with different malignant diseases underwent sequential whole-body TOF-PET/CT and TOF-PET/MR imaging. PET images with simulated reduction of injected 18F-FDG doses were generated by unlisting the list-mode data from PET/MR imaging. Two readers rated the image quality of whole-body data sets, as well as the image quality in each body compartment, and evaluated the conspicuity of malignant lesions. Results The image quality with 70% or 60% of the injected dose of 18F-FDG at PET/MR imaging was comparable to that at PET/CT. With 50% of the injected dose, comparable image quality was maintained among patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2. PET images without TOF reconstruction showed higher artifact scores and deteriorated sharpness than those with TOF reconstruction. Conclusion Sixty percent of the usually injected 18F-FDG dose (reduction of up to 40%) in patients with a BMI of more than 25 kg/m2 results in clinically adequate PET image quality in TOF-PET/MR imaging performed by using SiPM detectors. Additionally, in patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2, 50% of the injected dose may safely be used. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

PET+MR versus PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer, using a trimodality PET/CT+MR system.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET+MR with PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced PET/CT+MR was performed in 27 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer. PET/CT and PET+MR were evaluated separately, and the TNM stage and factors influencing treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The TNM staging by PET+MR was comparable to PET/CT (T: p=0.331, N: p=0.453, M: p=0.034). The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of treatment-influencing factors by PET/CT and PET+MR were 0.68/0.99/0.97, and 1.00/1.00/0.99, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body staging with PET+MR yields at least equal diagnostic accuracy as PET/CT in head and neck cancer.

The Effect of Susceptibility Artifacts Related to Metallic Implants on Adjacent-Lesion Assessment in Simultaneous TOF PET/MR.

Metalic implants may affect attenuation correction (AC) in PET/MR imaging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of susceptibility artifacts related to metallic implants on adjacent metabolically active lesions in clinical simultaneous PET/MR scanning for both time-of-flight (TOF) and non-TOF reconstructed PET images. Methods: We included 27 patients without implants but with confirmed 18F-FDG-avid lesions adjacent to common implant locations. In all patients, a clinically indicated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MR scan was acquired. Baseline non-TOF and TOF PET images were reconstructed. Reconstruction was repeated after the introduction of artificial signal voids in the AC map to simulate metallic implants in standard anatomic areas. All reconstructed images were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed and compared with the baseline images. Results: In total, 51 lesions were assessed. In 40 and 50 of these cases (non-TOF and TOF, respectively), the detectability of the lesions did not change; in 9 and 1 cases, the detectability changed; and in 2 non-TOF cases, the lesions were no longer visible after the introduction of metallic artifacts. The inclusion of TOF information significantly reduced artifacts due to simulated implants in the femoral head, sternum, and spine (P = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.03, respectively). It also improved image quality in these locations (P = 0.02, 0.01, and 0.01, respectively). The mean percentage error was -3.5% for TOF and -4.8% for non-TOF reconstructions, meaning that the inclusion of TOF information reduced the percentage error in SUVmax by 28.5% (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Qualitatively, there was a significant reduction of artifacts in the femoral head, sternum, and spine. There was also a significant qualitative improvement in image quality in these locations. Furthermore, our study indicated that simulated susceptibility artifacts related to metallic implants have a significant effect on small, moderately 18F-FDG-avid lesions near the implant site that possibly may go unnoticed without TOF information. On larger, highly 18F-FDG-avid lesions, the metallic implants had only a limited effect. The largest significant quantitative difference was found in artifacts of the sternum. There was only a weak inverse correlation between lesions affected by artifacts and distance from the implant.

The Effect of Defective PET Detectors in Clinical Simultaneous [18F]FDG Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of defective positron emission tomography (PET) detectors on clinical PET image quality in simultaneous PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for both time-of-flight (TOF) and non-TOF reconstructed images. PROCEDURES: A total of six patients with various malignant tumors were included and underwent a 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose PET scan in a fully functional simultaneous TOF PET/MRI. TOF and non-TOF PET images were reconstructed before and after simulating defective detector units. All images were clinically assessed and scored. In addition, a quantitative assessment was performed. Differences were ascertained and compared using the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test. RESULTS: Without TOF, the image artifacts introduced by one defective detector unit already started to degrade the overall image quality. It reduced the confidence and could lead to a change in diagnosis. Simulating three or five defective detector units resulted in more artifacts and further reduced overall image quality and confidence. By including TOF information, the effects were mitigated: Images reconstructed with one defective detector unit had similar scores as the ones without defective units. The average absolute percentage error for one, three, and five defective detector units were respectively 8, 20, and 37 % for the non-TOF cases and only 5, 11, and 19 % for the TOF cases. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that PET image artifacts due to (simulated) defective detectors are significantly mitigated with the integration of TOF information in simultaneous PET/MR. One defective detector unit introduces, on average, a 5 % absolute percentage error. However, in TOF imaging, even in cases with one or three defective units for head and neck imaging and one defective unit for chest and abdominal imaging, overall image quality, artifact scoring, and reader confidence are not significantly degraded.

