Interpreting microbiopsies in cervical smears. A cytohistologic approach.

OBJECTIVE: To assess interobserver variation in the diagnosis of thick tissue specimens (microbiopsies) in cytology smears and histologic sections taken from them, to evaluate the applicability of MIB-1 in histologic sections from microbiopsies and to evaluate whether processing microbiopsies in inconclusive smears has additional diagnostic value. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic smears were selected in which there were diagnostic disagreements between pathologists and cytologists and microbiopsies were present. Interobserver variation among three pathologists and three cytologists in the diagnosis of these microbiopsies was investigated. The smears were processed for histologic sections, and interobserver variation between pathologist diagnoses were analyzed. An additional histologic slide stained for MIB-1 was used for consensus diagnosis. The consensus diagnosis was compared with available follow-up and its sensitivity and specificity determined. The value of applying the microbiopsy technique in slides diagnosed as inadequate or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) was analysed. RESULTS: From a series of 62,334 cervical smears, 49 with microbiopsies were selected. It was possible to derive histologic slides from 38 cases. Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of microbiopsies and histologic sections from them was moderate--kappa = .44 (SE = .06) and kappa = .44 (SE = .09), respectively. In the consensus meeting for all cases, a conclusive diagnosis was reached. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the consensus diagnosis and MIB-1 staining was r = .62. The sensitivity of the consensus diagnosis for the follow-up diagnosis was 71% and the specificity 60%. Diagnosis on approximately 50% of slides diagnosed as inadequate or ASCUS could be made. CONCLUSION: The histotechnical workup of microbiopsies is not difficult; however, their diagnosis can be a problem. Adequate diagnostic criteria are not available. Aided by MIB-1 staining, histologic sections from microbiopsies can be diagnosed, and the diagnoses correlated with follow-up in most cases. Processing of microbiopsies in smears with an inconclusive cytologic diagnosis or a diagnosis of ASCUS allowed correct diagnosis in 50% of cases in this study.

Hyperlipidemia of ApoE2(Arg(158)-Cys) and ApoE3-Leiden transgenic mice is modulated predominantly by LDL receptor expression.

To investigate the relative roles of the LDL receptor- and non-LDL receptor-mediated pathways in the clearance of apolipoprotein E (apoE) variants in vivo, we have generated apoE2(Arg(158)-Cys) (apoE2) and apoE3-Leiden transgenic mice deficient for the endogenous mouse Apoe and Ldl receptor genes (Apoe-/-.Ldlr-/- mice). Unexpectedly, on the Apoe-/-.Ldlr-/- background, expression of neither apoE2 nor apoE3-Leiden results in a decrease of the hyperlipidemia. In contrast, serum cholesterol levels are increased by the introduction of apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden in Apoe-/-.Ldlr-/- mice (to 39.1+/-7.1 and 37.6+/-7.6 mmol/L, respectively, from 25. 9+/-6.5 mmol/L). In addition, in these transgenic mice, the serum triglyceride levels are substantially increased (to 9.6+/-7.0 and 5. 8+/-2.8 mmol/L, respectively, from 0.7+/-0.5 mmol/L), which is associated with a decreased efficiency of in vitro LPL-mediated lipolysis of circulating VLDL. The VLDL-triglyceride secretion rate is not affected by the expression of apoE2 or apoE3-Leiden on the Apoe-/-.Ldlr-/- background. These results indicate that in the absence of the LDL receptor, clearance of triglyceride-rich apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden-containing lipoproteins via alternative hepatic receptors, such as the LDL receptor-related protein (LRP) is inefficient. Although apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden are disturbed in binding to the LDL receptor in vitro, expression of 1 or 2 mouse Ldlr alleles in an apoE2.Apoe-/- or apoE3-Leiden.Apoe-/- background results in a gene dose-dependent decrease of the hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, overexpression of the LDL receptor via adenovirus-mediated gene transfer rescues the hyperlipidemia associated with apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden expression. These data indicate that in apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden transgenic mice, the LDL receptor constitutes the predominant route for clearance of VLDL remnants, carrying even poorly binding apoE variants, and that this pathway is functional despite an apoE-mediated disturbance in VLDL triglyceride lipolysis.

Adenovirus mediated overexpression of human phospholipid transfer protein alters plasma HDL levels in mice.

