Laparoscopic liver resection compared to open approach in patients with colorectal liver metastases improves further resectability: Oncological outcomes of a case-control matched-pairs analysis.

AIMS: Liver resection is considered the standard treatment of colorectal metastases (CRLM). However, to date, no long term oncological results and data regarding repeat hepatectomy after laparoscopic approach are known. The aim of this study is to analyze single center long-term surgical and oncological outcomes after liver resection for CRLM. METHODS: A total of 57 open resections (OR) were matched with 57 laparoscopic resections (LR) for CRLM. Matching was based mainly on number of metastases, tumor size, segmental position of lesions, type of hepatectomy and type of resection. RESULTS: Morbidity rate was significantly less in the LR group (p = 0.002); the length of hospital stay was 6.5 ± 5 days for the LR group and 9.2 ± 4 days for the OR group (p = 0.005). After a median follow up of 53.7 months for the OR group and 40.9 months for the LR group, the 5-y overall survival rate was 65% and 60% respectively (p = 0.36) and the 5-y disease free survival rate was 38% and 29% respectively (p = 0.24). More patients in the LR group received a third hepatectomy for CRLM relapse than in the OR group (80% vs. 14.3% respectively; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection for CRLM offers advantages in terms of reduced blood loss, morbidity rate and hospital stay. It provides comparable long-term oncological outcomes but can improve further resectability in patients with recurrent disease.

Early arterial revascularization after hepatic artery thrombosis may avoid graft loss and improve outcomes in adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) represents a devastating complication after liver transplantation (LT), occurring in 1.6%-9.2% of adult recipients. Treatments of HAT include thrombectomy and thrombolysis (with or without redo of the arterial anastomosis), percutaneous thrombolysis through an angiogram, liver retransplantation, and clinical observation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 739 adult LTs between January 1992 and September 2009. HAT was classified as early (E-HAT), when occurring within the first 30 days after LT, or late HAT (L-HAT), when diagnosed from the 2nd month onward. HAT suspected clinically was confirmed by Doppler ultrasound and angiography in all cases. Attempted revascularization was defined as early (ER) if performed within the first 2 weeks after LT and late (LR) if performed between 15 and 30 days. RESULTS: After a median follow-up (FU) of 62 months (range, 1-227 months), HAT occurred in 31/739 grafts (4.3%). E-HAT was recorded in 25/31 cases (3.4%) and L-HAT in 11/31 cases (0.8%). ER was performed in 20/31 patients (65%) leading to 62% graft salvage; it was 81% when the revascularization was performed within the first week after LT (P = ns). LR was unsuccessful in all cases (P = .08). The overall incidence of BC among rescued grafts was 54% without graft loss during FU. Graft survival was 79% versus 71%; and 50% versus 50% at 1 and 3 years for E-HAT and L-HAT, respectively (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Urgent revascularization in cases of early HAT may decrease graft loss, especially when performed within the first week after LT, with improved overall outcomes.

The anterolateral thigh flap for complicated abdominal wall reconstruction after giant incisional hernia repair.

In the management of giant incisional hernias with loss of domain several surgical obstacles have to be addressed. Adequate coverage of the defect using mesh, sufficient local tissue advancement and prevention of wound and mesh infections are prerequisites for success. We present a case of a complicated giant incisional hernia repair after oncologic surgery, in which we chose for an intraabdominal mesh repair using a composite mesh. The patient developed a wound dehiscence and mesh infection, successfully treated with negative pressure therapy followed by a free ALT perforator flap. Several surgical techniques are discussed to manage these complicated hernias, such as progressive pneumoperitoneum, the component separation technique and the importance of soft tissue coverage (e.g. anterolateral thigh flap). In cases of wound complications, negative pressure therapy and new soft tissue coverage are discussed.

Prospective evaluation of intraoperative hemodynamics in liver transplantation with whole, partial and DCD grafts.

The interaction of systemic hemodynamics with hepatic flows at the time of liver transplantation (LT) has not been studied in a prospective uniform way for different types of grafts. We prospectively evaluated intraoperative hemodynamics of 103 whole and partial LT. Liver graft hemodynamics were measured using the ultrasound transit time method to obtain portal (PVF) and arterial (HAF) hepatic flow. Measurements were recorded on the native liver, the portocaval shunt, following reperfusion and after biliary anastomosis. After LT HAF and PVF do not immediately return to normal values. Increased PVF was observed after graft implantation. Living donor LT showed the highest compliance to portal hyperperfusion. The amount of liver perfusion seemed to be related to the quality of the graft. A positive correlation for HAF, PVF and total hepatic blood flow with cardiac output was found (p = 0.001). Portal hypertension, macrosteatosis >30%, warm ischemia time and cardiac output, independently influence the hepatic flows. These results highlight the role of systemic hemodynamic management in LT to optimize hepatic perfusion, particularly in LDLT and split LT, where the highest flows were registered.

Improved results for adult split liver transplantation with extended right lobe grafts: could we enhance its application?

OBJECTIVE: Split liver transplantation (SLT) allows grafting of 2 recipients with 1 allograft. Results of adult SLT have improved since its first introduction. Children benefit most from SLT, while among some adult liver transplanters there are concerns about splitting a liver, turning a good quality graft into a marginal one. We performed a single center retrospective review to address this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and August 2008, we performed 22 extended right liver graft (eRLG) transplantations in 21 adult patients. RESULTS: Eleven donors (50%) did not meet the Eurotransplant criteria for optimal donors. Forty-one percent of eRLG donors showed hemodynamic instability at the time of harvest. Eighteen (82%) splitting procedures were performed ex situ. The main indications for transplantation were alcoholic liver cirrhosis (32%), hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (18%), and acute liver failure (18%). Mean recipient age was 54 years (range, 17-69 years); median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-40). Patients were followed for a median of 16 months (range, 4-92 months) following transplantation. We observed 5 (23%) vascular and 3 (14%) biliary complications. Overall patient survival was 84% at 3 years; overall graft survival was 79%. For the 11 patients who had undergone transplantation after 2007, we observed a 100% patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: After an initial learning curve and provided careful selection, exceptions to classical donor criteria for splitting can be accepted with successful outcomes comparable to those after whole liver transplantation.

Improved results for adult split liver transplantation with extended right lobe grafts: could we enhance its application?

OBJECTIVE: Split liver transplantation (SLT) allows grafting of 2 recipients with 1 allograft. Results of adult SLT have improved since its first introduction. Children benefit most from SLT, while among some adult liver transplanters there are concerns about splitting a liver, turning a good quality graft into a marginal one. We performed a single center retrospective review to address this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and August 2008, we performed 22 extended right liver graft (eRLG) transplantations in 21 adult patients. RESULTS: Eleven donors (50%) did not meet the Eurotransplant criteria for optimal donors. Forty-one percent of eRLG donors showed hemodynamic instability at the time of harvest. Eighteen (82%) splitting procedures were performed ex situ. The main indications for transplantation were alcoholic liver cirrhosis (32%), hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (18%), and acute liver failure (18%). Mean recipient age was 54 years (range, 17-69 years); median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-40). Patients were followed for a median of 16 months (range, 4-92 months) following transplantation. We observed 5 (23%) vascular and 3 (14%) biliary complications. Overall patient survival was 84% at 3 years; overall graft survival was 79%. For the 11 patients who had undergone transplantation after 2007, we observed a 100% patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: After an initial learning curve and provided careful selection, exceptions to classical donor criteria for splitting can be accepted with successful outcomes comparable to those after whole liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation combined with Whipple's procedure for metastatic gastrinoma: a clinical case with 5 years follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with gastro-enteropancreatic neuro-endocrine tumours present with liver metastases at the time of diagnosis. As metastases are usually widespread in the liver, though remain confined to this organ for long periods of time, liver transplantation could be in some cases a possible treatment option. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We herein report the case of a 24-year-old male with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, who was referred to our department after having had a right hepatectomy for metastatic lesions, followed by chemotherapy. At that time, the site of the primary tumour was undefined. Following the diagnosis of a primary gastrinoma in the pancreatic head after selective angiography of the pancreatic vessels with hormonal sampling tests in our institution, the decision was made to offer a living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). RESULTS: A right lobe LDLT was carried out together with a Whipple's procedure. The operation was uneventful and five years later the patient remains in an excellent clinical condition, although with a suspicion of relapsed gastrinoma. DISCUSSION: According to the literature, some conditions, such as the 1-step combined surgery, gastrinoma primary tumour and duodeno-pancreatical localisation are considered as poor prognostic factors, whereas young age and tumour expression of Ki-67 < 5% are linked to a more favourable outcome. We think that in cases of long-lasting stability of the disease under chemotherapy, together with the presence of a low Ki-67 expression index, such a treatment could be proposed to young and symptomatic patients, provided the resection of the primary tumour is feasible. Long-term survival may be achieved in metastatic gastro-enteropancreatic neuro-endocrine tumours after LDLT combined with Whipple's procedure, despite tumour relapse.

Open intraperitoneal mesh repair for umbilical hernias. A technical note.

BACKGROUND: Mesh techniques are the preferable methods for repair of small ventral hernias, including umbilical and epigastric hernias, as primary suture repair shows high recurrence rates. Recently, the Ventralex (Davol Inc., C.R.Bard, Inc., RI, USA) hernia patch was introduced with promising preliminary short-term results. METHODS: In this short technical note we describe both the surgical technique for adequate patch placement and the material characteristics of this device with associated pro's and con's. CONCLUSION: For small ventral hernia repair the Ventralex patch is a very elegant and quick to use mesh device. Although it is meant to be used intraperitoneally, it is also possible to place the patch in the preperitoneal space. However, probably due to the less controllable mesh deployment, and the interaction between the different materials, especially in the preperitoneal space, extra attention and some caution during placement is warranted using this device.

Feasibility of radiotherapy with concomitant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in locally advanced pancreatic cancer and distal cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective dose finding phase I-II study.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of pancreaticobiliary tumors is poor. The aim was to assess the feasibility of radiotherapy (RT) and concomitant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in locally advanced pancreatic cancer and distal cholangiocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with locally advanced pancreatic (n = 17) or biliary tract cancer (n = 5) were included. They received two cycles of gemcitabine/oxaliplatin followed by 5 weeks of RT in combination with a weekly fixed dose gemcitabine and an escalating dose of oxaliplatin from 40 up to 70 mg/m(2). National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria 3.0 was used to score weekly the treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: The patients treated at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin had no dose-limiting toxicity. At 50 mg/m(2), two patients developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Nine patients received 60 mg/m(2), one developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia in two patients and grade 3 diarrhea in one patient were observed with 70 mg/m(2). Median time to progression was 8 months and median overall survival was 17 months. CONCLUSIONS: RT in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is feasible in patients with locally advanced pancreaticobiliary cancer. The reported time to progression underlines the potential activity of this regimen. The dose of 60 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin can be considered as the recommended dose.

Induction of tolerance in solid organ transplantation: the rationale to develop clinical protocols in liver transplantation.

Minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive treatments after organ transplantation represents a major objective for improving quality of life and long-term survival of grafted patients. Such a goal may be reached under some clinical conditions, particularly in liver transplantation, making these patients good candidates for tolerance trials. In this context in liver transplantation, the central questions are (1) how to promote the natural propensity of the liver graft to be accepted, (2) which type of immunosuppressive drug should be used for induction and maintenance, and (3) which biomarkers could be used to discriminate tolerant patients from those requiring long-term immunosuppression. Induction therapies using aggressive T-cell-depleting agents may favor graft acceptance. However, persistent and/or rapidly reemerging cell lines, such as memory-type cells or CD8(+) T cells, could represent a significant barrier for induction of tolerance. The type of maintenance drugs also remains questionable. Calcineurin inhibitors may be eventually deleterious in the context of tolerance protocols, through inhibitory effects on regulatory T cells, that are not observed with rapamycin. In conclusion, significant efforts must be made to achieve reliable strategies for immunosuppression minimization or withdrawal after organ transplantation into the clinics.

The preperitoneal memory-ring patch for inguinal hernia: a prospective multicentric feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, the reproducibility, the safety and the efficacy of a recently introduced preperitoneal memory-ring patch (Polysoft, Davol Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., Crawley, UK) by a prospective multicentric observational study. METHODS: We performed 235 unilateral groin hernia repairs in 200 consecutive patients during a 12-month period. Patients were operated by three different surgeons in two different centres. Pre- and intraoperative data, as well as postoperative complications, were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred patients, with a mean age of 55.4 years, were operated for primary or recurrent unilateral groin hernias. The mean operation time for unilateral hernia repair was 22 min (range 14-37 min). Seventy-one patients (35.5%) were operated in an ambulatory setting. Considering pain scores, we observed a preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 1.4 (range 0-3.7). After 24 h, 3 weeks and 6 months, VAS was 4.2 (0.5-6.9), 1.7 (0-2.0) and 0.1 (0-1.5), respectively. The follow-up was more than 18 months in all patients (range 19-31 months). In total, three patients were diagnosed with a recurrence and were reoperated by an anterior Lichtenstein repair with large-pore mesh. CONCLUSION: This transinguinal minimally invasive preperitoneal mesh repair is reproducible, easy to perform and safe with acceptable mid-term results. These elements, together with a minimal superficial dissection in the inguinal canal, preperitoneal mesh placement and the absence of fixation, are possible elements to reduce acute and chronic postoperative pain compared to other open and also laparoscopic techniques that have to be proven in larger (randomised) trials.

Clinical application of topical sealants in liver surgery: does it work?

Hepatic resections are considered as a standard intervention in abdominal surgery. However there is still a remarkable complication rate. Despite all recent developments in surgical techniques during liver surgery, blood loss is still one of the main causes for postoperative morbidity and mortality. In addition to patient-dependent factors, aspects of the surgical technique play a major role, in particular with regard to the occurrence of peri-operative bleeding, fluid accumulation and bile leakage. Nowadays, the use of topical sealants is often recommended as an additional tool to decrease postoperative bleeding and bile fistula. Fibrin sealants are able not only to enhance clot formation and wound healing, but possibly work as a sealing device for the small biliary branches. In this overview we will try to evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to complete haemostasis, the need for blood transfusions and the incidence of bile leakage according to recent trials. Furthermore the clinical benefit for the liver surgery patient will be discussed.

A rapid test of alloreactivity based on interleukin-2 mRNA expression might identify liver transplant recipients with donor-specific hyporesponsiveness.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression withdrawal is feasible in some liver transplant (OLT) recipients but may lead to severe rejection in others, underlying the need for reliable biomarkers to identify patients with tolerant profile in whose weaning/withdrawal could be safely proposed. We evaluated the value of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based measurement of interleukin (IL)-2 mRNA in mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) to monitor in vitro anti-donor reactivity in OLT patients. METHODS: MLR were performed in three patients undergoing living donor OLT using a tolerogenic protocol including donor stem cells. IL-2 mRNA production in MLR was measured by PCR at several intervals after OLT. RESULTS: In the early posttransplant period, three patients presented with global immunodeficiency, as indicated by low IL-2 mRNA production against both donor and third-party antigens. In the two patients who has immunosuppression successfully withdrawn, donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was observed thereafter: IL-2 mRNA production against donor cells remained low, while IL-2 mRNA production against a third-party antigen-presenting cells progressively recovered. No such modulation of the anti-donor response was observed in the patient in whom withdrawal led to rapid rejection. CONCLUSION: Measurement of IL-2 mRNA production in MLR might prefer a tool to monitor anti-donor reactivity after OLT for decisions to minimize or withdraw immunosuppression in patients displaying donor-specific hyporesponsiveness.

The choice of recipient does not have a bearing on early outcome in liver transplant patients receiving grafts from non-heart-beating donors: a reappraisal?

