Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 59(4S): S72-S76, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31248844

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives of this study were to determine the percentage of travel recommendations accepted by individuals serviced at a university travel health clinic and to identify barriers to travel recommendation acceptance or implementation by travelers. A secondary objective was to use details regarding the identified barriers to refine travel clinic protocols. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized an 11-item questionnaire, conducted via telephone from February 2018 to April 2018. The survey was administered by a pharmacist employed at the travel clinic. The following data were collected: travel itinerary, content of pharmacist provided travel recommendation(s), acceptance of pharmacist travel recommendation(s) or reason for declining the recommendation(s), patient utilization of supplemental recommendations (e.g., traveler's diarrhea treatment flowchart, over-the-counter travel items, accessing medical care abroad), perceived usefulness of travel clinic resources, and the status of patient health during travel and upon return. Data was evaluated using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 205 travelers were screened to participate in the study; 85 surveys were completed, resulting in a 41% response rate. Of 349 travel vaccination recommendations made, 242 (69%) were accepted by patients. The vaccine recommendations with the lowest acceptance were Japanese Encephalitis (18%, n = 2/11), rabies (27%, n = 15/55), and influenza (51%, n = 41/80). The top reasons for declining included cost (40%, n = 34), lack of perceived necessity (37%, n = 31), and timing (16%, n = 14). In addition, 68% reported using travel clinic advice if they became ill during travel. CONCLUSION: This study showed a positive response to recommendations provided by this travel clinic. Cost and 'lack of perceived necessity' were identified as barriers to acceptance of recommendations. Travel clinic protocols will be refined to provide further education to travelers about unfamiliar disease states that may pose an increased risk during travel, aiming to increase acceptance of pharmacist-provided recommendations.

2.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(1): 86-89.e1, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27843108

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential outcomes of pharmacist intervention on patient selection of nonprescription and self-care products and to evaluate patient confidence and satisfaction with the assistance of the pharmacist. METHODS: A prospective, convenience sample study was conducted at 3 locations of a national supermarket chain pharmacy in the Charlottesville, Virginia, area over 4 months. Patients were recruited for the study if they approached the pharmacy counter and requested assistance with nonprescription and self-care product selection or if the investigating pharmacists approached the patient in the self-care aisles. Men and nonpregnant women age 18 years and older were included in the study. Patients self-selected into the study by agreeing to participate in the study intervention and answering questions relating to their experience with the pharmacist consultation. The study intervention was the pharmacist consultation with the patient to assess the self-care complaint and to make an appropriate recommendation. RESULTS: Forty-two patients participated, the mean (±SD) age was 57 ± 20.8 years, and 62% of patients were female. Sixty percent of patients had used pharmacist help in the past in selecting nonprescription and self-care products. There were 87 total potential outcomes, and a mean of 2.1 potential outcomes per patient. The most potential common outcomes were reduced drug cost, avoided physician visit, corrected product use, and avoided a new prescription. Mean patient confidence (±SD) was 4.38 ± 0.96. Mean patient satisfaction was 4.98. Every patient (100%) stated that they would be more willing to ask for pharmacist help in the future with self-care product selection. The mean encounter time was 6 minutes. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' active involvement in patient self-care consultation may help patients to select the most effective and safe product and improve patient outcomes. Patients are highly satisfied with pharmacists' help with the selection of nonprescription and self-care products and are more confident with future self-treatment.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Rol Profesional , Estudios Prospectivos , Autocuidado/métodos , Virginia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA