The impact of exercise training on muscle sympathetic nerve activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effects of exercise training on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in humans. Studies included exercise interventions [randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs), or pre-to-post intervention] that reported on adults (≥18 yr) where MSNA was directly assessed using microneurography, and relevant outcomes were assessed [MSNA (total activity, burst frequency, burst incidence, amplitude), heart rate, blood pressure (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or mean blood pressure), and aerobic capacity (maximal or peak oxygen consumption)]. Forty intervention studies (n = 1,253 individuals) were included. RCTs of exercise compared with no exercise illustrated that those randomized to the exercise intervention had a significant reduction in MSNA burst frequency and incidence compared with controls. This reduction in burst frequency was not different between individuals with cardiovascular disease compared with those without. However, the reduction in burst incidence was greater in those with cardiovascular disease [9 RCTs studies, n = 234, mean difference (MD) -21.08 bursts/100 hbs; 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.51, -25.66; I2 = 63%] compared with those without (6 RCTs, n = 192, MD -10.92 bursts/100 hbs; 95% CI -4.12, -17.73; I2 = 76%). Meta-regression analyses demonstrated a dose-response relationship where individuals with higher burst frequency and incidence preintervention had a greater reduction in values post-intervention. These findings suggest that exercise training reduces muscle sympathetic nerve activity, which may be valuable for improving cardiovascular health.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests exercise training reduces muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), which may be valuable for improving cardiovascular health. The reduction in burst incidence was greater among individuals with cardiovascular disease when compared with those without; exercise training may be particularly beneficial for individuals with cardiovascular disease. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated a dose-response relationship, where individuals with higher sympathetic activity preintervention had greater reductions in sympathetic activity post-intervention.

Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 is not related to cardiopulmonary impairment; a cross-sectional study of persistently dyspneic COVID-19, non-dyspneic COVID-19 and controls.

Background: Up to 53% of individuals who had mild COVID-19 experience symptoms for >3-month following infection (Long-CoV). Dyspnea is reported in 60% of Long-CoV cases and may be secondary to impaired exercise capacity (VO2peak) as a result of pulmonary, pulmonary vascular, or cardiac insult. This study examined whether cardiopulmonary mechanisms could explain exertional dyspnea in Long-CoV. Methods: A cross-sectional study of participants with Long-CoV (n = 28, age 40 ± 11 years, 214 ± 85 days post-infection) and age- sex- and body mass index-matched COVID-19 naïve controls (Con, n = 24, age 41 ± 12 years) and participants fully recovered from COVID-19 (ns-CoV, n = 14, age 37 ± 9 years, 198 ± 89 days post-infection) was conducted. Participants self-reported symptoms and baseline dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council, mMRC, dyspnea grade), then underwent a comprehensive pulmonary function test, cardiopulmonary exercise test, exercise pulmonary diffusing capacity measurement, and rest and exercise echocardiography. Results: VO2peak, pulmonary function and cardiac/pulmonary vascular parameters were not impaired in Long- or ns-CoV compared to normative values (VO2peak: 106 ± 25 and 107 ± 25%predicted, respectively) and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise were otherwise normal. When Long-CoV were stratified by clinical dyspnea severity (mMRC = 0 vs mMRC≥1), there were no between-group differences in VO2peak. During submaximal exercise, dyspnea and ventilation were increased in the mMRC≥1 group, despite normal operating lung volumes, arterial saturation, diffusing capacity and indicators of pulmonary vascular pressures. Interpretation: Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 was not associated with overt cardiopulmonary impairment or exercise intolerance. Interventions focusing on dyspnea management may be appropriate for Long-CoV patients who report dyspnea without cardiopulmonary impairment.