Limited sampling strategy for prolonged-release tacrolimus in renal transplant patients by use of the dried blood spot technique.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a clinically applicable limited sampling strategy for ambulatory Caucasian kidney transplant patients to estimate area under the curve in a 24-h period (AUC0-24) of prolonged-release tacrolimus. METHODS: Twenty six kidney recipients, at least 6 months after transplantation, receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus, were enrolled. In each patient, seven blood samples were collected during a period of 24 h by use of the validated dried blood spot method. Best subset selection multiple linear regression was performed to derive limited sampling strategy (LSS). The equations were constrained to include a maximum of three samples collected within 4 h after the intake to maintain clinical applicability. To assess the predictive performance of LSS, residuals for each patient were calculated based on models fitted to a dataset where that patient was omitted. RESULTS: The prediction formula for the AUC(0-24) using the time points 0, 2, and 4 h after ingestion (C(0h)-C(2h)-C(4h)) provided the highest correlation with the AUC(0-24) (r(2) = 0.95): AUC0-24 = 44.9 + 8.9 × C(0h) + 2.1 × C(2h) + 7.6 × C(4h). Measures for bias and precision, i.e., median percentage prediction error (MPPE) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE), were 0.4 and 4.8%, respectively. For the same patients, the correlation between C(24h) and AUC0-24 was worse (r(2) = 0.77) while MPPE and MAPE were 6.2 and 7.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the outpatient department, a LSS using C(0h)-C(2h)-C(4h) can be used for reliable estimation of the AUC(0-24) of prolonged-release tacrolimus.

Proton pump inhibitors do not increase the risk of acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Proton pump inhibitors impair exposure to MPA due to incomplete conversion from MMF. Lower exposure to MPA could result in an increased risk of acute rejection. We investigated whether MMF-treated renal transplant patients who concomitantly used pantoprazole as ulcer prophylaxis had a higher risk of acute rejection within the first three months after transplantation than those who used ranitidine. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2007 and December 2011. Their immunosuppressive therapy consisted of steroids, tacrolimus and MMF and they used either pantoprazole or ranitidine as ulcer prophylaxis. RESULTS: 202 patients were included: 125 using pantoprazole and 77 using ranitidine. There was no difference in the number of patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR): 13 (10.4%) in the pantoprazole group versus 7 (9.1%) in the ranitidine group (NS). Also after correction for inequalities between the two groups, there was no significant relationship between the risk of BPAR and the type of anti-ulcer agent. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence for an increased incidence of BPAR in renal transplant patients who use pantoprazole in combination with MMF.

Idiopathic giant oesophageal ulcer and leucopoenia after renal transplantation.

A 45-year-old male recipient of a renal allograft was admitted because of a giant oesophageal ulcer coinciding with leucopoenia. An extensive workup revealed no explanation for the ulcer and leucopoenia. Our final diagnosis by exclusion was an idiopathic giant oesophageal ulcer and late-onset neutropenia as consequences of rituximab induction therapy given during the transplant procedure. The patient fully recovered after treatment with prednisone. However, after four months, the ulcer and leucopoenia recurred and again successfully responded to treatment with prednisone.

Weight loss in obese men by caloric restriction and high-dose diazoxide-mediated insulin suppression.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the concept whether high-dose diazoxide (DZX)-mediated insulin suppression, in combination with moderate caloric restriction and increased physical activity, can establish a weight loss of at least 15% in obese hyperinsulinaemic men. DESIGN: Open, uncontrolled, 6-month pilot study. Energy intake was reduced by 30%, and walking for at least 30 min a day was strongly recommended. DZX treatment was started at 50 mg t.i.d. and increased by 50 mg per dose every 4 weeks to a maximum of 300 mg t.i.d., unless hyperglycaemia or other side-effects occurred. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen obese hyperinsulinaemic men with a body mass index of 30-35 kg/m(2). Measurements included body weight, body composition, blood pressure, glycaemic control, insulin response, adiponectin and serum lipids. RESULTS: Body weight decreased by 9.4 kg (95% CI: 5.6-13.2 kg, p < 0.001), waist circumference reduced by 9.2 cm (95% CI: 5.3-12.9 cm, p < 0.001) and total body fat mass decreased by 23.3% (95% CI: 13.7-32.9%, p < 0.001), without a concomitant change in soft tissue lean body mass or bone mass. Fat loss was inversely related to fasting insulin levels achieved at 6 months (r = -0.76, p < 0.002). Diastolic blood pressure decreased by 10.9 mmHg (95% CI: 6.5-15.4 mmHg, p < 0.002). Fasting and postmeal peak insulin levels were reduced by about 65% (p < 0.001) and decreased to the normal range for non-obese men. Fasting and postmeal peak glucose levels increased by 0.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (p = 0.01) and 1.4 +/- 0.7 mmol/l (p = 0.06) respectively. Haemoglobin A1c rose by 0.5% to 5.9 +/- 0.2%. CONCLUSION: High-dose DZX-mediated insulin suppression, in combination with moderate caloric restriction and lifestyle advice, is associated with a clinically relevant degree of weight reduction. A more extensive exploration is warranted to optimize this mode of treatment and to further clarify its risks and benefits.