Neuroestimulación del nervio vago, hipocampal y de núcleos anteriores y centromedianos del tálamo en epilepsia temporal: revisión de la literatura / Neurostimulation of the vagus nerve, hippocampal and anterior and centromedian nuclei of the thalamus in temporal epilepsy: literature review

Introducción: En pacientes con epilepsia del lóbulo temporal refractarios que no son candidatos a cirugía, se debe considerar la estimulación eléctrica cerebral como una opción. Contenido: La estimulación eléctrica cerebral es la administración directa de pulsos eléctricos al tejido nervioso que permite modular un sustrato patológico, interrumpir la manifestación clínica de las crisis y reducir la gravedad de estas. Así, dada la importancia de estos tratamientos para los pacientes con epilepsia del lóbulo temporal refractaria, se hace una revisión de cuatro tipos de estimulación eléctrica. La primera, la del nervio vago, es una buena opción en crisis focales y crisis generalizadas o multifocales. La segunda, la del hipocampo, es más útil en pacientes no candidatos a lobectomía por riesgo de pérdida de memoria, con resonancia magnética normal o sin esclerosis mesial temporal. La tercera, la del núcleo anterior, es pertinente principalmente en pacientes con crisis focales, pero debe realizarse con precaución en pacientes con alto riesgo de cambios cognitivos, como los ancianos, o en los que presentan alteración del estado de ánimo basal, y, por último, la del núcleo centromediano se recomienda para el tratamiento crisis focales en el síndrome de Rasmussen y crisis tónico-clónicas en el síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut. Conclusiones: El interés por la estimulación eléctrica cerebral ha venido aumentando, al igual que las estructuras diana en las cuales se puede aplicar, debido a que es un tratamiento seguro y eficaz en pacientes con epilepsia del lóbulo temporal para controlar las crisis, pues disminuye la morbimortalidad y aumenta la calidad de vida.

Introduction: In patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy who are not candidates for surgery, electrical brain stimulation should be considered as another option. Contents: Electrical brain stimulation is the direct administration of electrical pulses to nerve tissue that modulates a pathological substrate, interrupts the clinical manifestation of seizures, and reduces their severity. Thus, given the importance of these treatments for patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy, four types of electrical stimulation are reviewed. The first, vagus nerve stimulation, is a good option in focal seizures and generalized or multifocal seizures. The second, hippocampal stimulation, is more useful in patients who are not candidates for lobectomy due to the risk of memory loss, with normal MRI or without mesial temporal sclerosis. The third, the anterior nucleus, is mainly in patients with focal seizures, but with caution in patients at high risk of cognitive changes such as the elderly, or in those with baseline mood disturbance and, finally, the centromedian nucleus is recommended for the treatment of focal seizures in Rasmussen's syndrome and tonic-clonic seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Conclusions: the interest in brain electrical stimulation has been increasing as well as the target structures in which it can be applied because it is a safe and effective treatment in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy to control seizures, decreasing morbidity and mortality and increasing quality of life

A role for the anteromedial thalamic nucleus in the acquisition of contextual fear memory to predatory threats.

Previous studies from our group have shown that cytotoxic lesions in the ventral portion of the anteromedial thalamic nucleus (AMv), one of the main targets of the hypothalamic predator-responsive circuit, strongly impairs contextual fear responses to an environment previously associated with a predator. The AMv is in a position to convey information to cortico-hippocampal-amygdalar circuits involved in the processing of fear memory. However, it remains to be determined whether the nucleus is involved in the acquisition or subsequent expression of contextual fear. In the present investigation, we addressed this question by inactivating the rat AMv with muscimol either prior to cat exposure or prior to exposure to the cat-related context. Accordingly, AMv pharmacological inactivation prior to cat exposure did not interfere with innate fear responses, but it drastically reduced contextual conditioning to the predator-associated environment. On the other hand, AMv inactivation prior to exposure to the environment associated with the predator threat did not affect contextual fear responses. The behavioral results were further supported by the demonstration that AMv inactivation prior to cat exposure also blocked the activation of sites critically involved in the expression of anti-predatory contextual defensive responses (i.e., the dorsal premammillary nucleus and the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray) in animals exposed to the predator-associated context. The AMv projections were also examined, and the results of this investigation outline important paths that can influence hippocampal circuitry and raise new ideas for anterior thalamic-hippocampal paths involved in emotional learning.