TNM Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of PET/MR and PET/CT.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body unenhanced PET/MR with that of PET/CT in determining the stage of non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board and by national government authorities. Forty-two consecutive patients referred for the initial staging of non-small cell lung cancer underwent whole-body imaging with a sequential trimodality PET/CT/MR system. PET/MR and PET/CT datasets were evaluated separately, and a TNM stage was assigned on the basis of the image analysis. Nodal stations in the chest were identified according to the mapping system of the American Thoracic Society. The standard of reference was histopathology for the tumor stage in 20 subjects, for the nodal stage in 22 patients, and for extrathoracic metastases in 5 subjects. All other lesions were confirmed by at least 1 different imaging method. A Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used for comparing PET/MR with PET/CT. RESULTS: PET/MR did not provide additional information compared with PET/CT. The diagnostic accuracy of both imaging modalities was equal (T staging, P = 0.177; N staging, P = 0.114; M staging, P = 0.465), however, with advantages for PET/CT by trend. In the subgroup with histopathologic confirmation of T and N stages, the situation was similar (T staging, P = 0.705; N staging, P = 0.334). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that PET/MR using a fast MR protocol does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI and WB-DW-MRI in the evaluation of lymphoma: a prospective comparison to standard FDG-PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: Use of FDG-PET/CT for staging and restaging of lymphoma patients is widely incorporated into current practice guidelines. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI and WB-DW-MRI compared with FDG-FDG-PET/CT using a tri-modality PET/CT-MRI system. METHODS: From 04/12 to 01/14, a total of 82 FDG-PET/CT examinations including an additional scientific MRI on a tri-modality setup were performed in 61 patients. FDG-PET/CT, FDG-PET/MRI, and WB-DW-MRI were independently analyzed. A lesion with a mean ADC below a threshold of 1.2 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was defined as positive for restricted diffusion. FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI were evaluated for the detection of lesions corresponding to lymphoma manifestations according to the German Hodgkin Study Group. Imaging findings were validated by biopsy (n = 21), by follow-up imaging comprising CT, FDG-PET/CT, and/or FDG-PET/MRI (n = 32), or clinically (n = 25) (mean follow-up: 9.1 months). RESULTS: FDG-PET/MRI and FDG-PET/CT accurately detected 188 lesions in 27 patients. Another 54 examinations in 35 patients were negative. WB-DW-MRI detected 524 lesions, of which 125 (66.5% of the aforementioned 188 lesions) were true positive. Among the 188 lesions positive for lymphoma, FDG-PET/MRI detected all 170 instances of nodal disease and also all 18 extranodal lymphoma manifestations; by comparison, WB-DW-MRI characterized 115 (67.6%) and 10 (55.6%) lesions as positive for nodal and extranodal disease, respectively. FDG-PET/MRI was superior to WB-DW-MRI in detecting lymphoma manifestations in patients included for staging (113 vs. 73), for restaging (75 vs. 52), for evaluation of high- (127 vs. 81) and low-grade lymphomas (61 vs. 46), and for definition of Ann Arbor stage (WB-DW-MRI resulted in upstaging in 60 cases, including 45 patients free of disease, and downstaging in 4). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI probably have a similar performance in the clinical work-up of lymphomas. The performance of WB-DW-MRI was generally inferior to that of both FDG-PET-based methods but the technique might be used in specific scenarios, e.g., in low-grade lymphomas and during surveillance.

Combined PET/CT-perfusion in patients with head and neck cancers might predict failure after radio-chemotherapy: a proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging is broadly used in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) patients. CT perfusion (CTP) is known to provide information about angiogenesis and blood-flow characteristics in tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential relationship of FDG-parameters and CTP-parameters in HNSCC preand post-therapy and the potential prognostic value of a combined PET/CT with CTP. METHODS: Thirteen patients with histologic proven HNSCC were prospectively included. All patients underwent a combined PET/CT with integrated CTP before and after therapy. Pre- and post-therapeutic data of CTP and PET of the tumors were compared. Differences were tested using Spearman's rho test and Pearson's correlation. A p-value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlations were calculated using Pearson's correlation. Bootstrap confidence intervals were calculated to test for additive confidence intervals. RESULTS: Three patients died due to malignancy recurrence, ten patients were free of recurrence until the end of the follow-up period. Patients with recurrent disease had significantly higher initial CTP-values compared to the recurrence-free patients: BFpre 267.4 (171.2)ml/100 mg/min, BVpre 40.9 (8.4)ml/100 mg and MTTpre 8.2 (6.1)sec. No higher SUVs initially but significantly higher TLG compared to patients without recurrence were found. Post-therapeutic PET-values differed significantly between the two groups: SUVmaxpost 6.0 (3.2), SUVmeanpost 3.6 (2.0) and TLG 21751.7 (29794.0). CONCLUSION: In our proof of concept study, combined PET/CT with integrated CTP might show complementary prognostic data pre- and post chemo-radiotherapy. CTP may be used to predict local tumor recurrence, while FDGPET/CT is still needed for whole-body staging.

