Una miniplaca de titanio en comparación a dos miniplacas de titanio para fracturas de ángulo mandibular favorables y aisladas / One miniplate or two mini plates in the fixation of favorable and isolated mandibular angle fractures

RESUMEN: Introducción: Las fracturas mandibulares producen serias comorbilidades, alteraciones en la función, calidad de vida entre otros. Existen distintas alternativas quirúrgicas en las fracturas favorables de ángulo mandibular, siendo las más utilizadas las técnicas de estabilización mediante miniplacas de titanio. No existe consenso sobre si es más efectivo y seguro utilizar una o dos miniplacas de titanio. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados y conclusiones: Identificamos 7 revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron 17 estudios primarios, de los cuales 3 son ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el tratamiento de estabilización mediante una miniplaca de titanio probablemente disminuye el riesgo de paresia facial. Por otro lado, el uso de una miniplaca podría aumentar el riesgo de dehiscencia de la herida quirúrgica, disminuir el riesgo de reintervención quirúrgica y podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en el riesgo de maloclusión, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. No está claro si el uso de una en comparación con dos miniplacas de titanio reduce el riesgo de infección y parestesia ya que la certeza de la evidencia disponible es muy baja.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Mandibular fractures produce severe comorbidities, functional alterations, changes in the quality of life, among others. There are different surgical alternatives for favorable mandibular angle fractures; the most used is the stabilization techniques using titanium miniplates. There is no consensus on which it is more effective and safe; use one or two titanium miniplates. Methods: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. Results and conclusions: We identified seven systematic reviews that included 17 primary studies, in which three were randomized trials. We conclude that stabilization treatment with a titanium miniplate probably reduces the risk of facial paresis. On the other hand, the use of a miniplate could increase the risk of dehiscence of the surgical wound, decrease the risk of reoperation, and could result in little or no difference in the risk of malocclusion, but the certainty of the evidence is low. It is not clear whether the use of one compared to two titanium miniplates reduces the risk of infection and paresthesia since the certainty of the available evidence is very low.

Evaluation of different stable internal fixation in unfavorable mandible fractures under finite element analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The mandibular angle fracture is the most common fracture between this type of injury in jaw bone and also is the type of fracture treatment that presents a larger number of complications, and a series different osteosynthesis types have been studied over the years by the world literature. The finite element method is a form of mathematical analysis, which is based on dividing a structure into a finite number of small areas. It has the ability tomathematically model structures, making it possible to apply forces anywhere. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this study, a three-dimensional mandible with an unfavorable angle fracture was simulated. Five different types of fixations were evaluated: group 1, Champy technique with one 4-holes miniplate, 2.0 system; group 2, technique with two parallel 4-holes conventional miniplates, 2.0 system; group 3, technique with two parallel 4-holes locking miniplates, 2.0 system; group 4, technique with one reconstruction 6-holes plate, 2.8 system in base jaw; and group 5, technique with one reconstruction 6-holes plates, 2.8 system in jaw body + one parallel 4-holes conventional miniplate, 2.0 system. RESULTS: The results showed that strains are better distributed through the locking miniplate and screws system and presented less stress concentration when compared with the conventional ones. The Champy technique had the worst results about of all groups. The use of the locking system shows less stress compared to the non-locking system, and the presence of a reconstruction plate associated with a mini plate does not lead to increased stability compared with an isolated reconstruction plate.

Mandibular angle fractures: a comparative study between one- and two-plate fixation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The mandibular angle fracture is a challenging fracture to manage. Over time, the literature has shown many types of treatment modalities and different kinds of internal fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications of mandibular angle fractures managed by Champy's technique and two-plate fixation, over a period of 20 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The files of 149 patients with 155 angle fractures fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were chosen for this study. Data were collected regarding gender, age, race, date of trauma, addictions, etiology, signs and symptoms, fracture management, and complications. RESULTS: Prevalence was higher in males (82%), Caucasians (62%), and during the third decade of life (62%). Mean age was 26.5 years. The main cause was interpersonal violence, and the mean follow-up period was 232 days. The main signs and symptoms were pain, edema, and mouth-opening restriction. The most often associated fracture involved the mandibular condyle, and the most common complication was infection. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the two modalities of treatment. However, the one-plate fixation technique had fewer complications.

In vitro evaluation of the resistance of a 2.0-mm titanium fixation system in the sectioned angle without continuity of the inferior border of the mandible.

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical resistance of a 2.0-mm titanium system applied to the mandibular angle, either with or without continuity of the inferior border of the mandible. Polyurethane mandibles were used as substrates and divided into two groups: unfavourable and favourable to treatment. A single cut was made through the retromolar region, simulating an angle fracture either unfavourable or favourable to treatment. In addition, a small fragment of the inferior border of the mandible was removed in some of the mandibles, creating a discontinuity. The fragments were stabilized in accordance with the technique of Champy et al. The substrates were adapted to a universal mechanical testing machine and submitted to a constant load applied at three different points; load values were obtained at three different moments of displacement: 1mm, 2mm, and fixation failure. The value of the tip dislocation at final displacement was obtained. When the load was applied at the first molars, regardless of the side, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. When the load was applied at the central incisors, a statistically significant difference was observed at fixation failure in the unfavourable to treatment group, with better results in the subgroup with continuity of the inferior border of the mandible compared to the subgroup without continuity. Discontinuity of the inferior border of the mandible did not decrease the mechanical resistance of the fixation.

Does the Relationship between Retained Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Angle Fracture Exist? An Assessment of Three Possible Causes.

The objective of this study is to discuss problems associated with dental retention through three clinical cases of mandible fractures related to the presence of retained lower third molars, emphasizing the possibility of mandible fractures resulting from this or from the extraction procedure. The three evaluated patients had a fracture in the mandible angle. The third molars were present in all the cases, as was the relationship of the fracture with the teeth. After evaluating the three cases and reviewing literature, it is believed that the presence of the retained lower third molars and the surgical procedures for their extraction increase the risk of mandible angle fractures.