Is Treatment in Patients With Suspected Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Effective? Six-Month Results of a Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of 16-week treatment with etanercept (ETN) in patients with suspected nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-naive patients with inflammatory back pain with at least 2 SpA features and high disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score ≥4), without the requirement of a positive finding on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac (SI) joint and/or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level, were randomized (1:1) to receive ETN (n = 40) or placebo (n = 40) for 16 weeks and subsequently were followed up for a further 8 weeks (to 24 weeks from baseline) without study medication. The primary end point was the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 20 (ASAS20) response at 16 weeks. Secondary end points included the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and changes in disease parameters, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), CRP level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada index scores (MRI of the SI joint), after 16 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patient characteristics at baseline were comparable between the ETN and placebo groups. At 16 weeks, there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients exhibiting ASAS20 response between the ETN group (6 patients [16.7%]) and the placebo group (4 patients [11.1%]) (relative risk 0.7 [95% confidence interval 0.2-2.2], P = 0.5). Only the ESR showed more improvement in the ETN group compared to the placebo group at 16 weeks (decreases of 2.2 mm/hour and 1.4 mm/hour, respectively), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Between 16 and 24 weeks, without study medication, the BASMI, CRP level, and ESR had worsened to a greater extent in the ETN group compared to the placebo group, with the difference being significant for the CRP level. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in patients with suspected nonradiographic axial SpA with high disease activity but without the requirement of a positive finding on SI joint MRI and/or elevated CRP level, treatment with ETN is not effective.

Presence of active MRI lesions in patients suspected of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis with high disease activity and chance at conversion after a 6-month follow-up period.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to evaluate signs of inflammation on MRI of sacroiliac joints (SIJ)/spine in inflammatory back pain (IBP) patients suspected of nr-axSpA with high disease activity. Secondary aims are to describe the onset of new inflammatory lesions at MRI after 6 months and to evaluate gender differences in the presence of inflammation. METHOD: Consecutively, patients with IBP with at least two spondyloarthritis features, high disease activity (BASDAI ≥ 4), and who were TNFi naïve, had a MRI of SIJ and spine. In the absence of active lesions, MRI was repeated after 6 months. MRI images were scored according to the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada method. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included (53% female), of whom 39% showed signs of inflammation at the first MRI: 30.9% of the SIJ, 19.1% of the spine and 2.4% at both sites, irrespective of the CRP levels. Males more often showed inflammatory signs at the MRI of the SIJ and spine compared with females (45.5% vs. 33.3%). Consistently, the median SPARCC score was higher in males: for SIJ 14.0 (IQR 2.3-25.0) and for spine 11.5 (IQR 8.5-25.6). Only one patient (4.7%) without baseline inflammatory signs showed active lesions of SIJ after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 40% of the IBP patients suspected of nr-axSpA, with high disease activity, showed inflammatory lesions on MRI of SIJ and/or spine, which occurred more often in males compared with females. In the majority (95.3%), an MRI without inflammatory lesions remained negative after 6 months despite high disease activity.Key Points• Forty percent of inflammatory back pain patients with high disease activity showed inflammatory signs on MRI of the SIJ and/or spine.• Only 4% of baseline MRIs without inflammatory signs at baseline conversed to an MRI with inflammatory signs after 6 months.• Male inflammatory back pain patients with high disease activity showed more often inflammatory signs on MRI compared with females.