Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 70(8): 578-585, 2020 Dec 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33073289

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic illnesses can increase the risk of unemployment, but evidence on the specific impact of Q-fever fatigue syndrome (QFS) on work is lacking. AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe and quantify the impact of QFS on work. METHODS: Changes in work status from 1 year prior to 4 years after acute Q-fever infection of QFS patients were retrospectively collected with a self-report questionnaire measuring employment status and hours of paid work per week. In addition, information on work ability, job satisfaction and need for recovery after work was collected in 2016. Data were compared to participants from the general population. RESULTS: The proportion of employed QFS patients from 1 year prior to 4 years after acute infection decreased from 78 to 41%, while remaining relatively constant in the general population (82 to 78%). Working QFS patients showed a decrease in mean hours of paid work from 35 to 22 h per week, which is significantly steeper compared to the general population (31-28 h per week) (P < 0.001). QFS patients showed a significantly lower work ability (P < 0.001), lower job satisfaction (P = 0.006) and greater need for recovery (P < 0.001) compared to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: The number of QFS patients with paid work decreased over the years, while patients who continue to work experience lower work ability, job satisfaction and increased need for recovery. Occupational physicians should be aware of the occurrence and severity of the impact of QFS on work, even after many years.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Fiebre Q , Enfermedad Crónica , Fatiga , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Environ Res ; 146: 27-34, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26710340

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to high ambient temperatures leads to an increase in mortality and morbidity, especially in the elderly. This relationship is usually assessed with outdoor temperature, even though the elderly spend most of their time indoors. Our study investigated the relationship between indoor temperature and heat-related health problems of elderly individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted in the Netherlands between April and August 2012. Temperature and relative humidity were measured continuously in the living rooms and bedrooms of 113 elderly individuals. Respondents were asked to fill out an hourly diary during three weeks with high temperature and one cold reference week, and a questionnaire at the end of these weeks, on health problems that they experienced due to heat. RESULTS: During the warmest week of the study period (14-20 August), average living room and bedroom temperatures were approximately 5°C higher than during the reference week. More than half of the respondents perceived their indoor climate as too warm during this week. The most reported symptoms were thirst (42.7%), sleep disturbance (40.6%) and excessive sweating (39.6%). There was a significant relationship between both indoor and outdoor temperatures with the number of hours that heat-related health problems were reported per day. For an increase of 1°C of indoor temperature, annoyance due to heat and sleep disturbance increased with 33% and 24% respectively. Outdoor temperature was associated with smaller increases: 13% and 11% for annoyance due to heat and sleep disturbance, respectively. The relationship between outdoor temperature and heat-related health problems disappeared when indoor and outdoor temperatures were included in one model. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship with heat-related health problems in the elderly is stronger with indoor (living room and bedroom) temperature than with outdoor temperature. This should be taken into account when looking for measures to reduce heat exposure in this vulnerable group.


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Calor/efectos adversos , Vivienda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Países Bajos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estaciones del Año , Autoinforme
3.
Epidemiol Infect ; 143(12): 2580-7, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25582890

RESUMEN

Q fever patients are often reported to experience a long-term impaired health status, including fatigue, which can persist for many years. During the large Q fever epidemic in The Netherlands, many patients with a laboratory-confirmed Coxiella burnetii infection were not notified as acute Q fever because they did not fulfil the clinical criteria of the acute Q fever case definition (fever, pneumonia and/or hepatitis). Our study assessed and compared the long-term health status of notified and non-notified Q fever patients at 4 years after onset of illness, using the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument (NCSI). The study included 448 notified and 193 non-notified Q fever patients. The most severely affected subdomain in both patient groups was 'Fatigue' (50·5% of the notified and 54·6% of the non-notified patients had severe fatigue). Long-term health status did not differ significantly between the notified and non-notified patient groups, and patients scored worse on all subdomains compared to a healthy reference group. Our findings suggest that the magnitude of the 2007-2009 Q fever outbreak in The Netherlands was underestimated when only notified patients according to the European Union case definition are considered.


Asunto(s)
Notificación de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Fatiga/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Fiebre Q/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Fatiga/microbiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Fiebre Q/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Epidemiol Infect ; 143(1): 48-54, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24625631

RESUMEN

Patients with a lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) might be at risk for long-term impaired health status. We assessed whether LRTI patients without Q fever are equally at risk for developing long-term symptoms compared to LRTI patients with Q fever. The study was a cross-sectional cohort design. Long-term health status information of 50 Q fever-positive and 32 Q fever-negative LRTI patients was obtained. Health status was measured by the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument. The most severely affected subdomains of the Q fever-positive group were 'general quality of life' (40%) and 'fatigue' (40%). The most severely affected subdomains of the Q fever-negative group were 'fatigue' (64%) and 'subjective pulmonary symptoms' (35%). Health status did not differ significantly between Q fever-positive LRTI patients and Q fever-negative LRTI patients for all subdomains, except for 'subjective pulmonary symptoms' (P = 0·048).


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Disnea/epidemiología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA