The Association between Intracranial Calcifications and Symptoms in Patients with Primary Familial Brain Calcification.

(1) Background: Primary Familial Brain Calcification (PFBC) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by bilateral calcifications of the basal ganglia and other intracranial areas. Many patients experience symptoms of motor dysfunction and cognitive disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the amount and location of intracranial calcifications with these symptoms. (2) Methods: Patients with suspected PFBC referred to our outpatient clinic underwent a clinical work-up. Intracranial calcifications were visualized on Computed Tomography (CT), and a Total Calcification Score (TCS) was constructed. Logistic and linear regression models were performed. (3) Results: Fifty patients with PFBC were included in this study (median age 64.0 years, 50% women). Of the forty-one symptomatic patients (82.0%), 78.8% showed motor dysfunction, and 70.7% showed cognitive disorders. In multivariate analysis, the TCS was associated with bradykinesia/hypokinesia (OR 1.07, 95%-CI 1.02-1.12, p < 0.01), gait ataxia (OR 1.06, 95%-CI 1.00-1.12, p = 0.04), increased fall risk (OR 1.04, 95%-CI 1.00-1.08, p = 0.03), and attention/processing speed disorders (OR 1.06, 95%-CI 1.01-1.12, p = 0.02). Calcifications of the lentiform nucleus and subcortical white matter were associated with motor and cognitive disorders. (4) Conclusions: cognitive and motor symptoms are common among patients with PFBC, and there is an association between intracranial calcifications and these symptoms.

Amount and Distribution of Intracranial Calcification in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Primary Familial Brain Calcification.

Background and Objectives: In clinical practice, it can be difficult to differentiate between intracranial calcifications related to primary familial brain calcification (PFBC) or aging. Also, little is known about the consequences of the amount of intracranial calcifications in patients with PFBC. Therefore, we aimed to compare the amount and distribution of intracranial calcifications in persons with PFBC with controls and between asymptomatic and symptomatic PFBC cases. Methods: This was a case-control study including patients with PFBC and controls. Controls received a CT of the brain because of a trauma and had at least some basal ganglia calcification. The Nicolas score and volume of calcification were used to quantify intracranial calcifications on the CT scans. Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to calculate optimal cutoff points to discriminate between cases and controls. Mann-Whitney U tests and logistic regression, adjusted for age and sex, were used to compare the amount of calcification. Results: Twenty-eight cases (median age 65 years, 50.0% male) and 90 controls (median age 74 years, 46.1% male) were included. Calcification scores were higher in cases (median volume: 4.91 cm3 against 0.03 cm3, p < 0.001, median Nicolas score: 26.5 against 2.0, p < 0.001) than controls. Calcifications were also more diffusely distributed in cases. To differentiate between cases and controls, optimal cutoff points were ≥0.2 cm3 for the calcification volume and ≥6.0 for the Nicolas score. Calcification was higher for symptomatic than asymptomatic cases (calcification volume: 13.62 cm3 against 1.61 cm3, p = 0.01, Nicolas score: 39.0 against 15.5, p = 0.02). After adjustment for age and sex, the Nicolas score remained significantly higher in symptomatic patients, and the calcification volume did not. Discussion: Patients with PFBC had more severe intracranial calcifications, and these calcifications were more diffusely distributed through the brain compared with controls. Symptomatic patients with PFBC might have more intracranial calcifications than asymptomatic persons.

Diagnostic radiation exposure in children with spinal dysraphism: an estimation of the cumulative effective dose in a cohort of 135 children from The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: Based on the assumption that children with spinal dysraphism are exposed to a large amount of ionising radiation for diagnostic purposes, our objective was to estimate this exposure, expressed in cumulative effective dose. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The Netherlands. PATIENTS: 135 patients with spinal dysraphism and under 18 years of age treated at our institution between 1991 and 2010. RESULTS: A total of 5874 radiological procedures were assessed of which 2916 (49.6%) involved ionising radiation. Mean cumulative effective dose of a child with spinal dysraphism during childhood was 23 mSv, while the individual cumulative effective dose ranged from 0.1 to 103 mSv. Although direct radiography accounted for 81.7% of examinations, the largest contributors to the cumulative effective dose were fluoroscopic examinations (40.4% of total cumulative effective dose). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to ionising radiation and associated cancer risk were lower than expected. Nevertheless, the use of ionising radiation should always be justified and the medical benefits should outweigh the risk of health detriment, especially in children.