Eccentric versus conventional cycle training to improve muscle strength in advanced COPD: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare eccentric (ECC) and conventional concentric (CON) cycle training on quadriceps muscle strength in advanced COPD. Secondary objective was to assess functional capacity. METHODS: A parallel-group, assessor-blind, randomized trial was conducted. Severe COPD patients were randomized to either an ECC (n = 13) or CON (n = 11) cycling program for 30-min, 3 times/week for 10 weeks. ECC group trained at ∼4-fold higher power than the CON group at similar relative heart rate intensity. RESULTS: Isometric and isokinetic quadriceps peak torque improved after ECC but not CON; between group difference was significant for isometric peak muscle force (p < 0.05). Peak cycling power and endurance time increased in both groups (p < 0.05). Dyspnea at peak cycling power improved only after ECC training (p < 0.05). Sensory intensity ratings of dyspnea and leg fatigue were significantly lower (p < 0.05) during ECC compared with CON at equivalent relative heart rate intensities. CONCLUSIONS: ECC could be an effective alternative and/or adjunct modality to pulmonary rehabilitation in severely ventilatory limited COPD patients.

Eccentric Ergometer Training Promotes Locomotor Muscle Strength but Not Mitochondrial Adaptation in Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Eccentric ergometer training (EET) is increasingly being proposed as a therapeutic strategy to improve skeletal muscle strength in various cardiorespiratory diseases, due to the principle that lengthening muscle actions lead to high force-generating capacity at low cardiopulmonary load. One clinical population that may particularly benefit from this strategy is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as ventilatory constraints and locomotor muscle dysfunction often limit efficacy of conventional exercise rehabilitation in patients with severe disease. While the feasibility of EET for COPD has been established, the nature and extent of adaptation within COPD muscle is unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to characterize the locomotor muscle adaptations to EET in patients with severe COPD, and compare them with adaptations gained through conventional concentric ergometer training (CET). Male patients were randomized to either EET (n = 8) or CET (n = 7) for 10 weeks and matched for heart rate intensity. EET patients trained on average at a workload that was three times that of CET, at a lower perception of leg fatigue and dyspnea. EET led to increases in isometric peak strength and relative thigh mass (p < 0.01) whereas CET had no such effect. However, EET did not result in fiber hypertrophy, as morphometric analysis of muscle biopsies showed no increase in mean fiber cross-sectional area (p = 0.82), with variability in the direction and magnitude of fiber-type responses (20% increase in Type 1, p = 0.18; 4% decrease in Type 2a, p = 0.37) compared to CET (26% increase in Type 1, p = 0.04; 15% increase in Type 2a, p = 0.09). EET had no impact on mitochondrial adaptation, as revealed by lack of change in markers of mitochondrial biogenesis, content and respiration, which contrasted to improvements (p < 0.05) within CET muscle. While future study is needed to more definitively determine the effects of EET on fiber hypertrophy and associated underlying molecular signaling pathways in COPD locomotor muscle, our findings promote the implementation of this strategy to improve muscle strength. Furthermore, contrasting mitochondrial adaptations suggest evaluation of a sequential paradigm of eccentric followed by concentric cycling as a means of augmenting the training response and attenuating skeletal muscle dysfunction in patients with advanced COPD.