Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eval Program Plann ; 66: 70-78, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29053983

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Collaborations between communities, healthcare practices and academic institutions are a strategy to address health disparities. Trust is critical in the development and maintaining of effective collaborations. The aim of this pilot study was to engage stakeholders in defining determinants of trust in community academic research partnerships and to develop a framework for measuring trust. METHODS: The study was conducted by five collaborating National Institute of Health' Clinical and Translational Sciences Awardees. We used concept mapping to engage three stakeholders: community members, healthcare providers and academicians. We conducted hierarchical cluster analysis to assess the determinants of trust in community-academic research partnerships. RESULTS: A total of 186 participants provided input generating 2,172 items that were consolidated into 125 unique items. A five cluster solution was defined: authentic, effective and transparent communication; mutually respectful and reciprocal relationships; sustainability; committed partnerships; and, communication, credibility and methodology to anticipate and resolve problems. CONCLUSION: Results from this study contribute to an increasing empirical body of work to better understand and improve the underlying factors that contribute to building and sustaining trust in community academic research partnerships.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/organización & administración , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Confianza , Universidades/organización & administración , Comunicación , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/organización & administración , Proyectos Piloto , Investigadores/organización & administración , Investigadores/psicología , Estados Unidos
2.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 11(1): 81-86, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28603154

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Academic partners typically build community capacity for research, but few examples exist whereby community partners build community research capacity. This paper describes the benefits of communities sharing their "best practices" with each other for the purpose of building health research capacity. METHODS: In the context of a grant designed to engage African American communities to address health disparities (Faith Academic Initiatives Transforming Health [FAITH] in the Delta), leaders of two counties exchanged their "best practices" of creating faith-based networks and community health assessment tools to conduct a collective health assessment. LESSONS LEARNED: There were numerous strengths in engaging communities to build each other's capacity to conduct research. Communities identified with each other, perceived genuineness, conveyed legitimacy, and provided insider knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging communities to build each other's research capacity is a potentially valuable strategy.


Asunto(s)
Afroamericanos , Creación de Capacidad/organización & administración , Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Arkansas , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Población Rural
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA