A decision aid regarding treatment options for patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal aortic aneurysm patients tend to be informed inconsistently and incompletely about their disorder and the treatment options open to them. The objective of this trial was to evaluate whether these patients are better informed and experience less decisional conflict regarding their treatment options after viewing a decision aid. DESIGN: A six-centre, randomised clinical trial comparing a decision aid plus regular information versus regular information from the surgeon. METHODS: Included patients had recently been diagnosed with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm at least 4 cm in diameter. The decision aid consisted of a one-time viewing of an interactive CD-ROM elaborating on elective surgery versus watchful waiting. Generally, the decision aid advised patients with aneurysms less than 5.5 cm to agree to watchful waiting, for larger aneurysms the decision aid provided insight into the balance of benefit and harm of surgical and conservative approaches, taking into account age, co-morbidity and size of the aneurysm. The primary outcome was patient decisional conflict measured at 1 month follow-up (Decisional Conflict Scale). Secondary outcomes were patient knowledge, anxiety and satisfaction. RESULTS: In 178 aneurysm patients, decisional conflict scores did not differ significantly between the decision aid and the regular information groups (22 vs. 24 on the 0-100 Decisional Conflict Scale; p = .33). Patients in the decision aid group had significantly better knowledge (10.0 vs. 9.4 out of 13 points; p = .04), whereas anxiety levels (4.4 and 5.0 on a 0-21 scale; p = .73) and satisfaction scores (74 and 73 on a 0-100 scale; p = .81) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In addition to regular patient-surgeon communication, a decision aid helps to share treatment decisions with abdominal aortic aneurysm patients by increasing their knowledge about the disorder and available treatment options without raising anxiety levels; however, it does not reduce decisional conflict, nor does it improve satisfaction.

Cerebral blood flow in relation to contralateral carotid disease, an MRA and TCD study.

OBJECTIVE: to describe redistribution of cerebral blood flow in patients with severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses in relation to contralateral ICA disease. METHODS: sixty-six patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were grouped according to severity of contralateral stenosis (<30% [group I]; 30-69% [group II]; 70-99% [group III]; occlusion [group IV]. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) investigations were performed preoperatively. RESULTS: TCD demonstrated a reversed flow in the contralateral anterior cerebral artery (A(1)segment) and ophthalmic artery in three-quarters of group IV patients (p <0.0001). Group IV patients also exhibited decreased blood flow velocity in the contralateral middle cerebral artery (p =0.001). MRA showed increased ipsilateral ICA and basilar artery (BA) blood flow volumes (Q-flows) in group IV patients when compared to the other groups (p <0.001). No changes in total Q-flow (ICAs+BA) were found. CONCLUSIONS: in patients considered for CEA, the severity of the contralateral ICA disease is an important determinant of the pattern of blood flow redistribution through the anterior communicating pathway and ophthalmic artery. Significant flow redistribution through the posterior communicating pathway occurs especially in patients with contralateral ICA occlusion.

Dilatation of the proximal neck of infrarenal aortic aneurysms after endovascular AAA repair.

OBJECTIVES: to assess size changes of the proximal aortic neck after endograft placement. METHODS: since 1994, 54 consecutive patients have undergone abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with the Endovascular Technologies (EVT) endograft. The study group comprised the 33 patients who had completed at least six months of the prospective follow-up protocol. The pre-, postoperative and follow-up helical computed tomography (CT) angiograms (CTAs) were processed on a workstation. The proximal neck dimensions were measured perpendicular to the central lumen line of the aortic neck. The cross-sectional area was measured at the proximal attachment system and at 1 cm proximal to the renal arteries. RESULTS: while the dimensions of suprarenal aorta did not change, a significant dilatation of the proximal neck was found. The median increase was 10.3% at 6 months and 15.5% at 12 months. No correlation could be found between the amount of dilatation and pre- or postoperative neck-size, graft diameter and amount of graft-oversizing. CONCLUSION: the infrarenal aortic neck demonstrates continued dilatation during follow-up after endograft placement.