Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0145043, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26727369

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite the evidence for preventing childhood morbidity and mortality, financial resources are cited as a constraint for Governments to scale up the key health interventions in some countries. We evaluate the cost effectiveness of implementing IMNCI program in India from a health system and societal perspective. METHODS: We parameterized a decision analytic model to assess incremental cost effectiveness of IMNCI program as against routine child health services for infant population at district level in India. Using a 15-years time horizon from 2007 to 2022, we populated the model using data on costs and effects as found from a cluster-randomized trial to assess effectiveness of IMNCI program in Haryana state. Effectiveness was estimated as reduction in infant illness episodes, deaths and disability adjusted life years (DALY). Incremental cost per DALY averted was used to estimate cost effectiveness of IMNCI. Future costs and effects were discounted at a rate of 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken to estimate the probability of IMNCI to be cost effective at varying willingness to pay thresholds. RESULTS: Implementation of IMNCI results in a cumulative reduction of 57,384 illness episodes, 2369 deaths and 76,158 DALYs among infants at district level from 2007 to 2022. Overall, from a health system perspective, IMNCI program incurs an incremental cost of USD 34.5 (INR 1554) per DALY averted, USD 34.5 (INR 1554) per life year gained, USD 1110 (INR 49,963) per infant death averted. There is 90% probability for ICER to be cost effective at INR 2300 willingness to pay, which is 5.5% of India's GDP per capita. From a societal perspective, IMNCI program incurs an additional cost of USD 24.1 (INR 1082) per DALY averted, USD 773 (INR 34799) per infant death averted and USD 26.3 (INR 1183) per illness averted in during infancy. CONCLUSION: IMNCI program in Indian context is very cost effective and should be scaled-up as a major child survival strategy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles/terapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Niño , Mortalidad del Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedades Transmisibles/mortalidad , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil , Recién Nacido
2.
BMJ ; 349: g4988, 2014 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25172514

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of implementation of the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness strategy on treatment seeking practices and on neonatal and infant morbidity. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Haryana, India. PARTICIPANTS: 29,667 births in nine intervention clusters and 30,813 births in nine control clusters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The pre-specified outcome was the effect on treatment seeking practices. Post hoc exploratory analyses assessed morbidity, hospital admission, post-neonatal infant care, and nutritional status outcomes. INTERVENTIONS: The Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness intervention included home visits by community health workers, improved case management of sick children, and strengthening of health systems. Outcomes were ascertained through interviews with randomly selected caregivers: 6204, 3073, and 2045 in intervention clusters and 6163, 3048, and 2017 in control clusters at ages 29 days, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. RESULTS: In the intervention cluster, treatment was sought more often from an appropriate provider for severe neonatal illness (risk ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.38 to 2.24), for local neonatal infection (4.86, 3.80 to 6.21), and for diarrhoea at 6 months (1.96, 1.38 to 2.79) and 12 months (1.22, 1.06 to 1.42) and pneumonia at 6 months (2.09, 1.31 to 3.33) and 12 months (1.44, 1.00 to 2.08). Intervention mothers reported fewer episodes of severe neonatal illness (risk ratio 0.82, 0.67 to 0.99) and lower prevalence of diarrhoea (0.71, 0.60 to 0.83) and pneumonia (0.73, 0.52 to 1.04) in the two weeks preceding the 6 month interview and of diarrhoea (0.63, 0.49 to 0.80) and pneumonia (0.60, 0.46 to 0.78) in the two weeks preceding the 12 month interview. Infants in the intervention clusters were more likely to still be exclusively breast fed in the sixth month of life (risk ratio 3.19, 2.67 to 3.81). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness programme was associated with timely treatment seeking from appropriate providers and reduced morbidity, a likely explanation for the reduction in mortality observed following implementation of the programme in this study.Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00474981; ICMR Clinical Trial Registry CTRI/2009/091/000715.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de Caso , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Visita Domiciliaria , Madres/educación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Femenino , Humanos , India , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino
3.
Indian Pediatr ; 50(9): 839-46, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23502671

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the unit cost of level II neonatal intensive care treatment delivered through public hospitals and its fiscal implications in India. DESIGN: Cost analysis study. SETTINGS: Four Special Care Newborn Units (SCNUs) in public sector district hospitals in three Indian states, i.e. Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, for the period 2010. METHODS: Bottom-up economic costing methodology was adopted. Health system resources, i.e. capital, equipment, drugs and consumables, non-consumables, referral and overheads, utilized to treat all neonates during 2010 were elicited. Additionally, 360 randomly selected treatment files of neonates were screened to estimate direct out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure borne by the patients. In order to account for variability in prices and other parameters, we undertook a univariate sensitivity analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unit cost was computed as INR (Indian national rupees) per neonate treated and INR per bed-day treatment in SCNU. Standardized costs per neonate treatment and per bed day were estimated to incorporate the variation in bed occupancy rates across the sites. RESULTS: Overall, SCNU neonatal treatment costs the Government INR 4581 (USD 101.8) and INR 818 (USD 18.2) per neonate treatment and per bed-day treatment, respectively. Standardized treatment costs were estimated to be INR 5090 (USD 113.1) per neonate and INR 909 (USD 20.2) per bed-day treatment. In the event of entire direct medical expenditure being borne by the health system, we found cost of SCNU treatment as INR 4976 (USD 110.6) per neonate and INR 889 (USD 19.8) per bed-day. CONCLUSION: Level II neonatal intensive care at SCNUs is cost intensive. Rational use of SCNU services by targeting its utilization for the very low birth weight neonates and maintenance of community based home-based newborn care is required. Further research is required on cost-effectiveness of level II neonatal intensive care against routine pediatric ward care.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/economía , Humanos , India , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
S Afr Med J ; 97(2): 130-5, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17404675

RESUMEN

Kenya has had a history of health financing policy changes since its independence in 1963. Recently, significant preparatory work was done on a new Social Health Insurance Law that, if accepted, would lead to universal health coverage in Kenya after a transition period. Questions of economic feasibility and political acceptability continue to be discussed, with stakeholders voicing concerns on design features of the new proposal submitted to the Kenyan parliament in 2004. For economic, social, political and organisational reasons a transition period will be necessary, which is likely to last more than a decade. However, important objectives such as access to health care and avoiding impoverishment due to direct health care payments should be recognised from the start so that steady progress towards effective universal coverage can be planned and achieved.


Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Seguro de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Kenia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA