EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has posed multiple challenges to the practice of clinical neurology including recognition of emerging neurological complications and management of coexistent neurological diseases. In a fast-evolving pandemic, evidence-based studies are lacking in many areas. This paper presents European Academy of Neurology (EAN) expert consensus statements to guide neurologists caring for patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A refined Delphi methodology was applied. In round 1, statements were provided by EAN scientific panels (SPs). In round 2, these statements were circulated to SP members not involved in writing them, asking for agreement/disagreement. Items with agreement >70% were retained for round 3, in which SP co-chairs rated importance on a five-point Likert scale. Results were graded by importance and reported as consensus statements. RESULTS: In round one, 70 statements were provided by 23 SPs. In round two, 259/1061 SP member responses were received. Fifty-nine statements obtained >70% agreement and were retained. In round three, responses were received from 55 co-chairs of 29 SPs. Whilst general recommendations related to prevention of COVID-19 transmission had high levels of agreement and importance, opinion was more varied concerning statements related to therapy. CONCLUSION: This is the first structured consensus statement on good clinical practice in patients with neurological disease during the COVID-19 pandemic that provides immediate guidance for neurologists. In this fast-evolving pandemic, a rapid response using refined Delphi methodology is possible, but guidance may be subject to change as further evidence emerges.

The international European Academy of Neurology survey on neurological symptoms in patients with COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the main clinical features of COVID-19 infection are pulmonary, several associated neurological signs, symptoms and diseases are emerging. The incidence and characteristics of neurological complications are unclear. For this reason, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) core COVID-19 Task Force initiated a survey on neurological symptoms observed in patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: A 17-question online survey was made available on the EAN website and distributed to EAN members and other worldwide physicians starting on 9 April 2020. RESULTS: By 27 April 2020, proper data were collected from 2343 responders (out of 4199), of whom 82.0% were neurologists, mostly from Europe. Most responders (74.7%) consulted patients with COVID-19 mainly in emergency rooms and in COVID-19 units. The majority (67.0%) had evaluated fewer than 10 patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19 (neuro COVID-19). The most frequently reported neurological findings were headache (61.9%), myalgia (50.4%), anosmia (49.2%), ageusia (39.8%), impaired consciousness (29.3%) and psychomotor agitation (26.7%). Encephalopathy and acute cerebrovascular disorders were reported at 21.0%. Neurological manifestations were generally interpreted as being possibly related to COVID-19; they were most commonly recognized in patients with multiple general symptoms and occurred at any time during infection. CONCLUSION: Neurologists are currently and actively involved in the management of neurological issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey justifies setting up a prospective registry to better capture the prevalence of patients with neuro COVID-19, neurological disease characteristics and the contribution of neurological manifestations to outcome.

Patients with breakthrough tick-borne encephalitis suffer a more severe clinical course and display extensive magnetic resonance imaging changes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a common viral disease in central Europe and Asia. Severe or even lethal neurological symptoms may ensue. With limited therapeutic options, active vaccination against the TBE virus (TBEV) is strongly recommended in endemic areas. A systematic analysis of the clinical picture and cerebral imaging findings associated with TBE was conducted with particular focus on patients who acquired TBE despite previous vaccination. METHODS: A cohort of 52 patients with serologically proven TBE treated at our centre in a 10-year period who received at least one cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was retrospectively described. Extension of MRI changes was systematically assessed by an experienced neuroradiologist. Standard statistical procedures were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with a definite serological diagnosis of TBE were included. The most common presentation was encephalitis (67%). MRI showed TBE-associated parenchymal lesions in 33% of all patients. Sites of predilection included the periaqueductal grey, the thalamus and the brainstem. Ten patients had received at least one prior active or passive TBEV immunization. All of these had a maximal Rankin Scale score of at least 4. The median number of affected anatomical regions on MRI was significantly higher than in the non-vaccinated cohort. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study systematically describing the peculiarities of MRI in patients vaccinated against TBE. In addition to a severe clinical course, they exhibit more extensive MRI lesions than a non-vaccinated cohort. Possible reasons for these findings include incomplete seroconversion, more virulent TBEV strains or antibody-dependent enhancement.

CXCL13 as a diagnostic marker of neuroborreliosis and other neuroinflammatory disorders in an unselected group of patients.

BACKGROUND: The C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) and its receptor CXCR5 play an important role in the homing of B-lymphocytes. As a biomarker in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), CXCL13 has increasingly been used for the diagnosis of neuroborreliosis (NB). We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic potential of CXCL13 for NB and other neuroinflammatory diseases in an unselected cohort, paying attention to those patients particularly who might benefit from newly emerging CXCL13-directed therapies. METHODS: We report the CSF CXCL13 concentrations and other relevant baseline characteristics for an unselected cohort of 459 patients. We compare different diagnostic groups and analyse the sensitivity and specificity of CSF CXCL13 as a marker of NB. The course of the CXCL13 concentrations is reported in a subgroup of 19 patients. RESULTS: We confirm the high diagnostic yield of CXCL13 for NB in this unselected cohort. The optimal cut-off for the reliable diagnosis of NB was 93.83 pg/ml, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 95 and 97%, respectively (positive predictive value 55.9%, negative predictive value 99.8%), surpassing the sensitivity of both serological testing and PCR. CSF CXCL13 concentration showed a swift response to therapy. Non-NB patients with high CSF CXCL13 concentrations suffered from meningeosis neoplastica or infectious encephalitis. CONCLUSIONS: CXCL13 is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and assessment of therapeutic response in NB. Furthermore, our data point towards an emerging role of CXCL13 in the diagnosis and prognosis of viral encephalitis and meningeosis neoplastica. These results are of particular interest in the light of recently developed approaches to CXCL13-directed therapeutic interventions.

The effect of depression and side effects of antiepileptic drugs on injuries in patients with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: People with epilepsy are at increased risk of accidents and injuries but, despite several studies on this subject, data regarding preventable causes are still contradictory. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between injuries, side effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and depression. METHODS: Data from a consecutive sample of adult patients with epilepsy attending the outpatient clinics at St George's University Hospital in London were included. All patients were asked if they had had any injury since the last clinic appointment and completed the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (LAEP) and Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy. RESULTS: Among 407 patients (243 females, mean age 43.1 years), 71 (17.4%) reported injuries since the last appointment. A two-step cluster analysis revealed two clusters with the major cluster (53.5% of the injured group) showing a total score for LAEP ≥45, a positive Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy screening and presence of AED polytherapy. A total score for LAEP ≥45 was the most important predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Antiepileptic drug treatment should be reviewed in patients reporting injuries in order to evaluate the potential contribution and burden of AED side effects.

Anti-contactin-associated protein-2 encephalitis: relevance of antibody titres, presentation and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To clarify the relevance of titres of IgG antibodies against contactin-associated protein-2 (CASPR2) in diagnosing anti-CASPR2 encephalitis and to describe features and outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 64 patients with CASPR2 antibodies, categorized independently as 'autoimmune encephalitis' or 'other disease'. Logistic regression methods were performed to identify potential predictors of 'autoimmune encephalitis' in addition to CASPR2 antibodies. RESULTS: An upfront CASPR2 antibody serum titre cut-off at ≥1:200 had a diagnostic sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 81%. Logistic regression analyses indicated that, in addition to titre, encephalitic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was a significant predictor of 'autoimmune encephalitis' (Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.81, P < 0.001) with high sensitivity (84%) and very high specificity (100%). Patients with CASPR2 antibodies and an estimated probability of >70% of having anti-CASPR2 encephalitis (n = 22) had limbic encephalitis (n = 18, one patient plus ataxia), Morvan syndrome (n = 2) or a hyperkinetic movement disorder (n = 2). Median modified Rankin score (mRS) at diagnosis was 3 (range 1-4). Twenty patients were male; median age was 64 (range 54-75) years; 5/15 patients with cerebrospinal fluid data had intrathecal CASPR2 antibody synthesis, and 12/19 with follow-ups >3 months (median 12 months, range 4-43 months) improved by ≥1 mRS point resulting in a median mRS of 2 (range 0-6; one death; all but one having received immunotherapy); and 2/15 patients with follow-up MRI developed hippocampal atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Only higher CASPR2 serum antibody titres indicate anti-CASPR2 encephalitis, and diagnostic accuracy increases if MRI findings are considered. Anti-CASPR2 encephalitis has characteristic features and a favourable outcome with immunotherapy.

Clinical correlates of memory complaints during AED treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical correlates of memory complaints (MC) during anti-epileptic drug (AEDs) treatment in adults with epilepsy with special attention to the role of depression, using user-friendly standardized clinical instruments which can be adopted in any outpatient setting. MATERIALS & METHODS: Data from a consecutive sample of adult outpatients with epilepsy assessed with the Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDIE), the Adverse Event Profile (AEP) and the Emotional Thermometer (ET) were analysed. RESULTS: From a total sample of 443 patients, 28.4% reported MC as 'always' a problem. These patients were less likely to be seizure free (18.3% vs 34.3%; P < 0.001), had a high number of previous AED trials (4 vs 3; P < 0.001) and high AEP total scores (49 vs 34.2; P < 0.001). There was no correlation with specific AED type or combination. Depression was the major determinant with a 2-fold increased risk (95%CI 1.15-3.86; P = 0.016). When depression was already known and under treatment, patients with MC were less likely to be in remission from depression despite antidepressant treatment (11.9% vs 1.6% P < 0.001). Among patients without depression, those reporting MC presented with significantly high scores for depression (3.3 vs 2; t = 3.07; P = 0.003), anxiety (4.5 vs 2.7; t = 4.43; P < 0.001), anger (3 vs 2; t = 2.623; P = 0.009) and distress (3.8 vs 2.2; t = 4.027; P < 0.001) than those without MC. CONCLUSIONS: Depression has to be appropriately treated and full remission from depression should represent the ultimate goal as subthreshold or residual mood and anxiety symptoms can contribute to MC.

Limbic encephalitis due to GABAB and AMPA receptor antibodies: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Two novel antibodies (abs) directed to γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABA(B)R) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) in patients with limbic encephalitis (LE) were first described by the Philadelphia/Barcelona groups and confirmed by the Mayo group. We present a novel series for further clinical and paraclinical refinement. METHODS: Serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples from a diagnostic laboratory were selected if found to be positive for GABA(B)R or AMPAR abs within a broad antineuronal ab panel. Data were retrospectively compiled. RESULTS: In 10 patients, we detected abs to GABA(B)R. Median age was 70 years. Five of them were diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Intrathecal GABA(B)R ab synthesis was found in all six patients with sufficient data available (median ab-index: 76.8). On MRI, we found bilateral mediotemporal and in two cases cortical abnormalities. EEG revealed encephalopathy, partly with epileptiform discharges. Five patients received immunotherapy, two patients tumour treatment and three both therapies. Three patients died, in five patients cognitive functions declined, one patient improved slightly and one patient fully recovered. AMPAR abs were detected in three patients with mnestic disturbances. Median age was 60.7 years. The only female patient was diagnosed with ovarian cancer. None of the patients had intrathecal ab synthesis. MRI findings showed bilateral mediotemporal abnormalities. EEG was normal in all patients. Two of the three immunologically treated patients improved, one patient stabilised on a low level. DISCUSSION: GABA(B)R and AMPAR abs are well associated with LE. GABA(B)R abs lead to severe clinical, neuroradiological and EEG abnormalities with poorer outcome.