Major differences in clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of men and women with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, more awareness is raised about sex-specific dilemmas in inherited bleeding disorders. However, no large studies have been performed to assess differences in diagnosis, bleeding phenotype and management of men and women with bleeding disorders. Therefore, we investigated sex differences in a large cohort of well-defined patients with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders (von Willebrand disease (VWD), rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) and congenital platelet defects (CPDs)). METHODS: We included patients from three nationwide cross-sectional studies on VWD, RBDs and CPDs in the Netherlands, respectively the WiN, RBiN and TiN study. In all studies a bleeding score (BS) was obtained, and patients filled in an extensive questionnaire on the management and burden of their disorder. FINDINGS: We included 1092 patients (834 VWD; 196 RBD; 62 CPD), of whom 665 (60.9%) were women. Women were more often referred because of a bleeding diathesis than men (47.9% vs 36.6%, p = 0.002). Age of first bleeding was similar between men and women, respectively 8.9 ± 13.6 (mean ±sd) years and 10.6 ± 11.3 years (p = 0.075). However, the diagnostic delay, which was defined as time from first bleeding to diagnosis, was longer in women (11.6 ± 16.4 years) than men (7.7 ± 16.6 years, p = 0.002). Similar results were found when patients referred for bleeding were analyzed separately. Of women aging 12 years or older, 469 (77.1%) had received treatment because of sex-specific bleeding. INTERPRETATION: Women with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders are more often referred for bleeding, have a longer diagnostic delay, and often require treatment because of sex-specific bleeding. FUNDING: The WiN study was supported (in part) by research funding from the Dutch Hemophilia Foundation (Stichting Haemophilia), Shire (Takeda), and CSL Behring (unrestricted grant).

Clinically relevant differences between assays for von Willebrand factor activity.

Essentials It is unclear whether there are differences between von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays. We compared the four most used VWF activity assays in 661 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. All assays correlated excellently, but a discrepant classification was seen in 20% of patients. Differences between VWF activity assays have a large impact on the classification of VWD. SUMMARY: Background Measuring the ability of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to bind to platelets is crucial for the diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Several assays that measure this VWF activity using different principles are available, but the clinical relevance of different assay principles is unclear. Objective To compare the four most widely used VWF activity assays in a large VWD patient population. Methods We measured VWF:RCo (ristocetin to activate VWF + whole platelets), VWF:GPIbR (ristocetin + platelet glycoprotein Ib receptor [GPIb] fragments), VWF:GPIbM (gain-of-function GPIb fragments that bind VWF spontaneously without ristocetin) and VWF:Ab (monoclonal antibody directed against the GPIb binding epitope of VWF to mimic platelets) in 661 VWD patients from the nationwide 'Willebrand in the Netherlands' (WiN) Study. Results All assays correlated excellently (Pearson r > 0.9), but discrepant results led to a different classification for up to one-fifth of VWD patients. VWF:RCo was not sensitive enough to classify 18% of patients and misclassified half of genotypic 2B VWD patients, especially those with p.Arg1306Trp. VWF:GPIbR was more sensitive, accurately classified the vast majority of patients, and was unaffected by the p.Asp1472His variant that causes artificially low VWF:RCo. VWF:GPIbM was the most precise assay but misclassified over a quarter of genotypic 2A, 2B and 3 patients. VWF:Ab, often not considered an actual VWF activity assay, performed at least equally to the other assays with regard to accurate VWD classification. Conclusion Although the different VWF activity assays are often considered similar, differences between assays have a large impact on the classification of VWD.

Women prefer proactive support from providers for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: A qualitative study in adult women with moderate or severe Von Willebrand disease.

OBJECTIVE: To explore key factors for successful support in women with moderate or severe Von Willebrand disease (VWD) who are faced with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and surgery. DESIGN: A qualitative study design with focus-group interviews and thematic analysis of the discussions. SETTINGS AND POPULATION: Eleven VWD women aged 41-68 years (median age 58 years) who had had a hysterectomy or bipolar radiofrequency ablation (BRA) because of HMB participated in this study. Three of the 11 participants had VWD diagnosed before surgery. Two focus groups were conducted in the summer of 2012. Patients were identified through participation in a nationwide study on Von Willebrand disease in the Netherlands (WiN study). Inclusion criteria were at least 18 years of age, fluent in Dutch, diagnosed with VWD (based on Von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen and/or activity levels < 30 IU/dL) and previous surgical therapy for HMB. FINDINGS: The following key factors were identified during focus-group interviews: receiving information, proactive support from providers and considering bleeding disorders as a cause of HMB. Other topics were as follows: experiences with VWD and/or surgery, how relieved patients were when menses stopped, patients hoped that in future, providers would work better together so that women receive the best care. CONCLUSIONS: In this focus-group study among women with VWD who underwent surgery because of HMB, support by professionals could be improved by considering a bleeding disorder in women with HMB, providing information about different types of surgery and shared decision-making regarding type of interventions.

Plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and bleeding phenotype in patients with von Willebrand disease.

INTRODUCTION: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. In VWD patients, large variations in bleeding tendency are observed, which cannot be completely explained by the variation in von Willebrand factor levels or activities. Thus, there must be additional factors, for instance, changes in fibrinolysis that have an effect on the variation in bleeding tendency in VWD patients. AIM: To investigate whether plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) level influences the variation in bleeding tendency in VWD patients. METHODS: PAI-1 antigen levels were measured in the plasma of 633 patients with moderate or severe VWD who participated in the 'Willebrand in the Netherlands' (WiN) study, a nationwide multicentre cross-sectional study. Bleeding severity was assessed using the Tosetto bleeding score. RESULTS: PAI-1 levels increased with age (Spearman's rho: 0.225, P < 0.001) and were higher in men (23 [IQR 12-60] vs. 20 [IQR 10-44] ng mL-1 in women, P = 0.039), whereas the bleeding score was higher in women (11 [IQR 7-17] vs. 9 [IQR 5-14] ng mL-1 in men, P = 0.002). After adjustment for age and sex by stratification, PAI-1 level and bleeding score were negatively correlated (Spearman's rho: -0.170, P = 0.017) in the group of 196 young (age ≤ 45 year) female VWD patients, accounting for 31% of our study population. CONCLUSION: In young female VWD patients, we observed that low PAI-1 levels were associated with a higher bleeding score, which may partly explain the observed variability in bleeding phenotype in VWD patients.