RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anthropometric data quality in large multicentre nutrition surveys is seldom adequately assessed. In preparation for the South African National Dietary Intake Survey (NDIS-2022), this study assessed site leads' and fieldworkers' intra- and inter-rater reliability for measuring weight, length/height, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), waist circumference (WC) and calf circumference (CC). METHODS: Standardised training materials and measurement protocols were developed, and new anthropometric equipment was procured. Following two training rounds (12 site lead teams, 46 fieldworker teams), measurement reliability was assessed for both groups, using repeated measurements of volunteers similar to the survey target population. Reliability was statistically assessed using the technical error of measurement (TEM), relative TEM (%TEM), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of reliability (R). Agreement was visualised with Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: By %TEM, the best reliability was achieved for weight (%TEM = 0.260-0.923) and length/height (%TEM = 0.434-0.855), and the poorest for MUAC by fieldworkers (%TEM = 2.592-3.199) and WC (%TEM = 2.353-2.945). Whole-sample ICC and R were excellent ( > 0.90) for all parameters except site leads' CC inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.896, R = 0.889) and fieldworkers' inter-rater reliability for MUAC in children under two (ICC = 0.851, R = 0.881). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant bias except in fieldworkers' intra-rater reliability of length/height measurement in adolescents/adults ( + 0.220 (0.042, 0.400) cm). Reliability was higher for site leads vs. fieldworkers, for intra-rater vs. inter-rater assessment, and for weight and length/height vs. circumference measurements. CONCLUSION: NDIS-2022 site leads and fieldworkers displayed acceptable reliability in performing anthropometric measurements, highlighting the importance of intensive training and standardised measurement protocols. Ongoing reliability assessment during data collection is recommended.
RESUMEN
Background: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a life-threatening, underdiagnosed, and under-researched complication in treating children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM). This study aimed to determine the incidence and onset of RFS and identify biochemical abnormalities, clinical signs, and complications associated with RFS development in children, 0-59 months, treated with SAM in a South African public hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on hospital medical records of children aged 0-59 months, diagnosed with SAM at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Johannesburg, from 1/10/2014 to 31/12/2018. The onset of RFS among children included in the study was diagnosed based on published criteria for RFS. On admission, children who developed RFS and those who did not were compared concerning biochemistry and clinical signs and symptoms. Results: A total of 148 medical records were retrieved from the hospital archives. The diagnosis of SAM based on the World Health Organization (WHO) definition was confirmed in 126 children who were then included in the study. The median age of the 126 children (63 % male) with confirmed SAM was 11.2 months (P25:7.0 months; P75:17.0 months). The in-hospital mortality rate was 18.2 %, of which 8.7 % were retrospectively diagnosed as having developed RFS during their recorded hospital stay, despite implementing the WHO treatment guidelines for SAM. A significantly higher percentage of the children who developed RFS presented on admission with hypophosphatemia (p = 0.015), hypokalemia (p = 0.001), hyponatremia (p = 0.001), an international normalized ratio (INR) of above 1.7 (p = 0.025), diarrhea (p = 0.042), dehydration (p = 0.029) and urinary tract infection (UTI) (p = 0.041), than those who did not. Children who developed RFS stayed in hospital significantly longer than those who did not (18 vs. 12 days with a p-value of 0.003). Conclusion: In this population of children with SAM treated in a South African public hospital setting, the presence on hospital admission of low levels of electrolytes, elevated INR, dehydration, diarrhea, and UTI was significantly associated with developing RFS. Recognizing these as possible red flags for developing RFS in children admitted with SAM might contribute to improved outcomes and needs further investigation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by severe intellectual disability, little to no expressive speech, visual and motor problems, emotional/behavioral challenges, and a tendency towards hyperphagia and weight gain. The characteristics of AS make it difficult to measure these children's functioning with standard clinical tests. Feasible outcome measures are needed to measure current functioning and change over time, in clinical practice and clinical trials. AIM: Our first aim is to assess the feasibility of several functional tests. We target domains of neurocognitive functioning and physical growth using the following measurement methods: eye-tracking, functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), indirect calorimetry, bio-impedance analysis (BIA), and BOD POD (air-displacement plethysmography). Our second aim is to explore the results of the above measures, in order to better understand the AS phenotype. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 28 children with AS aged 2-18 years. We defined an outcome measure as feasible when (1) at least 70% of participants successfully finished the measurement and (2) at least 60% of those participants had acceptable data quality. Adaptations to the test procedure and reasons for early termination were noted. Parents rated acceptability and importance and were invited to make recommendations to increase feasibility. The results of the measures were explored. RESULTS: Outcome measures obtained with eye-tracking and BOD POD met the definition of feasibility, while fNIRS, indirect calorimetry, and BIA did not. The most important reasons for early termination of measurements were showing signs of protest, inability to sit still and poor/no calibration (eye-tracking specific). Post-calibration was often applied to obtain valid eye-tracking results. Parents rated the BOD POD als most acceptable and fNIRS as least acceptable for their child. All outcome measures were rated to be important. Exploratory results indicated longer reaction times to high salient visual stimuli (eye-tracking) as well as high body fat percentage (BOD POD). CONCLUSIONS: Eye-tracking and BOD POD are feasible measurement methods for children with AS. Eye-tracking was successfully used to assess visual orienting functions in the current study and (with some practical adaptations) can potentially be used to assess other outcomes as well. BOD POD was successfully used to examine body composition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered d.d. 23-04-2020 under number 'NL8550' in the Dutch Trial Register: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/23075.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Angelman , Niño , Humanos , Síndrome de Angelman/complicaciones , Síndrome de Angelman/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Composición Corporal , Pletismografía/métodos , Impedancia EléctricaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review and synthesize studies on household food security in South Africa. DESIGN: Systematic mapping review of metrics (methodological review). SETTING: Electronic databases, including EBSCOHost, Scopus and Web of Science, were searched for studies and reports on household food security in South Africa, reporting household food security published between 1999 and 2021. Searching, selecting and reporting were performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. PARTICIPANTS: South African households. RESULTS: Forty-eight articles reporting on six national surveys (one repeated annually since 2002) and forty sub-national studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Various metrics, with different recall periods and ways of categorizing food security levels, were identified. Surveys that used similar metrics showed that the percentage of South African households that have experienced food insecurity and hunger has decreased over the review period yet remains concerning. However, the multitude of metrics used to assess the different components and levels of food security limits the comparability of the results to evaluate the scope and scale of the problem. CONCLUSIONS: There is growing support for developing multi-variable approaches for food security research in sub-Saharan Africa. Future research should focus on finding the most appropriate combination of complementary metrics that would allow comparable data while holistically capturing food security and providing insight into the causes and consequences.
Asunto(s)
Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Hambre , Humanos , Sudáfrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Inseguridad AlimentariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Height measurement is a vital component for assessing nutritional risk, and calculating dietary requirements in a clinical setting where indirect calorimetry is not available. In many patients, height cannot be measured accurately, and equations based on body segments are relied on to predict height. This study aimed to evaluate if specific body segments are better associated with height than others in a South African public hospital setting. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in three public hospitals in Bloemfontein, South Africa, on patients, 20-50 years of age, and able to stand upright without assistance to be measured by stadiometer. Spearman correlations were assessed between stadiometer height and arm-span, demi-span, ulna length, knee height, tibia length, fibula length and foot length (measured by standardised techniques). Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the segment that is most closely associated with stadiometer height in the study population. RESULTS: The sample included 141 participants (61.7% male, median age 38.8 years; IQR: 10.1 years). All measured body segment were statistically significantly correlated with stadiometer height, the strongest association being with knee height in both males (R2:0.77) and females (R2:0.86). Foot length and ulna length had the weakest correlation with stadiometer height in males and females, respectively. Multiple regression analysis identified knee height as having the best predictive value in determining stadiometer height. Overall, measurements of lower leg segments, particularly knee height, predicted measured height better than upper body segments. CONCLUSIONS: When choosing height-prediction equations in clinical settings in populations with a high prevalence of stunting, such as South Africa, the fact that stunting affects the growth of long bones in the lower body more than in the upper body, should be considered.