INTRODUCTION: Donation after cardiac death has reemerged as a potential way of increasing the supply of organs for transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) liver transplantation (OLT) experience and compared with standard heart-beating donation (HBD) at a single center. METHODS: From October 2003 to November 2006, 13/111 liver transplantations were performed in our institution with NHBD. Living donor liver transplantation, splitting procedures, combined, and pediatric liver transplantations were excluded from this analysis. RESULTS: Donor population was similar in both groups. The median warm ischemia time was 10 minutes (range 6 to 38). The median cold ischemia times 6 hours and 16 minutes (2.4 to 6.30 hours and 9 hours and 14 minutes (2.15 to 15.35 hours) for NHBD and HBD groups, respectively (P = .0002). In the NHBD groups, 4/13 (31%) grafts were retransplanted within 3 months, due to ischemic biliary lesions with severe cholestasis (n = 3) or due to the occurrence of primary nonfunction (n = 1). The retransplantation rate was significantly lower in the HBD group (11/98, 11%; P = .03). One-year patient and graft survivals were 62% and 54% versus 86% and 79%, respectively, for the NHBD and HBD groups (P = .107 and P = .003). CONCLUSION: Liver grafts procured from donors after cardiac death accounted for a significantly greater retransplantation rates, mainly due to nonanastomotic biliary strictures. This risk must be taken into account when transplanting such grafts. Based upon this experience, NHBD cannot rival HBD to be a comparable source of quality organs for liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation using non-heart-beating donors: Belgian experience.

UNLABELLED: Mortality on liver transplantation (OLT) waiting lists has increased dramatically. Until recently, non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) were not considered suitable for OLT, because of a higher risk of primary graft nonfunction (PNF) and biliary strictures. However, recent experimental/clinical evidence has indicated that NHBD-OLT is feasible when the period of warm ischemia is short. PURPOSE: To characterize the results of NHBD-OLT in Belgium, a survey was sent to all Belgian OLT centers. RESULTS: Between January 2003 and November 2005, 16 livers originating from NHBD were procured and transplanted. The mean donor age was 48.8 years, including 9 males and 7 females with mean time of stop-therapy to cardiac arrest being 18 minutes and from cardiac arrest to liver cold perfusion, 10.5 minutes. Mean recipient age was 52.2 years including 12 males and 4 females. Mean cold ischemia time was 7 hours 15 minutes. No PNF requiring re-OLT was observed. Mean post-OLT peak transaminase was 2209 IU/L, which was higher among imported versus locally procured grafts. Biliary complications occurred in 6 patients requiring re-OLT (n = 2), endoscopic treatment (n = 2), surgical treatment (n = 1), or left untreated (n = 1). These tended to be more frequent after prolonged warm ischemia. Graft and patient survivals were 62.5% and 81.3%, respectively, with a follow-up of 3 to 36 months. CONCLUSION: This survey showed acceptable graft/patient survivals after NHBD-LT. The NHBD-liver grafts suffered a high rate of ischemic injury and biliary complications and therefore should be used carefully, namely with no additional donor risk factors, lower risk recipients, and short cold/warm ischemia.

One-sided limb lymphedema in a liver transplant recipient receiving sirolimus.

Sirolimus (SRL) is associated with many side effects including hypercholesterolemia, anaemia, impaired wound healing and abnormal liver function tests. Limb lymphedema has only been reported several times in renal transplant recipients. We present a case of lower limb lymphedema that occurred in a 59-year-old liver transplant recipient after being on a SRL regimen for seven months. Extensive diagnostic investigations could not reveal signs of infection, venous obstruction or malignancy. After discontinuation of SRL, the lymphedema gradually resolved during the next three months. The pathologic mechanism behind this phenomenon is unknown, but antiangiogenetic and antiproliferative properties of SRL have been hold responsible. Further studies are necessary to explain this rare side effect.

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Belgium: what are we waiting for?

BACKGROUND: The current advances and expertise in minimally invasive surgery and the present importance of cost containment have encouraged the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as an ambulatory procedure. A retrospective study was carried out to assess the feasibility, outcome and patients' preference and satisfaction after performing true day-case LC in a university teaching hospital. METHODS: All patients admitted consecutively between January 2003 and March 2005 for LC were considered for inclusion in the study. Patients were offered ambulatory treatment if they were ASA class 1 or 2, had no clinical signs of acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, and had a responsible carer at home. All others underwent a routine LC. Reasons for refusing day-surgery LC were analyzed. Postoperative complications, conversion rate, overnight stay and patient satisfaction were all evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 249 LCs were performed. Only 15 (6%) were performed in an ambulatory setting. Reasons for refusing day-surgery were medical (42%), doubt about reimbursement by insurance companies (15%) or psychological (49%). All patients were treated for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Unplanned admission was 13% because of excessive nausea and vomiting. Outpatient follow-up showed that overall patient satisfaction was over 80%. CONCLUSION: Considering an increasing trend towards reduced hospital stay, ambulatory LC is feasible and safe, showing high levels of patient satisfaction. Adequate prophylaxis of postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain management is necessary. However, the provision of adequate information to the patient by the referring physician is essential to avoid refusal of ambulatory treatment. Insurance companies have to be more liberal with their policies for day-case surgery.

Prospectively randomized trial using perioperative low dose octreotide to prevent organ related and general complications following pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of low dose perioperative Octreotide on the prevention of complications (pancreatic fistula and general complications) in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery followed by pancreatico-jejunostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 105 patients were randomized to receive either Octreotide 0.1 mg subcutaneously 3 times/day for a total of 7 days or no Octreotide. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of a pancreatic fistula and/or general complications including the length of hospital stay. There were 25 surgical draining procedures performed and 80 duodeno-pancreatectomies with or without preservation of the pylorus. Twenty-six (24.8%) of the patients were treated for chronic pancreatitis, 8 (7.6%) for benign tumoral disease and 71 (67.6%) for carcinoma. All patients underwent pancreatico-jejunostomy. RESULTS: 56 patients received Octreotide and 49 did not. The incidence of fistula formation in the Octreotide group was 8.9% (n=5) and in the control group 8.2% (n=4) for a total incidence of 8.5%. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. There was one death in the Octreotide group and none in the control group for an overall mortality of 0.9%. The morbidity, except fistulas, was 10.7% in the Octreotide group and 12.2% in the control group. The length of hospital stay was 23.1 +/- 15.1 days in the group receiving Octreotide vs 20.4 +/- 8.1 days in the control group (p = 0.808). Stratifying the data for duodenopancreatectomy and for draining procedures there was no difference between the groups either. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy, the perioperative use of 3 x 0.1 mg Octreotide for 7 days does not reduce general complications nor fistula formation.

[Obstructive jaundice caused by portal varicosis]. / Obstructie-icterus door portale varicosis.

In a 66-year-old woman with pruritus, jaundice, dark-brown urine and light-colored faeces obstructive jaundice was diagnosed. Despite extensive investigations, it was not possible to clearly distinguish if varicosis or cholangiocarcinoma was the cause of the obstruction. During laparotomy the right lobe of the liver was seen to be greatly underdeveloped. The portal system showed a varicose deformation with compression of the bile ducts and portal hypertension. The right lobe of the liver was removed and the portal hypertension was treated by creating a shunt between the hepatic portal vein and the right ovarian vein. The jaundice disappeared and the patient recovered. Histological investigation showed atrophy, secondary biliary fibrosis, cirrhosis and a biliary cystadenoma. There were no signs of malignancy. The varicose deformation can be considered to be a result of the portal hypertension caused by fibrosis and cirrhosis with possibly a history of thrombosis and insufficient recanalization.

Hepatitis C infection-related liver disease: patterns of recurrence and outcome in cadaveric and living-donor liver transplantation in adults.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data demonstrate that the recurrence of hepatitis C is more severe in patients undergoing adult-to-adult living liver (AAL) transplantation (Tx) in comparison with cadaveric liver (CL) Tx. The authors report on the 1-year follow-up of their cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients undergoing AALTx or CLTx. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with HCV end-stage liver cirrhosis underwent CLTx and 17 underwent AALTx. The diagnosis of recurrent HCV was made on the basis of increased transaminases, detectable HCV RNA levels, and histologic findings on liver biopsy. Liver biopsies were performed on the basis of clinical indications. Bilirubin concentration, partial thromboplastin time, and alanine aminotransferase activity were compared between the two groups at different time intervals. RESULTS: HCV recurrence was seen in 10 of 26 CLTx patients versus 6 of 17 AALTx patients (P=0.1). Time until recurrence was longer in AALTx patients (158+/-114 days vs. 227+/-154 days, P=0.4). Of the biochemical parameters, only bilirubin concentration at week 4 was significantly different between AALTx and CLTx patients (3.1+/-4.3 mg/dL vs. 1.26+/-0.83 mg/dL, P=0.04). Overall survival and the number of patients needing retransplantation were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: At a follow-up period of 1 year, there is no difference in outcome between end-stage HCV patients undergoing AALTx or CLTx.