Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Public Health ; 2024 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905592

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action. METHODS: National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country. RESULTS: Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.

2.
Genet Med ; 26(5): 101101, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38362852

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Females with biallelic CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) more often develop multiple breast cancers than individuals with monoallelic CHEK2 gPVs. This study is aimed at expanding the knowledge on the occurrence of other malignancies. METHODS: Exome sequencing of individuals who developed multiple primary malignancies identified 3 individuals with the CHEK2 (NM_007194.4) c.1100del p.(Thr367MetfsTer15) loss-of-function gPV in a biallelic state. We collected the phenotypes of an additional cohort of individuals with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs (n = 291). RESULTS: In total, 157 individuals (53.4%; 157/294 individuals) developed ≥1 (pre)malignancy. The most common (pre)malignancies next to breast cancer were colorectal- (n = 19), thyroid- (n = 19), and prostate (pre)malignancies (n = 12). Females with biallelic CHEK2 loss-of-function gPVs more frequently developed ≥2 (pre)malignancies and at an earlier age compared with females biallelic for the CHEK2 c.470T>C p.(Ile157Thr) missense variant. Furthermore, 26 males (31%; 26/84 males) with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs developed ≥1 (pre)malignancies of 15 origins. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that CHEK2 biallelic gPVs likely increase the susceptibility to develop multiple malignancies in various tissues, both in females and males. However, it is possible that a substantial proportion of individuals with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs is missed as diagnostic testing for CHEK2 often is limited to individuals who developed breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Quinasa de Punto de Control 2 , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alelos , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Quinasa de Punto de Control 2/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Secuenciación del Exoma/métodos , Mutación de Línea Germinal/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Fenotipo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
3.
Eur J Pediatr ; 182(6): 2683-2692, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36997769

RESUMEN

The introduction of rapid exome sequencing (rES) for critically ill neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit has made it possible to impact clinical decision-making. Unbiased prospective studies to quantify the impact of rES over routine genetic testing are, however, scarce. We performed a clinical utility study to compare rES to conventional genetic diagnostic workup for critically ill neonates with suspected genetic disorders. In a multicenter prospective parallel cohort study involving five Dutch NICUs, we performed rES in parallel to routine genetic testing for 60 neonates with a suspected genetic disorder and monitored diagnostic yield and the time to diagnosis. To assess the economic impact of rES, healthcare resource use was collected for all neonates. rES detected more conclusive genetic diagnoses than routine genetic testing (20% vs. 10%, respectively), in a significantly shorter time to diagnosis (15 days (95% CI 10-20) vs. 59 days (95% CI 23-98, p < 0.001)). Moreover, rES reduced genetic diagnostic costs by 1.5% (€85 per neonate). CONCLUSION:  Our findings demonstrate the clinical utility of rES for critically ill neonates based on increased diagnostic yield, shorter time to diagnosis, and net healthcare savings. Our observations warrant the widespread implementation of rES as first-tier genetic test in critically ill neonates with disorders of suspected genetic origin. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Rapid exome sequencing (rES) enables diagnosing rare genetic disorders in a fast and reliable manner, but retrospective studies with neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) indicated that genetic disorders are likely underdiagnosed as rES is not routinely used. • Scenario modeling for implementation of rES for neonates with presumed genetic disorders indicated an expected increase in costs associated with genetic testing. WHAT IS NEW: • This unique prospective national clinical utility study of rES in a NICU setting shows that rES obtained more and faster diagnoses than conventional genetic tests. • Implementation of rES as replacement for all other genetic tests does not increase healthcare costs but in fact leads to a reduction in healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Pruebas Genéticas , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Secuenciación del Exoma , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Países Bajos , Estudios de Cohortes , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos
4.
HGG Adv ; 4(2): 100181, 2023 04 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36785559

