The relationship between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and autoimmune diseases.

Objective: There have been reports of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) coexisting with connective tissue disorders. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of NMOSD coexisting with autoimmune diseases (AID). Methods: This retrospective study evaluated NMOSD patients with and without AID. The enrolled patients had at least one attack, with duration of more than 1 year. Data on the demographics, clinical features, and laboratory findings were assessed. The Poisson model was used to investigate the risk factors associated with the annualized relapse rate (ARR), whereas the Cox model was used to evaluate the risk factors for the first relapse. Results: A total of 180 patients (154 women and 26 men) with NMOSD were identified: 45 had AID and 135 did not. Female patients had a higher prevalence of concomitant AID (p = 0.006) and a greater relapse rate within the first year. There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that NMOSD patients with seropositive aquaporin 4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab; log-rank: p = 0.044), had a shorter time to relapse. Patients seropositive for AQP4-Ab (HR = 2.402, 95%CI = 1.092-5.283, p = 0.029) had a higher risk of suffering a first relapse, according to the Cox model. Patients with and without AID showed a similar declining tendency in terms of change in ARR throughout the first 5 years of the disease. The ARR was greater in the first year [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.534, 95%CI = 1.111-2.118] and the first 2 years (IRR = 1.474, 95%CI = 1.056-2.058) in patients with coexisting AID diagnosis prior to the NMOSD onset. Conclusions: Patients with NMOSD with coexisting AID had similar characteristics when compared with those without AID. NMOSD patients with AID diagnosed before onset had a higher risk of relapse in the early stage of the disease.

Comparative efficacy of ofatumumab versus oral therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis patients using propensity score analyses and simulated treatment comparisons.

Background: Evidence from network meta-analyses (NMAs) and real-world propensity score (PS) analyses suggest monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer a therapeutic advantage over currently available oral therapies and, therefore, warrant consideration as a distinct group of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This is counter to the current perception of these therapies by some stakeholders, including payers. Objectives: A multifaceted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was undertaken to clarify the relative efficacy of mAbs and oral therapies. Design: Two ITC methods that use individual patient data (IPD) to adjust for between-trial differences, PS analyses and simulated treatment comparisons (STCs), were used to compare the mAb ofatumumab versus the oral therapies cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod. Data sources and methods: As IPD were available for trials of ofatumumab and fingolimod, PS analyses were conducted. Given summary-level data were available for cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod trials, STCs were conducted between ofatumumab and each of these oral therapies. Three efficacy outcomes were compared: annualized relapse rate (ARR), 3-month confirmed disability progression (3mCDP), and 6-month CDP (6mCDP). Results: The PS analyses demonstrated ofatumumab was statistically superior to fingolimod for ARR and time to 3mCDP but not time to 6mCDP. In STCs, ofatumumab was statistically superior in reducing ARR and decreasing the proportion of patients with 3mCDP compared with cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod and in decreasing the proportion with 6mCP compared with fingolimod and ozanimod. These findings were largely consistent with recently published NMAs that identified mAb therapies as the most efficacious DMTs for RMS. Conclusion: Complementary ITC methods showed ofatumumab was superior to cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod in lowering relapse rates and delaying disability progression among patients with RMS. Our study supports the therapeutic superiority of mAbs over currently available oral DMTs for RMS and the delineation of mAbs as high-efficacy therapies.

Advances in the long-term treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune neuroinflammatory disorder with a prevalence of 1-5/100,000 globally, characterized by attacks of the central nervous system including but not limited to optic neuritis, transverse myelitis and brainstem lesions, including area postrema lesions. These autoimmune attacks can lead to irreversible damage if left untreated, therefore strategies have been developed to prevent relapses. Initial off-label treatments have achieved variable levels of success in relapse prevention, but improved relapse prevention and quality of life remain a goal in the field. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of NMOSD over the last 10 years has led to newer, more specific approaches in treatment, culminating in the first FDA approved treatments in the disease. In this review, we will discuss the seminal trials of PREVENT or Eculizumab in the treatment of aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG positive NMOSD, N-Momentum or Inebilizumab in the study of NMOSD (both AQP4-IgG positive and negative) and SAkura Sky and SAkuraStar which studied satralizumab in AQP4-IgG seropositive and seronegative NMOSD patients. We will also discuss the extension trials of each of these medications and what lead to their approval in AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD patients. We will then examine treatments in the pipeline for adult and pediatric NMOSD patients and conclude with discussions on treatment considerations in pregnant patients and how to approach treatment of NMOSD patients during COVID.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare central nervous system inflammatory disorder caused by the aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP-4 IgG) labeling and immune system attack of astrocytes, and later downstream loss of myelin, the protective sheath surrounding neurons. It occurs in approximately 1-5 individuals per 100,000 globally and is characterized by attacks of the central nervous system including but not limited to optic neuritis, transverse myelitis and brainstem lesions, including area postrema lesions. These autoimmune attacks can lead to irreversible damage if left untreated, therefore strategies have been developed to prevent additional attacks. Initial off-label treatments have achieved variable levels of success in relapse prevention, but improved immune attack prevention and quality of life remain a goal in the field. A better understanding of the underlying causes of NMOSD over the last 10 years has led to newer, more specific approaches in treatment, culminating in the first FDA approved treatments in the disease. In this review, we will discuss the trials PREVENT or Eculizumab in the treatment of aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG positive NMOSD, N-Momentum or Inebilizumab in the study of NMOSD (both AQP4-IgG positive and negative) and SAkura Sky and SAkuraStar which studied satralizumab in AQP4-IgG seropositive and seronegative NMOSD patients. We will also discuss the extension trials of each of these medications and what lead to their approval in AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD patients. We will then examine treatments in the pipeline for adult and pediatric NMOSD patients and conclude with discussions on treatment considerations in pregnant patients and how to approach treatment of NMOSD patients during COVID.

Patterns of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attacks in different age groups and sexes depending on the status of immunosuppressive therapy: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association between onset age and sex with relapse risk in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remains inconclusive. We aimed to describe the clinical features of patients with NMOSD in different age groups and sexes and to analyse relapse characteristics pre- and post-immunosuppressive therapy (IST). METHODS: Patients with NMOSD were retrospectively reviewed from our clinical centre's database. Demographic and clinical data, attack presentation, and disease course pre- and post-IST were investigated. We also analysed the effect of onset age on the annualized relapse rate and relapse risk according to sex and IST status. Interactions on the additive scale between onset age and sex were analysed. A restricted cubic spline was used to analyse potential nonlinear correlations. Longitudinal changes in the Expanded Disability Status Scale score across NMOSD attacks were analysed using linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: In total, 533 patients experienced 1394 attacks pre-IST and 753 relapses post-IST. Older age at onset was correlated with more myelitis attacks but fewer optic neuritis attacks, with no sex-related differences in attack presentation. Pre-IST, relapse risk increased with age at onset in women, while a U-shaped correlation between onset age and relapse risk was found in men. Post-IST, an inverted U-shaped association between the predicted relapse risk and onset age was observed in women. Conversely, a negative correlation between the predicted relapse risk and onset age was found in men. Overall, a higher ratio of myelitis attacks was found post-IST. CONCLUSIONS: Patients of different onset ages and sexes had different relapse patterns before and after IST.

Tocilizumab treatment in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Updated meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.

This systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the efficacy and safety of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in treating NMOSD and investigates the factors that affect its efficacy. TCZ is the first monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor for treating NMOSD, and its efficacy and safety vary in different studies. We collected English-language research literature until January 1, 2023, by searching databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, and identified 9 studies involving 153 patients (139 female and 14 male) that met our inclusion criteria. In these studies, the average ARR ratio and EDSS score reduction values in the TCZ treatment group were -1.34 (95 % CI, -1.60 to -1.09) and -0.81 (95 % CI, -1.04 to -0.58), respectively. Based on the data we have collected, compared to the AQP4-IgG negative NMOSD patients, TCZ demonstrates a more pronounced effectiveness in AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD patients. The study also found that the effectiveness of TCZ in reducing NMOSD patients' ARR ratio was related to gender, race, and TCZ dosage, while the effectiveness of reducing EDSS score was not related to these factors. Among the 153 patients receiving TCZ treatment, 101 (66 %) experienced mild adverse reactions, and one patient experienced a severe adverse reaction (facial cellulitis). The comprehensive data indicate that TCZ treatment can reduce the frequency of NMOSD relapses, improve patients' neurological function, and have good safety. The effectiveness of TCZ in reducing NMOSD patients' ARR ratio is related to multiple factors.

Comparison of multiple sclerosis patients with or without rebound activity after fingolimod cessation: Five-year clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who discontinue fingolimod might present with rebound activity. The reasons for the development of rebound have been identified, but there are limited data on the long-term clinical outcomes of these patients. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with MS with and without rebound activity after fingolimod discontinuation. METHODS: A total of 31 patients who discontinued fingolimod for various reasons with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included in the study. Of these, 10 were assigned to the rebound group and 21 to the non-rebound group. Clinical and demographic data and 5-year clinical outcomes of both groups were prospectively examined. RESULTS: At fingolimod initiation, there were no significant differences in age, disease duration, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) was significantly higher in the rebound group than in the non-rebound group before the fingolimod treatment (p = 0.005). In the rebound group, EDSS scores 2 months after rebound treatment and at the 5-year follow-up were not significantly different than before fingolimod initiation (p = 0.14 and p = 0.46, respectively). The last recorded EDSS was significantly higher in the non-rebound group than in the rebound group (3.6 ± 2.3 vs. 2.15 ± 1.4, p = 0.045). At the last follow-up, one patient was diagnosed with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in the rebound group (10%), and 11 patients were in the non-rebound group (52.4%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: When rebound activity is well-monitored and treated after fingolimod discontinuation, no overall EDSS change is expected in the long-term follow-up.

Brain MRI activity during the year before pregnancy can predict long-term clinical worsening in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy has been observed to reduce the frequency of relapses in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, but the relapse risk tends to increase during the early post-partum period. Increased pre- and post-partum disease activity may predict a poor long-term prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity during the year before pregnancy and long-term clinically meaningful worsening in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). METHODS: This observational, retrospective, case-control study included 141 pregnancies in 99 females with MS. Statistical analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between MRI activity during the year pre-pregnancy and post-partum clinical worsening during a 5-year follow-up. Clustered logistic regression was used to investigate the predictors of 5-year clinically meaningful worsening in EDSS (lt-EDSS). RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between an active MRI pre-pregnancy and lt-EDSS (p = 0.0006). EDSS pre-pregnancy and lt-EDSS were also significantly correlated (p = 0.043). Using a multivariate model, we predicted which females would not experience long-term clinical deterioration by a stable MRI pre-pregnancy (92.7% specificity; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: An active MRI pre-conception is a strong predictor of lt-EDSS and a higher annual relapse rate during the follow-up period, regardless of whether the female had clinical evidence of disease activity prior to conception and delivery. Optimizing disease control and achieving imaging stability prior to conception may reduce the risk of long-term clinical deterioration.

Real-world annualized relapse rates from contemporary multiple sclerosis clinics in the UK: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Annualized relapse rate (ARR) is used as an outcome measure in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials. Previous studies demonstrated that ARR has reduced in placebo groups between 1990 and 2012. This study aimed to estimate real-world ARRs from contemporary MS clinics in the UK, in order to improve the feasibility estimations for clinical trials and facilitate MS service planning. METHODS: A multicentre observational, retrospective study of patients with MS from 5 tertiary neuroscience centres in the UK. We included all adult patients with a diagnosis of MS that had a relapse between 01/04/2020 and 30/06/2020. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen out of 8783 patients had a relapse during the 3-month study period. Seventy-nine percent of the patients with a relapse were female, the mean age was 39 years, and the median disease duration was 4.5 years; 36% of the patients that had a relapse were on disease-modifying treatment. The ARR from all study sites was estimated at 0.05. The ARR for relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) was estimated at 0.08, while the ARR for secondary progressive MS (SPMS) was 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: We report a lower ARR compared to previously reported rates in MS.

Study to Compare the Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Various Disease Modifying Drugs in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis in India- An Observational Study.

Background: Real-world data on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying drugs (DMTs) is lacking in the Indian setting. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DMTs, and the secondary objective was to evaluate cost-effectiveness and the quality of life (QoL) in these patients. Method: Seventy-four patients fulfilling study criteria were recruited in the retrospective observational study, of which 69 completed the study. Primary outcome was measured by annualized relapse rate (ARR), and secondary outcome was measured by WHOQOL-BREF scale, modified Kuppuswamy scale, and rating of DMT scale through a subjective questionnaire. Results: Patients on natalizumab, rituximab, and glatiramer acetate showed the highest reduction in ARR. The highest reduction of ARR (2.5) was produced by natalizumab and least by Peg-IFNß1a (0.5). In QoL analysis, teriflunomide group had the highest average score for both physical health (22.7, SD 4.7) and psychological (21.3, SD 4.0) domains, whereas natalizumab group had the lowest average score. Socio-economic status analysis showed DMF, IFNß 1a, peg-IFNß 1a, rituximab, and glatiramer acetate are affordable to the upper middle class and above, whereas natalizumab could be afforded only by high-class strata. Teriflunomide was most affordable annually. Study of adverse drug reactions showed natalizumab was very well tolerated by the study participants. Conclusion: Natalizumab, an infusion DMT, was highly effective in terms of reducing the ARR. Rituximab, an off-label DMT, was found to be very effective. Teriflunomide was overall an effective DMT in terms of affordability, QoL balance, and an acceptable ARR reduction.

Does the use of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors and the c-kit inhibitor masitinib result in clinically significant outcomes among patients with various forms of multiple sclerosis?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system accompanied by chronic inflammation, axonal loss, and neurodegeneration. Traditionally, MS has been thought of as a T-cell mediated disease, but research over the past decade has demonstrated the importance of B cells in both acute demyelination and disease progression. The highly selective irreversible Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors evobrutinib, tolebrutinib, and orelabrutinib, and the reversible BTK inhibitor fenebrutinib, all target B-cell activation and aspects of innate immunity, including macrophage and microglia biology. The c-KIT inhibitor masitinib mitigates neuroinflammation by controlling the survival, migration, and degranulation of mast cells, leading to the inhibition of proinflammatory and vasoactive molecular cascades that result from mast cell activation. This article will review and critically appraise the ongoing clinical trials of two classes of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are emerging as potential medical treatments for the varying subtypes of MS: BTK inhibitors and c-KIT inhibitors. Specifically, this review will attempt to answer whether BTK inhibitors have measurable positive clinical effects on patients with RRMS, SPMS with relapses, relapse-free SPMS, and PPMS through their effect on MRI T1 lesions; annualized relapse rate; EDSS scale; MSFC score; and time to onset of composite 12-week confirmed disability progression. Additionally, this review will examine the literature to determine if masitinib has positive clinical effects on patients with PPMS or relapse-free SPMS through its effect on EDSS or MSFC scores.

Comparative Efficacy of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Therapies: Model-Based Meta-Analyses for Confirmed Disability Accumulation and Annualized Relapse Rate.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disorder and the most common cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults. The Phase 3 OPTIMUM study evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral ponesimod, a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 1 modulator, vs. teriflunomide in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The aim of this analysis was to assess the effect of ponesimod and other disease modifying treatments (DMTs) compared to placebo, as measured by 12-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) and annualized relapse rate (ARR) in RMS patients. METHODS: A database was developed by Certara Inc. (USA) based on relevant clinical trials identified from searching the following sources: PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, FDA and EMEA documents, and conference abstracts. This database consisted of 203 unique randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 74 MS treatments and was subsequently filtered to include RCTs with more than 25 patients receiving monotherapy to treat RMS for at least 48 weeks. A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was performed on the filtered database to assess treatment effects measured by CDA and ARR. Analyzed data for CDA were digitized from published Kaplan-Meier plots. A Weibull distribution was assumed to adequately capture the relationship of CDA probability over time, and hazard ratios (HRs) between treatments were assumed constant over time (proportional hazards). HRs were estimated for 12-week CDA for 17 DMTs vs. placebo. Additionally, mean ARR for each treatment arm was modelled, where relative effect versus placebo was estimated as a fixed effect parameter for each unique drug. A dose-response relationship was included if data for multiple doses were available. Relative treatment effect covariates explored for CDA and ARR included: percent of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), trial start year, mean duration of disease, percent of patients who received DMTs within the prior 2 years (pDMT), mean number of relapses in the prior year, mean age, mean baseline EDSS score, and mean treatment duration (for ARR). RESULTS: The 12-week CDA model utilized longitudinal data from 26 RCTs (18 unique treatments [including placebo]), 69 treatment arms, 31,160 patients). The ARR model utilized data from 40 RCTs (18 unique treatments [including placebo], 100 treatment arms, 33,686 patients). Compared to placebo, ponesimod significantly reduced 12-week CDA by 39% (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.45-0.82) and reduced ARR by 53% (rate ratio [RR]: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.39-0.58). Except for three DMTs (interferon ß-1b, glatiramer acetate, ozanimod), HR of 12-week CDA vs. placebo was significantly lower for the DMTs included in this analysis (HR range: 0.41 to 0.79). The ARR was significantly reduced for all DMTs compared to placebo (RR range: 0.29 to 0.82). A dose-response relationship indicated a potential dose-dependent effect (12-week CDA: 6 treatments; ARR: 8 treatments). Relative treatment effect was found to be significantly smaller in trials including more patients with prior DMT usage. Cross-trial heterogeneity in relative effects was assessed and found to be negligible; however, there is a possibility that confounders remain which may impact estimated relative treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, ponesimod 20 mg significantly reduced both the risk of 12-week CDA and mean ARR, suggesting it has robust efficacy in the treatment of RMS. The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