To study the function of plasma phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) in vivo, a liver directed adenoviral gene transfer system was used to overexpress human PLTP in mice. For the experiments, two strains of mice, wild type (C57/B1) and mice transgenic for the human apoA-I gene (HuApoA-ITg), were utilized. Five days after injection of the recombinant PLTP adenovirus, wild type mice showed a 4-fold increase in serum PLTP activity in (12.2+/-1.3 micromol/ml per h to 48.1+/-8.6 micromol/ml per h (+394%), P < 0.001). The PLTP overexpression induced significant reduction of serum cholesterol (2.46+/-0.08 to 0.69+/-0.42 mmol/l (-72%), P < 0.001), phospholipids (3.10+/-0.06 to 0.90+/-0.24 mmol/l (-71%), P < 0.01), and triglycerides (0.2+/-0.07 to 0.08+/-0.03 mmol/l (-69%), (P < 0.001). ApoA-I was hardly detectable in the serum. These lipid changes were due to a dramatic reduction of high density lipoprotein (HDL). The HuApoA-ITg mice displayed higher basal HDL level and PLTP activity. Adenovirus mediated PLTP overexpression in these mice resulted in a similar decrease of the lipid levels as that seen in the C57/B1 mice. However, the lipoprotein profile revealed a redistribution of HDL, with the appearance of larger buoyant HDL species. The results demonstrate that plasma phospholipid transfer protein in vivo causes high density lipoprotein (HDL) conversion and thereby plays a central role in HDL metabolism.

Reversal of hypercholesterolemia in apolipoprotein E2 and apolipoprotein E3-Leiden transgenic mice by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the VLDL receptor.

We have investigated the interaction of apolipoprotein E2(Arg158-Cys) (apoE2) and apolipoprotein E3-Leiden (apoE3-Leiden) with the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor in vivo and in vitro to define the possible role of this receptor in lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. The in vivo binding specificity of the VLDL receptor for apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden was investigated by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the VLDL receptor in apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden transgenic mice lacking endogenous mouse apoE (Apoe-/-). Ectopic overexpression of the VLDL receptor gene in the liver resulted in a >50% decrease of plasma cholesterol levels in both apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden transgenic mice compared with liver expression of the beta-galactosidase gene. This reduction in plasma cholesterol was mainly due to a reduction in the VLDL level. Overexpression of the VLDL receptor did not affect the hepatic VLDL triglyceride production, indicating that the hypocholesterolemic effect is due to an increased level of plasma clearance mediated by the VLDL receptor. In vitro binding analysis showed that both apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden VLDL compete efficiently with rabbit beta-VLDL for binding to the VLDL receptor expressed on LDL receptor-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cells. We conclude from these data that both apoE2 and apoE3-Leiden function as proper ligands for the VLDL receptor in vitro and in vivo. This finding substantiates a possible role for the VLDL receptor in atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic subjects homozygous for apoE2 or carrying apoE3-Leiden and indicates that the VLDL receptor expressed on the liver has therapeutic potential as an alternative route for clearance of binding-defective lipoproteins.

Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints of the back, arms or neck, and legs among nurses, and to investigate the relation between these complaints and various work related and personal variables. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was carried out in four nursing homes in The Netherlands. RESULTS: The response was 95% and resulted in 846 completed questionnaires. It was found that a large proportion of the subjects regularly had back complaints (36%) but also had arm or neck (30%) and leg complaints (16%). Almost all respondents (89%) considered nursing work as physically strenuous. Most of them complained of working under time pressure (69%), increased work pressure (70%), and having no opportunity to take a break from the work (70%). The physical variables which seem to trouble the subjects most were lifting (65%), working in awkward postures (47%), and stooping (34%). Moreover, 53% of the subjects responded that the ergonomic lay out of the ward was disagreeable. Most of the work related variables under study seemed to be associated with musculoskeletal complaints. For all types of complaints the strongest associations were found with having to lift heavy loads. Apart from physical stress various aspects of work pressure showed strong associations with the occurrence of musculoskeletal complaints. The variables on the ergonomy of the ward showed less clear associations with musculoskeletal complaints than were found for physical stress and work pressure. CONCLUSIONS: From these results it may be concluded that future research of health risks of nursing work should have a wider focus than the relation between physical workload and low back pain.