RESUMEN

A significant number of individuals with a rare disorder such as Usher syndrome (USH) and (non-)syndromic autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (arRP) remain genetically unexplained. Therefore, we assessed subjects suspected of USH2A-associated disease and no or mono-allelic USH2A variants using whole genome sequencing (WGS) followed by an improved pipeline for variant interpretation to provide a conclusive diagnosis. One hundred subjects were screened using WGS to identify causative variants in USH2A or other USH/arRP-associated genes. In addition to the existing variant interpretation pipeline, a particular focus was put on assessing splice-affecting properties of variants, both in silico and in vitro. Also structural variants were extensively addressed. For variants resulting in pseudoexon inclusion, we designed and evaluated antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) using minigene splice assays and patient-derived photoreceptor precursor cells. Biallelic variants were identified in 49 of 100 subjects, including novel splice-affecting variants and structural variants, in USH2A or arRP/USH-associated genes. Thirteen variants were shown to affect USH2A pre-mRNA splicing, including four deep-intronic USH2A variants resulting in pseudoexon inclusion, which could be corrected upon AON treatment. We have shown that WGS, combined with a thorough variant interpretation pipeline focused on assessing pre-mRNA splicing defects and structural variants, is a powerful method to provide subjects with a rare genetic condition, a (likely) conclusive genetic diagnosis. This is essential for the development of future personalized treatments and for patients to be eligible for such treatments.


Asunto(s)
Retinitis Pigmentosa , Síndromes de Usher , Humanos , Síndromes de Usher/diagnóstico , Precursores del ARN , Mutación , Linaje , Retinitis Pigmentosa/diagnóstico , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , Proteínas de la Matriz Extracelular/genética
5.
Front Genet ; 14: 1304520, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38259611

RESUMEN

Introduction: Rapid exome sequencing (rES) has become the first-choice genetic test for critically ill patients, mostly neonates, young infants, or fetuses in prenatal care, in time-sensitive situations and when it is expected that the genetic test result may guide clinical decision making. The implementation of rES has revolutionized medicine by enabling timely identification of genetic causes for various rare diseases. The utilization of rES has increasingly been recognized as an essential diagnostic tool for the identification of complex and undiagnosed genetic disorders. Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our experiences with rES performed on 575 critically ill patients from various age groups (prenatal to adulthood), over a four-year period (2016-2019). These patients presented with a wide spectrum of rare diseases, including but not limited to neurological disorders, severe combined immune deficiency, and cancer. Results: During the study period, there was a significant increase in rES referrals, with a rise from a total of two referrals in Q1-2016 to 10 referrals per week in Q4-2019. The median turnaround time (TAT) decreased from 17 to 11 days in the period 2016-2019, with an overall median TAT of 11 days (IQR 8-15 days). The overall diagnostic yield for this cohort was 30.4%, and did not significantly differ between the different age groups (e.g. adults 22.2% vs children 31.0%; p-value 0.35). However, variability in yield was observed between clinical entities: craniofacial anomalies yielded 58.3%, while for three clinical entities (severe combined immune deficiency, aneurysm, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) no diagnoses were obtained. Discussion: Importantly, whereas clinical significance is often only attributed to a conclusive diagnosis, we also observed impact on clinical decision-making for individuals in whom no genetic diagnosis was established. Hence, our experience shows that rES has an important role for patients of all ages and across the broad spectrum of rare diseases to impact clinical outcomes.

6.
Eur J Med Genet ; 65(5): 104467, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35240323

RESUMEN

It has been estimated that at least 6.0% of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit remains genetically undiagnosed because genetic testing is not routinely performed. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of average healthcare costs for patients admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and to assess possible impact of implementing Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) on these total healthcare costs. Hereto, we retrospectively collected postnatal healthcare data of all patients admitted to the level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Radboudumc (October 2013-October 2015) and linked unit costs to these healthcare consumptions. Average healthcare costs were calculated and a distinction between patients was made based on performance of genetic tests and the presence of congenital anomalies. Overall, on average €26,627 was spent per patient. Genetic costs accounted for 2.3% of all costs. Healthcare costs were higher for patients with congenital anomalies compared to patients without congenital anomalies. Patients with genetic diagnostics were also more expensive than patients without genetic diagnostics. We next modelled four scenarios based on clinical preselection. First, when performing trio-WES for all patients instead of current diagnostics, overall healthcare costs will increase with 22.2%. Second, performing trio-WES only for patients with multiple congenital anomalies will not result in any cost changes, but this would leave patients with an isolated congenital anomalies untested. We therefore next modelled a scenario performing trio-WES for all patients with congenital anomalies, increasing the average per patient healthcare costs by 5.3%. This will rise to a maximum of 5.5% when also modelling for an extra genetic test for clinically selected patients to establish genetic diagnoses that are undetectable by WES. In conclusion, genetic diagnostic testing accounted for a small fraction of total costs. Implementation of trio-WES as first-tier test for all patients with congenital anomalies will lead to a limited increase in overall healthcare budget, but will facilitate personalized treatments options guided by the diagnoses made.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Niño , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Secuenciación del Exoma
8.
Prenat Diagn ; 40(8): 972-983, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333414

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of trio-based rapid whole exome sequencing (rWES) in pregnancies of fetuses with a wide range of congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound imaging. METHODS: In this observational study, we analyzed the first 54 cases referred to our laboratory for prenatal rWES to support clinical decision making, after the sonographic detection of fetal congenital anomalies. The most common identified congenital anomalies were skeletal dysplasia (n = 20), multiple major fetal congenital anomalies (n = 17) and intracerebral structural anomalies (n = 7). RESULTS: A conclusive diagnosis was identified in 18 of the 54 cases (33%). Pathogenic variants were detected most often in fetuses with skeletal dysplasia (n = 11) followed by fetuses with multiple major fetal congenital anomalies (n = 4) and intracerebral structural anomalies (n = 3). A survey, completed by the physicians for 37 of 54 cases, indicated that the rWES results impacted clinical decision making in 68% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that rWES improves prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with congenital anomalies, and has an important impact on prenatal and peripartum parental and clinical decision making.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Anomalías Congénitas/genética , Secuenciación del Exoma , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Anomalías Múltiples/diagnóstico , Anomalías Múltiples/genética , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
9.
J Genet Couns ; 29(5): 786-799, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31889383

RESUMEN

The uptake of predictive DNA testing in families with a hereditary disease is <50%. Current practice often relies on the proband to inform relatives about the possibility of predictive DNA testing, but not all relatives are informed adequately. To enable informed decision-making concerning predictive DNA testing, the approach used to inform at-risk relatives needs to be optimized. This study investigated the preferences of patients, relatives, and the general population from the Netherlands on how to inform relatives at risk of autosomal dominant diseases. Online surveys were sent to people with autosomal dominant neuro-, onco-, or cardiogenetic diseases and their relatives via patient organizations (n = 379), and to members of the general population via a commercial panel (n = 1,000). Attitudes of the patient and population samples generally corresponded. A majority believed that initially only first-degree relatives should be informed, following the principles of a cascade screening approach. Most participants also thought that probands and healthcare professionals (HCPs) should be involved in informing relatives, and a large proportion believed that HCPs should contact relatives directly in cases where patients are unwilling to inform, both for untreatable and treatable conditions. Participants from the patient sample were of the opinion that HCPs should actively offer support. Our findings show that both patients and HCPs should be involved in informing at-risk relatives of autosomal dominant diseases and suggest that relatives' 'right to know' was considered a dominant issue by the majority of participants. Further research is needed on how to increase proactive support in informing of at-risk relatives.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Familia , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Relaciones Interpersonales , Etnicidad , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Genome Med ; 11(1): 38, 2019 06 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31203817

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) is complex and cumbersome yet important for the clinical management of the disease. Exome sequencing may provide a genetic diagnosis in a significant number of patients in a single genetic test. METHODS: In May 2013, we implemented exome sequencing in routine diagnostics for patients suffering from PIDs. This study reports the clinical utility and diagnostic yield for a heterogeneous group of 254 consecutively referred PID patients from 249 families. For the majority of patients, the clinical diagnosis was based on clinical criteria including rare and/or unusual severe bacterial, viral, or fungal infections, sometimes accompanied by autoimmune manifestations. Functional immune defects were interpreted in the context of aberrant immune cell populations, aberrant antibody levels, or combinations of these factors. RESULTS: For 62 patients (24%), exome sequencing identified pathogenic variants in well-established PID genes. An exome-wide analysis diagnosed 10 additional patients (4%), providing diagnoses for 72 patients (28%) from 68 families altogether. The genetic diagnosis directly indicated novel treatment options for 25 patients that received a diagnosis (34%). CONCLUSION: Exome sequencing as a first-tier test for PIDs granted a diagnosis for 28% of patients. Importantly, molecularly defined diagnoses indicated altered therapeutic options in 34% of cases. In addition, exome sequencing harbors advantages over gene panels as a truly generic test for all genetic diseases, including in silico extension of existing gene lists and re-analysis of existing data.


Asunto(s)
Secuenciación del Exoma/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Preescolar , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/normas , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Secuenciación del Exoma/normas
11.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 60(6): 2049-2063, 2019 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074760

RESUMEN

Purpose: To assess the phenotypic variability and natural course of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) caused by EYS mutations. Methods: Multiethnic cohort study (N = 30) with biallelic EYS variants from a clinical IRD database (retinitis pigmentosa [RP], N = 27; cone-rod dystrophy [CRD], N = 1; and macular dystrophy, N = 2). In vitro minigene splice assay was performed to determine the effect on EYS pre-mRNA splicing of the c.1299+5_1299+8del variant in macular dystrophy patients. Results: We found 27 different EYS variants in RP patients and 7 were novel. The rate of visual field loss of the V4e isopter area was -0.84 ± 0.44 ln(deg2) per year, and the rate of visual acuity loss was 0.75 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters per year. Ellipsoid zone width was correlated with area of the hyperautofluorescent ring, with rs = 0.78 and P < 0.001. Rate of decline in ellipsoid zone width was -57 ± 17 µm per year (P < 0.01) (n = 14) or -3.69% ± 0.51% from baseline per year (P < 0.001). An isolated CRD patient carried a homozygous EYS variant (c.9405T>A), previously identified in RP patients. Two siblings with macular dystrophy carried compound heterozygous EYS variants: c.1299+5_1299+8del and c.6050G>T. The former was novel and shown to result in skipping of exon 8, and the latter was a known RP variant. Conclusions: We report on EYS-associated macular dystrophy, extending the spectrum of EYS-associated IRDs. We observed heterogeneity between RP patients in age of onset and disease progression. Identical EYS variants were found in cases with RP, CRD, and macular dystrophy. Screening for EYS variants in CRD and macular dystrophy patients might increase the diagnostic yield in previously unsolved cases.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas del Ojo/genética , Degeneración Macular/genética , Mutación , ARN Mensajero/genética , Retina/patología , Retinitis Pigmentosa/genética , Agudeza Visual , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Electrorretinografía , Proteínas del Ojo/metabolismo , Femenino , Homocigoto , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linaje , Fenotipo , Retina/metabolismo , Retina/fisiopatología , Retinitis Pigmentosa/diagnóstico , Retinitis Pigmentosa/metabolismo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Adulto Joven
12.
Hum Reprod ; 31(11): 2651-2659, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27907901

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Do BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a compromised ovarian reserve compared to proven non-carriers, based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels? SUMMARY ANSWER: BRCA1/2 mutation carriers do not show a lower serum AMH level in comparison to proven non-carriers, after adjustment for potential confounders. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It has been suggested that the BRCA genes play a role in the process of ovarian reserve depletion, although previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the association between serum AMH levels and BRCA mutation status. Hence, it is yet unclear whether BRCA1/2 mutation carriers may indeed be at risk of a reduced reproductive lifespan. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was performed between January 2012 and February 2015 in 255 women. We needed to include 120 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and 120 proven non-carriers to demonstrate a difference in AMH levels of 0.40 µg/l (SD ± 0.12 µg/l, two-sided alpha-error 0.05, power 80%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: Healthy women aged 18-45 years who were referred to the Clinical Genetics Department and applied for predictive BRCA1/2 testing because of a familial BRCA1/2 mutation were asked to participate. A cross-sectional assessment was performed by measuring serum AMH levels and filling out a questionnaire. Multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for age, current smoking and current hormonal contraceptive use were performed on log-transformed serum AMH levels. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Out of 823 potentially eligible women, 421 (51.2%) were willing to participate, and of those, 166 (39%) did not meet our inclusion criteria. Two hundred and fifty-five women were available for analyses; 124 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and 131 proven non-carriers. The median [range] AMH level in carriers was 1.90 µg/l [0.11-19.00] compared to 1.80 µg/l [0.11-10.00] in non-carriers (P = 0.34). Adjusted linear regression analysis revealed no reduction in AMH level in the carriers (relative change = 0.98 (95%CI, 0.77-1.22); P = 0.76). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants were relatively young. Power was insufficient to analyze BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers separately. AMH levels may have been influenced by the use of hormonal contraceptives, though similar proportions of carriers and non-carriers were current users and adjustments were made to correct for potential confounding in our analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Limitations of the current analysis and limitations of the existing literature argue for prospective, well-controlled follow-up studies with recurrent AMH measurements to determine whether carriers might be at risk for low ovarian reserve and to definitively guide care. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was partially financially supported by a personal grant for Inge A.P. Derks-Smeets, kindly provided by the Dutch Cancer Society (Grant Number UM 2011-5249). Theodora C. van Tilborg, Inge A.P. Derks-Smeets, Anna M.E. Bos, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Christine E. de Die-Smulders, Lizet E. van der Kolk, Wendy A.G. van Zelst-Stams, Maria E. Velthuizen, Marinus J.C. Eijkemans and Margreet G.E.M. Ausems have nothing to disclose. Ron J. van Golde has received unrestricted research grants from Ferring and Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. Annemieke Hoek received an unrestricted educational grant from Ferring pharmaceutical BV, The Netherlands and a speaker's fee for post graduate education from MSD pharmaceutical company, outside the submitted work. Joop S.E. Laven has received unrestricted research grants from Ferring, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dome, Organon, and Schering Plough, outside the submitted work. Frank J.M. Broekmans is a member of the external advisory board for Merck Serono (The Netherlands), outside the submitted work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR no. 4324.


Asunto(s)
Hormona Antimülleriana/sangre , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Heterocigoto , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Salud de la Mujer
14.
J Genet Couns ; 25(3): 504-14, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26531312

RESUMEN

According to standard practice following referral to clinical genetics, most high risk breast cancer (BC) patients in many countries receive face-to-face genetic counseling prior to BRCA-mutation testing (DNA-intake). We evaluated a novel format by prospective study: replacing the intake consultation with telephone, written and digital information sent home. Face-to-face counseling then followed BRCA-mutation testing (DNA-direct). One year after BRCA-result disclosure, 108 participants returned long-term follow-up questionnaires, of whom 59 (55 %) had previously chosen DNA-direct (intervention) versus DNA-intake (standard practice i.e., control: 45 %). Questionnaires assessed satisfaction and psychological distress. All participants were satisfied and 85 % of DNA-direct participants would choose this procedure again; 10 % would prefer DNA-intake and 5 % were undecided. In repeated measurements ANOVA, general distress (GHQ-12, p = 0.01) and BC-specific distress (IES-bc, p = 0.03) were lower in DNA-direct than DNA-intake at all time measurements. Heredity-specific distress (IES-her) did not differ significantly between groups. Multivariate regression analyses showed that choice of procedure did not significantly contribute to either general or heredity-specific distress. BC-specific distress (after BC diagnosis) did contribute to both general and heredity-specific distress. This suggests that higher distress scores reflected BC experience, rather than the type of genetic diagnostic procedure. In conclusion, the large majority of BC patients that used DNA-direct reported high satisfaction without increased distress both in the short term, and 1 year after conclusion of genetic testing.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Pruebas Genéticas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estrés Psicológico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Asesoramiento Genético/psicología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
15.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 159: A8910, 2015.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26332814

RESUMEN

In the majority of breast cancer families, DNA testing does not show BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and the genetic cause of breast cancer remains unexplained. Routine testing for the CHEK2*1100delC mutation has recently been introduced in breast cancer families in the Netherlands. The 1100delC mutation in the CHEK2-gene may explain the occurrence of breast cancer in about 5% of non-BRCA1/2 families in the Netherlands. In the general population the CHEK2*1100delC mutation confers a slightly increased breast cancer risk, but in a familial breast cancer setting this risk is between 35-55% for first degree female carriers. Female breast cancer patients with the CHEK2*1100delC mutation are at increased risk of contralateral breast cancer and may have a less favourable prognosis. Female heterozygous CHEK2*1100delC mutation carriers are offered annual mammography and specialist breast surveillance between the ages of 35-60 years. Prospective research in CHEK2-positive families is essential in order to develop more specific treatment and screening strategies.


Asunto(s)
Quinasa de Punto de Control 2/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas , Genotipo , Humanos , Mamografía , Mutación , Países Bajos , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Eliminación de Secuencia
16.
Nat Genet ; 47(6): 668-71, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25938944

RESUMEN

The genetic cause underlying the development of multiple colonic adenomas, the premalignant precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC), frequently remains unresolved in patients with adenomatous polyposis. Here we applied whole-exome sequencing to 51 individuals with multiple colonic adenomas from 48 families. In seven affected individuals from three unrelated families, we identified a homozygous germline nonsense mutation in the base-excision repair (BER) gene NTHL1. This mutation was exclusively found in a heterozygous state in controls (minor allele frequency of 0.0036; n = 2,329). All three families showed recessive inheritance of the adenomatous polyposis phenotype and progression to CRC in at least one member. All three affected women developed an endometrial malignancy or premalignancy. Genetic analysis of three carcinomas and five adenomas from different affected individuals showed a non-hypermutated profile enriched for cytosine-to-thymine transitions. We conclude that a homozygous loss-of-function germline mutation in the NTHL1 gene predisposes to a new subtype of BER-associated adenomatous polyposis and CRC.


Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/genética , Desoxirribonucleasa (Dímero de Pirimidina)/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Codón sin Sentido , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Reparación del ADN , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Homocigoto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linaje
17.
Virchows Arch ; 466(1): 117-21, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25342144

RESUMEN

Melanocytic BAP1-associated intradermal tumors (MBAITs) are epithelioid spitzoid looking, mostly intradermally located melanocytic tumors that often have tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a common nevus component. They occur sporadically but also in the context of an underlying BAP1 germline mutation. Recognition of these lesions is important because they can be a marker for an underlying BAP1-associated cancer syndrome. Most cases reported in the literature thus far were found to have both a BRAF and BAP1 mutation. Here, we report an unusual case of an MBAIT lesion with a combined NRAS and BAP1 mutation. A BAP1 germline mutation was excluded. Our case is the second case reported until now with this combination of mutations in this subset of lesions. In the other reported NRAS-/BAP1-mutated MBAIT case, presence of a BAP1 germline mutation was not tested. Our case confirms that the mutational spectrum in MBAITs is broader than previously thought. Just as in the BRAF-mutated cases, it is likely that a subset might be associated with a BAP1 germline mutation. In case of suspicion of an MBAIT lesion based on histological examination, diagnostic work-up should include assessment of protein expression and/or mutation analysis of at least BRAF, NRAS, and BAP1. Work-up should not be limited to analyzing only BRAF protein expression or mutation, since NRAS-mutated MBAITs might be missed.


Asunto(s)
GTP Fosfohidrolasas/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Mutación/genética , Nevo Intradérmico/genética , Nevo Pigmentado/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/genética , Ubiquitina Tiolesterasa/genética , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , GTP Fosfohidrolasas/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Nevo Intradérmico/diagnóstico , Nevo Intradérmico/cirugía , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico , Nevo Pigmentado/cirugía , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/metabolismo , Piel/metabolismo , Piel/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/metabolismo , Ubiquitina Tiolesterasa/metabolismo
18.
Fam Cancer ; 13(2): 143-51, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24068317

RESUMEN

Currently, most breast cancer (BC) patients receive face-to-face genetic counseling (DNA-intake) prior to BRCA-mutation testing, with generic information regarding hereditary BC and BRCA-mutation testing. This prospective study evaluated a novel format: replacing the intake consultation with telephone, written and digital information sent home, and face-to-face contact following BRCA-mutation testing (DNA-direct). From August 2011 to February 2012, 161 of 233 eligible BC patients referred to our Human Genetics department chose between DNA-direct (intervention) or DNA-intake (control). Exclusion criteria were psychological problems (n = 33), difficulty with Dutch text (n = 5), known BRCA-family (n = 3), non-BRCA-referral (n = 1). 30 declined genetic counseling or study participation. Participants received questionnaires including satisfaction and psychological distress. 59 % chose DNA-direct (p = 0.03), of whom 90 % were satisfied and would choose DNA-direct again (including 6/8 BRCA-mutation carriers); although 27 % hesitated to recommend DNA-direct to other patients. General distress (GHQ-12, p = 0.001) and heredity-specific distress (IES, p = 0.02) scored lower in DNA-direct than DNA-intake, both at baseline and follow-up 2 weeks after BRCA-result disclosure; all scores remained below clinical relevance. DNA-direct participants reported higher website use (53 vs. 32 %, p = 0.01), more referrer information about personal consequences (41 vs. 20 %, p = 0.004) and lower decisional conflict (median 20 [0-88] vs. 25 [0-50], p = 0.01). Processing time in DNA-direct was reduced by 1 month. Mutation detection rate was 8 % in both groups. All BRCA-mutation carriers fulfilled current testing criteria. In conclusion, more BC patients preferred DNA-direct over intake consultation prior to BRCA-mutation testing, the majority being strongly to moderately satisfied with the procedure followed, without increased distress.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Asesoramiento Genético/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas , Prioridad del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Conducta de Elección , Conflicto Psicológico , Análisis Mutacional de ADN/psicología , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético/psicología , Humanos , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
19.
Gastroenterology ; 146(3): 643-646.e8, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24333619

RESUMEN

Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Tumors are characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI). However, a considerable number of MSI-positive tumors have no known molecular mechanism of development. By using Sanger and ion semiconductor sequencing, 25 MSI-positive tumors were screened for somatic mutations and loss of heterozygosity in mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) and mutS homolog 2 (MSH2). In 13 of 25 tumors (8 MLH1-deficient and 5 MSH2-deficient tumors), we identified 2 somatic mutations in these genes. We conclude that 2 acquired events explain the MMR-deficiency in more than 50% of the MMR-deficient tumors without causal germline mutations or promoter methylation.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Mutación de Línea Germinal/genética , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/genética , Síndromes Neoplásicos Hereditarios/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Metilación de ADN/genética , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN/genética , Humanos , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Persona de Mediana Edad , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL , Síndromes Neoplásicos Hereditarios/epidemiología , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
20.
Hum Mutat ; 34(12): 1721-6, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24123792

RESUMEN

The advent of massive parallel sequencing is rapidly changing the strategies employed for the genetic diagnosis and research of rare diseases that involve a large number of genes. So far it is not clear whether these approaches perform significantly better than conventional single gene testing as requested by clinicians. The current yield of this traditional diagnostic approach depends on a complex of factors that include gene-specific phenotype traits, and the relative frequency of the involvement of specific genes. To gauge the impact of the paradigm shift that is occurring in molecular diagnostics, we assessed traditional Sanger-based sequencing (in 2011) and exome sequencing followed by targeted bioinformatics analysis (in 2012) for five different conditions that are highly heterogeneous, and for which our center provides molecular diagnosis. We find that exome sequencing has a much higher diagnostic yield than Sanger sequencing for deafness, blindness, mitochondrial disease, and movement disorders. For microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer, this was low under both strategies. Even if all genes that could have been ordered by physicians had been tested, the larger number of genes captured by the exome would still have led to a clearly superior diagnostic yield at a fraction of the cost.


Asunto(s)
Exoma , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Humanos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...