Emergency Care for High-Altitude Trekking and Climbing.

Introduction: High altitude regions are characterized by harsh conditions (environmental, rough terrain, natural hazards, and limited hygiene and health care), which all may contribute to the risk of accidents/emergencies when trekking or climbing. Exposure to hypoxia, cold, wind, and solar radiation are typical features of the high altitude environment. Emergencies in these remote areas place high demands on the diagnostic and treatment skills of doctors and first-aiders. The aim of this review is to give insights on providing the best possible care for victims of emergencies at high altitude. Methods: Authors provide clinical recommendations based on their real-world experience, complemented by appropriate recent studies and internationally reputable guidelines. Results and Discussion: This review covers most of the emergencies/health issues that can occur when trekking or during high altitude climbing, that is, high altitude illnesses and hypothermia, freezing cold injuries, accidents, for example, with severe injuries due to falling, cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses, abdominal, musculoskeletal, eye, dental, and skin issues. We give a summary of current recommendations for emergency care and pain relief in case of these various incidents.

Effect of oxygen supplementation on cognitive performance among HEMS providers after acute exposure to altitude: the HEMS II randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Emergency medical services (EMS) providers transiently ascend to high altitude for primary missions and secondary transports in mountainous areas in helicopters that are unpressurised and do not have facilities for oxygen supplementation. The decrease in cerebral oxygen saturation can lead to impairment in attention and reaction time as well as in quality of care during acute exposure to altitude. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of oxygen supplementation on cognitive performance in Helicopter EMS (HEMS) providers during acute exposure to altitude. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This interventional, randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial was conducted in October 2021. Each trial used a simulated altitude scenario equivalent to 4000 m, in which volunteers were exposed to hypobaric hypoxia with a constant rate of ascent of 4 m/s in an environmental chamber under controlled, replicable, and safe conditions. Trials could be voluntarily terminated at any time. Inclusion criteria were being members of emergency medical services and search and rescue services with an age between 18 and 60 years and an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I. EXPOSURES: Each participant conducted 2 trials, one in which they were exposed to altitude with oxygen supplementation (intervention trial) and the other in which they were exposed to altitude with ambient air supplementation (control trial). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Measurements included peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), cerebral oxygenation (ScO2), breathing and heart rates, Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT), Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), n-Back test (2-BACK), the Grooved Pegboard test, and questionnaires on subjective performance, stress, workload, and positive and negative affect. Paired t-tests were used to compare conditions (intervention vs. control). Data were further analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE). RESULTS: A total of 36 volunteers (30 men; mean [SD] age, 36 [9] years; mean [SD] education, 17 [4] years) were exposed to the intervention and control trials. The intervention trials, compared with the control trials, had higher values of SpO2 (mean [SD], 97.9 [1.6] % vs. 86 [2.3] %, t-test, p = 0.004) and ScO2 (mean [SD], 69.9 [5.8] % vs. 62.1 [5.2] %, paired t-test, p = 0.004). The intervention trials compared with the control trials had a shorter reaction time (RT) on the PVT after 5 min (mean [SD], 277.8 [16.7] ms vs. 282.5 [15.3] ms, paired t-test, p = 0.006) and after 30 min (mean [SD], 276.9 [17.7] ms vs. 280.7 [15.0] ms, paired t-test, p = 0.054) at altitude. While controlling for other variables, there was a RT increase of 0.37 ms for each % of SpO2 decrease. The intervention trials showed significantly higher values for DSST number of correct responses (with a difference of mean [SD], 1.2 [3.2], paired t-test, p = 0.035). Variables in the intervention trials were otherwise similar to those in the control trials for DSST number of incorrect responses, 2-BACK, and the Grooved Pegboard test. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial found that oxygen supplementation improves cognitive performance among HEMS providers during acute exposure to 4000 m altitude. The use of oxygen supplementation may allow to maintain attention and timely reaction in HEMS providers. The impact of repeated altitude ascents on the same day, sleep-deprivation, and additional stressors should be investigated. Trial registration NCT05073406, ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration.

Personal Protective Equipment Protocols Lead to a Delayed Initiation of Patient Assessment in Mountain Rescue Operations.

van Veelen, Michiel J., Giulia Roveri, Ivo B. Regli, Tomas Dal Cappello, Anna Vögele, Michela Masè, Marika Falla, and Giacomo Strapazzon. Personal protective equipment protocols lead to a delayed initiation of patient assessment in mountain rescue operations. High Alt Med Biol. 24:127-131, 2023. Introduction: Mountain rescue operations can be challenging in austere environmental conditions and remote settings. Airborne infection prevention measures include donning of personal protective equipment (PPE), potentially delaying the approach to a patient. We aimed to investigate the time delay caused by these prevention measures. Methods: This randomized crossover trial consisted of 24 rescue simulation trials intended to be as realistic as possible, performed by mountain rescue teams in difficult terrain. We analyzed the time needed to perform an airborne infection prevention protocol during the approach to a patient. Time delays in scenarios involving patients already wearing versus not wearing face masks and gloves were compared using a linear mixed model Results: The airborne infection prevention measures (i.e., screening questionnaire, hand antisepsis, and donning of PPE) resulted in a time delay of 98 ± 48 (26-214) seconds on initiation of patient assessment. There was a trend to a shorter time to perform infection prevention measures if the simulated patient was already wearing PPE consisting of face mask and gloves (p = 0.052). Conclusion: Airborne infection prevention measures may delay initiation of patient assessment in mountain rescue operations and could impair clinical outcomes in time-sensitive conditions. Trial registration number 0105095-BZ Ethics Committee review board of Bolzano.

Hypothermia in Trauma.

Hypothermia in trauma patients is a common condition. It is aggravated by traumatic hemorrhage, which leads to hypovolemic shock. This hypovolemic shock results in a lethal triad of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis, leading to ongoing bleeding. Additionally, hypothermia in trauma patients can deepen through environmental exposure on the scene or during transport and medical procedures such as infusions and airway management. This vicious circle has a detrimental effect on the outcome of major trauma patients. This narrative review describes the main factors to consider in the co-existing condition of trauma and hypothermia from a prehospital and emergency medical perspective. Early prehospital recognition and staging of hypothermia are crucial to triage to proper care to improve survival. Treatment of hypothermia should start in an early stage, especially the prevention of further cooling in the prehospital setting and during the primary assessment. On the one hand, active rewarming is the treatment of choice of hypothermia-induced coagulation disorder in trauma patients; on the other hand, accidental or clinically induced hypothermia might improve outcomes by protecting against the effects of hypoperfusion and hypoxic injury in selected cases such as patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) or traumatic cardiac arrest.

COVID-19 Pandemic in Mountainous Areas: Impact, Mitigation Strategies, and New Technologies in Search and Rescue Operations.

van Veelen, Michiel J., Anna Voegele, Simon Rauch, Marc Kaufmann, Hermann Brugger, and Giacomo Strapazzon. COVID-19 pandemic in mountainous areas: impact, mitigation strategies, and new technologies in search and rescue operations. High Alt Med Biol. 22:335-341, 2021.-Mitigating the spread of COVID-19, an airborne infection, can lead to delays in the prehospital response and impair the performance of search and rescue (SAR) services in mountainous and remote areas. We provide an overview of the developing epidemiological situation related to the COVID-19 pandemic in mountainous areas and review current protocols to determine their suitability for mountain rescue teams. We also discuss using novel technologies to reduce the adverse effects caused by COVID-19 mitigation strategies such as delays caused by donning personal protective equipment (PPE) and reduced rescuer performance due to impaired movement and ventilation. COVID-19 has spread even in mountainous and remote locations. Dedicated protocols for the use of PPE appropriate for SAR rescuers exerting physical effort in remote areas and using technologies such as drones, telemedicine, and localization and contact tracing applications could contribute to an effective and timely emergency response in mountainous and remote settings.

The use of an 'acclimatisation' heatwave measure to compare temperature-related demand for emergency services in Australia, Botswana, Netherlands, Pakistan, and USA.

BACKGROUND: Heatwaves have been linked to increased risk of mortality and morbidity and are projected to increase in frequency and intensity due to climate change. The current study uses emergency department (ED) data from Australia, Botswana, Netherlands, Pakistan, and the United States of America to evaluate the impact of heatwaves on ED attendances, admissions and mortality. METHODS: Routinely collected time series data were obtained from 18 hospitals. Two separate thresholds (≥4 and ≥7) of the acclimatisation excess heat index (EHIaccl) were used to define "hot days". Analyses included descriptive statistics, independent samples T-tests to determine differences in case mix between hot days and other days, and threshold regression to determine which temperature thresholds correspond to large increases in ED attendances. FINDINGS: In all regions, increases in temperature that did not coincide with time to acclimatise resulted in increases in ED attendances, and the EHIaccl performed in a similar manner. During hot days in California and The Netherlands, significantly more children ended up in the ED, while in Pakistan more elderly people attended. Hot days were associated with more patient admissions in the ages 5-11 in California, 65-74 in Karachi, and 75-84 in The Hague. During hot days in The Hague, patients with psychiatric symptoms were more likely to die. The current study did not identify a threshold temperature associated with particularly large increases in ED demand. INTERPRETATION: The association between heat and ED demand differs between regions. A limitation of the current study is that it does not consider delayed effects or influences of other environmental factors. Given the association between heat and ED use, hospitals and governmental authorities should recognise the demands that heat can place on local health care systems. These demands differ substantially between regions, with Pakistan being the most heavily affected within our study sample.

Effects of a general practitioner cooperative co-located with an emergency department on patient throughput.

BACKGROUND: In 2013 a General Practitioner Cooperative (GPC) was introduced at the Emergency Department (ED) of our hospital. One of the aims of this co-located GPC was to improve throughput of the remaining patients at the ED. To determine the change in patient flow, we assessed the number of self-referrals, redirection of self-referrals to the GPC and back to the ED, as well as ward and ICU admission rates and length of stay of the remaining ED population. METHODS: We conducted a four months' pre-post comparison before and after the implementation of a co-located GPC with an urban ED in the Netherlands. RESULTS: More than half of our ED patients were self-referrals. At triage, 54.5% of these self-referrals were redirected to the GPC. After assessment at the GPC, 8.5% of them were referred back to the ED. The number of patients treated at the ED declined with 20.3% after the introduction of the GPC. In the remaining ED population, there was a significant increase of highly urgent patients (P<0.001), regular admissions (P<0.001), and ICU admissions (P<0.001). Despite the decline of the number of patients at the ED, the total length of stay of patients treated at the ED increased from 14 682 hours in the two months' control period to 14 962 hours in the two months' intervention period, a total increase of 270 hours in two months (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Introduction of a GPC led to efficient redirection of self-referrals but failed to improve throughput of the remaining patients at the ED.