Surgical Options and Clinical Outcomes Following a Failed Latarjet Procedure: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: A failed prior Latarjet procedure can be a challenging situation for both patients and surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report on the techniques and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies which reported on surgical techniques for a failed Latarjet procedure with reporting of clinical outcomes. The search terms used were: Latarjet failed. Patients were evaluated based on revision method, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), reoperation rates, recurrent instability, overall satisfaction, and return to sports and work. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (all Level IV evidence) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 293 shoulders with a mean age of 28.3 years (range, 16-55 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up time was 50.4 months (range, 14.0-208.0 months) and males accounted for 78.6% of all patients. Revision procedures included open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. These may all be viable techniques for revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure. All revision procedures showed improvements in PROMs including the VAS (Visual analogue scale), Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores. Return to sports ranged from 46.1% to 94%. Recurrent instability rates ranged from 0% to 43.8%. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 31.3%. Overall satisfaction following a revision procedure ranged from 80% to 100%. CONCLUSION: A failed Latarjet procedure can be treated with various revision procedures such as open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. Overall, surgical management of the failed Latarjet results in improvements in PROMs, pain, return to sports, and decreased recurrent instability with a moderate complication rate.

The Arthroscopically Guided Bristow-Latarjet Procedure With Cortical Button Fixation: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Despite improved visualization, the use of arthroscopic surgery to perform the Latarjet procedure has not decreased the rates of complications and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) in the long term. Many of the reported complications are related to the use of screws for bone block fixation with freehand drilling. PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term (at a minimum 10-year follow-up) clinical and radiological outcomes of the arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure using a posterior guided drilling technique and suture button for coracoid bone graft fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent the arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure with suture button fixation between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed by 2 independent evaluators. Complications and revision surgery were recorded, and we evaluated patient-reported outcomes including subjective scores, recurrence of shoulder instability (dislocation or subluxation), range of motion limitations, and return to sports. Patients had radiographs taken at least 10 years after surgery to assess glenohumeral OA according to the Samilson-Prieto classification system and computed tomography scans to assess bone block positioning and healing. RESULTS: A total of 65 consecutive patients (68 shoulders) with a mean follow-up of 135 months (range, 120-156 months) were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 25 ± 8 years; 7 patients had previous failed Bankart repair. At follow-up, 94% (64/68) of the shoulders had no recurrence of instability. The 4 cases of instability recurrence were traumatic and occurred at 3 weeks (a fall), 4 months, 2 years, and 7 years after surgery. No hardware failures, coracoid fractures, or neurological complications were observed. Overall, 61 patients (94%) were still participating in sports, with 44 (68%) at the same or higher level. Range of motion showed nonsignificant restrictions in external rotation with the arm at the side (7° ± 9°) and with the arm at 90° of abduction (9° ± 10°) compared with the contralateral side. Additionally, 11 shoulders (16%) had some residual anterior apprehension on clinical examination. At last follow-up, 77% (47/61) of the shoulders had no OA development or progression. Previous failed Bankart repair was a risk factor for the development of OA. Patients with OA had significantly lower Subjective Shoulder Value scores (79% vs 91%, respectively; P = .01) and decreased external rotation with the arm at the side (40° vs 65°, respectively; P = .001) compared with patients with no or little OA. CONCLUSION: The arthroscopically guided Bristow-Latarjet procedure with suture button fixation is a safe and durable surgical treatment method for recurrent anterior shoulder instability, allowing a high rate of return to sports without significant motion restrictions and no or little OA in the long term.

The open Latarjet procedure does not affect scapulohumeral rhythm three months postoperatively.

BACKGROUND: Although it is considered a sensitive indicator of shoulder disabilities, the scapulohumeral rhythm has not been investigated after anterior glenohumeral stabilization with open Latarjet procedure. This study aimed to assess the short-term influence of glenohumeral stabilization on scapulohumeral rhythm in patients who underwent open Latarjet procedure compared to asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: A group of male patients who underwent anterior glenohumeral stabilization by open Latarjet procedure and a healthy group were enrolled in this study. An electromagnetic device was used to record scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint kinematics during dynamic arm elevation and depression in the scapular plane before and three months after surgery. Then, the three-dimensional dynamic scapulohumeral rhythm was computed bilaterally. SPM ANOVAs were used for statistical analysis. FINDINGS: Twenty-two participants per group were included. The scapulohumeral rhythm of the two groups increased from 1.88 [mean] ± 0.79 [standard deviation] to 2.83 ± 1.52 during the ascending phase, while a decrease followed by a slight increase in the scapulohumeral rhythm were observed during the descending phase. The scapulohumeral rhythm did not significantly differ between the operated and non-operated sides or before and after surgery. When pooling the sides for each group, no significant differences were observed between the groups. INTERPRETATION: The scapulohumeral rhythm in patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure is not modified three months after surgery and is similar to the scapulohumeral rhythm of asymptomatic individuals. These findings suggest that in addition to restoring glenohumeral stability, the open Latarjet procedure preserves shoulder joint coordination three months postoperatively.

A comparison of conventional 3.0-Tesla nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings of the anteroinferior capsulolabral complex in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the association between specific, reproducible findings of an anteroinferior capsulolabral complex obtained using conventional 3.0-Tesla nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathologic arthroscopic findings and to assess the confidence level of the findings. Methods: Of 125 cases of traumatic anterior instability surgery from January 2017 to November 2019, 66 patients (52 men, 14 women; 23.5 ± 7.9 year old) who underwent conventional 3.0-Tesla MRI at our hospital were reviewed. The following anteroinferior capsulolabral complex features were observed on the T2-star axial image: size difference of the labrum (swelling, diminished), difference in marginal and internal signals (irregularity), and capsule edema image (capsular thickening). We also reviewed fraying, flattening, cracking, and capsular hypertrophy as pathologic arthroscopic findings of the capsulolabral complex. These findings allowed for the simultaneous description of the MRI and arthroscopic evaluations. Three orthopedic surgeons and one radiologist measured the interobserver reliability. We investigated the correlation between the MRI and arthroscopic findings. Results: The interobserver reliability of MRI irregularities was low (κ = -0.16), whereas reliability was moderate (κ = 0.554-0.595) for swelling in 22 cases (33%), diminished in 34 cases (52%), and capsular thickness in 40 cases (59%). Labral detachment was found in 26 patients (39%) and fluid collection in 24 patients (36%). The agreement of MRI findings with arthroscopic findings was κ = 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.268-0.654) for swelling to fraying; κ = 0.42 (95% CI: 0.202-0.638) for swelling to capsular hypertrophy; and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.268-0.654) for flattening to diminished. Conclusion: The swelling and diminished findings of the anteroinferior capsulolabral complex on conventional MRI were moderately related to pathologic arthroscopic findings in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability. These findings contribute to achieving an accurate clinical diagnosis.

Single anterior shoulder dislocation patients demonstrate higher rates of posterior labral repair and biceps procedures than multiple dislocators at the time of arthroscopic stabilization surgery.

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to identify and compare demographic, clinical, historical, and intraoperative variables in patients who have received arthroscopic treatment for single vs. multiple anterior shoulder dislocations. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair of the shoulder by six surgeons at a single institution between 2012 and 2020. Patients with a documented anterior shoulder dislocation were included. Patients with pain-only, subluxation-only, multidirectional or posterior instability, and prior shoulder surgeries of any kind were excluded. Studied variables included age, sex, laterality, body mass index, contact/collision sports, Charlson comorbidity index, tobacco use, number of dislocations (1, >1), labral tear size, time from first dislocation to surgery, anchor number, and concomitant procedures. Study groups were compared using student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for discrete variables with a significance of 0.05. Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients were identified, and 351 (85 single dislocators [SDs], 266 multiple dislocators [MDs]) met inclusion criteria (mean age: 27 years; range: 14-71 years). There were no demographic differences between the study groups. SD received surgery significantly sooner at 17 ± 44 months after injury, while MD received surgery 53 ± 74 months postinitial dislocation. SDs (30/85, 35%) were significantly more likely than MDs (56/266, 21%) to receive concomitant posterior labrum repair. MDs (46/266, 17%) were significantly more likely than SDs (5/85, 6%) to receive a remplissage. SDs (11/85, 13%) were significantly more likely than MDs (11/266, 4%) to receive a concomitant biceps tenotomy/tenodesis. There were no other significant differences in injury or surgery characteristics. Conclusion: MDs will have more time between their initial dislocation and arthroscopic labral repair and are more likely to receive a remplissage procedure, yet they are less likely than SDs to receive a concomitant posterior labral repair or biceps tenodesis/tenotomy despite no differences in age, sex, and activity level. Whether the greater extent of labrum injury in SD is due to a more severe initial injury vs. earlier recognition and intervention requires further study.

Rehabilitation and Return to Sport following Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability.

There has been growing interest in the rehabilitation process and timing of returning an athlete to sport following the management options for anterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this article is to review the current rehabilitation and return to sport (RTS) protocols for various nonoperative and operative management strategies following anterior shoulder instability events. When appropriate in the rehabilitation protocol, RTS testing should be criteria based, rather than time based, with a special focus given to psychological readiness in order to promote successful return to athletics and prevention of recurrent instability episodes in the future.

Arthroscopic Autologous Iliac Crest Grafting with an Adjustable Loop Suspensory Device Yields Favorable Outcomes for Anterior Shoulder Instability with Glenoid Defects.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the arthroscopic autologous iliac crest grafting (AICG) procedure with an adjustable-loop suspensory fixation device in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability (ASI) with glenoid bone defects. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the patients who underwent arthroscopic AICG with an adjustable-loop suspensory fixation device from January 2017 to December 2020. Patients with traumatic ASI, significant glenoid bone defects, and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), the Rowe score, the Walch-Duplay score, the Constant score, and the Visual Analogue Score (VAS), were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiological assessments using computed tomography (CT) were performed before and after the procedure. Additional data on active range of motion, recurrence events, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 35.2 months ranging from 25.1 to 55.9 months. Mean preoperative OSIS, Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, and Constant score significantly improved from 24.4±7.2, 25.0±9.0, 25.2±9.8, 87.5±7.1 to 42.4±4.9, 92.4±8.1, 87.9±8.3, 93.6±4.5 at the last follow-up, respectively. All patients exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for OSIS, Rowe, and Walch-Duplay scores. The graft union rate was 100%, and the glenoid area increased significantly from 82.5% preoperatively to 100.1% at the final follow-up. No patient experienced a recurrence of instability. Two recorded complications included one case of dysesthesia around the donor site and one case of postoperative shoulder stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the arthroscopic AICG procedure, which utilizes an adjustable-loop suspensory fixation device, demonstrated stable bone graft fixation, high rates of graft integration, favorable clinical results, and a low incidence of complications. Moreover, the remodeling of the graft during the follow-up period significantly restored the width and concavity of the inferior glenoid, contributing to the overall recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Comparison between arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Bankart/SLAP lesion repair in limited-contact athletes with type V SLAP lesion. A prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, recurrence rate, range of motion (ROM) and return to sports activities between arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) versus arthroscopic Bankart/SLAP repair (ABR/S) in limited contact-athletes with a type V SLAP lesion in the scenario of recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI). Our hypothesis was that there is no difference between the two treatments. METHODS: Two groups of 45 limited-contact athletes with type V SLAP lesion were created. Group 1 underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair, while group 2 had an arthroscopic Bankart/SLAP repair. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. The WOSI and ASES scores were used to assess primary functional outcomes. Recurrence rate, ROM and return to sport were also evaluated. RESULTS: Significant differences were reported in the WOSI and ASES scores pre- and post-operatively in each group. There were no significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.78 and 0.43). We reported 4 recurrences (8.8 %) in group 1 and 5 (11.1 %) in group 2, with no difference between them (P = 0.62). There were no significant differences between the range of motion of each of the groups as well as between them. More than 90% of the athletes in both groups returned to their previous sporting activities. CONCLUSIONS: Limited-contact athletes with RASI who have a type V SLAP lesion as their primary diagnosis can be treated using either ABR or ABR/S with equal efficacy. Both treatment alternatives preserve athlete's function, stability, ROM and return to sport.

Arthroscopic Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Study of Functional Outcome and Analysis.

Background The remarkable range of motion of the shoulder comes at the cost of increased instability, especially anterior instability. Arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without remplissage, which is a minimally invasive surgery, is the preferred treatment for recurrent anterior instability. This study investigated the effectiveness of Bankart repair, with or without remplissage, in restoring function, preventing redislocation, and improving patient satisfaction. Methods A prospective observational study examined 40 patients (19-50 years old) with recurrent anterior instability and MRI-confirmed Bankart or Bankart with Hill-Sachs lesions. Patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without remplissage based on the inclusion criteria of this study. Preoperative assessments included demographics, history, physical examination, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, ROWE score, and plain MRI of the shoulder joint. Post-operative radiographs and rehabilitation were advised. Functional recovery was evaluated at three months and six months after surgery. Results All patients underwent Bankart repair. Among them, 22 with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions received an additional remplissage procedure. Both groups showed significant improvements in their functional scores (p<0.05) and returned to their prior activities. However, the additional remplissage group had a slightly reduced mean external rotation (86.59°) compared with the Bankart repair-only group (90°). Notably, the recurrence rate was very low, with only one patient (2.5%) experiencing instability. Conclusion  Our study emphasizes the importance of proper capsulolabral tissue elevation to achieve a sufficient labral bump during Bankart repair. This technique allowed us to efficiently use only two suture anchors in 35 cases (87.5%). Additionally, remplissage was performed on all identified engaging Hill-Sachs lesions. We found that proper anchor placement and suturing techniques were crucial for successful Bankart repair. The emphasis on the potential cost benefits of a two-anchor approach is a valuable contribution to the field.

Return to sport after arthroscopic xenograft bone block associated with Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation in competitive contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Open Bankart repair and Latarjet stabilization are two of surgical procedures used in the treatment of shoulder instability in contact athletes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of bone block arthroscopic procedure, performed with xenograft, in combination with Bankart repair and selective subscapularis augmentation (ASA) for contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed contact athletes who underwent arthroscopic bone block with xenograft and Bankart repair with selective augmentation of subscapularis for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between January 2017 and December 2021. Shoulders with posterior instability or multidirectional instability were excluded. Recurrence, complications, return to sport, and functional scores (Rowe score, WOSI score, ASES score) were assessed. A CT scan at 2-year follow-up was performed to assess the status of Bone block integration, its displacement and restoration of glenoid surface. RESULTS: 16 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 24. None of the patients treated with arthroscopic bone block and ASA presented new dislocation episodes. An increase in preoperative scores was observed at the last follow-up, in particular the ASES, Rowe, and WOSI scores increased from 69±7, 31±9 , 1235±46 respectively to 96.1±3.2, 94±6, 119±51. All athletes returned to sporting activity at or near the same level as pre-surgery. The glenoid bone surface increase from 83% to 116% at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bone block treatment with Xenograft combined with Bankart repair and ASA procedures has been shown to be effective in treating instability in contact athletes with significant glenoid deficit. All athletes returned to athletic activity at a level similar to the pre-intervention period.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Fewer Redislocations Than Bankart Repair Alone at Medium-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) to Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) reported benefits of remplissage in reducing recurrent instability at 2 years postoperative. The ongoing benefits beyond this time point are yet to be explored. PURPOSE: To (1) compare medium-term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of these previously randomized patients undergoing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) to manage recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability; (2) examine the failure rate, overall recurrent instability, and reoperation rate. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Recruitment and randomization for the original randomized trial occurred between 2011 and 2017. Patients ≥14 years diagnosed with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with an engaging Hill-Sachs defect of any size were included. Those with a glenoid defect >15% were excluded. In 2020, participants were contacted by telephone and asked standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation, or reoperation on their study shoulder. "Failure" was defined as a redislocation, and "overall recurrent instability" was described as a redislocation or ≥2 subluxations. Descriptive statistics, relative risk, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 108 participants were randomized, of whom 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to the final follow-up was 49.3 and 53.8 months for the NO REMP and REMP groups, respectively. Failure rates were 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP group versus 8% (4/52) in the REMP group. Rates of overall recurrent instability were 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group versus 10% (5/52) in the REMP group. Survival curves were significantly different, favoring REMP in both scenarios. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and subcritical glenoid bone loss (<15%), a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative recurrent instability was observed with arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage than with isolated Bankart repair at a medium-term follow-up (mean of 4 years). Patients who did not receive a remplissage experienced a failure (redislocated) earlier and had a higher rate of revision/reoperation than those who received a concomitant remplissage. REGISTRATION: NCT01324531 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary vs. revision arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction with distal tibial allograft for anterior shoulder instability with bone loss.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR) used for primary vs. revision surgery for addressing anterior shoulder instability with bone loss. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review on consecutive patients who underwent AAGR from 2012 to 2020. Patients who received AAGR for anterior shoulder instability with bone loss and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with incomplete primary patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), multidirectional instability, glenoid fracture, nonrigid fixation and concomitant humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament, or rotator cuff repair. Our primary outcome was measured using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) scores, complications, recurrence of instability and computed tomographic (CT) evaluation of graft position, resorption, and healing. RESULTS: There were 73 patients (52 primary and 21 revision) finally included. Both groups had comparable demographics and preoperative WOSI and DASH scores. The primary group had significantly better postoperative WOSI and DASH scores at final follow-up when compared to the revision group (WOSI: 21.0 vs. 33.8, P = .019; DASH: 7.3 vs. 17.2, P = .001). The primary group also showed significantly better WOSI scores than the revision group at the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year time points (P = .029, .022, and .003, respectively). The overall complication rate was 9.6% (5 of 52) in the primary group and 23.8% (5 of 21) in the revision group. Both groups showed good graft healing and placement in the anterior-to-posterior and mediolateral orientation and had a similar rate of graft resorption and remodeling. There was no difference between the groups in the remainder of the CT measurements. CONCLUSION: Functional outcome scores and stiffness were significantly worse in patients undergoing an AAGR procedure after a failed instability surgery when compared with patients undergoing primary AAGR. There were no differences in postoperative recurrence of instability or radiographic outcomes. As a result, AAGR should be considered as a primary treatment option within current treatment algorithms for shoulder instability.

Graft Position, Healing, and Resorption in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Comparison of 4 Glenoid Augmentation Techniques.

Background: The success of glenoid augmentation procedures depends on accurate placement and healing of the graft to the glenoid. Different glenoid augmentation techniques have been described, but no comparative studies between them exist. Purpose: To assess the bone graft position, healing, and resorption in a group of patients treated with 1 of 4 procedures: arthroscopic anterior bone-block procedure using either (1) fresh-frozen iliac crest allograft or (2) iliac crest autograft, (3) open Latarjet, or (4) arthroscopic Latarjet. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 40 patients (87.5% men; mean age, 29.5 ± 7.9 years) were included, with 10 patients in each of the procedure groups. The graft position in the axial and sagittal planes was assessed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Graft healing and resorption were assessed in a second CT scan performed 1 year postoperatively. Qualitative variables were compared between the 4 procedures using the chi-square test, and quantitative variables were compared with the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results: No differences were found between the procedures in the axial or sagittal position. The healing rate was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group (20%) compared with the autograft bone-block (80%), open Latarjet (90%), and arthroscopic Latarjet (90%) groups (P < .001). Graft resorption developed in 17 of 40 (42.5%) cases overall. Osteolysis occurred in 100% of cases in the allograft bone-block group compared with 50% in the autograft group, 20% in the open Latarjet group, and 0% in the arthroscopic Latarjet group (P < .001). The glenoid surface area on 1-year CT scan was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group compared with the autograft bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet groups (P < .001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures provided accurate bone graft positioning. However, very high rates of osteolysis and nonunion were observed in the iliac crest fresh-frozen allograft bone-block procedure when compared with the other procedures.

Prognostic factors for recurrent instability in recreational athletes following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a retrospective study with an average 4.1-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Extensive research has been conducted to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair, yielding varying results across different populations. However, there remains a dearth of studies specifically focused on evaluating outcomes in recreational athletes. METHODS: A retrospective case series study was conducted on recreational athletes who underwent isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2013 and 2021. The primary outcome assessed was recurrent instability, defined as dislocation or subluxation. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, rates of returning to the same sports (RTS) and RTS at preinjury level, and patient-reported outcomes. Evaluation of the Rowe score, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and VAS pain score were performed. Prognostic factors for recurrent instability, including demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the labrum were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients met the selection criteria, with 150 (78.5%) available for the final follow-up. Recurrent instability occurred in 10.7% of patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 4.1 years. Younger age at surgery and more critical glenoid bone loss were significantly associated with recurrent instability (p = .038 and p = .011, respectively). The satisfaction rate regarding surgery was 90.0%. Rates of return to the same sports (RTS) and RTS at preinjury level were 82.0% and 49.3%, respectively. Clinical outcomes measured at the final follow-up were as follows: Rowe score - 92.8; Constant score - 98.0; ASES score - 98.3; VAS pain score - 0.2. Patients with recurrent instability had significantly inferior outcomes in terms of satisfaction rate, RTS at preinjury level rate, Rowe score, and Constant score (p = .000, p = .039, p = .000, and p = .015, respectively). A total of thirty-seven patients underwent MRI examination six months after surgery in our institution. The T2-weighted anterior labrum morphology was found to be poorer in patients with recurrent instability. No significant difference was observed between patients with or without recurrent instability in terms of anterior Slope, anterior labral glenoid height index (LGHI), inferior Slope, inferior LGHI, and T2-weighted inferior labrum morphology. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic Bankart repair can yield satisfactory medium-term outcomes for recreational athletes. Younger age at surgery, more critical glenoid bone loss, and poorer T2-weighted anterior labrum morphology assessed six months postoperatively were significantly associated with recurrent instability.

[Research progress of Chinese unique Inlay Bristow (Cuistow surgery) using suture button fixation].

Objective: To explore the research progress of the coracoid transfer surgery using suture button fixation, particularly focusing on the technique known as Chinese unique Inlay Bristow (Cuistow surgery). Methods: Extensive literature review was conducted to summarize and analyze the utilization of suture button fixation in the Cuistow surgery, comparing its biomechanical and clinical outcomes with those of traditional screw fixation. Results: Utilizing suture button fixation in coracoid transfer surgery helps circumvent certain metal-related complications associated with traditional screw fixation. While its biomechanical stability and effectiveness have been preliminarily confirmed, debates persist regarding its graft healing rate and postoperative recurrence rate compared to traditional screw fixation. The Cuistow surgery based on the Inlay structure is a solution to improve the healing rate of graft after suture button fixation. Conclusion: Suture button fixation, as a novel approach in coracoid transfer surgery, remains to have its advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional screw fixation not entirely elucidated, underscoring the need for further in-depth clinical and fundamental research. Cuistow surgery is the Chinese experience of coracoid transfer surgery, and its biomechanical stability and clinical advantages have been preliminarily confirmed.

[Suture button fixation Latarjet procedure under total arthroscopy for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with severe bone defect].

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of suture button fixation Latarjet procedure under total arthroscopy for anterior shoulder instability with severe bone defects. Methods: The clinical data of 15 patients with severe bone defects and anterior shoulder instability treated with suture button fixation Latarjet procedure under total arthroscopy between June 2020 and February 2023 was retrospectively analyzed, including 11 males and 4 females, with an average age of 31.1 years (range, 20-54 years). Three-dimensional CT showed that the average glenoid bone defect was 24.4% (range, 16.3%-35.2%). The average number of shoulder dislocation was 4.2 times (range, 3-8 times). The disease duration ranged from 6 to 21 months with an average of 10.6 months. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The pain relief was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the functional recovery of shoulder joint was evaluated by Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, and American Association for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score before and after operation. The range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint was assessed, including active flexion, lateral external rotation, abduction 90° external rotation, and internal rotation. Three-dimensional CT was performed at 6 months after operation and at last follow-up to observe the absorption of bone graft, the position of bone graft and glenoid, and the healing of bone graft. Results: The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time was 85-195 minutes, with an average of 123.0 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 20-75 mL, with an average of 26.5 mL. All patients were followed up 13-32 months, with an average of 18.7 months. During the follow-up, there was no serious complication such as shoulder joint infection, joint stiffness, or vascular and nerve injury. One patient had partial absorption of the transplanted bone and bone nonunion at 3 months after operation, but the pain of the shoulder joint relieved at last follow-up, and no redislocation of the shoulder joint occurred; no obvious bone fracture or dislocation of the shoulder joint was found in the other patients. Bone union was achieved at 6 months during follow-up. At last follow-up, the VAS score, Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, and ASES score significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05), while the ROM of active flexion, lateral external rotation, abduction 90° external rotation, and internal rotation of the shoulder joint was not significantly different from those before operation ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Suture button fixation Latarjet procedure under total arthroscopy can improve shoulder joint function in patients with severe anterior shoulder instability caused by bone defects, and imaging also indicates satisfactory placement of transplanted bone blocks.

The glenoid track concept is insufficient to predict Bankart failures: a computed tomography scan study.

Background: The glenoid track concept identifies patients with "off-track" (engaging) Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) as poor candidates for arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) due to the high risk of shoulder instability recurrence. Purpose: To retrospectively calculate the glenoid track index, using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, in a cohort of patients with failed ABR. We hypothesized that all patients with a failed ABR would have engaging ("off-track") HSLs on preoperative CT scan. Type of Study: CT scan study. Methods: Preoperative CT scan of 45 patients, seen in our facility for failed ABR, was used to retrospectively calculate the glenoid track index. The risk of recurrence was also calculated for each patient using Instability Severity Index Score (ISI-Score) and Glenoid Track Instability Management Score (GTIMS). There were 37 failed isolated ABRs and 8 associated HS remplissage. The mean t age at surgery was 24 years (range, 15-52) and instability recurred at a mean of 29 months postoperative (range, 3-167). Results: Preoperative CT scan imaging identified "off-track" bony lesions in 85% of patients (38/45) and "on-track" lesions in 15% (7/45). No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups (off-track vs. on-track) regarding patient age, hyperlaxity, sports participation, size of HS lesion, or ISI-Score. The mean glenoid bone loss was 15.7% (range, 4-36%) with mean HS width was greater than 20 mm in 66% of CT scans. The preoperative ISI-Score was predictive of failures (>3 points in all patients) with no difference between on-track and off-track patients (6.3 ± 1.7 vs. 6.6 ± 1.7, P = .453). By contrast, the GTIMS did not predict failures as there was a significant difference between GTIMS for on-track and off-track patients (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 6.6 ± 1.7). Conclusions: The glenoid track concept alone is insufficient to predict Bankart failures: in the present series of failed ABR, 15% of shoulders had "on-track" (non-engaging) lesions on preoperative CT scan. In patients, with "on-track" bony lesions, the ISI-Score is a useful predictive tool to detect patients at risk of failure, while the GTIMS is not.

Glenoid track and subcritical Hill-Sachs lesion.

Background: We have proposed the concept of glenoid track ("on-track/off-track" lesion) to evaluate the risk of engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion with the glenoid after arthroscopic Bankart repair. This concept has been widely used and many clinical validation studies have been reported. To measure the glenoid track width, we have recommended to use 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images. However, the CT method has the issue of radiation exposure and involves time and effort to make 3-dimensional CT images from 2-dimensional images. For these reasons, there are several reports describing the measurement method using magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, the threshold of the critical glenoid bone loss becomes lower. A zone of bone loss below the critical size is called "subcritical bone loss", which might be related to deterioration of quality of life and bone grafting is recommended. We applied the concept of "subcritical bone loss" to the glenoid track. Patients with "on-track" lesions can be divided into 2 subgroups: those with a "peripheral-track" lesion (most medial 1/4) and those with a "central-track" lesion (the rest 3/4). More recently, similar evaluation methods to evaluate the risk of "off-track" lesions have been reported: ''distance to dislocation'' and "Hill-Sachs interval/glenoid track ratio". Also, similar concept to "peripheral-track" lesion, "near-track" lesion was reported. The concept of "peripheral-track" lesion is a concept of assessing an "on-track" lesion which is very close to the medial margin of the glenoid track (subcritical bone loss). Methods: Similar evaluation methods to evaluate the risk of "off-track" or "peripheral-track" lesions were proposed in the literature. A review was performed by searching PubMed. Journal articles published between January 2014 and January 2023 were taken into account. They were compared and their differences were explained. Results: The "near-track" lesion concept is similar to "peripheral-track" lesion. However, the cutoff value is different: Hill-Sachs occupancy ≥ 75% is the "peripheral-track" lesion, whereas "distance to dislocation" < 8 mm is the "near-track" lesion. Conclusion: We introduced update of the glenoid track concept including the evaluation method, peripheral-track lesion, and its clinical application.

Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?

OBJECTIVE: Although SLAP-5 lesions are associated with recurrent dislocations, their causes and pathomechanisms have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the association between SLAP-5 lesions and scapular morphology in traumatic anterior shoulder instability (ASI). We hypothesized that there may be a relationship between SLAP-5 lesions and scapular morphology in traumatic ASI patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 74 patients with isolated Bankart lesions and 69 with SLAP-5 lesions who underwent arthroscopic labral repair for ASI. Critical shoulder angle (CSA) was measured on the roentgenograms, while glenoid inclination (GI) and glenoid version (GV) were measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by two observers in two separate sessions blinded to each other. Both groups were compared in terms of CSA, GI, and GV. RESULTS: The mean ages of Bankart and SLAP-5 patients were 28.4±9.1 and 27.9±7.7 (P=0.89), respectively; their mean CSA values were 33.1°±2.6° and 28.2°±2.4°, respectively (P<0.001). The ROC analysis's cut-off value was 30.5°, with 75.0% sensitivity and 76.7% specificity (AUC = 0.830). SLAP-5 lesions were more common on the dominant side than isolated Bankart lesions (P=0.021), but no difference was found between the groups in terms of GI and GV (P=0.334, P=0.081, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In ASI, low CSA values appeared to be related to SLAP-5 lesions, and the cut-off value of CSA for SLAP lesion formation was 30.5° with 75.0% sensitivity and 76.7% specificity. Scapula morphology may be related to the SLAP-5 lesions, and CSA can be used as an additional parameter in provocative diagnostic tests and medical imaging techniques for the detection of SLAP lesions accompanying Bankart lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III retrospective case-control study.

Serial Magnetic Resonance Arthrography for a Midsubstance Capsular Tear in a Patient With Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability.

The natural history of midsubstance capsular tears (MCTs) is unclear. We herein describe a case of MCT observed using serial magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. A 46-year-old woman presented with excessive external rotation of the left glenohumeral joint, resulting in an initial anterior dislocation of the left shoulder. She subsequently developed recurrent shoulder joint dislocations. MR arthrography revealed an MCT without a Bankart lesion three months after the initial dislocation. She opted for nonoperative treatment, but the shoulder instability did not improve. The second MR arthrography, nine months after the initial dislocation, showed no natural healing of the MCT. The third MR arthrography, 12 months after the initial dislocation, also showed no natural healing. Her shoulder instability remained persistent. The patient then decided to have surgery. Arthroscopy revealed a large capsular defect extending from the glenoid to the humeral head in the anterior inferior glenohumeral ligamentous complex. The MCT was repaired with the placement of nonabsorbable sutures in a side-to-side fashion. At the final follow-up, three years postoperatively, the patient had no anterior shoulder instability. The Rowe score was 100 points. MR arthrography showed good repair integrity of the MCT at one year postoperatively. Serial MR arthrography was useful for both the patient and the shoulder surgeon in considering the treatment of the MCT, facilitating an accurate and qualitative assessment of whether natural healing of the MCT had been achieved.