Diagnostic accuracy of Ara h 2 for detecting peanut allergy in children.

BACKGROUND: Specific IgE to Ara h 2 is a diagnostic test for peanut allergy which may reduce the need for double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC); however, guidance for using Ara h 2 in place of DBPCFCs has not been validated. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate 1) diagnostic accuracy of previously published Ara h 2 cut-off levels to diagnose peanut allergy in children and 2) costs. METHODS: A consecutive series of 150 children age 3.5 to 18 years was evaluated in secondary and tertiary settings in the Netherlands. sIgE to Ara h 2 was the index test, and oral peanut ingestion was the reference test. Oral peanut ingestion was home or supervised introduction for Ara h 2 ≤ 0.1, DBPCFC for 0.1-5.0 and open food challenge for ≥5.0. Costs were calculated using financial healthcare data. RESULTS: A conclusive reference test was performed in 113 children (75%). Sixty-four children (57%) had peanut allergy, as confirmed by a DBPCFC (27/47) or an open challenge (37/50). Forty-nine children (43%) were considered peanut-tolerant after peanut introduction (19/19), a DBPCFC (20/47) or an open challenge (10/50). Area under the curve for Ara h 2 was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.98). The diagnostic flow chart correctly classified 26/26 (100%; 84-100) of children with Ara h 2 ≤ 0.1 as peanut-tolerant and 34/35 (97%; 83-100) of children with Ara h 2 ≥ 5.0 as peanut-allergic. At a cut-off of ≤0.1 and ≥5.0, a sensitivity of respectively 100% (93-100) and 53% (38-67) was observed and a specificity of 53% (38-67) and 98% (87-100). Mean annual costs of the flow chart were estimated as €320-€636 per patient lower than following national allergy guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: In this diagnostic accuracy study, which did not take into account pretest probability, we have validated previously published Ara h 2 cut-off levels which are associated with peanut tolerance and allergy.

Accurate Prediction of Peanut Allergy in One-Third of Adults Using a Validated Ara h 2 Cutoff.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of peanut components is extensively studied in children, but to a lesser extent in adults with suspected peanut allergy. The use of peanut components in daily practice may reduce the need for double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs); however, validation studies are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of (combined) peanut components and validate a previously found Ara h 2 cutoff level with 100% positive predictive value (PPV) in adults with suspected peanut allergy. METHODS: Adults who underwent a peanut DBPCFC were included: 84 patients from a previous study (2002-2012) and 70 new patients (2012-2019). Specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut extract, Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 was measured using ImmunoCAP. Diagnostic value was assessed with an area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: In total, 95 (62%) patients were peanut allergic. sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were the best predictors with an AUC (95% confidence interval) of 0.85 (0.79-0.91) and 0.85 (0.79-0.92), respectively. The Ara h 2 cutoff level with 100% PPV (≥1.75 kUA/L) was validated in the 70 new patients. Thirty percent of all included patients could be classified correctly as peanut allergic using this validated cutoff level. CONCLUSION: sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 have equally high discriminative ability. Peanut allergy can be predicted accurately in one-third of adults using a validated cutoff level of sIgE to Ara h 2.

[Non-healing wounds]. / Een wond aan het been die niet geneest.

The incidence of non-healing wounds is increasing. Identification of the underlying cause of a wound is of essential importance for adequate treatment. In this article, we present three female patients aged 50, 65 and 85 years with respectively pyoderma gangraenosum, livedoid vasculopathy and Martorell hypertensive ischaemic leg ulcer. All patients were treated with local wound care for weeks without a valid diagnosis. In retrospect it can be concluded that several warning signals had not been recognised. Severe pain, atypical location or appearance, insufficient healing and progression of the wound despite adequate wound care should all be considered red flags. Patients with non-healing wounds require prompt referral and more extensive diagnostic investigation. Our cases also show that a multidisciplinary wound care team ensures and accelerates consensus on diagnosis and treatment plan. Such a team can ensure and coordinate follow-up in the home environment.

Risk factors for atopic diseases and recurrent respiratory tract infections in children.

INTRODUCTION: The simultaneously increased prevalence of atopic diseases and decreased prevalence of infectious diseases might point to a link between the two entities. Past work mainly focused on either atopic diseases or recurrent infections. We aim to investigate whether risk factors for atopic diseases (ie, asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and/or food allergy) differ from risk factors for recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTIs) in children. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were used from 5517 children aged 1 to 18 years who participated in an Electronic Portal for children between 2011 and 2019. Univariable/multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for any atopic disease and RRTIs. RESULTS: Children aged ≥5 years were more likely to have any atopic disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.50-2.77) and less likely to have RRTIs (OR: 0.68-0.84) compared to children aged less than 5 years. Female sex (OR: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.81), low birth weight (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.97) and dog ownership (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95) reduced the odds of any atopic disease, but not of RRTIs. Daycare attendance (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.47) was associated with RRTIs, but not with atopic diseases. A family history of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and RRTIs was significantly associated with the same entity in children, with OR varying from 1.58 (95% CI: 1.35-1.85) in allergic rhinitis to 2.20 (95% CI: 1.85-2.61) in asthma. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for atopic diseases are distinct from risk factors for RRTIs, suggesting that the changing prevalence of both entities is not related to shared risk factors.

Reintroduction failure after negative food challenges in adults is common and mainly due to atypical symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Reintroduction of a food after negative food challenge (FC) faces many obstacles. There are no studies available about this subject in adults. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency, reasons and risk factors of reintroduction failure in adults. METHODS: In this prospective study, adult patients received standardized follow-up care after negative FCs including a reintroduction scheme and supportive telephone consultations. Data were collected by telephone interview (2 weeks after FC) and questionnaires (at baseline and 6 months after FC(s)): food habits questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire-Adult Form and Food Allergy Independent Measure. Frequency and reasons of reintroduction failure were analysed using descriptive statistics and risk factors with univariate analyses. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included with, in total, 113 negative FCs. Reintroduction failed on short-term (2 weeks after FC) in 20% (95% CI: 13%-28%). Common reasons were symptoms upon ingestion during the reintroduction scheme (50%) and no need to eat the food (23%). On the long-term (5-12 months after FC(s)), reintroduction failure increased to 40% (95% CI: 28%-53%). Common reasons were atypical symptoms after eating the food (59%) and fear for an allergic reaction (24%). Five risk factors for long-term reintroduction failure were found: if culprit food was not one of the 13 EU regulated allergens, reintroduction failure at short-term, atypical symptoms during FC, a lower quality of life and a higher state anxiety. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Reintroduction failure after negative FCs in adults is common, increases over time, and is primarily due to atypical symptoms. This stresses the need for more patient-tailored care before and after negative food challenges.

Perceived triggers of asthma impair quality of life in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Data on the impact of the number and nature of perceived asthma triggers on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of perceived asthma triggers on both asthma-specific and generic HRQL in children. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among children (7-18 years) with asthma in secondary and tertiary care. Children were screened with electronic questionnaires regarding respiratory and allergic symptoms. Asthma-specific HRQL was assessed using the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) (score range 1-7) and generic HRQL using the RAND questionnaire (score range 7-32). The Kruskal-Wallis test and one-way ANOVA were used to test the difference of, respectively, the PAQLQ and RAND scores across the number of perceived asthma triggers (0, 1-2, 3-4, or ≥ 5). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between individual triggers and HRQL. RESULTS: A total of 527 children with a mean (SD) age of 12.1 (2.9) years were included. Children with a higher number of perceived triggers had significantly lower PAQLQ and RAND scores (ie poorer HRQL). The difference in PAQLQ scores was clinically relevant between children with 0 versus 3-4 or ≥ 5 triggers and 1-2 versus ≥ 5 triggers (mean difference 0.66, 1.02 and 0.63, respectively). Especially, non-allergic triggers (physical exercise, the weather, (cigarette) smoke and emotions) were significantly associated with reduced PAQLQ scores. Emotions and food/drinks were associated with reduced RAND scores. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A higher number of perceived triggers of asthma were associated with reduced HRQL in children with asthma. Especially, non-allergic triggers were associated with reduced HRQL.

The impact of oral food challenges for food allergy on quality of life: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy significantly impairs health-related quality of life (HRQL). Currently, it is still unknown whether diagnostic interventions for food allergy improve HRQL. We aim to assess the impact of diagnostic interventions for food allergy on HRQL. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL focused on patients with a (suspected) food allergy who underwent diagnostic interventions (ie, skin prick test, specific IgE, or oral food challenges [OFC]) and in whom HRQL was assessed. The mean difference between HRQL before and after the diagnostic intervention was calculated. A minimal clinically important difference of 0.5 was considered clinically relevant for the food allergy quality of life questionnaire. RESULTS: Seven of 1465 original identified publications were included in which the impact of an OFC on HRQL was investigated (total patients n = 1370). No other diagnostic interventions were investigated. Food allergy-specific parent-reported HRQL improved significantly after an OFC irrespective of the outcome in children with a suspected food allergy in two publications. The change was considered clinically relevant in one of two publications. In addition, parent-reported HRQL improved after an OFC to assess the eliciting dose in children with a confirmed food allergy. The parental burden was significantly reduced after an OFC to assess resolution of food allergy. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the limited numbers of, and considerable heterogeneity between, eligible publications. CONCLUSION: An OFC is associated with an improved food allergy-specific HRQL and a reduced parental burden of food allergy.

Characteristics and severity of asthma in children with and without atopic conditions: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Childhood allergic diseases have a major impact on a child's quality of life, as well as that of their parents. We studied the coexistence of reported allergies in children who use asthma medication. Additionally, we tested the hypothesis that asthma severity is greater among children with certain combinations of co-morbid allergic conditions. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, 703 children (ages 4 to 12 years) from the PACMAN cohort study were selected. All of the children were regular users of asthma medication. The study population was divided into nine subgroups according to parental-reported allergies of the child (hay fever, eczema, food allergy or combinations of these). In order to assess whether these subgroups differed clinically, the groups were compared for child characteristics (age, gender, family history of asthma), asthma exacerbations in the past year (oral corticosteroids (OCS) use; asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits), asthma control, fractional exhaled nitric oxide level (FeNO), and antihistaminic usage. RESULTS: In our study, 79.0% of the parents reported that their child suffered from at least one atopic condition (hay fever, food allergy and eczema), and one quarter of the parents (25.6%) reported that their child suffered from all three atopic conditions. Having more than one atopic condition was associated with an increased risk of OCS use (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.6 - 6.6), ED visits (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.2 - 4.6) in the past year and inadequate short term asthma control (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.3 - 2.8). CONCLUSIONS: Children who use asthma medication often also have other allergic conditions. Parental reported allergies were associated with a higher risk of more severe asthma (more asthma complaints and more asthma exacerbations).

Usefulness of open mixed nut challenges to exclude tree nut allergy in children.

BACKGROUND: To minimize the risk of accidental reactions, atopic children with multiple sensitizations to tree nuts are advised to avoid all nuts. Multiple food challenges would be needed to confirm the clinical relevance, but are too burdensome to be practical. The usefulness of open mixed nut challenges in terms of safety, reactions during challenge, tolerance of the challenge material, effect on the elimination diet and satisfaction of the parents was evaluated. FINDINGS: Open mixed nut challenges were performed in 19 children with a previous negative hazelnut challenge and long term elimination diet for tree nuts. Challenges were negative in 13 (68 %) children, in four (21 %) children (non-severe) allergic symptoms were observed. The challenges were well accepted, safe and efficient. We were able to avoid multiple nut challenges in 15 (79 %) children. CONCLUSIONS: Open mixed nut challenge can efficiently exclude multiple tree nut allergies in children with a lifelong nut free diet and low suspicion of clinical allergy.

Standardized food challenges are subject to variability in interpretation of clinical symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Food challenge tests are the gold standard in diagnosing food allergy. Guidelines provide scoring systems to classify symptoms during challenge and typically recommend that challenges are considered positive when objective symptoms occur. However, currently no standard criteria for the definition of a positive challenge outcome exists and interpretation of food challenges mainly depends on clinical judgment. This study aims to assess inter- and intra-observer variability in outcomes of routinely performed peanut challenges in children. METHODS: All complete food challenge score sheets of double blind placebo controlled peanut challenges performed in 2008-2010 in an academic hospital were included. Score sheets were reassessed independently by three clinical experts including double reassessment in a subset of score sheets. Inter- and intra-observer variability was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: We included 191 food challenge score sheets. Inter-observer agreement on overall challenge outcome was moderate (κ = 0.59-0.65) and was fair (κ = 0.31-0.46) on challenges with symptoms. Intra-observer agreement on overall challenge outcome was good (κ = 0.63-0.77) but was moderate (κ = 0.50-0.60) on challenges with symptoms. Subjective symptoms (oral symptoms, abdominal complaints, food aversion) were significantly associated with disagreement between observers. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that, despite strict adherence to guidelines, there is a considerable amount of variability in reassessment of symptoms recorded on food challenges sheets between and within well trained clinicians, especially when subjective symptoms occur.

Reintroduction failure after negative peanut challenges in children.

BACKGROUND: A negative double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) should normally be followed by reintroduction of the food. However, reintroduction fails in a subset of children. The observed reintroduction problems could be due to refusal of the food that long has been avoided, to other behavioural/psychological factors or to false negative DBPCFC outcome. This study analyses the frequency, causes and risk factors for reintroduction failure in children after negative peanut DBPCFC. METHODS: A retrospective study of children with a negative DBPCFC for peanut was performed. During follow-up after DBPCFC, parents were systematically interviewed about the current diet, symptoms and problems during reintroduction, and reactions to peanut after the reintroduction period. Successful reintroduction was defined as eating peanut or products containing peanut as ingredient on a regular basis. RESULTS: Follow-up data were obtained in 103 children with a negative peanut challenge. In 70 (68%) children, reintroduction was successful (54 children tolerated peanut, 16 children tolerated peanut as ingredient). Reintroduction failed in 33 (32%) children. Food refusal (45%) and peanut-related symptoms (33%) were the most reported reasons. Risk factors for reintroduction failure were an elimination diet for more than three other foods (p = 0.019), a long elimination diet for peanut (p = 0.048) and peanut-related symptoms at home (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Reintroduction failure is a common problem in children after negative peanut challenge. To guide reintroduction and identify potential peanut-related symptoms at home, careful follow-up after negative DBPCFC is advised. When symptoms occur or persist, food challenge outcome needs to be reconsidered.

Can we predict severe reactions during peanut challenges in children?

BACKGROUND: Limited and contrasting data are available about risk factors for severe reactions during double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Knowing these risk factors would help to improve safety precautions and choosing the best setting for challenge. We assessed whether we could determine predictors for positive and severe food challenge outcome (FCO) with regular available patient data in children suspected for peanut allergy. METHODS: A retrospective study in children referred for DBPCFC with peanut was performed during a 3-year period. Reactions during challenge were classified as mild/moderate (Sampson's grade 1-3) and severe (Sampson's grade 4-5). We performed uni- and multivariable logistic regression to determine predictors for positive and severe FCO. RESULTS: A group of 225 children with a median age of 6.7 (IQR 5.0-9.5) years were studied. In 109 (48%) children, food challenge outcome was positive and 24 (11%) children developed a severe reaction. The level of sIgE for peanut OR 1.14 (1.08-1.20), male gender OR 0.40 (0.20-0.81), having another food allergy OR 0.43 (0.20-0.88), were independently related to positive FCO. No significant differences were found between children with severe and non-severe FCO with respect to age, gender, asthma, sIgE, or previous reaction to peanut. CONCLUSIONS: Although predictors of positive FCO could be identified, none of the studied risk factors could predict a severe reaction during peanut challenge. When challenging a child sensitized to peanut, clinicians should be prepared and equipped to handle any reaction in all cases.

Inflammatory phenotypes underlying uncontrolled childhood asthma despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment: rationale and design of the PACMAN2 study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of childhood asthma covers a broad spectrum of pathological mechanisms that can lead to similarly presenting clinical symptoms, but may nonetheless require different treatment approaches. Distinct underlying inflammatory patterns are thought to influence responsiveness to standard asthma medication. METHODS/DESIGN: The purpose of the PACMAN2 study is to identify inflammatory phenotypes that can discriminate uncontrolled childhood asthma from controlled childhood asthma by measures in peripheral blood and exhaled air. PACMAN2 is a nested, case-control follow-up study to the ongoing pharmacy-based "Pharmacogenetics of Asthma medication in Children: Medication with Anti-inflammatory effects" (PACMAN) study. The original PACMAN cohort consists of children aged 4-12 years with reported use of asthma medication. The PACMAN2 study will be conducted within the larger PACMAN cohort, and will focus on detailed phenotyping of a subset of the PACMAN children. The selected participants will be invited to a follow-up visit in a clinical setting at least six months after their baseline visit based on their adherence to usage of inhaled corticosteroids, their asthma symptoms in the past year, and their age (≥ 8 years). During the follow-up visit, current and long-term asthma symptoms, medication use, environmental factors, medication adherence and levels of exhaled nitric oxide will be reassessed. The following measures will also be examined: pulmonary function, exhaled volatile organic compounds, as well as inflammatory markers in peripheral blood and blood plasma. Comparative analysis and cluster-analyses will be used to identify markers that differentiate children with uncontrolled asthma despite their use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (cases) from children whose asthma is controlled by the use of ICS (controls). DISCUSSION: Asthmatic children with distinct inflammatory phenotypes may respond differently to anti-inflammatory therapy. Therefore, by identifying inflammatory phenotypes in children with the PACMAN2 study, we may greatly impact future personalised treatment strategies, uncover new leads for therapeutic targets and improve the design of future clinical studies in the assessment of the efficacy of novel therapeutics.

The expert network and electronic portal for children with respiratory and allergic symptoms: rationale and design.

Data on baseline characteristics of children with asthma to predict individual treatment responses are lacking. We aimed to set up a data-collection system which can easily fill this gap in clinical practice.A web-based application was developed, named 'Portal for children with respiratory and allergic symptoms', hereafter called Electronic Portal (EP). It contains health- and disease-related questionnaires on respiratory- and allergic diseases. All patients, 1-18 years of age, with respiratory- and/or allergic complaints are invited to enter the EP before their first visit. By using the EP large amounts of data, gathered during routine patient care can be used for research purposes. This may help to further investigate the different treatment related asthma phenotypes and will be helpful to monitor risk factors for other atopic diseases and respiratory infections.