Transfusion outcomes and clinical safety of ABO-nonidentical platelets transfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: ABO-nonidentical platelets transfusion has been frequently employed to address clinical platelets insufficiencies. The significance of ABO compatibility for platelets transfusion is not clearly defined. This study is aimed to explore the transfusion outcomes and clinical safety of ABO-nonidentical platelets transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic articles search was performed for eligible studies published up to November 30, 2023 through the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Wanfang database and SinMed. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology study guidelines for observational studies and Newcastle Ottawa bias scale were implemented to assess studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Manager 5.3. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42023417824. RESULTS: A total of 11 retrospective cohort studies and 7 prospective cohort studies with a sample size of 104,359 platelets transfusions were included. There was significant difference in transfusion effectiveness between the ABO-identical and ABO-nonidentical platelets transfusions (RR 1.20, 95 % CI 1.11-1.38, P < 0.00001, I2 = 21 %), also the ABO-identical platelets transfusions showed more platelets increment than ABO-nonidentical ones, but it was not statistically significant (MD 0.34, 95 % CI - 0.01 to 0.70, P = 0.06, I2 = 0 %). Allergy and fever occurred more in ABO-nonidentical platelets transfusions in terms of adverse reactions (RR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.41-0.96, P = 0.03, I2 = 0 %; RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.37-0.94, P = 0.03, I2 = 31 %). When it comes to the mortality, the ABO-identical platelets transfusions did not statistically improve survival in patients who received multiple platelets transfusions (RR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.72-0.83, P = 0.17, I2 = 38 %) and who only received less than 3 transfusions (RR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.52-1.06, P = 0.10, I2 = 47 %) compared with the ABO-nonidentical platelets transfusions. CONCLUSION: In comparison to ABO-identical platelets transfusions, nonidentical platelets transfusions exhibited lower transfusion efficacy. However, the clinical safety between these two groups was similar, which indicated that ABO-nonidentical transfusions are acceptable, albeit inferior to ABO-identical ones.

Impact of dose and storage duration of platelet concentrates on platelet recovery between ABO identical and ABO non-identical random donor platelet transfusions in hemato-oncology patients.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: It is challenging to adopt a policy of ABO identical platelet transfusion in hemato-oncological patients because of the high demand. Moreover, there are no global standards for the management of ABO non-identical platelet transfusions due to limited evidence. The current study compared the impact of dose and storage duration of platelets on percent platelet recovery (PPR) at 1 h and 24 h between ABO identical and ABO non-identical platelet transfusions in hemato-oncological conditions. The other objectives were to assess the clinical efficacy and compare adverse reactions between the two groups. METHODS: A total of 130 random donor platelet transfusion episodes (81 ABO identical and 49 ABO non-identical) were evaluated in 60 eligible patients with different malignant, as well as non-malignant, hematological conditions. All analysis was performed using two-sided tests, and p-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The PPR at 1 h and 24 h was significantly higher in ABO identical platelet transfusion. Platelet recovery and survival were not affected by the gender, dose or storage duration of platelet concentrate. Aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) disease conditions were observed to be independent risk predictors for 1-h post-transfusion refractoriness. CONCLUSION: ABO identical platelets have higher platelet recovery and survival. Both ABO identical and ABO non-identical platelet transfusions have similar efficacy in controlling bleeding episodes up to World Health Organization (WHO) grade two. Assessment of other factors, such as platelet functional properties in the donor, anti-HLA and anti-HPA antibodies, may be needed to better understand the platelet efficacy of platelet transfusions.

A prospective observational study to compare transfusion outcomes in ABO identical versus ABO non-identical single donor platelet concentrates: An experience from a tertiary healthcare center in India.

ABO incompatible single donor platelet concentrates (SDPC) have a concern about unsatisfactory increments as well as possibility of hemolytic transfusion reaction. But from Indian population no study has commented on the clinical and laboratory outcome of ABO mismatched platelet transfusion. The aim of study was to compare transfusion outcomes in ABO identical versus ABO non-identical single donor platelet concentrates. In this prospective observational study, 400 SDPC transfusions among different patients were included. In group A (n=200), ABO identical SDPC transfusions and in group B (n=200) ABO non-identical SDPC transfusions were added. Corrective count increment (CCI), absolute count increment (ACI), percent platelet recovery (PPR) were calculated and incidents of hemolytic transfusion reactions were noted. In group A mean±SD of ACI, CCI and PPR were as 30.78±12.51, 15.10±6.677, 39,948.9±20,099.392. In group B, mean±SD of ACI, CCI and PPR were - 25.4±15.65, 12.509±5.906, 33,559.2±22,150.304. And when CCI, ACI, PPR were compared with group A and group B, statistically significant differences were noted (P<0.05). There was statistically significant difference in CCI, ACI and PPR in oncology patients and other prophylactic recipients except patients with dengue and other infectious disease. But there was no hemolytic transfusion reaction noted in any group. Our study clearly establish the potential benefits of ABO-identical PLT transfusion. It also points out that in emergency conditions or when there is a paucity in inventory, ABO non-identical SDPC transfusion may be lifesaving and clinically significant.

Effectiveness of Pooled Platelet Transfusion in Concordant and Discordant Groups among Dengue Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Dengue affects more than 50 million people per year and is one of the most common causes of severe thrombocytopaenia. Thrombocytopaenia is a common complication of dengue and other viral fevers apart from malaria, typhoid, leptospirosis, leukaemia and megaloblastic anaemia. A platelet count of <20,000/µl is characteristically seen in dengue haemorrhagic fever and dengue fever. It results from immune complex mediated platelet destruction or bone marrow suppression. Severe thrombocytopaenia <10,000/µl is one of the indications for prophylactic platelet transfusion therapy to prevent haemorrhage. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of transfusion of ABO compatible and ABO incompatible pooled platelet units in severe thrombocytopaenia cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study ABO compatible and incompatible pooled platelet units were transfused to serologically confirmed dengue cases having thrombocytopaenia with or without bleeding manifestations. Each of the adult patients received 4-6 units of pooled platelet concentrates prepared from random donor whole blood suspended in plasma for severe thrombocytopaenia. Pre and post transfusion platelet counts were compared. Children aged less than 12 years, pregnant women and patients with splenomegaly those on ayurvedic and homeopathic therapy, recipients of packed red cells on the same day of platelet transfusion and recipients of multiple platelet transfusions within 24 hours were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The median post transfusion platelet increments (PPI) and corrected count increments (CCI) at 4hour post transfusion were 25,000/µL (5,000-80,000/µL) and 18,000/µL (range 8,000/µL- 47,500/µL) respectively among the responders. Median PPI and CCI at 24 hours were 45,000/µL and 28,863/µL among the responders. The median CCI at 4 hour post transfusion among the non-responders was 850/µL and at 24hours was 1,425/µL. At 24 hours responders showed significantly higher PPI as compared to non responders. The average platelets transfused were 4units in case of responders and 8 units in case of non-responders. CONCLUSION: ABO identical and compatible pooled platelet transfusions were more successful in increasing the post transfusion platelet counts as compared to ABO incompatible pooled platelets.

Single-lung transplantation with ABO-compatible donors results in excellent outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine if carefully selected ABO-compatible donors in single-lung transplantation results in acceptable outcomes. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed for adult single-lung transplant recipients from May 2005 to December 2011. Recipients of lungs from ABO-compatible donors were compared with those of ABO-identical donors. Mortality was examined with risk-adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression using significant univariate predictors. RESULTS: Of 3,572 single-lung transplants, 342 (9.6%) were from ABO-compatible donors. The two groups were evenly matched in recipient age (60.8 vs 60.2 years, p = 0.28), male gender (61.8% vs 58.2%, p = 0.10), lung allocation score (43.4 vs 42.6, p = 0.32), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; 41.2% vs 40.8%, p = 0.32), and ischemic time (4.2 vs 4.0 hours, p = 0.09), and donor age (34.4 vs 32.9, p = 0.07) and male gender (61.5 vs 65.5, p = 0.14). ABO-compatible donors were less likely to be race mismatched (58.3% vs 50.9%, p = 0.01). Median survival was not different (1,284.0 vs 1,540 days, p = 0.39). On multivariate analysis, lungs from ABO-compatible donors were not associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.22; p = 0.86). Prolonged ischemic time, increasing recipient creatinine, increasing recipient age, race mismatch, class I plasma reactive antigen panel > 10%, and the use of mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with mortality. Peak post-transplant FEV1 (64.5% vs 64.0%, p = 0.69) and decrement in FEV1 over time were similar (p = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: This large multi-institutional analysis of ABO-compatible donors in single-lung transplantation demonstrates that careful selection of ABO-compatible donors results in excellent outcomes.