Evaluating circumlocution in naming as a predictor of communicative informativeness and efficiency in discourse.

Background: Discourse analyses yield quantitative measures of functional communication in aphasia. However, they are historically underutilized in clinical settings. Confrontation naming assessments are used widely clinically and have been used to estimate discourse-level production. Such work shows that naming accuracy explains moderately high proportions of variance in measures of discourse, but proportions of variance remain unexplained. We propose that the inclusion of circumlocution productions into predictive models will account for a significant amount more of the variance. Circumlocution productions at the naming-level, while they may not contain the target word, are similar to the content that contributes to discourse informativeness and efficiency. Thus, additionally measuring circumlocution may improve our ability to estimate discourse performance and functional communication. Aim: This study aimed to test whether, after controlling for naming accuracy, the addition of a measure of circumlocution into predictive models of discourse-level informativeness and efficiency would account for a significant amount more of the variance in these discourse-level outcomes. Methods & Procedures: Naming and discourse data from 43 people with poststroke aphasia were analyzed. Naming data were collected using 120 pictured items and discourse data were collected using two picture description prompts. Data scoring and coding yielded measures of naming accuracy, incorrect response type, communicative informativeness, and efficiency. We used robust hierarchical regression to evaluate study predictions. Outcomes & Results: After controlling for naming accuracy, the inclusion of circumlocution into predictive models accounted for a significant amount more of the variance in both informativeness and efficiency. The subsequent inclusion of other response types, such as real word and nonword errors, did not account for a significant amount more of the variance in either outcome. Conclusions: In addition to naming accuracy, the production of circumlocution during naming assessments may correspond with measures of informativeness and efficiency at the discourse-level. Reducing the burden of estimating patients' functional communication will increase our ability to estimate functional communication using tools that are easy to administer and interpret.

Listening to Yourself and Watching Your Tongue: Distinct Abilities and Brain Regions for Monitoring Semantic and Phonological Speech Errors.

Despite the many mistakes we make while speaking, people can effectively communicate because we monitor our speech errors. However, the cognitive abilities and brain structures that support speech error monitoring are unclear. There may be different abilities and brain regions that support monitoring phonological speech errors versus monitoring semantic speech errors. We investigated speech, language, and cognitive control abilities that relate to detecting phonological and semantic speech errors in 41 individuals with aphasia who underwent detailed cognitive testing. Then, we used support vector regression lesion symptom mapping to identify brain regions supporting detection of phonological versus semantic errors in a group of 76 individuals with aphasia. The results revealed that motor speech deficits as well as lesions to the ventral motor cortex were related to reduced detection of phonological errors relative to semantic errors. Detection of semantic errors selectively related to auditory word comprehension deficits. Across all error types, poor cognitive control related to reduced detection. We conclude that monitoring of phonological and semantic errors relies on distinct cognitive abilities and brain regions. Furthermore, we identified cognitive control as a shared cognitive basis for monitoring all types of speech errors. These findings refine and expand our understanding of the neurocognitive basis of speech error monitoring.

Aphasia severity is modulated by race and lesion size in chronic survivors: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: In stroke survivors with aphasia (SWA), differences in behavioral language performance have been observed between Black and White Americans. These racial differences in aphasia outcomes may reflect biological stroke severity, disparities in access to care, potential assessment bias, or interactions between these factors and race. Understanding the origin of disparities in aphasia outcomes is critical to any efforts to promote health equity among SWA. In this study, we explore aphasia outcomes by examining the relationship between race, socioeconomic status, and neurological factors in SWA. METHOD: Eighty-five chronic left-hemisphere SWA (31 Black, 54 White) participated in the study. The primary aphasia outcome measure was the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R). Lesion size was measured based on manual lesion segmentations. FLAIR and T2 images were scored for severity of white matter disease. Independent sample t-tests were used to determine differences by race in education, age, income, aphasia severity, white matter disease, and lesion size. A linear regression model was used to explore factors that predicted aphasia severity on the WAB-R. RESULT: Level of education and estimated income differed by race in our sample. For predictors of aphasia severity, the regression model revealed a significant effect of lesion size on WAB Aphasia Quotient and an interaction of race x lesion size, such that Black and White participants with small lesions had similar WAB scores, but in individuals with larger lesions, Black participants had lower WAB scores than White participants. CONCLUSION: We suggest two explanations for the difference between Black and White SWA in the relationship between lesion size and aphasia severity. First, the impact of disparities in access to rehabilitation after stroke may be more evident when a stroke is larger and causes significant aphasia. Additionally, an assessment bias in aphasia outcome measures may be more evident with increasing severity of aphasia. Future studies should further discern the drivers of observed disparities in aphasia outcomes in order to identify opportunities to improve equity in aphasia care.

Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.

People use cognitive control across many contexts in daily life, yet it remains unclear how cognitive control is used in contexts involving language. Distinguishing language-specific cognitive control components may be critical to understanding aphasia, which can co-occur with cognitive control deficits. For example, deficits in control of semantic representations (i.e., semantic control), are thought to contribute to semantic deficits in aphasia. Conversely, little is known about control of phonological representations (i.e., phonological control) in aphasia. We developed a switching task to investigate semantic and phonological control in 32 left hemisphere stroke survivors with aphasia and 37 matched controls. We found that phonological and semantic control were related, but dissociate in the presence of switching demands. People with aphasia exhibited group-wise impairment at phonological control, although individual impairments were subtle except in one case. Several individuals with aphasia exhibited frank semantic control impairments, and these individuals had relative deficits on other semantic tasks. The present findings distinguish semantic control from phonological control, and confirm that semantic control impairments contribute to semantic deficits in aphasia.

Two types of phonological reading impairment in stroke aphasia.

Alexia is common in the context of aphasia. It is widely agreed that damage to phonological and semantic systems not specific to reading causes co-morbid alexia and aphasia. Studies of alexia to date have only examined phonology and semantics as singular processes or axes of impairment, typically in the context of stereotyped alexia syndromes. However, phonology, in particular, is known to rely on subprocesses, including sensory-phonological processing, motor-phonological processing, and sensory-motor integration. Moreover, many people with stroke aphasia demonstrate mild or mixed patterns of reading impairment that do not fit neatly with one syndrome. This cross-sectional study tested whether the hallmark symptom of phonological reading impairment, the lexicality effect, emerges from damage to a specific subprocess of phonology in stroke patients not selected for alexia syndromes. Participants were 30 subjects with left-hemispheric stroke and 37 age- and education-matched controls. A logistic mixed-effects model tested whether post-stroke impairments in sensory phonology, motor phonology, or sensory-motor integration modulated the effect of item lexicality on patient accuracy in reading aloud. Support vector regression voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping localized brain regions necessary for reading and non-orthographic phonological processing. Additionally, a novel support vector regression structural connectome-symptom mapping method identified the contribution of both lesioned and spared but disconnected, brain regions to reading accuracy and non-orthographic phonological processing. Specifically, we derived whole-brain structural connectomes using constrained spherical deconvolution-based probabilistic tractography and identified lesioned connections based on comparisons between patients and controls. Logistic mixed-effects regression revealed that only greater motor-phonological impairment related to lower accuracy reading aloud pseudowords versus words. Impaired sensory-motor integration was related to lower overall accuracy in reading aloud. No relationship was identified between sensory-phonological impairment and reading accuracy. Voxel-based and structural connectome lesion-symptom mapping revealed that lesioned and disconnected left ventral precentral gyrus related to both greater motor-phonological impairment and lower sublexical reading accuracy. In contrast, lesioned and disconnected left temporoparietal cortex is related to both impaired sensory-motor integration and reduced overall reading accuracy. These results clarify that at least two dissociable phonological processes contribute to the pattern of reading impairment in aphasia. First, impaired sensory-motor integration, caused by lesions disrupting the left temporoparietal cortex and its structural connections, non-selectively reduces accuracy in reading aloud. Second, impaired motor-phonological processing, caused at least partially by lesions disrupting left ventral premotor cortex and structural connections, selectively reduces sublexical reading accuracy. These results motivate a revised cognitive model of reading aloud that incorporates a sensory-motor phonological circuit.

Intellectual awareness of naming abilities in people with chronic post-stroke aphasia.

Anosognosia, or lack of self-awareness, is often present following neurological injury and can result in poor functional outcomes. The specific phenomenon of intellectual awareness, the knowledge that a function is impaired in oneself, has not been widely studied in post-stroke aphasia. We aim to identify behavioral and neural correlates of intellectual awareness by comparing stroke survivors' self-reports of anomia to objective naming performance and examining lesion sites. Fifty-three participants with chronic aphasia without severe comprehension deficits rated their naming ability and completed a battery of behavioral tests. We calculated the reliability and accuracy of participant self-ratings, then examined the relationship of poor intellectual awareness to speech, language, and cognitive measures. We used support vector regression lesion-symptom mapping (SVR-LSM) to determine lesion locations associated with impaired and preserved intellectual awareness. Reliability and accuracy of self-ratings varied across the participants. Poor intellectual awareness was associated with reduced performance on tasks that rely on semantics. Our SVR-LSM results demonstrated that anterior inferior frontal lesions were associated with poor awareness, while mid-superior temporal lesions were associated with preserved awareness. An anterior-posterior gradient was evident in the unthresholded lesion-symptom maps. While many people with chronic aphasia and relatively intact comprehension can accurately and reliably report the severity of their anomia, others overestimate, underestimate, or inconsistently estimate their naming abilities. Clinicians should consider this when administering self-rating scales, particularly when semantic deficits or anterior inferior frontal lesions are present. Administering self-ratings on multiple days may be useful to check the reliability of patient perceptions.