Systematic review with meta-analysis: Branched-chain amino acid supplementation in liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Dietary supplementation with branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) is often used in cirrhotic patients to improve nutritional status. We wanted to explore the evidence for BCAA supplementation in chronic liver disease. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies with BCAA supplementation with the presence of a disease-control group (placebo or no intervention) using search terms 'liver cirrhosis', 'hepatocellular carcinoma', 'branched chain amino acids' and relevant synonyms. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2.0 tools. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model. Results were reported following EQUATOR guidelines. RESULTS: Of 3378 studies screened by title and abstract, 54 were included (34 randomized controlled trials, 5 prospective case-control studies, 13 retrospective case-control studies: in total 2308 patients BCAA supplementation, 2876 disease-controls). Risk of bias was high/serious for almost all studies. According to meta-analyses, long-term (at least 6 months) BCAA supplementation in cirrhotic patients significantly improved event-free survival (p = .008; RR .61 95% CI .42-.88) and tended to improve overall survival (p = .05; RR .58 95% CI .34-1.00). Two retrospective studies suggested the beneficial effects during sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma. Available studies reported no beneficial effects or contradictory results of BCAA after other specific therapeutic interventions (resection or radiological interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, paracentesis or variceal ligation). No convincing beneficial effects of BCAA supplementation on liver function, nutritional status or quality of life were found. No study reported serious side effects of BCAA. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic BCAA supplementation appears safe and might improve survival in cirrhotic patients.

Nutritional status in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Potential relevance for clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Impaired nutritional status is a risk factor for unfavorable outcome in cirrhosis. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study in hepatocellular carcinoma patients referred for tumor-specific therapy, nutritional status was assessed before and 3 months post-treatment using 4 complementary tools: hand-grip strength (HGS), Liver Frailty Index (LFI), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and skeletal muscle index (L3-SMI). Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier curves and Cox's regression analyses with correction for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, alpha-fetoprotein and age. RESULTS: 56 patients were evaluated at baseline and 38 patients 3 months post-treatment. Baseline BCLC stage was 0 in 14%, A in 27%, B in 36%, C in 21%, and D in 2%. HGS, LFI, PG-SGA and L3-SMI were impaired in 13%, 95%, 21% and 71% respectively. Of all patients, 52% died after (median, range) 373 (32-962) days. Of the nutritional assessment tools, only HGS was independently associated with complication-free survival (HR 0.304, 95%CI 0.10-0.88: p = 0.028) and, approaching significance, with overall survival (HR 0.323, 95%CI 0.103-1.008: p = 0.052). Tumor-specific therapy was administered in 50 patients (20% radiofrequency / microwave ablation, 4% resection, 74% transarterial radio- or chemoembolization, 2% sorafenib). Three months post-treatment, complete response occurred in 44%, partial response in 20%, stable disease in 20% and progressive disease in 16%. Child-Pugh scores deteriorated and such deterioration was independently associated with reduced overall and complication-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: reduced baseline HGS and deteriorated post-treatment Child-Pugh score are associated with reduced overall and complication-free survival in HCC.

More than 10% weight loss in head and neck cancer patients during radiotherapy is independently associated with deterioration in quality of life.

The authors prospectively assessed the independent association between weight loss and deterioration in quality of life (QOL) in patients treated by radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. In 533 head and neck cancer patients treated by curative radiotherapy, changes in weight and QOL were assessed between baseline (before radiotherapy) and follow-up (12 wk after the start of radiotherapy). Patients were categorized into 4 weight loss categories: 0%, 0.1%-5.0%, 5.1%-10.0%, and >10% weight loss. The association between weight loss and change in QOL was analyzed by linear regression analysis, adjusted for sociodemographic and tumor-related characteristics, and additionally for disease specific symptoms and tube feeding. Thirty percent of patients lost 0.1%-5.0% weight, 26% lost 5.1%-10.0% weight, and 24% lost >10% weight. Adjusted regression analyses showed a significant association between weight loss and deterioration of global QOL, physical functioning, social functioning, social eating, and social contact. After additional adjustment for disease-specific symptoms and tube feeding, weight loss (>10%) remained significantly associated with global QOL, social eating, and social contact (P < 0.05). More than 10% weight loss during and directly after radiotherapy has a significant impact on social eating, social contact, and QOL in head and neck cancer patients.