Calculating and Comparing the Annualized Relapse Rate and Estimating the Confidence Interval in Relapsing Neurological Diseases.

Calculating the crude or adjusted annualized relapse rate (ARR) and its confidence interval (CI) is often required in clinical studies to evaluate chronic relapsing diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. However, accurately calculating ARR and estimating the 95% CI requires careful application of statistical approaches and basic familiarity with the exponential family of distributions. When the relapse rate can be regarded as constant over time or by individuals, the crude ARR can be calculated using the person-years method, which divides the number of all observed relapses among all participants by the total follow-up period of the study cohort. If the number of relapses can be modeled by the Poisson distribution, the 95% CI of ARR can be obtained by finding the 2.5% upper and lower critical values of the parameter λ as the mean. Basic familiarity with F-statistics is also required when comparing the ARR between two disease groups. It is necessary to distinguish the observed relapse rate ratio (RR) between two sample groups (sample RR) from the unobserved RR between their originating populations (population RR). The ratio of population RR to sample RR roughly follows the F distribution, with degrees of freedom obtained by doubling the number of observed relapses in the two sample groups. Based on this, a 95% CI of the population RR can be estimated. When the count data of the response variable is overdispersed, the negative binomial distribution would be a better fit than the Poisson. Adjusted ARR and the 95% CI can be obtained by using the generalized linear regression models after selecting appropriate error structures (e.g., Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson, and zero-inflated negative binomial) according to the overdispersion and zero-inflation in the response variable.

Improving pediatric multiple sclerosis interventional phase III study design: a meta-analysis.

Background: To support innovative trial designs in a regulatory setting for pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (MS), the study aimed to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of relapse rates with interferon ß (IFN ß), fingolimod, and natalizumab and thereby demonstrate potential benefits of Bayesian and non-inferiority designs in this population. Methods: We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until 17 June 2020 of all studies reporting annualized relapse rates (ARR) in IFN ß-, fingolimod-, or natalizumab-treated patients with pediatric-onset relapsing-remitting MS. These interventions were chosen because the literature was mainly available for these treatments, and they are currently used for the treatment of pediatric MS. Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care - Quality Assessment Tool. The meta-analysis estimates were obtained by Bayesian random effects model. Data were summarized as ARR point estimates and 95% credible intervals. Results: We found 19 articles, including 2 randomized controlled trials. The baseline ARR reported was between 1.4 and 3.7. The meta-analysis-based ARR was significantly higher in IFN ß-treated patients (0.69, 95% credible interval: 0.51-0.91) versus fingolimod (0.11, 0.04-0.27) and natalizumab (0.17, 0.09-0.31). Based on the meta-analysis results, an appropriate non-inferiority margin versus fingolimod could be in the range of 2.29-2.67 and for natalizumab 1.72-2.29 on the ARR ratio scale. A Bayesian design, which uses historical information for a fingolimod or natalizumab control arm, could reduce the sample size of a new trial by 18 or 14 patients, respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that relapse rates are considerably higher with IFNs versus fingolimod or natalizumab. The results support the use of innovative Bayesian or non-inferiority designs to avoid exposing patients to less effective comparators in trials and bringing new medications to patients more efficiently.

Relatively Early and Late-Onset Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder in Central China: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Features.

Background: We aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic features of Chinese patients with relatively late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (RLO-NMOSD>40 years of age at disease onset), compared with patients with relatively early onset NMOSD (REO-NMOSD, ≤ 40 years of age at disease onset). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NMOSD in central China (with disease courses longer than 3 years) between January 2012 and January 2021. We further analyzed the clinical and prognostic differences between patients with REO-NMOSD and RLO-NMOSD. Results: A total of 71 patients were included in this study. The results showed that 39 (54.9%) of the patients had RLO-NMOSD. The patients with RLO-NMOSD had higher expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores than patients with REO-NMOSD at the initial (5.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.01), 3-month (4.0 vs. 2.5, p = 0.001), 1-year (4.0 vs. 2.5, p = 0.003), 3rd-year (3.5 vs. 3.0, p = 0.0017), and final follow-up (4.0 vs. 2.5, P = 0.002) time points. The EDSS scores of visual function were 2.0 (1.0-3.0) in REO-NMOSD and 3.0 (2.0-3.0) in RLO-NMOSD (p = 0.038) at the final follow-up time point. The locations of spinal cord lesions at transverse myelitis (TM) onset were prone to cervical cord in patients with REO-NMOSD. There were no between-group treatment differences. The risk of requiring a cane to walk (EDSS score of 6.0) increased as the age of disease onset increased: for every 10-year increase in the age of disease onset, the risk of needing a cane to walk increased by 65% [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.65, 95% CI 1.15-2.38, p = 0.007]. Another significant predictor identified in the multivariate analysis was annualized relapse rate (ARR) (HR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.09-3.71, p = 0.025). In addition, we observed a positive correlation between age at onset and EDSS scores at the final follow-up (Spearman's r = 0.426, p < 0.0001) time point. EDSS scores at different periods were significantly different between patients with RLO-NMOSD and REO-NMOSD with anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) IgG positive. Conclusion: The patients with RLO-NMOSD developed more severe disabilities than patients with REO-NMOSD at a variety of time periods. All of the patients may experience recurrent aggravated symptoms after their first year, with only patients with REO-NMOSD partly recovering from the 3rd year. The age at onset and ARR were the main predictors of outcomes.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators versus interferon beta for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: findings from randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: As one kind of disease-modifying therapies, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators such as fingolimod, ozanimod, and siponimod have been approved or are being developed to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been implemented to compare the efficacy and safety of S1PR modulators versus interferon beta in the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHOD: We searched RCTs which were implemented from January 2010 to June 2020 by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and the Central Register of Controlled Trials. Finally, five RCTs were included in our study after carefully choosing. RESULT: We pooled 4304 patients from 5 RCTs. The primary outcome was the annualized relapse rate. We found that the annualized relapse rate in the S1PR modulator group is 20% less than that in the interferon beta group (95%CI, - 0.32 to - 0.07, P = 0.002). S1PR modulators led to a significant reduction in number of new or enlarging T2 lesions per scan and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions compared with interferon beta. Moreover, S1PR modulators can also improve 54-item multiple sclerosis quality of life (MSQOL-54) physical health composite score (P = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: S1PR modulators exhibited good efficacy and safety for the treatment of RRMS compared with interferon beta. According to follow-up trials, S1PR modulators can improve MSQOL-54 physical health composite score so that it may be beneficial to neurological recovery which need more research to confirm.

Favorable benefit-risk ratio with teriflunomide treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Results of the 2-year, multicenter, prospective, noninterventional TAURUS MS study in Austria.

Objectives: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, noninterventional study assessed the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and patient satisfaction with teriflunomide therapy over a 24-month follow-up period under real-world conditions in Austria. Methods: An all-comer population aged ≥18 years was followed in clinic and office-based settings. The primary objective of the study was the annualized relapse rate after 12 and 24 months of teriflunomide treatment. Patient-reported outcomes included treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and fatigue, and were assessed based on the Short Form Health-36, Fatigue Severity Scale, and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)-9 questionnaires. Results: Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis, 23 of whom were still on treatment after 24 months. At 12 months (n = 24), the annualized relapse rate was 0.3 (SD, 0.8), which indicated a significant decrease compared to the annualized relapse rate of 1.0 (SD, 0.9) observed during the 12-month reference period prior to treatment initiation (p = 0.009). Similarly, after 24 months of follow-up (n = 23), the annualized relapse rate of 0.2 (SD, 0.8) was significantly lower than that during the last 24 months reference period prior to treatment initiation of 0.7 (SD, 0.8) (p = 0.0003). The Expanded Disability Status Scale score remained stable over 12 and 24 months. This also applied to patient-reported fatigue of the Fatigue Severity Scale, with a mean change of 0.1 (SD, 1.0). Patient treatment satisfaction as assessed by the TSQM-9 increased for all three domains (i.e., effectiveness, convenience, global satisfaction). This was confirmed by the physician and multiple sclerosis nurse ratings of patient treatment satisfaction and ease of use. Adverse events occurred in 38.7%, with hair thinning and diarrhea as the most common. Conclusions: This noninterventional study showed a sustained favorable benefit-risk ratio for this disease-modifying treatment with teriflunomide over 24 months in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Patient-reported outcomes and ratings performed by physicians and nurses showed overall trends to improvement for patient treatment satisfaction with teriflunomide treatment and its ease of administration.

Evaluation of effect of empirical attack-preventive immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: An update systematic review and meta -analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, which mainly involves the optic nerve and spinal cord. Frequent relapse can accumulate the degree of disability. At present, the main treatment options are immunosuppressants and blood purification. The first-line immunosuppressants for NMOSD are mainly rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA). Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and effect of the above three drugs in the treatment of NMOSD patients. METHODS: The following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and related entry terms are used to search English literature in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, respectively. MeSH include: Neuromyelitis optic and Rituximab or Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Mofetil; entry terms include: NMO Spectrum Disorder, NMO Spectrum Disorders, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorder, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Devic Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica, Devic, Devic's Disease, Devic Syndrome, Devic's Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorders, CD20 Antibody, Rituximab CD20 Antibody, Mabthera, IDEC-C2B8 Antibody, GP2013, Rituxan, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Mofetil, Mycophenolate, Mycophenolic Acid, Morpholinoethyl Ester, Cellcept, Mycophenolate Sodium, Myfortic, Mycophenolate Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mycophenolate, RS 61443, RS-61443, RS61443, azathioprine sodium, azathioprine sulfate (note: literature retrieval operators "AND" "OR" "NOT" are used to link MeSH with Entry Terms.) The literature search found a total of 3058 articles about rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in the treatment of NMOSD, 63 of which were included in this study after a series of screening. RESULTS: 930,933,732 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with MMF, AZA and RTX, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of EDSS before and after RTX treated was -0.58 (95%CI: -0.72, -0.44) (I2 = 0%, p = 0.477), before and after MMF treated was -0.47 (95%CI: -0.73, -0.21) (I2 = 85.6%, p<0.001), before and after AZA treated was -0.41 (95%CI: -0.60, -0.23) (I2 = 65.4%, p<0.001). there was no significant difference in the effect of the three drugs on reducing EDSS scores (RTX vs MMF, p = 0.522; RTX vs AZA, p = 0.214; MMF vs AZA, p = 0.732). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of ARR before and after RTX treated was -1.45 (95%CI: -1.72, -1.18) (I2 = 72.4%, p<0.001), before and after MMF treated was -1.14 (95%CI: -1.31, -0.97) (I2 = 54.5%, p<0.001), before and after AZA treated was -1.11 (95%CI: -1.39, -0.83) (I2 = 83.4%, p<0.001). RTX significantly reduced ARR compared with the other two drugs (RTX vs MMF, p = 0.039; RTX vs AZA, p = 0.049; MMF vs AZA, p = 0.436). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with RTX, MMF and AZA is associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well, and there was no significant difference in the effect of the three drugs on reducing EDSS scores, but RTX significantly reduced ARR compared with the other two drugs.

Estimation of sample size in randomized controlled trials in multiple sclerosis studying annualized relapse rates: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis (MS) studies, the most appropriate model for the distribution of the number of relapses was shown to be the negative binomial (NB) distribution. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sample-size estimation (SSE) and the analysis of annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were aligned and compare the SSE between normal and NB distributions. METHODS: Systematic review of phase 3 and 4 RCTs for which the primary endpoint was ARR in relapsing remitting MS published since 2008 in pre-selected major medical journals. A PubMed search was performed on 30 November 2020. We checked whether the SSE and ARR analyses were congruent. We also performed standardized (fixed α/ß, number of arms and overdispersion) SSEs using data collected from the studies. RESULTS: Twenty articles (22 studies) were selected. NB distribution (or quasi-Poisson) was used for SSE in only 7/22 studies, whereas 21/22 used it for ARR analyses. SSE relying on NB regression necessitated a smaller sample size in 21/22 of our calculations. CONCLUSION: SSE was rarely performed using the most appropriate model. However, the use of an NB model is recommended to optimize the number of included patients and to be congruent with the final analysis.

Early Initiation of Tocilizumab Treatment Against Moderate-to-Severe Myelitis in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Background: Interleukin-6 receptor blockade is effective in reducing the risk of relapses in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). However, its efficacy during acute attacks of NMOSD remains elusive. Objective: We investigated the effects of tocilizumab on disability during acute attacks, as well as its maintenance, in patients with moderate-to-severe myelitis. Methods: Nineteen patients with NMOSD received tocilizumab treatment as add-on to high-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) in acute myelitis and twenty-two patients who only received HDMP were compared. Disease disability was assessed using a multi-level scaling system that included the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), Hauser ambulation index (HAI), modified Rankin scale (mRS), pain numerical rating scale (NRS), functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale (FACIT-F), activity of daily living (ADL), EuroQol five-dimensions-three-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), and sensory function score and bowel and bladder function score in Kurtzke functional systems scores (FSS). Results: Improved EDSS, HAI, and mRS, as well as increased ADL and EQ-5D-3L were significant in patients on tocilizumab compared with those on steroids as monotherapy at 3 months (p < 0.05). Both groups of patients showed improved pain, fatigue, sensory function, and autonomic function at follow-ups, compared with baseline respectively. The changes in NRS, FACIT-F, and sensory and autonomic FSS showed no significant differences between the two groups. Tocilizumab significantly lowered the risk of relapses (HR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.76, p = 0.017) and reduced the annualized relapse rate compared with those by steroids (0.1 ± 0.2 vs 0.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Early initiation of tocilizumab provided a safe and effective add-on alternative during attacks, and its maintenance contributed to a significant reduction of relapse rate in NMOSD.

Long-Term Efficacy Outcomes of Natalizumab vs. Fingolimod in Patients With Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Real-World Data From a Multiple Sclerosis Reference Center.

Background: Natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) are second-line disease modifying treatments (DMTs) approved for Relapsing - Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Few studies are available on a direct comparison between NTZ and FTY, based on post-marketing experience, with conflicting results and reporting relatively short follow-up period. Aim: We hereby report real-world experience of a MS Center with respect to NTZ vs. FTY comparison in terms of efficacy and safety, referencing long-term follow-up. Methods: We used retrospective data for all patients that received 2nd-line treatment NTZ (since May 2007) or FTY (since September 2011). Primary endpoints were, among others, annual EDSS score (mean change from baseline), time to disability worsening or improvement, Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) after 12 and 24 months and upon total treatment duration, time to first relapse and time to radiological progression. Results: A total of 138 unmatched patients, 84 treated with NTZ and 54 treated with FTY were included. Following Propensity Score (PS) matching, 31 patients in each group were retained. Mean follow-up period for NTZ- and FTY-treated patients was 4.43 ± 0.29 and 3.59 ± 0.32 years (p = 0.057), respectively. In the matched analysis, time to disability improvement and time to disability worsening was comparable between groups. A higher proportion of patients remained free of relapse under NTZ, compared to FTY (Log Rank test p = 0.021, HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.8), as well as free of MRI activity (Log Rank test p = 0.006, HR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.6). Treatment discontinuation due to MRI activity was significantly higher for FTY-treated patients compared to NTZ (Log Rank test p = 0.019, HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05-0.76). Conclusion: Our results indicate toward NTZ superiority with respect to relapse and MRI activity outcomes. The fact that NTZ-treated patients may achieve long-standing clinical and radiological remission points toward the need for long follow-up data.