A single bout of jumping exercise does not modulate serum markers of bone formation or bone resorption throughout a 24 h period.

INTRODUCTION: This randomized, cross-over trial assessed the effect of a single bout of high-impact exercise on serum markers of bone formation and bone resorption over a 24 h period. METHODS: Twenty healthy males and females performed a single bout of brief jumping exercise (EXC) or no exercise (CON), 55 min following consumption of a standard breakfast. Blood markers of bone formation (P1NP) and bone resorption (CTX-I) were assessed before (t = 0 h) and over a 5 h period after breakfast, and following 24 h of post-exercise recovery (t = 24 h). RESULTS: Serum CTX-I concentrations decreased during the 5 h postprandial period (time-effect, P < 0.001) with no differences between conditions (time x condition, P = 0.14). After a ~ 16 % decline during the first 30 min following breakfast, serum P1NP concentrations gradually returned to baseline values during the 5 h postprandial period, with no differences in the overall response between conditions (time-effect, P < 0.001; time x condition, P = 0.25). Fasted serum CTX-I concentrations decreased from 0.33 ± 0.15 and 0.35 ± 0.15 ng/mL at baseline, to 0.31 ± 0.13 and 0.31 ± 0.16 ng/mL at t = 24 h in CON and EXC, respectively, with no differences between conditions (time-effect, P < 0.01; time x condition, P = 0.70). Fasted serum P1NP concentrations did not change from baseline to t = 24 h in both CON (baseline: 76 ± 27 ng/mL, t = 24 h: 79 ± 26 ng/mL) and EXC (baseline: 80 ± 24 ng/mL, t = 24 h: 77 ± 29 ng/mL; time-effect, P = 0.89), with no differences between conditions (time x condition, P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: High-impact exercise does not modulate the concentrations of the serum marker of bone formation P1NP and the serum marker of bone resorption CTX-I throughout a 24 h recovery period in healthy adults.

Do Paralympic athletes suffer from brittle bones? Prevalence and risk factors of low bone mineral density in Paralympic athletes.

Background: Bone health may be a concern in Paralympic athletes, given the presence of multiple risk factors predisposing these athletes to low bone mineral density (BMD). Objective: We aimed to assess the prevalence of low BMD among Paralympic athletes participating in various sport disciplines, and to identify potential risk factors for low BMD. Methods: Seventy Paralympic athletes, of whom 51 % were wheelchair-dependent, were included in this cross-sectional study. BMD of the whole-body, lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Comparisons between groups were conducted by one-way ANOVA, and regression analyses were conducted to identify potential risk factors for low BMD. Results: The prevalence of low BMD (Z-score < -1.0) was highest at femoral neck (34 %), followed by total hip (31 %), whole-body (21 %), and lumbar spine (18 %). Wheelchair-dependent athletes had significantly lower BMD Z-scores compared to the non-wheelchair-dependent athletes at whole-body level (-0.5 ± 1.4 vs 0.2 ± 1.3; P = 0.04), total hip (-1.1 ± 1.2 vs 0.0 ± 1.1; P < 0.01), and femoral neck (-1.0 ± 1.3 vs -0.1 ± 1.2; P < 0.01). At the lumbar spine, low BMD was completely absent in wheelchair basketball and tennis players. Regression analyses identified body mass, wheelchair dependence, and type of sport, as the main risk factors for low BMD. Conclusions: In this cohort of Paralympic athletes, low BMD is mainly present at the hip, and to a lesser extent at the whole-body and lumbar spine. The most prominent risk factors for low BMD in Paralympic athletes are related to mechanical loading patterns, including wheelchair use, the type of sport, and body mass.

Energy expenditure and dietary intake in professional female football players in the Dutch Women's League: Implications for nutritional counselling.

In contrast to male football players, research on the nutritional requirements of female football players is limited. This study aimed to assess total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) in professional female football players, along with body composition, physical activity and dietary intake. This observational study included 15 professional football players playing in the highest Dutch Women's League. TDEE was assessed by doubly labelled water over 14 days, along with resting metabolic rate (RMR; ventilated hood), fat-free mass (FFM; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), and dietary intake (24-h recalls). Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) was derived from subtracting RMR and estimated diet-induced thermogenesis (10%) from TDEE. TDEE was 2882 ± 278 kcal/day (58 ± 5 kcal/kg FFM) and significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with FFM (r = 0.62). PAEE was 1207 ± 213 kcal/d. Weighted energy intake was 2344 kcal [2023-2589]. Carbohydrate intakes were 3.2 ± 0.7, 4.4 ± 1.1 and 5.3 ± 1.9 g/kg body mass for rest, training and match days, respectively, while weighted mean protein intake was 1.9 ± 0.4 g/kg body mass. In conclusion, the energy requirements of professional female football players are moderate to high and can be explained by the substantial PAEE. To fuel these requirements, sports nutritionists should consider shifting the players' focus towards prioritizing adequate carbohydrate intakes, rather than emphasizing high protein consumption.

Energy Requirements of Paralympic Athletes: Insights from the Doubly Labeled Water Approach.

PURPOSE: Advanced insight in energy requirements of Paralympic athletes is imperative for optimizing their nutritional counseling. Given the lack of accurate data on total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) of Paralympic athletes, this study aimed to assess energy expenditure and nutritional intake of a large cohort of Paralympic athletes, across different sports and disabilities. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 48 Dutch and Norwegian Paralympic athletes (19 male/29 female) with various disabilities, competing in Para cycling, wheelchair tennis, wheelchair basketball, Para Nordic skiing, and alpine skiing participated. TDEE was assessed by the gold standard doubly labeled water method over a 14-d period, resting metabolic rate by ventilated hood indirect calorimetry, energy intake by three unannounced 24-h dietary recalls, body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and exercise training duration by a training log. RESULTS: Mean TDEE was 2908 ± 797 kcal·d -1 , ranging from 2322 ± 340 kcal·d -1 for wheelchair basketball players to 3607 ± 1001 kcal·d -1 for Para cyclists. Regression analysis identified fat-free mass, exercise duration, and the presence of a spinal cord disorder as the primary predictors of TDEE, explaining up to 73% of the variance in TDEE. Athletes' energy intake (2363 ± 905 kcal·d -1 ) was below their TDEE, whereas their body mass remained constant, indicating underreporting. Carbohydrate intake (4.1 ± 1.9 g·kg -1 body mass) was low, even when considering underreporting, whereas protein intake (1.8 ± 0.6 g·kg -1 body mass) was relatively high. CONCLUSIONS: Paralympic athletes display moderate- to high-energy expenditure, varying across sports and individuals. Much of the variation in TDEE can be attributed to individual differences in fat-free mass and exercise duration. This study establishes the benchmarks for energy requirements of Paralympic athletes, serving as the foundation for future dietary guidelines within this population.