Functional genomics for curation of variants in telomere biology disorder associated genes: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Patients with an underlying telomere biology disorder (TBD) have variable clinical presentations, and they can be challenging to diagnose clinically. A genomic diagnosis for patients presenting with TBD is vital for optimal treatment. Unfortunately, many variants identified during diagnostic testing are variants of uncertain significance. This complicates management decisions, delays treatment, and risks nonuptake of potentially curative therapies. Improved application of functional genomic evidence may reduce variants of uncertain significance classifications. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for published functional assays interrogating TBD gene variants. When possible, established likely benign/benign and likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants were used to estimate the assay sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and odds of pathogenicity. RESULTS: In total, 3131 articles were screened and 151 met inclusion criteria. Sufficient data to enable a PS3/BS3 recommendation were available for TERT variants only. We recommend that PS3 and BS3 can be applied at a moderate and supportive level, respectively. PS3/BS3 application was limited by a lack of assay standardization and limited inclusion of benign variants. CONCLUSION: Further assay standardization and assessment of benign variants are required for optimal use of the PS3/BS3 criterion for TBD gene variant classification.

A practical guide to interpreting germline variants that drive hematopoietic malignancies, bone marrow failure, and chronic cytopenias.

PURPOSE: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines for germline variant interpretation are implemented as a broad framework by standardizing variant interpretation. These rules were designed to be specified, but this process has not been performed for most of the 200 genes associated with inherited hematopoietic malignancies, bone marrow failure, and cytopenias. Because guidelines on how to perform these gene specifications are lacking, variant interpretation is less reliable and reproducible. METHODS: We have used a variety of methods such as calculations of minor allele frequencies, quasi-case-control studies to establish thresholds, proband counting, and plotting of receiver operating characteristic curves to compare different in silico prediction tools to design recommendations for variant interpretation. RESULTS: We herein provide practical recommendations for the creation of thresholds for minor allele frequencies, in silico predictions, counting of probands, identification of functional domains with minimal benign variation, use of constraint Z-scores and functional evidence, prediction of nonsense-mediated decay, and assessment of phenotype specificity. CONCLUSION: These guidelines can be used by anyone interpreting variants associated with inherited hematopoietic malignancies, bone marrow failure, and cytopenias to develop criteria for reliable, accurate, and reproducible germline variant interpretation.

Adapting the ACMG/AMP variant classification framework: A perspective from the ClinGen Hemoglobinopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.

Accurate and consistent interpretation of sequence variants is integral to the delivery of safe and reliable diagnostic genetic services. To standardize the interpretation process, in 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) published a joint guideline based on a set of shared standards for the classification of variants in Mendelian diseases. The generality of these standards and their subjective interpretation between laboratories has prompted efforts to reduce discordance of variant classifications, with a focus on the expert specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for individual genes or diseases. Herein, we describe our experience as a ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel to adapt the ACMG/AMP criteria for the classification of variants in three globin genes (HBB, HBA2, and HBA1) related to recessively inherited hemoglobinopathies, including five evidence categories, as use cases demonstrating the process of specification and the underlying rationale.

Considerations for using population frequency data in germline variant interpretation: Cancer syndrome genes as a model.

Aggregate population genomics data from large cohorts are vital for assessing germline variant pathogenicity. However, there are no specifications on how sequencing quality metrics should be considered, and whether exome-derived and genome-derived allele frequencies should be considered in isolation. Germline genome sequence data were simulated for nine read-depths to identify a minimum acceptable read-depth for detecting variants. gnomAD exome-derived and genome-derived datasets were assessed for read-depth, for six key cancer genes selected for variant curation by ClinGen expert panels. Non-Finnish European allele frequency (AF) or filter AF of coding variants in these genes, assigned into frequency bins using modified ACMG-AMP criteria, was compared between exome-derived and genome-derived datasets. A 30X read-depth achieved acceptable precision and recall for detection of substitutions, but poor recall for small insertions/deletions. Exome-derived and genome-derived datasets exhibited low read-depth for different gene exons. Individual variants were mostly assigned to non-divergent AF bins (>95%) or filter AF bins (>97%). Two major bin divergences were resolved by applying the minimal acceptable read-depth threshold. These findings show the importance of assessing read-depth separately for population datasets sourced from different short-read sequencing technologies before assigning a frequency-based ACMG-AMP classification code for variant interpretation.

Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants.

PURPOSE: The ability of a single technology, next-generation sequencing, to provide both sequence and copy number variant (CNV) results has driven the merger of clinical cytogenetics and molecular genetics. Consequently, the distinction between the definition of a sequence variant and a CNV is blurry. As the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) standards and guidelines for interpretation of sequence variants address CNV classification only sparingly, this study focused on adapting ACMG/AMP criteria for single-gene CNV interpretation. METHODS: CNV-specific modifications of the 2015 ACMG/AMP criteria were developed and their utility was independently tested by three diagnostic laboratories. Each laboratory team interpreted the same 12 single-gene CNVs using three systems: (1) without ACMG/AMP guidance, (2) with ACMG/AMP criteria, and (3) with new modifications. A replication study of 12 different CNVs validated the modified criteria. RESULTS: The adapted criteria system presented here showed improved concordance and usability for single-gene CNVs compared with using the ACMG/AMP interpretation guidelines focused on sequence variants. CONCLUSION: These single-gene CNV criteria modifications could be used as a supplement to the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variants, allowing for a streamlined workflow and a step toward a uniform classification system for both sequence and copy number alterations.