Initial steps for the Portuguese Atlas of geographical variation in healthcare.

Non-clinical aspects contribute to differences in healthcare practices within each country, which may imply that some patients do not receive the care they need. In contrast, others may not benefit from the care that they receive. However, to the authors' knowledge, only a few geographical variation studies with a national scope were recently conducted in Portugal. This study aimed to test if it was possible to conduct a geographical variation analysis in Portugal using publicly available data to compare the 18 districts and stimulate a debate around this topic. To achieve this goal, we first investigated the publicly available Portuguese National Health Service database (Transparency Portal) for data from activities and procedures that could be included in this analysis. Four were included: percentage of cesarian sections in total births, rate of hip surgeries within the first 48 h after admission in patients older than 65, rate of consumed antibiotics in the total drugs consumed, and percentage of elective surgeries. After retrieving the data, we mapped the results and computed the ratio of variation and the coefficient of variation. Finally, we discussed the results with medical doctors, public health researchers, and health economists. Results suggested geographical variation mainly in the rate of hip surgeries performed 48 h after admission (from 18.53% to 83.64%). Overall, the results highlighted the need for a national benchmarking system to span this analysis to other activities and initiate a broader discussion with patients, clinicians, providers, and policymakers.

Scaling-up digital follow-up care services: collaborative development and implementation of Remote Patient Monitoring pilot initiatives to increase access to follow-up care.

Background: COVID-19 increased the demand for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) services as a rapid solution for safe patient follow-up in a lockdown context. Time and resource constraints resulted in unplanned scaled-up RPM pilot initiatives posing risks to the access and quality of care. Scalability and rapid implementation of RPM services require social change and active collaboration between stakeholders. Therefore, a participatory action research (PAR) approach is needed to support the collaborative development of the technological component while simultaneously implementing and evaluating the RPM service through critical action-reflection cycles. Objective: This study aims to demonstrate how PAR can be used to guide the scalability design of RPM pilot initiatives and the implementation of RPM-based follow-up services. Methods: Using a case study strategy, we described the PAR team's (nurses, physicians, developers, and researchers) activities within and across the four phases of the research process (problem definition, planning, action, and reflection). Team meetings were analyzed through content analysis and descriptive statistics. The PAR team selected ex-ante pilot initiatives to reflect upon features feedback and participatory level assessment. Pilot initiatives were investigated using semi-structured interviews transcribed and coded into themes following the principles of grounded theory and pilot meetings minutes and reports through content analysis. The PAR team used the MoSCoW prioritization method to define the set of features and descriptive statistics to reflect on the performance of the PAR approach. Results: The approach involved two action-reflection cycles. From the 15 features identified, the team classified 11 as must-haves in the scaled-up version. The participation was similar among researchers (52.9%), developers (47.5%), and physicians (46.7%), who focused on suggesting and planning actions. Nurses with the lowest participation (5.8%) focused on knowledge sharing and generation. The top three meeting outcomes were: improved research and development system (35.0%), socio-technical-economic constraints characterization (25.2%), and understanding of end-user technology utilization (22.0%). Conclusion: The scalability and implementation of RPM services must consider contextual factors, such as individuals' and organizations' interests and needs. The PAR approach supports simultaneously designing, developing, testing, and evaluating the RPM technological features, in a real-world context, with the participation of healthcare professionals, developers, and researchers.

Case management intervention of high users of the emergency department of a Portuguese hospital: a before-after design analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) High users (HU), defined as having more than ten visits to the ED per year, are a small group of patients that use a significant proportion of ED resources. The High Users Resolution Group (GRHU) identifies and provides care to HU to improve their health conditions and reduce the frequency of ED visits by delivering patient-centered case management integrated care. The main objective of this study was to measure the impact of the GRHU intervention in reducing ED visits, outpatient appointments, and hospitalizations. As secondary objectives, we aimed to compare the GRHU intervention costs against its potential savings or additional costs. Finally, we intend to study the impact of this intervention across different groups of patients. METHODS: We studied the changes triggered by the GRHU program in a retrospective, non-controlled before-after analysis of patients' hospital utilization data on 6 and 12-month windows from the first appointment. RESULTS: A total of 238 ED HU were intervened. A sample of 152 and 88 patients was analyzed during the 6 and 12-month window, respectively. On the 12-month window, GRHU intervention was associated with a statistically significant reduction of 51% in ED visits and hospitalizations and a non-statistically significant increase in the total number of outpatient appointments. Overall costs were reduced by 43.56%. We estimated the intervention costs to be €79,935.34. The net cost saving was €104,305.25. The program's Return on Investment (ROI) was estimated to be €2.3. CONCLUSION: Patient-centered case management for ED HU seems to effectively reduce ED visits and hospitalizations, leading to better use of resources.

Formal home care use and spousal health outcomes.

This study explores the relationship between formal home care provided by paid professionals and spousal health outcomes. We use data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe, a panel of older adults living in several European countries. We match new formal home care users to non-users to eliminate baseline (t-1) differences between couples who decide to seek formal home care in t and those who do not. After considering several potentially confounding changes between baseline and t, and looking closer at specific subgroups, we conclude that in the short run, use of formal home care is unlikely to affect spousal physical or mental health.