Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 185: 115-121, 2022 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36243566

RESUMEN

The optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with left-ventricular thrombus (LVT) is unclear. In the present study, we aimed to analyze the effect of treatment duration (≤12 months [short-term anticoagulation, (STA)] versus >12 months [long-term anticoagulation, (LTA)]) in the incidence of stroke and other secondary outcomes (acute myocardial infarction, bleeding, and mortality). Multivariate Cox regression was used to determine the association between treatment duration and stroke, adjusted for baseline embolic risk. A total of 98 cases of LVT (age 64.3 ± 12.8 years, female 18 [18%]) were identified. Sixty-one patients (62%) received LTA. Patients receiving LTA were older than those receiving STA (66.5 ± 11.6 vs 60.7 ± 13.9 years, p = 0.029), more often had atrial fibrillation (31% vs 0%, p <0.001), and had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.3 ± 1.6 vs 3.6 ± 1.6, p = 0.046). Stroke occurred in 2 and 10 patients (3% vs 27%, p <0.001), acute myocardial infarction in 2 and 3 patients (3% vs 8%, p = 0.292), bleeding in 4 and 3 patients (7% vs 8%, p = 0.773), and mortality in 12 and 7 patients (20% vs 19%, p = 0.927) in the LTA and STA groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for embolic risk, LTA was associated with decreased risk of stroke at 5 years (adjusted hazard ratio 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 0.72, p = 0.017). In conclusion, our data suggest that prolonged anticoagulation in patients with LVT may be associated with significantly lower risk of stroke.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Embolia , Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trombosis , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Trombosis/complicaciones , Embolia/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 921378, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35958423

RESUMEN

Background: Heart Failure (HF) is a growing epidemic with a similar prevalence in men and women. However, women have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to uneven evidence regarding the benefit of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). This review aims to outline the sex differences in the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: We conducted a systematic review via Medline from inception to 31 January 2022, including all randomized clinical trials published in English including adult patients suffering HFrEF that reported data on the efficacy of each drug. Baseline clinical characteristics, primary outcomes, and sex-specific effects are summarized in tables. The systemic review has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. In total, 29 articles were included in the systematic review. We observed that the proportion of women enrolled in clinical trials was generally low, the absence of a prespecified analysis of efficacy by sex was frequent, and the level of quality of evidence on the efficacy of GDMT and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-) in women was relatively poor. Conclusions: Sex influences the response to treatment of patients suffering from HFrEF. All the results from the landmark randomized clinical trials are based on study populations composed mainly of men. Further studies specifically designed considering sex differences are warranted to elucidate if GDMT and new devices are equally effective in both sexes.

3.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 78(5): e662-e668, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34321396

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Recent studies have proven benefit of SGLT2i drugs in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their safety when combined with angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has not been established. The Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Sacubitril/Valsartan and SGLT2i in HFrEF Patients registry was conducted to address this issue. SECSI registry is a consecutive, observational, retrospective, multicentre study conducted in 3 Heart Failure Units in Spain. It included 144 HFrEF patients who were treated with ARNI and iSGLT2. Data were collected at baseline, month 2, and month 6. The primary endpoint was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), after the initiation of ARNI and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Secondary endpoints included potassium levels and functional class (New York Heart Association class). There were 3 prespecified subgroup analyses: Elderly patients (≥70 years), patients with chronic kidney disease (KDIGO classification G3), and the sequence of drug initiation. Mean age was 69.9 ± 10.1 years, and 110 (76.4%) were men. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 32 ± 7.8%, and most patients were symptomatic [123 (87.2%) New York Heart Association II/III/IV]. eGFR decreased at month 2 and this trend was maintained at month 6 [eGFR baseline 68.5 ± 17.3, month 2 62 ± 19.7 and month 6 64.7 ± 8.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.01 for both)]. In prespecified analysis, elder patients and those who simultaneously initiate both treatments showed the steeper decrease in eGFR. To conclude, co-administration of SGLT2i and ARNI in routine care in HFrEF patients produced a slight decrease in eGFR at 6 months of follow-up. This decrease was especially significant in elder patients and those who initiate both drugs simultaneously.


Asunto(s)
Aminobutiratos/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/tratamiento farmacológico , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Proteasas/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Valsartán/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aminobutiratos/efectos adversos , Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Bifenilo/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/fisiopatología , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neprilisina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de Proteasas/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , España , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Valsartán/efectos adversos , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos
4.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 5(5): ytab144, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34013162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has emerged as a new threat, not only to Health Care systems but also to citizen's freedom of movement in many developed countries. CASE SUMMARY: We report a suicidal attempt in a destination therapy left ventricular assist device patient, potentially triggered by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown, highlighting the importance of regular and long-term psychological support for this vulnerable population. DISCUSSION: The psychological consequences of this pandemic, particularly in chronically ill patients, are yet to be defined.

5.
Cardiology ; 145(8): 481-484, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32594082

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a new threat to healthcare systems. In this setting, heart failure units have faced an enormous challenge: taking care of their patients while at the same time avoiding patients' visits to the hospital. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a follow-up protocol established in an advanced heart failure unit at a single center in Spain during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: During March and April 2020, a protocolized approach was implemented in our unit to reduce the number of outpatient visits and hospital admissions throughout the maximum COVID-19 spread period. We compared emergency room (ER) visits, hospital admissions, and mortality with those of January and February 2020. RESULTS: When compared to the preceding months, during the COVID pandemic there was a 56.5% reduction in the ER visits and a 46.9% reduction in hospital admissions, without an increase in mortality (9 patients died in both time periods). A total of 18 patients required a visit to the outpatient clinic for decompensation of heart failure or others. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that implementing an active-surveillance protocol in acutely decompensated heart failure units during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic can reduce hospital admissions, ER visits and, potentially, viral transmission, in a cohort of especially vulnerable patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología
6.
Echocardiography ; 37(6): 850-857, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32433805

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Morphological and functional right ventricular (RV) changes during normal pregnancy remain poorly characterized. Similar to left ventricle, RV load and function are expected to change, and establishing reference values for RV during a healthy pregnancy is critical for the evaluation of pregnancy-related heart disease. The aim of the study was to describe RV adaptation in a prospective cohort. METHODS: Serial echocardiographic examinations were performed in second trimester (24 ± 2 weeks), third (32 ± 2 week) trimester, and postpartum (>3 months after delivery). Nulliparous women were evaluated as control group. RV linear dimensions, areas, and function were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Forty-three pregnant women were evaluated and compared with nineteen nulliparous women as control. Function parameters decreased along gestation. RV fractional area fell from second to third trimester (52.01 ± 0.92 vs 48.73 ± 0.97, P < .05), as well as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (2.62 ± 0.05 vs 2.41 ± 0.05, P < .05); however, RV longitudinal strain (L) decreased earlier, showing main changes from second trimester (26.17 ± 0.86 vs 22.71 ± 0.57, P < .003, control vs second trimester). S'-wave velocity followed a different pattern without changes during pregnancy. RV diameters significantly increased during pregnancy: basal (3.65 ± 0.06 vs 3.90 ± 0.06, P < .05), mid- (2.70 ± 0.06 vs 3.00 ± 0.07, P < .05), longitudinal (6.90 ± 0.09 vs 7.32 ± 0.11, P < .05), and right ventricle outflow tract proximal diameter (3.20 ± 0.06 vs 3.44 ± 0.06, P < .05). RV areas also suffered early variation during pregnancy. In postpartum evaluation, all these changes were reversed. CONCLUSION: During pregnancy, RV experiments important variations. RV size increases, and its function decreases. Changes in LS were earlier compared with other function measures.


Asunto(s)
Ventrículos Cardíacos , Función Ventricular Derecha , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Valores de Referencia
8.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 20(8): 525-530, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31260420

RESUMEN

AIM: Differences exist in the diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between men and women. However, recent advancements in the management of ACSs might have attenuated this sex gap. We evaluated the status of ACS management in a multicenter registry in 10 tertiary Spanish hospitals. METHODS: We enrolled 1056 patients in our study, including only those with type 1 myocardial infarctions or unstable angina presumably not related to a secondary cause in an 'all-comers' design. RESULTS: The women enrolled (29%) were older than men (71.0 ±â€Š12.8 vs. 64.0 ±â€Š12.3, P = 0.001), with a higher prevalence of hypertension (71.0 vs. 56.5%, P < 0.001), insulin-treated diabetes (13.7 vs. 7.9%, P = 0.003), dyslipidemia (62.2 vs. 55.3%, P = 0.038), and chronic kidney disease (16.9 vs. 9.1%, P = 0.001). Women presented more frequently with back or arm pain radiation (57.3 vs. 49.7%, P = 0.025), palpitations (5.9 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.001), or dyspnea (33.0 vs. 19.4%, P = 0.001). ACS without significant coronary stenosis was more prevalent in women (16.8 vs. 8.1%, P = 0.001). There were no differences in percutaneous revascularization rates, but drug-eluting stents were less frequently employed in women (75.4 vs. 67.8%, P = 0.024); women were less often referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program (19.9 vs. 33.9%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in in-hospital complications such as thrombosis or bleeding. CONCLUSION: ACS presenting with atypical symptoms and without significant coronary artery stenosis is more frequent in women. Selection of either an invasive procedure or conservative management is not influenced by sex. Cardiac rehabilitation referral on discharge is underused, especially in women.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Angina Inestable/terapia , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angina Inestable/diagnóstico por imagen , Angina Inestable/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...