RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Severe asthma is associated with a serious disease burden, partially caused by limitations in activity and work impairment. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to relate treatment with biologics targeting IL-5/5Ra to work productivity and activity in the long term in a real-world context. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a registry-based multi-center cohort study evaluating data from adults with severe eosinophilic asthma included in the Dutch Register of Adult Patients with Severe Asthma for Optimal DIsease management (RAPSODI). Patients that started with anti-IL-5/5Ra biologics and completed the work productivity and activity improvement questionnaire, were included. Study and patient characteristics were compared between the employed and unemployed patients. Work productivity and activity impairment are related to accompanying improvements in clinical outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, 91 of 137 patients (66%) were employed which remained stable throughout the follow-up period. Patients in the working age category were younger and had significantly better asthma control (p = 0.02). Mean overall work impairment due to health decreased significantly from 25.5% (SD2.6) to 17.6% (SD 2.8) during 12 months anti-IL-5/5Ra biologics treatment (P = 0.010). There was a significant association between ACQ6 and overall work improvement after targeted therapy (ß = 8.7, CI 2.1-15.4, P = 0.01). The improvement of asthma control of 0.5 points on the asthma Control Questionnaire was associated with an overall work impairment of -9%. CONCLUSIONS: Work productivity and activity in severe eosinophilic asthma improved after starting anti-IL-5/5Ra biologics. Clinically relevant improvement in asthma control was associated with an overall work impairment score of -9% in this study.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Productos Biológicos , Adulto , Humanos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/etiología , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
The incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in the Netherlands is declining every year. We fear there may be a loss of knowledge and awareness of detecting TB in the new generation of medical specialists. As medical specialists a great challenge lies before us in maintaining the quality of TB control in the Netherlands. Collaboration between pulmonologist, infectious disease specialist, microbiologist and the public health services is a necessity. Here we describe how, in the region of Arnhem, we work closely with these medical specialists based on structural multidisciplinary meetings. We also describe two of the quality indicators - doctor's delay and HIV testing policy - which are included in the national plan for TB control for 2016-2020. We explain how we intend to maintain and improve the quality of TB control by means of our structural meetings and collaboration.
Asunto(s)
Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Países Bajos , Pruebas Serológicas , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the case of pneumonia an infectious cause is always considered first. However, toxic agents and medicines can also be the cause of pneumonia. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 54-year-old woman was referred to the emergency department because of progressive dyspnoea, a non-productive cough, headache, and fever. She was admitted with the diagnosis community acquired pneumonia. Despite treatment with antibiotics and oxygen she developed hypoxic respiratory failure, which necessitated invasive mechanical ventilation. Imaging diagnostics showed extensive bilateral pulmonary consolidation, despite the absence of a causative agent in cultures. Further medical history-taking revealed that the patient had recently commenced a course of minocycline. She had used this medicine previously and had twice before developed pneumonia without the presence of a proven causative agent. Our differential diagnosis included the toxic effect of minocycline and we treated the patient with methylprednisolone. This resulted in rapid clinical improvement and full recovery of our patient. CONCLUSION: Acute respiratory failure as a side effect of medication is rare, but nonetheless potentially life-threatening. Despite repeated exposure to minocycline, the link with pneumonia was not previously made in this patient.