Quantitative analysis of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination response in immunocompromised adult hematology patients.

Vaccination guidelines for patients treated for hematological diseases are typically conservative. Given their high risk for severe COVID-19, it is important to identify those patients that benefit from vaccination. We prospectively quantified serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to spike subunit 1 (S1) antigens during and after 2-dose mRNA-1273 (Spikevax/Moderna) vaccination in hematology patients. Obtaining S1 IgG ≥ 300 binding antibody units (BAUs)/mL was considered adequate as it represents the lower level of S1 IgG concentration obtained in healthy individuals, and it correlates with potent virus neutralization. Selected patients (n = 723) were severely immunocompromised owing to their disease or treatment thereof. Nevertheless, >50% of patients obtained S1 IgG ≥ 300 BAUs/mL after 2-dose mRNA-1273. All patients with sickle cell disease or chronic myeloid leukemia obtained adequate antibody concentrations. Around 70% of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), multiple myeloma, or untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) obtained S1 IgG ≥ 300 BAUs/mL. Ruxolitinib or hypomethylating therapy but not high-dose chemotherapy blunted responses in myeloid malignancies. Responses in patients with lymphoma, patients with CLL on ibrutinib, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell recipients were low. The minimal time interval after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to reach adequate concentrations was <2 months for multiple myeloma, 8 months for lymphoma, and 4 to 6 months after allogeneic HCT. Serum IgG4, absolute B- and natural killer-cell number, and number of immunosuppressants predicted S1 IgG ≥ 300 BAUs/mL. Hematology patients on chemotherapy, shortly after HCT, or with cGVHD should not be precluded from vaccination. This trial was registered at Netherlands Trial Register as #NL9553.

Food-effect study of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia (NiFo study): Enabling dose reduction and relief of treatment burden.

OBJECTIVES: Taking advantage of its food-dependent bioavailability, the present study investigated the effect of a reduced dose taken with real-life meals on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. METHODS: Nilotinib was taken fasted (300 mg BID, days 1-4) or with real-life meals (200 mg BID, days 5-11). Rich sampling (days 1, 3, 8, 11) allowed for non-compartmental PK analysis. Nilotinib exposure (AUC0-12 h  -Cmin -Cmax ) and its intra- and interpatient variability were compared between the two regimens. Adverse events were recorded by means of a patient diary and ECG monitoring. RESULTS: Fifteen patients aged 40-74 years participated. Nilotinib PK following 200 mg BID taken with a meal strongly resembled that of 300 mg BID taken fasted (Cmin percentile (P)10-P90: 665-1404 ng/mL and 557-1743 ng/mL, respectively). Meals delayed nilotinib absorption. Intra- and interpatient variability were not increased by intake with meals. Nilotinib with food was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: With support of therapeutic drug monitoring, the use of a reduced 200 mg nilotinib dose with real-life meals seems feasible and safe. Future (confirmatory) studies should further explore the usefulness of nilotinib dosing together with food, including the relationship with treatment efficacy as well as long-term effects on quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5000 (Netherlands Trial Register, www.trialregister.nl).

Dried blood spot sampling of nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: a comparison with venous blood sampling.

OBJECTIVES: To compare nilotinib concentrations obtained by venous blood sampling and dried blood spot (DBS) in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). It was investigated how to predict nilotinib plasma levels on the basis of DBS. METHODS: Forty duplicate DBS and venous blood samples were collected from 20 patients. Capillary blood was obtained by finger prick and spotted on DMPK-C Whatman sampling paper, simultaneously with venous blood sampling. Plasma concentrations were predicted from DBS concentrations using three methods: (1) individual and (2) mean haematocrit correction and (3) the bias between plasma and DBS concentrations. Results were compared using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis. KEY FINDINGS: Nilotinib plasma concentrations ranged from 376 to 2663 µg/l. DBS concentrations ranged from 144 to 1518 µg/l. The slope was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.61) with an intercept of -41.68 µg/l (95% CI, -93.78 to 10.42). Mean differences between calculated and measured plasma concentrations were -14.3% (method 1), -14.0% (method 2) and -0.6% (method 3); differences were within 20% of the mean in 73%, 85% and 80% of the samples, respectively. The slopes were respectively 0.96 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.06), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.03) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma concentrations of nilotinib could be predicted on the basis of DBS. DBS sampling to assess nilotinib concentrations in CML patients seems a suitable alternative for venous sampling.