Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Access ; : 11297298231212754, 2024 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166508

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice. METHODS: The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups. DISCUSSION: As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.

2.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e053108, 2022 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35115352

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Current evidence on vascular access strategies for haemodialysis patients is based on observational studies that are at high risk of selection bias. For elderly patients, autologous arteriovenous fistulas that are typically created in usual care may not be the best option because a significant proportion of fistulas either fail to mature or remain unused. In addition, long-term complications associated with arteriovenous grafts and central venous catheters may be less relevant when considering the limited life expectancy of these patients. Therefore, we designed the Optimising Access Surgery in Senior Haemodialysis Patients (OASIS) trial to determine the best strategy for vascular access creation in elderly haemodialysis patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: OASIS is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with an equal participant allocation in three treatment arms. Patients aged 70 years or older who are expected to initiate haemodialysis treatment in the next 6 months or who have started haemodialysis urgently with a catheter will be enrolled. To detect and exclude patients with an unusually long life expectancy, we will use a previously published mortality prediction model after external validation. Participants allocated to the usual care arm will be treated according to current guidelines on vascular access creation and will undergo fistula creation. Participants allocated to one of the two intervention arms will undergo graft placement or catheter insertion. The primary outcome is the number of access-related interventions required for each patient-year of haemodialysis treatment. We will enrol 195 patients to have sufficient statistical power to detect an absolute decrease of 0.80 interventions per year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because of clinical equipoise, we believe it is justified to randomly allocate elderly patients to the different vascular access strategies. The study was approved by an accredited medical ethics review committee. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and will be implemented in clinical practice guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7933. PROTOCOL VERSION AND DATE: V.5, 25 February 2021.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Anciano , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diálisis Renal/métodos
3.
J Vasc Access ; 22(1): 58-63, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436420

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Chronic renal failure patients with arteriovenous hemodialysis access may exhibit pain and neurological complaints due to local nerve compression by the access conduit vessels of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas or the prosthesis of arteriovenous grafts. In this study, we have examined the results of surgical intervention for vascular access-related nerve compression in the upper extremity. METHODS: A single center retrospective study was performed of all patients referred for persistent pain and neurological complaints after vascular access surgery for hemodialysis. There were four brachial-cephalic, three brachial-basilic upper arm arteriovenous fistulas, and three prosthetic arteriovenous grafts. All patients had pain and sensory deficits in a distinct nerve territory (median nerve: 6; median + ulnar nerve: 1; medial cutaneous nerve: 1), and two patients had additional motor deficits (median nerve). RESULTS: A total of 10 patients (mean age: 59 years; range: 25-73 years; 2 men; 4 diabetics) were treated by surgical nerve release alone (2 patients) or in combination with access revision (8 patients). Mean follow-up was 23 months (range: 8-46 months). Direct complete relief of symptoms was achieved in six patients. Three patients had minor complaints, and one patient had a reoperation with good success. CONCLUSION: Vascular access-related nerve compression is an uncommon cause for pain, sensory and motor deficits after vascular access surgery. Surgical nerve release and access revision have good clinical outcome with relief of symptoms and maintenance of the access site in the majority of patients.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/cirugía , Diálisis Renal , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Superior/inervación , Adulto , Anciano , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1642020 11 05.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33331724

RESUMEN

A novel endovascular technique allows percutaneous creation of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. The proximal radial artery is cannulated through the perforating vein in the cubital fossa using ultrasound guidance. A fused anastomosis between these blood vessels is created using heat and pressure. This results in an arteriovenous fistula that can be regarded as an alternative for a surgically created brachiocephalic fistula. In our early experience, this new technique is safe and successful. Moreover, no complications due to high-flow fistulas have been reported with this technique to date. Nevertheless, the intervention rate and the cost effectiveness of the new endovascular technique need to be compared to traditional open surgery before it can be considered standard clinical care.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Venas/cirugía , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 60(1): 98-106, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32340878

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) needs to mature before it becomes suitable to cannulate for haemodialysis treatment. Maturation importantly depends on the post-operative flow increase. Unfortunately, 20-40% of AVFs fail to mature (FTM). A patient specific computational model that predicts immediate post-operative flow was developed, and it was hypothesised that providing information from this model for planning of fistula creation might reduce FTM rates. METHODS: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial in nine Dutch hospitals was conducted in which patients with renal failure who were referred for AVF creation, were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the control or computer simulation group. Both groups underwent a work up, with physical and duplex ultrasonography (DUS) examination. In the simulation group the data from the DUS examination were used for model simulations, and based on the immediate post-operative flow prediction, the ideal AVF configuration was recommended. The primary endpoint was AVF maturation defined as an AVF flow ≥500 mL/min and a vein inner diameter of ≥4 mm six weeks post-operatively. The secondary endpoint was model performance (i.e. comparisons between measured and predicted flows, and (multivariable) regression analysis for maturation probability with accompanying area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC]). RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were randomly assigned (116 in the control and 120 in the simulation group), of whom 205 (100 and 105 respectively) were analysed for the primary endpoint. There was no difference in FTM rates between the groups (29% and 32% respectively). Immediate post-operative flow prediction had an OR of 1.15 (1.06-1.26; p < .001) per 100 mL/min for maturation, and the accompanying AUC was 0.67 (0.59-0.75). CONCLUSION: Providing pre-operative patient specific flow simulations during surgical planning does not result in improved maturation rates. Further study is needed to improve the predictive power of these simulations in order to render the computational model an adjunct to surgical planning.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirugía , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Remodelación Vascular , Anciano , Circulación Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 59(2): 277-287, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31911136

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to observe the natural haemodynamic changes after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in haemodialysis patients with and without a previous ipsilateral vascular access. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single centre cohort study. Patient demographics were registered and pre- and post-operative vessel ultrasound examinations were performed at regular follow up intervals. Arteriovenous fistula outcomes in terms of vessel diameter and access flow enhancement were determined for radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, and brachiobasilic AVFs. RESULTS: In total, 331 patients (median age 66 years, 60% male) with 366 new autologous AVFs were studied, of whom 112 patients had a previous ipsilateral vascular access (VA). Patients with a previous ipsilateral VA had a statistically significantly greater pre-operative brachial artery diameter (4.4 mm) and flow (106 mL/min), and basilic vein diameter (4.9 mm), compared with patients without a previous ipsilateral VA (4.0 mm, 54 mL/min, and 4.3 mm, respectively). For all AVF configurations these differences gradually disappeared over three months after AVF creation. The haemodynamic changes reached a plateau at three months, and were statistically significantly accelerated in patients with a previous ipsilateral VA. There were no differences in primary failure or high flow complications between both groups. CONCLUSION: Arteriovenous fistulae show haemodynamic and remodelling changes up to three months post-operatively. Previous ipsilateral VAs may initiate vessel preconditioning, and accelerate the observed haemodynamic changes after AVF creation. However, this preconditioning does not result in a beneficial or detrimental effect on VA function.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Remodelación Vascular/fisiología , Anciano , Arteria Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Arteria Braquial/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular/fisiología , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/fisiopatología , Venas/cirugía
7.
Perit Dial Int ; 38(2): 104-112, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29386303

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best operation technique, open versus laparoscopic, for insertion of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter with regard to clinical success. Clinical success was defined as an adequate function of the catheter 2 - 4 weeks after insertion. METHODS: All patients with end-stage renal disease who were suitable for PD and gave informed consent were randomized for either open surgery or laparoscopic surgery. A previous laparotomy was not considered an exclusion criterion. Laparoscopic placement had the advantage of pre-peritoneal tunneling, the possibility for adhesiolysis, and placement of the catheter under direct vision. Catheter fixation techniques, omentopexy, or other adjunct procedures were not performed. Other measured parameters were in-hospital morbidity and mortality and post-operative infections. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2016, 95 patients were randomized to this study protocol. After exclusion of 5 patients for various reasons, 44 patients received an open procedure and 46 patients a laparoscopic procedure. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, current hemodialysis, severe heart failure, and previous an abdominal operation were not significantly different between the groups. However, in the open surgery group, fewer patients had a previous median laparotomy compared with the laparoscopic group (6 vs 16 patients; p = 0.027). There was no statistically significant difference in mean operation time (36 ± 24 vs 38 ± 15 minutes) and hospital stay (2.1 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 7.3 days) between the groups. In the open surgery group 77% of the patients had an adequate functioning catheter 2 - 4 weeks after insertion compared with 70% of patients in the laparoscopic group (p = not significant [NS]). In the open surgery group there was 1 post-operative death (2%) compared with none in the laparoscopic group (p = NS). The morbidity in both groups was low and not significantly different. In the open surgery group, 2 patients had an exit-site infection and 1 patient had a paramedian wound infection. In the laparoscopic group, 1 patient had a transient cardiac event, 1 patient had intraabdominal bleeding requiring reoperation, and 1 patient had fluid leakage that could be managed conservatively. The survival curve demonstrated a good long-term function of PD. CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing open vs laparoscopic placement of PD catheters demonstrates equal clinical success rates between the 2 techniques. Advanced laparoscopic techniques such as catheter fixation techniques and omentopexy might further improve clinical outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Laparoscopía , Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud
8.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 55(2): 240-248, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29307757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maturation failure is the major obstacle to establishing functional arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) for haemodialysis treatment. Various endovascular and surgical techniques have been advocated to enhance fistula maturation and to increase the number of functional AVFs. This narrative review considers the available evidence of interventional techniques for treatment of AVF non-maturation. RESULTS: Intra-operative vein dilation and anastomosis modification results in a clinical maturation rate of 74-92% and a 6 month cumulative AVF patency of 79-93%. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with or without accessory vein obliteration is successful in 43-97% of patients. The long-term primary patency of PTA is rather low and multiple re-interventions are needed to achieve an acceptable cumulative fistula patency. The results of surgical revision exceed the results of endovascular intervention, with a mean primary one year patency of 73% (range 68-78%) compared with 49% (range 28-72%), respectively. The role of accessory vein obliteration remains unclear. CONCLUSION: Intervention for autologous arteriovenous fistula non-maturation is worthwhile and results in an increased number of functional fistulae. The outcome of surgical revision is better than endovascular and might be preferable in certain patient populations.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia/métodos , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Reoperación/métodos , Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Angioplastia/instrumentación , Arterias/fisiopatología , Arterias/cirugía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Venas/fisiopatología , Venas/cirugía
9.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 54(5): 613-619, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28947359

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although clinical guidelines on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation advocate minimum luminal arterial and venous diameters, assessed by duplex ultrasonography (DUS), the clinical value of routine DUS examination is under debate. DUS might be an insufficiently repeatable and/or reproducible imaging modality because of its operator dependency. The present study aimed to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement of DUS examination in support of AVF surgery planning. METHODS: Ten end stage renal disease patients were included, to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement of pre-operative DUS measurements. All measurements were performed by two trained and experienced vascular technicians, blinded to measurement readings. From the routine DUS protocol, representative measurements (venous diameters, and arterial diameters and volume flow in the upper arm and forearm) were selected. For intra-observer agreement the measurements were performed in triplicate, with the probe released from the skin between each. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intra- and inter-observer agreement, and Bland-Altman plots used to graphically display mean measurement differences and limits of agreement. RESULTS: Ten patients (6 male, 59.4±19.7 years) consented to participate, and all predefined measurements were obtained. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra-observer agreement of diameter measurements were at least 0.90 (95% CI 0.74-0.97; radial artery). Inter-observer agreement was at least 0.83 (0.46-0.96; lateral diameter upper arm cephalic vein). The Bland-Altman plots showed acceptable mean measurement differences and limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement can be reached for the discrete pre-operative DUS measurements advocated in clinical guidelines. DUS is therefore a reliable imaging modality to support AVF surgery planning. The content of DUS protocols, however, needs further standardisation.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
10.
J Vasc Access ; 18(Suppl. 1): 118-124, 2017 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28297050

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, 20-40% of all constructed AVFs fail to mature (FTM), and are therefore not usable for hemodialysis. AVF maturation importantly depends on postoperative blood volume flow. Predicting patient-specific immediate postoperative flow could therefore support surgical planning. A computational model predicting blood volume flow is available, but the effect of blood flow predictions on the clinical endpoint of maturation (at least 500 mL/min blood volume flow, diameter of the venous cannulation segment ≥4 mm) remains undetermined. METHODS: A multicenter randomized clinical trial will be conducted in which 372 patients will be randomized (1:1 allocation ratio) between conventional healthcare and computational model-aided decision making. All patients are extensively examined using duplex ultrasonography (DUS) during preoperative assessment (12 venous and 11 arterial diameter measurements; 3 arterial volume flow measurements). The computational model will predict patient-specific immediate postoperative blood volume flows based on this DUS examination. Using these predictions, the preferred AVF configuration is recommended for the individual patient (radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, or brachiobasilic). The primary endpoint is FTM rate at six weeks in both groups, secondary endpoints include AVF functionality and patency rates at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02453412), and ToetsingOnline.nl (NL51610.068.14).


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Arteria Braquial/cirugía , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Modelación Específica para el Paciente , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Diálisis Renal , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Venas/cirugía , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Arteria Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Países Bajos , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/fisiopatología , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Proyectos de Investigación , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/fisiopatología
11.
J Vasc Access ; 16 Suppl 9: S11-5, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25751544

