Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care ; 22(1): 243, 2018 Sep 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30268133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) reduce colonization with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (ARGNB), incidence of nosocomial infections and improve survival in ICU patients. The effect on bacterial gut colonization might be caused by growth suppression by antibiotics during SDD/SOD. We investigated intestinal colonization with ARGNB after discharge from ICU and discontinuation of SDD or SOD. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational follow-up study in regular hospital wards of three teaching hospitals in the Netherlands in patients discharged from the ICU, who were participating in a cluster randomized trial comparing SDD with SOD. We determined rectal carriage with ARGNB at ICU discharge (time (T) = 0) and 3, 6 and 10 days after discharge. The primary endpoint was time to first colonization with ARGNB that was not present at T = 0. Bacteria that are intrinsically resistant to antibiotics were not included in the primary analysis, but were included in post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Of 1370 patients screened for inclusion, 996 patients had samples at T = 0 (507 after SDD and 489 after SOD). At ICU discharge, the prevalence of intestinal carriage with any ARGNB was 22/507 (4.3%) after SDD and 87/489 (17.8%) after SOD (p < 0.0001): 426 (SDD) and 409 (SOD) patients had at least one follow-up sample for analysis. The hazard rate for acquiring carriage of ARGNB after discontinuation of SDD, compared to SOD, in the ICU was 0.61 (95% CI 0.40-0.91, p = 0.02), and cumulative risks of acquisition of at least one ARGNB until day 10 were 13% (SDD) and 18% (SOD). At day 10 after ICU discharge, the prevalence of intestinal carriage with ARGNB was 11.3% (26/230 patients) after SDD and 12.5% (28/224 patients) after SOD (p = 0.7). In post-hoc analysis of all ARGNB, including intrinsically resistant bacteria, colonization at ICU discharge was lower after SDD (4.9 vs. 22.3%, p < 0.0001), but acquisition rates after ICU discharge were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal carriage at ICU discharge and the acquisition rate of ARGNB after ICU discharge are lower after SDD than after SOD. The prevalence of intestinal carriage with ARGNB at 10 days after ICU discharge was comparable in both groups, suggesting rapid clearance of ARGNB from the gut after ICU discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR3311 . Registered on 28 february 2012.


Asunto(s)
Descontaminación/métodos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/fisiopatología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Orofaringe/efectos de los fármacos , Orofaringe/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 60(10): 1395-1403, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624218

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-induced dynamic hemodynamic parameters such as stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) have been shown to predict fluid responsiveness in contrast to static hemodynamic parameters such as central venous pressure (CVP). We hypothesized that the ventilator-induced central venous pressure variation (CVPV) could predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: Twenty-two elective cardiac surgery patients were studied post-operatively on the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 6-8 ml/kg without spontaneous breathing efforts or cardiac arrhythmia. Before and after administration of 500mL hydroxyethyl starch, SVV and PPV were measured using pulse contour analysis by modified Modelflow® , while CVP was obtained from a central venous catheter positioned in the superior vena cava. CVPV was calculated as 100 × (CVPmax -CVPmin )/[(CVPmax + CVPmin) /2]. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (86%) were fluid responders defined as an increase in cardiac output of ≥ 15% after fluid administration. CVPV decreased upon fluid loading in responders, but not in non-responders. Baseline CVP values showed no correlation with a change in cardiac output in contrast to baseline SVV (r = 0.60, P = 0.003), PPV (r = 0.58, P = 0.005), and CVPV (r = 0.63, P = 0.002). Baseline values of SVV > 9% and PPV > 8% could predict fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 89% and 95%, respectively, both with a specificity of 100%. Baseline CVPV could identify all fluid responders and non-responders correctly at a cut-off value of 12%. There was no difference between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of SVV, PPV, and CVPV. CONCLUSION: The use of ventilator-induced CVPV could predict fluid responsiveness similar to SVV and PPV in post-operative cardiac surgery patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Presión Venosa Central , Fluidoterapia , Ventiladores Mecánicos , Anciano , Gasto Cardíaco , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Volumen Sistólico
3.
Anaesthesia ; 71(7): 788-97, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27291598

RESUMEN

We compared the accuracy and precision of the non-invasive Nexfin(®) device for determining systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure variation, with arterial blood pressure values measured from a radial artery catheter in 19 patients following upper abdominal surgery. Measurements were taken at baseline and following fluid loading. Pooled data results of the arterial blood pressures showed no difference between the two measurement modalities. Bland-Altman analysis of pulse pressure variation showed significant differences between values obtained from the radial artery catheter and Nexfin finger cuff technology (mean (SD) 1.49 (2.09)%, p < 0.001, coefficient of variation 24%, limits of agreement -2.71% to 5.69%). The effect of volume expansion on pulse pressure variation was identical between methods (concordance correlation coefficient 0.848). We consider the Nexfin monitor system to be acceptable for use in patients after major upper abdominal surgery without major cardiovascular compromise or haemodynamic support.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Monitores de Presión Sanguínea , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Presión Arterial/fisiología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/instrumentación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
4.
Intensive Care Med ; 39(11): 2011-9, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23995984

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effects of a restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Pediatric ICU in an academic tertiary care center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. PATIENTS: One hundred seven patients with non-cyanotic congenital heart defects between 6 weeks and 6 years of age. One hundred three patients underwent corrective surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Prior to surgery patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups with specific RBC transfusion thresholds: Hb 10.8 g/dl (6.8 mmol/l) and Hb 8.0 g/dl (5.0 mmol/l). MEASUREMENTS: Length of stay in hospital (primary outcome), length of stay in PICU, duration of ventilation (secondary outcome), incidence of adverse events and complications related to randomization (intention to treat analysis). RESULTS: In the restrictive transfusion group, mean volume of transfused RBC was 186 (±70) ml per patient and in the liberal transfusion group 258 (±87) ml per patient, (95% CI 40.6-104.6), p < 0.001. Length of hospital stay was shorter in patients with a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy: median 8 (IQR 7-11) vs. 9 (IQR 7-14) days, p = 0.047. All other outcome measures and incidence of adverse effects were equal in both RBC transfusion groups. Cost of blood products for the liberal transfusion group was 438.35 (±203.39) vs. 316.27 (±189.96) euros (95% CI 46.61-197.51) per patient in the restrictive transfusion group, p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a non-cyanotic congenital heart defect undergoing elective cardiac surgery, a restrictive RBC transfusion policy (threshold of Hb 8.0 g/dl) during the entire perioperative period is safe, leads to a shorter hospital stay and is less expensive.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Seguridad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Intensive Care Med ; 37(10): 1656-63, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21877210

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in an academic tertiary care center to characterize ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery in The Netherlands. METHODS: All patients following cardiac surgery and mechanically ventilated for ≥24 h were included. The primary outcome was development of VAP. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 16.5 months. The rate of VAP was 17.1/1,000 mechanical ventilation days. Frequently found organisms were Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Patients with VAP had longer duration of ventilation and longer ICU stay. Risk factors associated with the development of VAP were a PRISM III score of ≥10 and transfusion of fresh frozen plasma. CONCLUSION: The mean VAP rate in this population is higher than that reported in general pediatric ICU populations. Children with VAP had a prolonged need for mechanical ventilation and a longer ICU stay.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Anaesthesia ; 64(9): 1004-9, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19686486

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV) as measured by the LiDCOplus system (SVVli) and by the FloTrac-Vigileo system (SVVed). We measured SVVli and SVVed in 15 postoperative cardiac surgical patients following five study interventions; a 50% increase in tidal volume, an increase of PEEP by 10 cm H2O, passive leg raising, a head-up tilt procedure and fluid loading. Between each intervention, baseline measurements were performed. 136 data pairs were obtained. SVVli ranged from 1.4% to 26.8% (mean (SD) 8.7 (4.6)%); SVVed from 2.0% to 26.0% (10.2 (4.7)%). The bias was found to be significantly different from zero at 1.5 (2.5)%, p < 0.001, (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9). The upper and lower limits of agreement were found to be 6.4 and -3.5% respectively. The coefficient of variation for the differences between SVVli and SVVed was 26%. This results in a relative large range for the percentage limits of agreement of 52%. Analysis in repeated measures showed coefficients of variation of 21% for SVVli and 22% for SVVed. The LiDCOplus and FloTrac-Vigileo system are not interchangeable. Furthermore, the determination of SVVli and SVVed are too ambiguous, as can be concluded from the high values of the coefficient of variation for repeated measures. These findings underline Pinsky's warning of caution in the clinical use of SVV by pulse contour techniques.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Volumen Sistólico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/instrumentación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
7.
Anaesthesia ; 64(7): 762-9, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19624632

RESUMEN

We evaluated cardiac output (CO) using three new methods - the auto-calibrated FloTrac-Vigileo (CO(ed)), the non-calibrated Modelflow (CO(mf) ) pulse contour method and the ultra-sound HemoSonic system (CO(hs)) - with thermodilution (CO(td)) as the reference. In 13 postoperative cardiac surgical patients, 104 paired CO values were assessed before, during and after four interventions: (i) an increase of tidal volume by 50%; (ii) a 10 cm H(2)O increase in positive end-expiratory pressure; (iii) passive leg raising and (iv) head up position. With the pooled data the difference (bias (2SD)) between CO(ed) and CO(td), CO(mf) and CO(td) and CO(hs) and CO(td) was 0.33 (0.90), 0.30 (0.69) and -0.41 (1.11) l.min(-1), respectively. Thus, Modelflow had the lowest mean squared error, suggesting that it had the best performance. CO(ed) significantly overestimates changes in cardiac output while CO(mf) and CO(hs) values are not significantly different from those of CO(td). Directional changes in cardiac output by thermodilution were detected with a high score by all three methods.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo/fisiología , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Humanos , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Postura/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Termodilución , Ultrasonografía
8.
Anaesthesia ; 62(8): 760-8, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17635422

RESUMEN

The bias, precision and tracking ability of five different pulse contour methods were evaluated by simultaneous comparison of cardiac output values from the conventional thermodilution technique (COtd). The five different pulse contour methods included in this study were: Wesseling's method (cZ); the Modelflow method; the LiDCO system; the PiCCO system and a recently developed Hemac method. We studied 24 cardiac surgery patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery bypass grafting. In each patient, the first series of COtd was used to calibrate the five pulse contour methods. In all, 199 series of measurements were accepted by all methods and included in the study. COtd ranged from 2.14 to 7.55 l.min(-1), with a mean of 4.81 l.min(-1). Bland-Altman analysis showed the following bias and limits of agreement: cZ, 0.23 and - 0.80 to 1.26 l.min(-1); Modelflow, 0.00 and - 0.74 to 0.74 l.min(-1); LiDCO, - 0.17 and - 1.55 to 1.20 l.min(-1); PiCCO, 0.14 and - 1.60 to 1.89 l.min(-1); and Hemac, 0.06 and - 0.81 to 0.93 l.min(-1). Changes in cardiac output larger than 0.5 l.min(-1) (10%) were correctly followed by the Modelflow and the Hemac method in 96% of cases. In this group of subjects, without congestive heart failure, with normal heart rhythm and reasonable peripheral circulation, the best results in absolute values as well as in tracking changes in cardiac output were measured using the Modelflow and Hemac pulse contour methods, based on non-linear three-element Windkessel models.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Volumen Sistólico , Termodilución
9.
Anaesthesia ; 61(8): 743-6, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16867085

RESUMEN

This study was performed to determine the interchangeability of femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure measurements as the input for the PiCCO system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). We studied 15 intensive care patients following cardiac surgery. Five-second averages of the cardiac output derived from the femoral artery pressure (COfem) were compared to 5-s averages derived from the radial artery pressure (COrad). One patient was excluded due to problems in the pattern recognition of the arterial pressure signal. In the remaining 14 patients, 14 734 comparative cardiac output values were analysed. The mean sample time was 88 min, range [30-119 min]. Mean (SD) COfem was 6.24 (1.1) l.min(-1) and mean COrad 6.23 (1.1) l.min(-1). Bland-Altman analysis showed an excellent agreement with a bias of - 0.01 l.min(-1), and limits of agreement from 0.60 to - 0.62 l.min(-1). If changes in CO were > 0.5 l.min(-1), the direction of changes in COfem and COrad were equal in 97% of instances. We conclude that femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure are interchangeable as inputs for the PiCCO device.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Arteria Femoral/fisiología , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Arteria Radial/fisiología , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
10.
Br J Anaesth ; 95(3): 326-31, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16006488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output by modelflow pulse contour method can be monitored quantitatively and continuously only after an initial calibration, to adapt the model to an individual patient. The modelflow method computes beat-to-beat cardiac output (COmf) from the radial artery pressure, by simulating a three-element model of aortic impedance with post-mortem data from human aortas. METHODS: In our improved version of modelflow (COmfc) we adapted this model to a real time measure of the aortic cross-sectional area (CSA) of the descending aorta just above the diaphragm, measured by a new transoesophageal echo device (HemoSonic 100). COmf and COmfc were compared with thermodilution cardiac output (COtd) in 24 patients in the intensive care unit. Each thermodilution value was the mean of four measurements equally spread over the ventilatory cycle. RESULTS: Least squares regression of COtd vs COmf gave y=1.09x[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.22], R2=0.15, and of COtd vs COmfc resulted in y=1.02x(95% CI 0.96-1.08), R2=0.69. The limits of agreement of the un-calibrated COmf were -3.53 to 2.79, bias=0.37 litre min(-1) and of the diameter-calibrated method COmfc, -1.48 to 1.32, bias=-0.08 litre min(-1). The coefficient of variation for the difference between methods decreased from 28 (un-calibrated) to 12% after diameter-calibration. CONCLUSIONS: After diameter-calibration, the improved modelflow pulse contour method reliably estimates cardiac output without the need of a calibration with thermodilution, leading to a less invasive cardiac output monitoring method.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/anatomía & histología , Gasto Cardíaco , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Antropometría , Presión Sanguínea , Calibración , Simulación por Computador , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Arteria Radial/fisiología , Termodilución/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA