Rescue of arterial function by angiotensin-(1-7): towards improvement of endothelial function by drug-eluting stents.

PURPOSE: To explore the hypothesis that stent placement decreases dilator function of various arteries outside the stented segment and that angiotensin- (1-7) improves this function, and to assess the contribution of dilator signal compounds. A further objective was to test the hypothesis that on-stent delivery of Ang-(1-7) reduces neointima formation and improves endothelial function. METHODS: Abdominal aortic stenting or sham operation was performed in the rat four weeks after stenting and treatment with intravenous saline or Ang-(1-7) infusion (24 mug/kg/h); vasomotor function in isolated thoracic aorta and brachial and iliac artery was measured in organ baths. Furthermore, Ang-(1-7)-eluting stents were designed and placed in rat abdominal aorta. Neointima formation and aortic function were tested after four weeks. RESULTS: Relaxation of the thoracic aorta to metacholine was decreased after stenting compared with shams due to a decrease in nitric oxide-mediated response (67% reduction in maximal NO-dependent response). Ang-(1-7) restored the response mainly through increased prostaglandin- and possibly also endothelial-derived hyperpolarising factor-mediated relaxation. Relaxation in the brachial artery decreased after stenting (maximal response dropped by 50%), whilst contractions to phenylephrine increased. Ang-(1-7) normalised vasomotor function. Iliac artery function remained unaltered after stenting but Ang-(1-7) increased maximal relaxations by 65%. Delivery of Ang-(1-7) by means of a drug-eluting stent improved endothelial function. CONCLUSION: Stenting differentially affects dilator and contractile function in various arterial beds. Ang-(1-7) both improves dilator function and normalises contractile function. Delivery of protective peptides such as Ang-(1-7) from the stent is a new therapy option that merits further development and exploration. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:293-8.).

Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression.

OBJECTIVES: To compare Angio-Seal (AS) and StarClose (SC) and manual compression (MC) on efficacy of hemostasis, complication rate, safety of early mobilization, and patient comfort. BACKGROUND: Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization can be obtained through different methods. Today, physicians can choose from a number of different devices to achieve arterial closure. METHODS: In a prospective trial 450 patients were randomized to AS, SC, or MC. Patients were mobilized 1 to 2 hr after device placement, and 6 hr after MC. Data were collected during hospital admission and by telephone at one month after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Devices were used in 138/150 allocated to AS and 124/150 allocated to SC patients (92% vs. 83%, P = 0.015) Patients with MC experienced more pain during sheath removal than patients receiving a device, and rated their period of bed rest as less comfortable. Oozing and need for pressure bandage at the puncture site were observed in 37 AS patients and 57 SC patients (25% vs. 38%, P = 0.002). Hematoma occurred in 15 AS patients, in 17 SC patients, and in 14 MC patients (11 vs. 14 vs. 9%, ns). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in safety between the three methods of arterial closure. SC was more often not used or successfully deployed. SC patients more often had continuing oozing. On patient comfort, closure devices performed better than MC. Early ambulation in patients with a closure device is safe. AS is the preferred method of arterial closure after cardiac catheterization.

Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain-B expression in balloon-dilated and stented arteries: a study in the atherosclerotic Yucatan micropig.

BACKGROUND: Restenosis after balloon angioplasty is in part due to remodelling, whereas restenosis after stenting is entirely due to neointima formation. Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain-B (NMMHC-B) is expressed by vascular smooth muscle cells and because of its overexpression in restenotic lesions after balloon angioplasty, NMMHC-B is proposed as a potential therapeutic target. Because the mechanisms underlying restenosis after balloon angioplasty or after stenting are different we hypothesised that the expression of NMMHC-B would differ in balloon-dilated versus stented arteries. METHODS: To study the localisation and time course of expression of NMMHC-B, we performed stenting or balloon dilation in peripheral arteries of 16 atherosclerotic Yucatan micropigs and used serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angiography to measure geometric dimensions following balloon angioplasty or stenting. In situ hybridisation techniques were used to detect NMMHC-B mRNA. 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) was administered to detect proliferating cells. By counting the number of silver grains in the different layers of the artery, we could compare the amount of expression at the different time points between the groups. RESULTS: In intima and media, NMMHC-B expression increased after balloon dilation and stenting and peaked at 7 days. In stented arteries, the expression of NMMHC-B remained high for up to 42 days after injury, whereas in balloon-dilated arteries it had normalised. In the adventitia of balloon-dilated arteries, but not of stented arteries, NMMHC-B expression peaked at 7 days. NMMHC-B expression was not limited to proliferating cells. CONCLUSION: NMMHC-B is expressed near sites of active repair after arterial injury, but not limited to proliferating cells. The different pattern of NMMHC-B expression after balloon dilation compared with stenting may be related to arterial remodelling, because stented arteries that do not remodel lack this conspicuous adventitial expression at 7 days.