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In the Netherlands, 86% of patients start renal replacement therapy with chronic intermittent hemodialysis (HD). Guidelines do indicate predialysis care and maintenance of a well-functioning vascular access (VA) as critical issues in the management of the renal failure patient. Referral to the surgeon and time to VA creation are important determinants of the type and success of the VA and HD treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from a national questionnaire showed that time from referral to the surgeon and actual access creation is <4 weeks in 43%, 4 to 8 weeks in 30% and >8 weeks in 27% of the centers. Preoperative ultrasonography and postoperative access flowmetry are the diagnostic methods in the majority of centers (98%). Most facilities perform rope-ladder cannulation with occasionally the buttonhole technique for selected patients in 87% of the dialysis units. Endovascular intervention for thrombosis is practiced by 13%, surgical thrombectomy by 21% and either endovascular or surgery by 66% of the centers. Weekly multidisciplinary meetings are organized in 57% of the units. Central vein catheters are inserted by radiologists (36%), nephrologists and surgeons (32%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that guidelines implementation has been successful in particular regarding issues as preoperative patient assessment for VA creation and postoperative surveillance in combination with (preemptive) endovascular intervention, leading to very acceptable VA thrombosis rates.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/normas , Obstrucción del Catéter/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Adhesión a Directriz , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta , Diálisis Renal/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trombosis/diagnóstico , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 25(1): 225-30, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19717827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rope-ladder puncture technique, with cannulation along the whole length of the vessel traject, has been very common in haemodialysis patients with autogenous arterio-venous fistula (AVF). Today's dialysis population with AVF may exhibit difficult cannulation, because of a short vein length or a complicated cannulation route. An alternative needling possibility is the buttonhole (BH) technique, which inserts needles at exactly the same location during every dialysis session. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of both cannulation techniques on the incidence of vascular access (VA) complications. METHODS: A total of 75 prevalent haemodialysis patients with autogenous AVF using the BH technique were compared with 70 patients using the rope-ladder technique. The following parameters were registered: haematoma occurrence, redness, swelling, aneurysm formation, the use of sharp or dull needles, miscannulations, and interventions. Needling pain and fear of puncture were assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS). The duration of the follow-up was 9 months. RESULTS: Patients in the BH group had more unsuccessful cannulations, compared with the rope-ladder method (P < 0.0001), but the frequency of haematoma (P < 0.0001) and aneurysm formation (P < 0.0001) was less. In addition, intervention such as angioplasty (P < 0.0001) was higher in patients using the rope-ladder technique. A negative outcome of the BH technique was the higher incidence of access infections compared to the rope-ladder method. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the BH method is a valuable technique with few complications like haematoma, aneurysm formation and the need for interventions. However, the infections induced by the BH method should not be underestimated. This underlines the importance of an aseptic and correct technique of the buttonhole procedure.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma/etiología , Cateterismo/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hematoma/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agujas
13.
Hemodial Int ; 13(4): 498-504, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19840142

RESUMEN

Little is known about cannulation of the vascular access (VA), such as the number of successful cannulation procedures, frequency of complications caused by cannulation, and VA failure. Incident patients were followed for 6 months, from the first successful cannulation with 2 needles--both used for the hemodialysis treatment. Data included patient characteristics, comorbidities, and medication. Vascular access characteristics included: type of VA and location, vein diameter assessed by Duplex ultrasound, length of the cannulation route, and maturation period. Longitudinal data were collected by dialysis nurses, using identical questionnaires, and a standardized method to register data from each dialysis session. Among 10 Dutch dialysis facilities, clinical data from 120 patients were collected from June 2005 to March 2007. The use of autogenous arteriovenous fistulae (P<0.001) and limited length of the cannulation route (P<0.003) negatively affect the outcome of cannulation and complications such as use of single-needle (SN) dialysis and central vein catheters (CVC). Previous use of CVC and SN hemodialysis were significant predictors for VA failure (P<0.0001). The present study demonstrated that during the first 6 months of a newly placed VA, a huge number of cannulation-related complications such as miscannulation, use of CVC, and SN dialysis are encountered. Despite the fact that guidelines recommended the arteriovenous fistulae as the preferred VA, cannulation-related complications can lead to increased morbidity. The length of the cannulation route positively correlates with successful cannulation. Therefore, adjusted cannulation techniques might be indicated to improve VA outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia , Adulto Joven
14.
J Ren Care ; 35(2): 82-9, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19432853

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relationship of cannulation practices in dialysis facilities with the frequency of failed cannulations, complications and subsequent vascular access (VA) failure. METHODS: In an observational study the incidence of mis-cannulations and related complications were observed. Patient characteristics, comorbidities and VA characteristics like type of VA were correlated with occurrence of cannulation-related complications. In addition, the cannulation technique and practice patterns like needle direction, tourniquet use and years of experience of dialysis nurses were registered. RESULTS: During the study period, 37% of patients with autogenous arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), and 19% of patients with arteriovenous grafts (AVG) had more than 10 miscannulations. Cannulation-induced haematoma resulted into single-needle (SN) and catheter dialysis in 40% of the patients. The use of central venous catheters (CVC) and SN dialysis were significant predictors of VA failure (p <0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a high incidence of unsuccessful cannulation procedures and cannulation-related complications necessitating catheter and SN dialysis. The type and location of the VA is significantly related to occurrence of unsuccessful and complicated cannulation.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Prótesis Vascular , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo/enfermería , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Diálisis Renal/enfermería , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA