Molecular investigation in individuals with orofacial clefts and microphthalmia-anophthalmia-coloboma spectrum.

This study describes genomic findings among individuals with both orofacial clefts (OC) and microphthalmia/anophthalmia/coloboma (MAC) recorded in the Brazilian Database on Craniofacial Anomalies (BDCA). Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) were performed in 17 individuals with OC-MAC. Clinical interpretation of molecular findings was based on data available at the BDCA and on re-examination. No copy number variants (CNVs) classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic were detected by CMA. WES allowed a conclusive diagnosis in six individuals (35.29%), two of them with variants in the CHD7 gene, and the others with variants in the TFAP2A, POMT1, PTPN11, and TP63 genes with the following syndromes: CHARGE, CHD7-spectrum, Branchiooculofacial, POMT1-spectrum, LEOPARD, and ADULT. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) possibly associated to the phenotypes were found in six other individuals. Among the individuals with VUSes, three individuals presented variants in genes associated to defects of cilia structure and/or function, including DYNC2H1, KIAA0586, WDR34, INTU, RPGRIP1L, KIF7, and LMNA. These results show that WES was the most effective molecular approach for OC-MAC in this cohort. This study also reinforces the genetic heterogeneity of OC-MAC, and the importance of genes related to ciliopathies in this phenotype.

Diagnostic Approach to Microdeletion Syndromes Based on 22q11.2 Investigation: Challenges in Four Cases.

In the last few decades, different methods for the detection of genomic imbalances, such as the microdeletion syndromes, were developed. The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common microdeletion syndrome and presents wide clinical heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to describe 4 unusual cases of genomic imbalances found in individuals with suspected microdeletion syndromes. Different methods were necessary to complete the diagnosis and to obtain information for genetic counseling. The study was retrospective and descriptive. From August 2014 to December 2015, 39 individuals were assessed using FISH and/or MLPA; in 15 cases, chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis was carried out. Of 39 registered individuals, we found deletions in the 22q11.2 region in 10 individuals (8 individuals with 22q11.2DS and 2 individuals presenting with atypical deletions in the 22q11.2 region: 1 distal deletion and 1 central deletion). In one case with a typical 22q11.2 deletion, a familial balanced translocation was detected. In another case without a 22q11.2 deletion, a 6p duplication concomitant with a 9p deletion was detected by CMA. Clinical data are reported and diagnostic investigations are discussed. Essential aspects for the understanding of different diagnostic techniques of genomic imbalances are considered, and the 4 cases described underline the complexity and the difficulties involved in the diagnostic process. The approach is informative for clinical practice and may be applied in other contexts of genomic imbalance investigation in microdeletion syndromes.