Pitfalls and Limitations in Simultaneous PET/MRI.

Simultaneous PET/MRI was introduced into the commercial market only a few years ago, and its availability is currently gaining momentum with the introduction of a second-generation PET/MRI system from an additional vendor. Furthermore, there is still an increasing interest in its potential in clinical and research applications. Despite very early technical infancy problems, which meanwhile have been solved, there are still different limitations that have to be worked around in daily routine responsibly by the physicists and physicians. This article gives an overview over the most common technical, logistical, and clinical limitations; artifacts; and pitfalls, without any claim for completeness. The readers will not only learn the background of the limitation but also partly learn about possible solutions. At the end of each paragraph, the readers will find a short summary for an easier overview of the topics discussed.

Dose Optimization in TOF-PET/MR Compared to TOF-PET/CT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possible activity reduction in FDG-imaging in a Time-of-Flight (TOF) PET/MR, based on cross-evaluation of patient-based NECR (noise equivalent count rate) measurements in PET/CT, cross referencing with phantom-based NECR curves as well as initial evaluation of TOF-PET/MR with reduced activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 consecutive patients were evaluated in this study. PET/CT imaging was performed on a PET/CT (time-of-flight (TOF) Discovery D 690 PET/CT). Initial PET/MR imaging was performed on a newly available simultaneous TOF-PET/MR (Signa PET/MR). An optimal NECR for diagnostic purposes was defined in clinical patients (NECRP) in PET/CT. Subsequent optimal activity concentration at the acquisition time ([A]0) and target NECR (NECRT) were obtained. These data were used to predict the theoretical FDG activity requirement of the new TOF-PET/MR system. Twenty-five initial patients were acquired with (retrospectively reconstructed) different imaging times equivalent for different activities on the simultaneous PET/MR for the evaluation of clinically realistic FDG-activities. RESULTS: The obtained values for NECRP, [A]0 and NECRT were 114.6 (± 14.2) kcps (Kilocounts per second), 4.0 (± 0.7) kBq/mL and 45 kcps, respectively. Evaluating the NECRT together with the phantom curve of the TOF-PET/MR device, the theoretical optimal activity concentration was found to be approximately 1.3 kBq/mL, which represents 35% of the activity concentration required by the TOF-PET/CT. Initial evaluation on patients in the simultaneous TOF-PET/MR shows clinically realistic activities of 1.8 kBq/mL, which represent 44% of the required activity. CONCLUSION: The new TOF-PET/MR device requires significantly less activity to generate PET-images with good-to-excellent image quality, due to improvements in detector geometry and detector technologies. The theoretically achievable dose reduction accounts for up to 65% but cannot be fully translated into clinical routine based on the coils within the FOV and MR-sequences applied at the same time. The clinically realistic reduction in activity is slightly more than 50%. Further studies in a larger number of patients are needed to confirm our findings.

Incorporation of Time-of-Flight Information Reduces Metal Artifacts in Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Simulation Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe and evaluate the influence of time-of-flight (TOF) information on metal artifact reduction in positron emission tomography (PET) image quality in clinical simultaneous PET/magnetic resonance (MR) scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7 patients with various malignant tumors were included and underwent a PET/MR examination after standard PET/computed tomography. Baseline TOF and non-TOF PET images were reconstructed. Next, the TOF and non-TOF PET reconstructions were repeated after the introduction of artificial signal voids in the attenuation map to simulate metal artifacts of various sizes in a range of locations. Three different sizes of signal voids were inserted in the attenuation maps for each location of interest: over the maxilla, humeral head, chest, sternum, thoracic and lumbar spine, as well as the femoral head to replicate clinically relevant metal artifacts. The reconstructed images with the artifacts were then compared with the baseline reconstructed images. The mean percentage error in a region of interest surrounding the simulated artifact was used to compare between TOF and non-TOF images. Further comparison between TOF and non-TOF images was performed using histogram analysis. RESULTS: In all cases, the mean percentage error in a region of interest surrounding the simulated artifact was reduced when TOF information was included in the reconstruction. The inclusion of TOF also changes the distribution of smaller errors away from the origin of the artifact. In some anatomical regions, an increase in the number of small errors was noted with TOF, although the differences with non-TOF were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Positron emission tomographic imaging benefits from the integration of TOF information in simultaneous PET/MR. The inclusion of TOF information in simultaneous PET/MR imaging reduces errors related to metal artifacts at the site of the artifact.