Efficacy and safety of very early mobilization after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Stroke has a deleterious impact on human health due to its high incidence, degree of disabling sequelae and mortality, constituting one of the main causes of death and disability worldwide. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of very early mobilization (VEMG) after thrombolysis in functional recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: The present study was an open, prospective, randomized study, with no blinded outcome, carried out in the stroke unit of a tertiary referral hospital located in Salvador-Bahia, Brazil. The primary outcome was the level of functional independence. Secondary outcomes were functional mobility, balance, complications within 7 days of hospitalization and 90 days after hospital discharge, and length of stay. OUTCOMES: A total of 104 patients with ischemic stroke who received thrombolytic treatment between August 2020 and July 2021 were prospectively recruited to the study. Of these, 51 patients received VEMG within 24 h of the ictus and another 53 patients receiving usual care (UCG) with mobilization 24 h after the ictus. When compared to the usual care, the VEMG group was not associated with a significant reduction in the risk of the primary outcome (relative risk [95% confidence intervals]: 0.74 [0.339-1.607]) or any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this study, the strategy of early mobilization after thrombolysis in ischemic stroke was safe, but without evidence of short-term benefit. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under the registry (registry number: RBR-8bgcs3).

Effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a critical problem with an impact on both oncological and cardiovascular prognosis, especially when it prevents patients from receiving cancer treatment. However, there are very limited data on the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in the prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the potential benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with CTRCD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The databases included MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Scopus and Cochrane Central up to January 20, 2022. All pre-clinical and clinical studies including observational studies (cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional and case reports) that used sacubitril/valsartan for prevention or treatment of CTRCD. The primary effectiveness endpoints was CTRCD, defined as a clinically significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the end of the follow-up. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: And after applying the eligibility criteria, 12 articles (9 in humans and 3 preclinical studies) were included in this systematic review. The 3 preclinical studies demonstrated beneficial effects in preventing, attenuating and/or delaying the onset of myocardial damage at the cellular level, ventricular dysfunction and remodeling. Regardind human studies, most of them were composed of case reports. The largest study consisted of a retrospective multicentric cohort with 64 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All clinical studies have demonstrated that used Sac/Val in human showed a significant increase in LVEF, and when reported, a reduction in left ventricular volume and NT-proBNP (or BNP). Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves: Open-Label, Proof-of-Concept trial-The RIWA study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To date, vitamin K antagonists are the only available oral anticoagulants in patients with mechanical heart valves. In this way, we developed a pilot trial with rivaroxaban. METHODS:  The RIWA study was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized clinical trial and was designed to assess the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events of the rivaroxaban-based strategy (15 mg twice daily) in comparison to dose-adjusted warfarin. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and were followed prospectively for 90 days. RESULTS:  A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the present study. Of these, 44 patients were randomized: 23 patients were allocated to the rivaroxaban group and 21 to the warfarin group. After 90 days of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in one patient (4.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and three patients (14.3%) in the warfarin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-2.85; P = 0.25). Minor bleeding (without discontinuation of medical therapy) occurred in six patients (26.1%) in the rivaroxaban group versus six patients (28.6%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.23-3.32; P = 0.85). One patient in the warfarin group died from myocardial infarction. No cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, peripheral embolic events, or new intracardiac thrombus were related in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily had thromboembolic and bleeding events similar to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. These data confirm the authors' proof-of-concept and suggest that a larger trial with a similar design is not unreasonable. CLINICALTRIAL. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03566303.

Endomyocardial fibrosis: past, present, and future.

Endomyocardial fibrosis (EMF) is a neglected idiopathic disorder, predominant in tropical and subtropical regions of the developing world. It is characterized by fibrotic thickening of the endocardium and myocardium of one or both ventricles. EMF was an important cause of heart failure which accounted for up to 20% of the cases in endemic areas of Africa (rural community in Mozambique), but during the last few years, incidents of the disease have decreased considerably. Although its pathogenesis and etiology are not fully understood, its pathology resembles conditions such as eosinophilic cardiomyopathy and hypereosinophilic syndrome. Extensive fibrosis of the ventricular endocardium causing architectural distortion, impaired filling, and valvular insufficiency defines the disease. Confined to peculiar and limited geographical areas, the etiology remains blurred and it carries a grim prognosis. Medical care currently remains very challenging as one-third to half of patients with an advanced disease die within 2 years. Surgery in the correct setting can increase survival and especially in patients with advanced heart failure.

Comparison of the New Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are approved for use in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin in AF and valvular heart disease (VHD). METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post-hoc analyses comparing NOACs and warfarin in AF and VHD, including biological and mechanical heart valves (MHV). Through systematic review and meta-analysis, with the aid of the "Rev Man" program 5.3, the primary effectiveness endpoints were stroke and systemic embolism (SE). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and the secondary outcome included intracranial hemorrhage. Data were analyzed using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included, involving 13,850 patients with AF and VHD. NOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke/SE (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.91; P = 0.002) and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33-0.79; P = 0.003) and lowered the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.58-1.02; P = 0.07) compared with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of NOACs as thromboprophylaxis for AF and VHD are similar to those of warfarin.

Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve: Rationale and Design of the RIWA Study.

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical heart valves (MHV) are extremely durable, but they require permanent use of anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolic events. The only approved therapeutic options are vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as warfarin. As a drug class, clinical management is difficult, therefore new alternatives need to be evaluated. METHODS: RIWA is a phase II/III, prospective, open-label, randomized, pilot study designed to investigate oral rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily compared with dose-adjusted warfarin for the prevention of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism in patients with MHV, from August 2018 to December 2019. Patients will undergo transesophageal echocardiography at the beginning and the end of the study (follow-up time 90 days). On an explanatory basis, all events will be analyzed, including stroke, peripheral systemic embolism, valve thrombosis, significant bleeding and death. DISCUSSION: Warfarin and similar VKAs are standard therapy for patients with an MHV. Even with the appropriate use of therapy, the incidence of thromboembolic events is high at 1-4% per year. Furthermore, bleeding risk is significant, ranging from 2 to 9% per year. The new frontier to be overcome in relation to use of the new oral anticoagulants is undoubtedly in patients with MHV. A significant portion of people with MHV worldwide will benefit if noninferiority of these new agents is confirmed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03566303. Recruitment Status: Recruiting. First Posted: 25 June 2018. Last Update Posted: 25 June 2018.