Clinicopathological Profiles Associated with Discordant RAS Mutational Status between Liquid and Tissue Biopsies in a Real-World Cohort of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

We aimed to identify common mCRC profiles associated with a discordant mutational status of RAS between the standard of care (SoC) tumour tissue tests and ctDNA tests to understand ctDNA detection and improve treatment responses. This was a multicentre, retrospective and prospective study. A total of 366 Spanish mCRC patients were independently recruited. BEAMing ddPCR technology was employed to detect ctDNA RAS mutations, and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate clinicopathological factors associated with discordance. The highest concordance ratios were observed in profiles with multiple metastatic sites when the liver was present (89.7%; 95% CI 84.8-93.2), profiles with synchronous disease without primary tumour resection (90.2%; 95% CI 83.6-94.3) and profiles with mCRC originating in the left colon (91.3%; 95% CI 85.0-95.0). Metachronous disease originating in the right colon (OR = 6.1; 95% CI 1.7-26.5; p-value = 0.006) or rectum (OR = 5.0; 95% CI 1.5-17.8; p-value = 0.009) showed the highest probability of discrepancies. Primary tumour resection and a higher frequency of single metastases in the peritoneum or lungs in these patients were associated with reduced plasmatic mutation allele fractions (MAFs) and an increased probability of showing false-negative genotypes. Additional testing of patients with mCRC originating in the right colon or rectum with a single non-mutated ctDNA test is advised before the choice of therapy.

Efficacy, safety and prognostic factors in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in a real-world setting.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab in treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a retrospective, observational study. Patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies received TAS-102 (30-35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 every 28 days) plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Clinical and pathological characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were collected and analysed. Thirty-five patients were treated from July 2019 to October 2021 (median age 64 years). The majority of patients (68.6%) were receiving TAS-102 plus bevacizumab as third-line treatment. Patients received a median of 4 (range 2-15) cycles of treatment. Among 31 patients evaluable for response (88.6%), ORR and DCR were 3.2% and 51.6%, respectively. After a median 11.6 months' follow-up, median PFS was 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-5.1) months and median OS was 9.3 (95% CI 6.6-12.1) months. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia, asthenia and nausea/vomiting, and there were no treatment-related deaths. This real-world study confirms the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab in patients with refractory mCRC.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept (FA) in an elderly population with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of an oxaliplatin-based regimen.

BACKGROUND: The VELOUR study showed the benefit of FOLFIRI-Aflibercept (FA) versus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in second-line treatment. However, only 36% of the included patients were ≥65 years. Thus, we seek to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FA in the elderly population in the context of routine practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicenter, observational study of patients ≥70 years with mCRC treated with FA after progression to oxaliplatin chemotherapy in routine clinical practice in 9 hospitals of the GITuD group. RESULTS: Of 388 patients treated with FA between June 2013 and November 2018, 75 patients ≥70 years were included. The median number of cycles was 10 and the objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 33.8% and 72.0%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 27.1 months, median Progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months and median Overall Survival (OS) was 15.1 months. One third fewer metastasectomies were performed in the ≥75 years' subgroup (24 vs. 52%, p = 0.024) and more initial FOLFIRI dose reductions (68 vs. 36%, p = 0.014). ORR (23.8% vs. 38.3%), DCR (42.8% vs. 85.1%), and PFS (4 vs. 7.8 months; p = 0.017) were significantly less, without difference in OS (9.9 vs. 17.1 months; p = 0.129). The presence of prior hypertension (HT) (PFS 7.9 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.049) and HT ≥ grade 3 during treatment (PFS 7.6 vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.024) were associated with longer PFS. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were: asthenia (21.3%), neutropenia (14.7%), and diarrhea (14.7%). 57.3% required FOLFIRI dose reduction; 34.7% of aflibercept, including discontinuation (5.3% and 18.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: FA combination is effective in patients ≥70 years. The occurrence of HT is predictive of efficacy. Close monitoring of toxicity and initial dose adjustment is recommended.

Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data.

Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of the RECOURSE randomized clinical trial (RCT) established two categories, a good prognosis corresponding to subjects having a low tumor burden and indolent disease. Other models in refractory mCRC are the FAS-CORRECT and Colon Life nomogram. The main objective was to externally validate the prognostic factors of the RECOURSE and FAS-CORRECT trials, and the Colon Life nomogram in a multicenter, real-world series of mCRC treated in 3rd and successive lines with trifluridine/tipiracil. The secondary aim was to develop an OS predictive model, TAS-RECOSMO. Between 2016 and 2019, 244 patients were recruited. Median OS was 8.15 vs 8.12 months for the poor (85% of the subjects) and good (15%) prognosis groups from the RESOURCE trial, respectively, log-rank p = 0.9. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (17%), asthenia (6%), and anemia (5%). The AFT lognormal model TAS-RECOSMO included six variables: ECOG-PS, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation status, time between diagnosis of metastasis and beginning of trifluridine/tipiracil, NLR, CEA, and alkaline phosphatase. The model's bootstrapped bias-corrected c-index was 0.682 (95% CI, 0.636-0.722). The factors from the Colon Life model, FAS-CORRECT, and RECOURSE displayed a c-index of 0.690, 0.630, and 0.507, respectively. TAS-RECOSMO, FAS-CORRECT, and the Colon Life nomogram appear to predict OS in patients with refractory mCCR who begin trifluridine/tipiracil treatment in the real world. The prognostic groups of the RECOURCE RCT were unable to capture the situation of real-world subjects treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in this series.

Do Clinical Trials Meet Current Care Needs? Views of Digestive Oncology Specialists in Galicia (Spain) Using the Delphi Method.

Background: In recent years, abundant scientific evidence has been generated based on clinical trials (CT) in the field of oncology. The general objective of this paper is to find out the extent to which decision making is based on knowledge of the most recent CT. Its specific objectives are to pinpoint difficulties with decision making based on the CT performed and find out the motivations patients and clinicians have when taking part in a CT. Methodology: Combined, prospective study, based on the Delphi method. A lack of correspondence between the people who take part in CT and patients who come for consultation has been identified. A need for training in analysing and interpreting CT has also been identified and a lack of trust in the results of CT financed by the pharmaceutical industry itself has been perceived. Conclusions: There is a difficulty in selecting oncological treatment due to the lack of correspondence between the patients included in the CT and patients seen in consultation. In this process, real world data studies may be highly useful, as they may provide this group with greater training in interpreting CT and their results.

First-line panitumumab plus capecitabine for the treatment of older patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. The phase II, PANEL study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high morbidity and mortality of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in older patients, they have been underrepresented in clinical trials and their optimal treatment is yet to be determined. This open-label phase II study evaluated the benefits of panitumumab and capecitabine as a first-line chemotherapy regimen in older patients with wild-type [WT] RAS mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (≥70 years; ECOG≤2) received 3-week cycles of panitumumab (9 mg/kg on day 1) plus capecitabine (850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was evaluated every 9 weeks according to RECIST_1.1. Outcome measures were: objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression (TTP) and treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (11 women; median age: 78 years; ECOG: 0 [26%], 1 [67%], 2 [7%]) were evaluated. Median follow-up was 17.7 months. Confirmed ORR (95%CI) was 44.4% (25.7-63.2), with 25.9% of patients achieving at least stable disease. Median (95%CI) DoR was 8.7 (5.5-10.4) months, and median TTR was 2.2 (1.9-2.8) months. Median TTP was 9.6 (4.8-11.5) months, with a median TTF of 5.2 (2.8-7.2) months. The median PFS was 7.5 (4.4-10.4) months, and the median OS was 23.7 (7.4-27.5) months. Seventeen (63%) patients reported panitumumab and/or capecitabine-related adverse events grade 3-4, with skin toxicity (18.5%) being the most common. Two (7.4%) deaths were treatment-related. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that panitumumab plus capecitabine is a safe and effective regimen in older patients with WT RAS mCRC.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world population: Prognostic and predictive markers.

PURPOSE: The phase III VELOUR trial demonstrated efficacy with combined FOLFIRI-aflibercept in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab versus placebo. The effect of FOLFIRI-aflibercept in routine clinical practice was evaluated. METHODS/PATIENTS: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response and safety were analysed for 78 patients treated with FOLFIRI-aflibercept at six GITuD institutions. Exploratory analyses of prognostic and predictive markers of efficacy were performed. RESULTS: Patients had good general status (PS 0-1 96.2%), tumours were mostly RAS-mutant (75.6%), synchronous (71.8%), and left-sided (71.8%). Prior therapy included bevacizumab (47.4%) and anti-EGFR agents (12.8%). PFS was longer for metachronous than synchronous tumours (11.0 vs 5.0 months, P = 0.028), and for left-colon tumours (7.0 vs 3.0 months, P = 0.044). RAS-mutant status, first-line treatment and primary tumour surgery did not impact PFS. The disease control rate was 70.5%. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (15.3%), asthenia (10.3%), diarrhea and mucositis (6.4% each). Dysphonia was reported in 39.7% of patients, and grade 3 hypertension in 3.8%. Development of hypertension (any grade) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of progression by multivariate analysis (HR = 2.7; 95%CI 1.3-5.4; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy with FOLFIRI-aflibercept in a real-life population was in line with results from the pivotal trial and toxicity was manageable with treatment adaptation. Survival outcomes were not impacted by primary tumour location, RAS-mutant status, first-line treatment or primary tumour surgery. Hypertension may be a surrogate marker of efficacy in this patient population.

Phase II trial of erlotinib plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (XELTA study).

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib plus capecitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, uncontrolled, phase II trial. Patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer received oral capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, of a 21-day treatment cycle; and oral erlotinib at 150 mg daily. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled. The overall response rate (ORR) was 6%, with a median time to treatment failure of 2.1 months. The median follow-up was 7.6 months. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months and median overall survival was 4.3 months. The one-year survival rate was 22%. Major grade 1 and 2 non-hematological toxicities were skin rash (34%), asthenia (31%) and diarrhea (31%). Grade 3 hematological toxicity was <13%. No grade 4 toxicities were detected. None of the patients died due to treatment toxicity. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine with erlotinib is an active regimen with a favorable safety profile for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on von Willebrand factor and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: von Willebrand factor (vWf) is thought to mediate binding of tumour cells to platelets and to favour their systemic spreading capacity. Platelets involved in tumour angiogenesis are capable of releasing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Hence, levels of vWf and VEGF may correlate with cancer stage. The objectives are determine the impact of surgery and chemotherapy on vWf and VEGF in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers (group 1), 14 patients with locally advanced CRC (group 2) and 12 patients with metastatic CRC (group 3) were enrolled. Blood samples were taken at recruitment in group 1, and before and after surgery and chemotherapy in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Blood levels of vWf, VEGF, platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP), ceruloplasmin and carcinoembrionary antigen (CEA) were measured. RESULTS: At baseline, group 3 showed higher concentrations of vWf than the other groups (p<0.05). In group 2, vWf became elevated 40% post-surgery (p=0.016), independently of changes in CRP or ceruloplasmin. In group 3, chemotherapy caused a 42% reduction in VEGF (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong correlation between higher vWf levels and more advanced CRC stage at diagnosis. These levels were elevated post-surgery in patients with locally advanced CRC. Chemotherapy significantly decreased VEGF in metastatic CRC patients before CEA showed any significant change.