Cannabinoid consumption among cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: Despite the inconclusiveness regarding health effects of cannabinoids among cancer patients, studies from non-European countries suggest that the medical-intended consumption of such products by this patient group is significant. The current study analyses cannabinoid usage among oncology patients receiving systemic treatment in the Netherlands. METHODS: The current study included adult patients receiving intravenous systemic therapy at Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, for a solid malignancy. Participants were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire including questions on demographic variables, clinical variables and cannabinoid consumption. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients with solid cancer were included in this study. Almost 25% reported usage of cannabinoids for medical purposes, with 15% of the patients currently using the substance. Additionally, 18% of non-users considered future medical usage. In 48% of the cases, consumption was reported by the oncologist. The proposed anti-cancer effect was reported by 46% of the users as motivation for consumption. Current users were mainly palliative patients and 54% of the users were undergoing immunotherapy. Intention of treatment and type of therapy were predictive factors for consumption. Cannabinoid-oil was the most frequently used way of consumption. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the high number of cannabinoid users among oncology patients in the Netherlands in presumed absence of clinical guidance. It highlights the essence of a pro-active role of the clinician, assessing cannabinoid usage and educating the patients on the most recent evidence regarding its potential benefits and risks. Further studies on clinical decision making and efficacy of cannabinoids are recommended, to improve clinical guidance.

Morphine for chronic breathlessness in COPD: improvement predictors-cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Morphine is used as palliative treatment of chronic breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Part of the patients does not experience a clinically meaningful improvement of breathlessness and it is unclear which characteristics are related to a clinically meaningful improvement of breathlessness after morphine. Therefore, this study assessed whether sensory breathlessness description, demographic and clinical characteristics are related with this improvement. METHODS: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of the intervention arm of a randomised controlled trial. 45 patients with COPD and moderate-to-very severe chronic breathlessness despite optimal treatment received 20-30 mg oral sustained-release morphine daily for 4 weeks. Using binary logistic regression, the relationship between a clinically meaningful improvement in breathlessness (≥1 point on 0-10 numeric rating scale) and the baseline variables sensory breathlessness descriptors, age, breathlessness and body mass index (BMI) was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants (42%) showed a clinically meaningful improvement. Baseline breathlessness (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.21, p=0.03) and BMI (OR 1.13, 95% 1.02-1.28, p=0.02) were significant associated to a clinically meaningful improvement of breathlessness, while age and sensory breathlessness descriptors were not. CONCLUSIONS: Worse baseline breathlessness and higher BMI are associated to a clinically meaningful improvement of breathlessness in patients using 20-30 mg oral sustained-release morphine. Opioid treatment should be considered in patients with COPD with severe breathlessness, taking into account the patient's BMI.

Professionals guidance about palliative medicine in chronic heart failure: a mixed-method study.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) experience difficulties in timely recognising and directing palliative care (PC) needs of their patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive tool to enable HCPs in timely recognising and directing PC needs in CHF. METHODS: A four-stage mixed-method study was performed. Stage 1: identification of needs and questions of patients and families; stage 2: prioritisation and refinement of the needs and questions; stage 3a: testing and online feedback on V.1; stage 3b: selecting and refining care recommendations; stage 4: testing and review of V.2. Iterative reviews followed each step in the development process to ensure a wide range of stakeholder input. In total, 16 patients, 12 family members and 54 HCPs participated. RESULTS: A comprehensive set of 13 PC needs was identified, redefined and tested. The resulting tool, called Identification of patients with HeARt failure with PC needs (I-HARP), contains an introduction prompt with open questions to start the conversation, 13 closed screening questions with additional in-depth questions, and recommendations on actions for identified needs. CONCLUSION: I-HARP contains an evidence-based set of questions and palliative CHF care suggestions for HCPs in the Netherlands. The resulting tool, approved by HCPs, patients and family members, is a promising guidance for HCP to timely recognise and direct PC needs in CHF.