Priapism – A rare side effect of alpha blockers: Report of 2 cases and literature review / Priapismo – Un efecto secundario raro de los alfabloqueantes: informe de dos casos y revisión de la literatura

Priapism is a prolonged unintended erectile state unrelated to sexual stimulation or sexual desire. There is a very rare relationship between the use of alpha blockers and the development of priapism. Here, we describe 2 cases of alpha blocker induced priapism and a literature review. One of these cases is related to the use of silodosin and the other is related to the use of tamsulosin. So far, 18 alpha blocker induced priapism cases have been reported. We are presenting the first case of silodosin induced priapism and the eighth case of priapism secondary to tamsulosin. Despite silodosin having a much greater affinity for the α1-a receptor than the α1-b receptor, as represented in this case it can cause this rare side effect. Before starting alpha blocker treatment, side effects such as priapism, which may be very rare but may cause serious problems, should be kept in mind. (AU)

El priapismo es un estado eréctil prolongado no intencionado y no relacionado con la estimulación o el deseo sexual. Existe una relación muy infrecuente entre el uso de alfabloqueantes y el desarrollo de priapismo. Describimos aquí dos casos de priapismo inducido por alfabloqueantes y una revisión de la literatura. Uno de estos casos guarda relación con el uso de silodosina, y el otro con el uso de tamsulosina. Hasta el momento se han reportado 18 casos de priapismo inducido por alfabloquantes. Presentamos aquí el primer caso de priapismo inducido por silodosina y el octavo caso de priapismo secundario a tamsulosina. A pesar de que silodosina tiene mucha mayor afinidad por el receptor α1-a que el receptor α1-b, según lo representado en este caso, puede causar este efecto secundario raro. Antes de iniciarse tratamiento con alfabloquantes deben tenerse en cuenta los efectos secundarios, tales como priapismo, que pueden ser muy raros pero pueden causar problemas graves. (AU)

Priapism - A rare side effect of alpha blockers: Report of 2 cases and literature review.

Priapism is a prolonged unintended erectile state unrelated to sexual stimulation or sexual desire. There is a very rare relationship between the use of alpha blockers and the development of priapism. Here, we describe 2 cases of alpha blocker induced priapism and a literature review. One of these cases is related to the use of silodosin and the other is related to the use of tamsulosin. So far, 18 alpha blocker induced priapism cases have been reported. We are presenting the first case of silodosin induced priapism and the eighth case of priapism secondary to tamsulosin. Despite silodosin having a much greater affinity for the α1-a receptor than the α1-b receptor, as represented in this case it can cause this rare side effect. Before starting alpha blocker treatment, side effects such as priapism, which may be very rare but may cause serious problems, should be kept in mind.

Diagnosis and treatment of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms in Spain - The MERCURY Study. Do urologists follow the recommendations of the European guidelines? / Diagnóstico y tratamiento del paciente varón con síntomas del tracto urinario inferior en España - Estudio MERCURY. ¿Seguimos los urólogos las recomendaciones de las guías europeas?

OBJECTIVES: To explore the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men in Spain and assess the compliance with recommendations established in the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MERCURY was an epidemiological and cross-sectional study which involved 227 Urology Units across Spain assessing adult male patients with mixed LUTS and persisting storage symptoms. Sociodemographic, clinical and resource use data for the 6 months prior to study inclusion were collected. Additionally, through a theoretical clinical case, clinicians described their attitude toward the diagnostic and therapeutic management of males with mixed LUTS and persisting storage symptoms during the first and second visits. Answer options given to clinicians about LUTS management were aligned with those recommended by EAU guidelines. RESULT: 610 patients included in the study were evaluated. 87.7% of them consumed some health resource mainly due to: urologist visits (79.7%), PSA determination (76.6%) and treatment with alpha-blockers (37.5%) and alpha-blockers plus antimuscarinics (37.2%). According to the theoretical clinical case, urologists preference toward diagnostic tools and pharmacological treatment in first visit were mainly PSA determination (97.7%), digital rectal examination (91.4%) and treatment with alphablockers as monotherapy (56.6%), whereas in the second visit uroflowmetry (48.9%), voiding diary (40.3%) and treatment with alpha-blockers plus antimuscarinics (70.6%) were mainly preferred. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists attitude toward management of male patients with mixed LUTS and persisting storage symptoms is aligned with that recommended in the EAU guidelines.