Perspectiva neurológica en la elección del anticoagulante oral directo para la prevención del accidente cerebrovascular en fibrilación auricular / Neurological perspective in the choice of direct oral an ticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation

Resumen La fibrilación auricular no valvular (FA) es la arritmia con potencial embolígeno más prevalente y una de las principales y crecientes causas de accidente cerebrovas cular isquémico (ACVi). El principal objetivo del uso de la anticoagulación en pacientes con FA es la prevención del ACVi. Hasta hace poco tiempo, la anticoagulación con antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVKs) era la única opción disponible. Los anticoagulantes orales directos (DOACs) como el inhibidor directo de la trombina, dabigatrán, o los inhibidores directos del factor Xa, rivaroxabán, apixa bán y edoxabán, tienen un perfil de efectividad/seguridad más favorable en comparación con los AVKs. No existen estudios que comparen la efectividad de los DOACs entre sí. La elección del DOAC depende de múltiples factores específicos del paciente, preferencias del médico, costos y accesibilidad. Entre 1-2% de los pacientes correctamente tratados con un DOAC intercurre con un ACVi cada año. La posibilidad de contar con un agente reversor debería ser tenida en cuenta al momento de la elección del DOAC, especialmente por el riesgo residual de ocurrencia de ACVi. En la actualidad, en nuestro país solo el dabigatrán cuenta con un agente reversor disponible y lo convierte en el único DOAC que no contraindica el uso de trombolisis intraveno sa con rtPA. Esta situación debería ser considerada en el momento de la elección del DOAC para la prevención de eventos tromboembólicos en pacientes con FA.

Abstract Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preva lent arrhythmia with high embolic potential, and one of the main and growing causes of stroke. The main objec tive of anticoagulation in patients with AF is prevention of stroke. Until recently, anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was the only available option. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, or the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, have a more favor able effectiveness/safety profile compared to VKAs. There are no studies comparing the efficacy of DOACs with each other. The choice of a DOAC arose from patient car achterictis, physician preferences, cost, and accessibility. Between 1-2% of patients correctly treated with a DOAC experience a stroke each year. The possibility of having a reversal agent should be taken into account when choos ing a DOAC, especially due to the residual risk of stroke occurrences even under DOACs. Currently, in our country only dabigatran has a reversing agent available, making it the only DOAC that does not contraindicate the use of intravenous thrombolysis. This should be taken into account when choosing the DOAC for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with AF.

Antitrombóticos en las prótesis valvulares biológicas: ¿cuál es el mejor camino a seguir? / Antithrombotics in biological valve prostheses: what is the best way forward? / Antitrombóticos em próteses de válvulas biológicas: qual é o melhor caminho a seguir?

La enfermedad valvular cardíaca es una condición muy frecuente en la población general y un porcentaje considerable de estos pacientes requieren un tratamiento intervencionista sobre su valvulopatía para lograr atenuar su evolución natural. En este contexto, en la actualidad ha aumentado el uso de las prótesis valvulares biológicas para su tratamiento y, con ello, surge el dilema del manejo antitrombótico en estos pacientes en términos de prevención de tromboembolias y eventos hemorrágicos. ¿Cuál es el fármaco más efectivo y seguro en el período posoperatorio temprano? ¿Qué antitrombóticos podemos utilizar en el período posoperatorio tardío? ¿Qué estrategia seguimos cuando el paciente presenta otras indicaciones de anticoagulación? El objetivo de esta revisión es valorar la evidencia actual respecto al tratamiento antitrombótico en pacientes portadores de prótesis valvulares biológicas con y sin indicaciones adicionales de anticoagulación.

Heart valve disease is a very common condition in the general population and a considerable percentage of these patients require interventional treatment for their valve disease to mitigate its natural evolution. In this context, the use of biological prosthetic valves for their treatment has now increased, and with this, the dilemma of antithrombotic management in these patients arises, in terms of prevention of thromboembolism and hemorrhagic events. What is the most effective and safe drug in the early postoperative period? What antithrombotics can we use in the late postoperative period? What strategy do we follow when the patient presents other indications for anticoagulation? The objective of this review is to assess the current evidence regarding antithrombotic treatment in patients with biological prosthetic valves with and without additional indications for anticoagulation.

A valvopatia é uma condição muito comum na população geral e uma porcentagem considerável desses pacientes necessita de tratamento intervencionista para sua valvopatia para amenizar sua evolução natural. Nesse contexto, o uso de próteses valvares biológicas para seu tratamento tem aumentado, e com isso surge o dilema do manejo antitrombótico nesses pacientes em termos de prevenção de tromboembolismo e eventos hemorrágicos. Qual é o fármaco mais eficaz e seguro no pós-operatório imediato? Que antitrombóticos podemos usar no pós-operatório tardio? Que estratégia seguimos quando o paciente apresenta outras indicações de anticoagulação? O objetivo desta revisão é avaliar as evidências atuais sobre o tratamento antitrombótico em pacientes com próteses valvares biológicas com e sem indicações adicionais de anticoagulação.

Predictores de uso de anticoagulantes orales directos en tromboembolia pulmonar aguda / Predictors of use of direct oral anticoagulants in acute pulmonary embolism

Resumen Introducción: En la última década los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) se incorporaron como herramienta para la anticoagulación en pacientes con tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP) aguda. Aunque tienen un mejor perfil farmacológico que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK), el uso de estos fármacos no es masivo. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el uso de ACOD en pacientes con TEP aguda y detectar determinantes de su indicación. Metodología: Análisis preespecificado del registro CONAREC XX que incorporó pacientes con TEP aguda en 64 centros de Argentina. Se realizó un análisis para detectar predictores de prescripción de ACOD al alta. Resultados: Se analizaron 579 pacientes que recibieron anticoagulación al alta hospitalaria: el 60% recibió AVK, el 21% heparinas y el 19% ACOD (de ellos, un 49% rivaroxabán, un 34% apixabán y un 17% dabigatrán). Los pacientes que recibieron ACOD tenían TEP de menor gravedad, menor riesgo de hemorragia y menos complicaciones intrahospitalarias. En el seguimiento a 30 días no hubo diferencias en mortalidad por todas las causas o sangrados. La cobertura de salud por un seguro social (odds ratio [OR] 7.45; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1.74-31.9; p < 0.01) o por cobertura privada (OR 10.5; IC 95%: 2.4-45.9; p < 0.01) fueron predictores independientes de la prescripción de ACOD al alta, y el antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca (OR 0.19; IC 95%: 0.04-0.84; p = 0.028) y de enfermedad oncológica (OR 0.49; IC 95%: 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) fueron predictores de no prescribirlos. Conclusiones: Uno de cada cinco supervivientes de TEP aguda recibió ACOD al egreso hospitalario en Argentina, y esto fue determinado por variables clínicas y económicas

Abstract Introduction: In the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been incorporated as an anticoagulation tool in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Although they have a better pharmacological profile than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), the use of these drugs is not massive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of DOACs in patients with acute PE and to detect determinants of its use. Methodology: Prespecified analysis of the CONAREC XX registry that included patients with acute PE in 64 centers in Argentina. An analysis was performed to detect predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge. Results: 579 patients who received anticoagulation at hospital discharge were analyzed: 60% received VKA, 21% heparin and 19% DOAC (of them, 49% Rivaroxaban, 34% Apixaban, and 17% Dabigatran). Patients receiving DOACs had less severe PE, lower risk of bleeding, and fewer in-hospital complications. At 30-day follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or bleeding. Health coverage by social insurance (OR 7.45, CI 95% 1.74-31.9, p < 0.01) or by private coverage (OR 10.5, CI 95% 2.4-45.9, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge, and history of heart failure (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84, p = 0.028) and oncological disease (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) were predictors not prescribe them. Conclusions: One in five survivors of acute PE received DOACs at hospital discharge in Argentina, and this was determined by clinical and economic variables.

Predictors of use of direct oral anticoagulants in acute pulmonary embolism.

INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been incorporated as an anticoagulation tool in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Although they have a better pharmacological profile than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), the use of these drugs is not massive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of DOACs in patients with acute PE and to detect determinants of its use. METHODOLOGY: Prespecified analysis of the CONAREC XX registry that included patients with acute PE in 64 centers in Argentina. An analysis was performed to detect predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge. RESULTS: 579 patients who received anticoagulation at hospital discharge were analyzed: 60% received VKA, 21% heparin and 19% DOAC (of them, 49% Rivaroxaban, 34% Apixaban, and 17% Dabigatran). Patients receiving DOACs had less severe PE, lower risk of bleeding, and fewer in-hospital complications. At 30-day follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or bleeding. Health coverage by social insurance (OR 7.45, CI 95% 1.74-31.9, p < 0.01) or by private coverage (OR 10.5, CI 95% 2.4-45.9, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge, and history of heart failure (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84, p = 0.028) and oncological disease (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) were predictors not prescribe them. CONCLUSIONS: One in five survivors of acute PE received DOACs at hospital discharge in Argentina, and this was determined by clinical and economic variables.

INTRODUCCIÓN: En la última década los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) se incorporaron como herramienta para la anticoagulación en pacientes con tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP) aguda. Aunque tienen un mejor perfil farmacológico que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK), el uso de estos fármacos no es masivo. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el uso de ACOD en pacientes con TEP aguda y detectar determinantes de su indicación. METODOLOGÍA: Análisis preespecificado del registro CONAREC XX que incorporó pacientes con TEP aguda en 64 centros de Argentina. Se realizó un análisis para detectar predictores de prescripción de ACOD al alta. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 579 pacientes que recibieron anticoagulación al alta hospitalaria: el 60% recibió AVK, el 21% heparinas y el 19% ACOD (de ellos, un 49% rivaroxabán, un 34% apixabán y un 17% dabigatrán). Los pacientes que recibieron ACOD tenían TEP de menor gravedad, menor riesgo de hemorragia y menos complicaciones intrahospitalarias. En el seguimiento a 30 días no hubo diferencias en mortalidad por todas las causas o sangrados. La cobertura de salud por un seguro social (odds ratio [OR] 7.45; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1.74-31.9; p < 0.01) o por cobertura privada (OR 10.5; IC 95%: 2.4-45.9; p < 0.01) fueron predictores independientes de la prescripción de ACOD al alta, y el antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca (OR 0.19; IC 95%: 0.04-0.84; p = 0.028) y de enfermedad oncológica (OR 0.49; IC 95%: 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) fueron predictores de no prescribirlos. CONCLUSIONES: Uno de cada cinco supervivientes de TEP aguda recibió ACOD al egreso hospitalario en Argentina, y esto fue determinado por variables clínicas y económicas.

Gender differences in antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation from Spain versus the rest of Western Europe. GLORIA-AF Program

Background and objective:Thromboembolic risk is higher in women than men with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Published data indicate variability in antithrombotic use by gender and region. We analyzed gender-specific antithrombotic treatment patterns in Spain and rest of Western Europe (rWE) in patients with NVAF.Methods:GLORIA-AF (Phase III) is a global, prospective, observational study which enrolled newly diagnosed NVAF patients with CHA2DS2-VAScs≥1 (2014–2016). Analyses were performed comparing antithrombotic treatments by gender in Spain and rWE.Results:This analysis included 1163 and 7972 patients from Spain and rWE, respectively. Stroke risk was higher in women than men in both Spain and rWE. While in rWE, bleeding risk and antithrombotic treatment pattern were similar between genders, in Spain bleeding risk in women was lower and more females compared to men received OACs (95.0% versus 92.4%, d=−0.1078, respectively). Fewer Spanish patients received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (women 32.1%, men 25.3%) than vitamin-K-antagonists (VKAs) (women 63.0%, men 67.1%) vs. rWE patients. In Spain women received more DOACs compared to men (56.0% versus 44.0%).Conclusions:OAC rates were higher in Spain as compared to rWE. More women received OACs in Spain, while in rWE no difference by gender was observed. DOACs in rWE are the most prescribed OAC while in Spain, due to prescription barriers, its use remains low for both genders and VKAs are preferred. Spanish women received more DOACs compared to men. (NCT01468701). (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivo:El riesgo tromboembólico es mayor en mujeres que en varones con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV). Existen diferencias en el uso de anticoagulantes (ACO) según sexo y zona geográfica. Se estudiaron los patrones de anticoagulación por sexo en España y el resto de Europa Occidental (rEO) en pacientes con FANV.Métodos:GLORIA-AF es un estudio observacional prospectivo (fase III) que incluyó a pacientes con diagnóstico reciente de FANV y CHA2DS2-VASc>1 (2014-2016). Se analizó la prescripción de anticoagulantes por sexo en España y el rEO.Resultados:Se incluyó a 1.163 pacientes de España y 7.972 del rEO. El riesgo de ictus fue superior en mujeres tanto en España como en el rEO. El riesgo de hemorragia y el tratamiento antitrombótico fueron similares en ambos sexos en el rEO; en España, el riesgo de hemorragia fue menor en mujeres y estas recibieron más ACO que los varones (95,0% vs. 92,4%, d=–0,1078). En España, menos pacientes recibieron ACO directos (ACOD) (mujeres 32,1%, varones 25,3%) vs. antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) (mujeres 63,0%, varones 67,1%), y las mujeres recibieron más ACOD que los varones (56,0% vs. 44,0%).Conclusiones:En España se emplearon más ACO que en el rEO y más mujeres fueron tratadas con ACO, mientras que en el rEO no hubo diferencias por sexo. En el rEO, los ACOD se emplearon más. En España, los ACOD se emplean menos por restricciones de prescripción y se emplean más los AVK. Las mujeres españolas reciben más ACOD que los varones. (NCT01468701). (AU)

Gender differences in antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation from Spain versus the rest of Western Europe. GLORIA-AF Program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thromboembolic risk is higher in women than men with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Published data indicate variability in antithrombotic use by gender and region. We analyzed gender-specific antithrombotic treatment patterns in Spain and rest of Western Europe (rWE) in patients with NVAF. METHODS: GLORIA-AF (Phase III) is a global, prospective, observational study which enrolled newly diagnosed NVAF patients with CHA2DS2-VAScs≥1 (2014-2016). Analyses were performed comparing antithrombotic treatments by gender in Spain and rWE. RESULTS: This analysis included 1163 and 7972 patients from Spain and rWE, respectively. Stroke risk was higher in women than men in both Spain and rWE. While in rWE, bleeding risk and antithrombotic treatment pattern were similar between genders, in Spain bleeding risk in women was lower and more females compared to men received OACs (95.0% versus 92.4%, d=-0.1078, respectively). Fewer Spanish patients received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (women 32.1%, men 25.3%) than vitamin-K-antagonists (VKAs) (women 63.0%, men 67.1%) vs. rWE patients. In Spain women received more DOACs compared to men (56.0% versus 44.0%). CONCLUSIONS: OAC rates were higher in Spain as compared to rWE. More women received OACs in Spain, while in rWE no difference by gender was observed. DOACs in rWE are the most prescribed OAC while in Spain, due to prescription barriers, its use remains low for both genders and VKAs are preferred. Spanish women received more DOACs compared to men. (NCT01468701).

Utilidad del cuestionario EQ-5D y CRES-4 para la valoración de la calidad de vida y grado de satisfacción tras el cambio de dicumarínicos por edoxabán: experiencia vida real de un estudio multicéntrico / Effectiveness of the EQ-5D and CRES-4 questionnaire for assessing the impact on the quality of life of patients and the level of satisfaction after exchanging dicumarinics for edoxabán: Real-life experience based on a multicentre study

Antecedentes y objetivo: La fibrilación auricular y la anticoagulación merman la calidad de vida de los pacientes. El objetivo del estudio es valorar la calidad de vida y el grado de satisfacción tras el cambio de anticoagulante de AVK a edoxabán.Material y métodosEstudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, que incluye a 105 pacientes en tratamiento con dicumarínicos que se sustituye por edoxabán. Se valoró la calidad de vida antes y después a través del cuestionario EQ-5D y el grado de satisfacción con la escala CRES-4.ResultadosEdad media 75 años, CHA2DS2VASC 3,5puntos, HASBLED 2,1puntos; eventos tromboembólicos y hemorragias clínicamente relevantes durante el seguimiento <1%. El EQ5D mostró una mejoría global significativa en los parámetros de movilidad y ansiedad (p=0,023, IC95%: 0,0175-0,23; p=0,019, IC95%: 0,028-0,31). El CRES-4 recoge una satisfacción con el terapeuta del 95%, una repercusión positiva en la vida del 73% y negativa del 3,8%. La situacional emocional atribuida al cambio de tratamiento mejoró (41% vs 69,5%, p=0,0001). Se correlacionó débilmente la puntuación final del CRES-4 con la situacional emocional del EQ-5D.ConclusionesEl cambio de anticoagulante por edoxabán mejora la calidad de vida y el grado de satisfacción del paciente, pudiendo emplearse conjuntamente los cuestionarios de calidad de vida EQ-5D y el CRES-4. (AU)

Background and objective: Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation decrease the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of life and the degree of satisfaction after changing from VKA to edoxaban anticoagulants.Material and methodsProspective, multicentre study, including 105 patients in dicumarinic anticoagulant treatment replaced by edoxaban. Their quality of life was evaluated before and after using the EQ-5D questionnaire, and the degree of satisfaction with CRES-4 scale.ResultsAverage 75 years, CHA2DS2VASC3,5 and HASBLED2,1; thromboembolic events and clinically relevant bleeding during follow-up <1%. EQ-5D showed a significant overall improvement in the mobility and anxiety parameters (P=.023, 95%CI: .0175-.23; P=.019, 95%CI:=.028-.31). The CRES-4 questionnaire showed satisfaction with the therapist of 95%, a positive impact on life of 73% and a negative impact of 3.8%. The emotional state attributed to the change in treatment improved (41% vs 69.5%, P=.0001). The final score of the CRES-4 weakly correlated with the emotional situation of the EQ-5D questionnaire.ConclusionsThe change of anticoagulant for edoxaban improves the quality of life and the degree of patient satisfaction, and the EQ-5D and CRES-4 quality of life questionnaires can be used complementarily. (AU)

[Effectiveness of the EQ-5D and CRES-4 questionnaire for assessing the impact on the quality of life of patients and the level of satisfaction after exchanging dicumarinics for edoxabán: Real-life experience based on a multicentre study]. / Utilidad del cuestionario EQ-5D y CRES-4 para la valoración de la calidad de vida y grado de satisfacción tras el cambio de dicumarínicos por edoxabán: experiencia vida real de un estudio multicéntrico.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation decrease the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of life and the degree of satisfaction after changing from VKA to edoxaban anticoagulants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, multicentre study, including 105 patients in dicumarinic anticoagulant treatment replaced by edoxaban. Their quality of life was evaluated before and after using the EQ-5D questionnaire, and the degree of satisfaction with CRES-4 scale. RESULTS: Average 75 years, CHA2DS2VASC3,5 and HASBLED2,1; thromboembolic events and clinically relevant bleeding during follow-up <1%. EQ-5D showed a significant overall improvement in the mobility and anxiety parameters (P=.023, 95%CI: .0175-.23; P=.019, 95%CI:=.028-.31). The CRES-4 questionnaire showed satisfaction with the therapist of 95%, a positive impact on life of 73% and a negative impact of 3.8%. The emotional state attributed to the change in treatment improved (41% vs 69.5%, P=.0001). The final score of the CRES-4 weakly correlated with the emotional situation of the EQ-5D questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The change of anticoagulant for edoxaban improves the quality of life and the degree of patient satisfaction, and the EQ-5D and CRES-4 quality of life questionnaires can be used complementarily.

Manejo perioperatorio de la anticoagulación en cirugía cardíaca: ¿un lugar para los anticoagulantes directos? / Perioperative management of anticoagulation in cardiac surgery: a place for direct anticoagulants? / Gerenciamento perioperatório de anticoagulação em cirurgia cardíaca: ¿um lugar para anticoagulantes diretos?

Resumen: La anticoagulación en el posoperatorio de cirugía cardíaca constituye todo un reto. La oportunidad de inicio, la dosis a utilizar y el tipo de anticoagulante, dependerán del procedimiento realizado, de la asociación de factores de riesgo trombótico y/o hemorrágico y de un estricto seguimiento clínico, a fin de lograr un adecuado nivel de protección y evitar complicaciones durante la estadía hospitalaria. Analizaremos tres escenarios de posoperatorio: pacientes con prótesis valvulares, fibrilación auricular y prevención de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa, así como la prevención y el manejo de las complicaciones hemorrágicas, adecuando el tratamiento a los niveles de INR y a la presencia de sangrados. El trabajo en equipo, multi e interdisciplinario y la protocolización de las medidas a tomar, facilitan el manejo de este tipo de pacientes y reducen las complicaciones, muchas de ellas totalmente evitables.

Summary: Anticoagulation in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery constitutes a challenge. The timing of initiation, the anticoagulation dose to be used and the type of anticoagulant will depend on the procedure performed, the association of thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic risk factors, and strict clinical monitoring in order to achieve an adequate level of protection and avoid complications during hospital stay. We will analyze three postoperative situations: patients with valve prostheses, atrial fibrillation and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease as well as prevention and management of bleeding complications, adapting treatment to INR levels and presence of bleeding. Multi and interdisciplinary teamwork and the protocolization of the measures to be taken, facilitate the management of these patients and reduces complications, many of which are totally avoidable.

Resumo: A anticoagulação no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca constitui um desafio. O momento de início, a dose de anticoagulação a ser utilizada, o tipo de anticoagulante vão depender do procedimento realizado, da associação de fatores de risco trombóticos e/ou hemorrágicos e de monitoramento clínico rigoroso para atingir um nível adequado de proteção e evitar complicações durante a internação. Analisaremos três cenários pós-operatórios: pacientes com próteses valvares, fibrilação atrial e prevenção de doença tromboembólica venosa, além da prevenção e manejo de complicações hemorrágicas, adequando o tratamento aos níveis de INR e à presença de sangramento. O trabalho em equipe multi e interdisciplinar e a protocolização das medidas a serem tomadas facilitam o manejo destes pacientes e reduzem complicações, muitas das quais são totalmente evitáveis.

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation on vitamin k antagonists or direct-acting oral anticoagulants: patients profile and long-term follow up outcomes.

Introduction: The arrival of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has led to a change in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in recent years. The objectives of this study are to determine the level of therapeutic control of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and its possible involvement in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and to evaluate differences between the group on VKA with respect to the group on DOACs. Patients and methods: Prospective cohort study that included consecutive patients diagnosed with NVAF in Cardiology Consultations with a clinical follow-up of 18 months. Demographic, clinical and analytical differences between groups were analyzed, including the level of therapeutic control of anticoagulation on the VKA group and its association with MACE. Results: Overall, 273 patients were included: 46.5% on VKA, 42.5% on DOACs, 11% without antithrombotic treatment. Patients on VKA spent 62.1% of their time within therapeutic range (TTR by the Rosendaal formule). There were no differences in MACE depending on anticoagulation control. The DOACs group presented lesser MACE rate than the VKA group (13.4 vs. 4.3%; 0.90; HR 0.90; 0.83-0.98 p = 0.01) with lower cardiovascular mortality (0.0 vs. 5.5%; HR, 0.94; 0.90-0.98; p = 0.01) and total mortality (0.9 vs. 12.6%; HR, 0.88; 0.82-0.94; p < 0.01) although without significant differences in hemorrhagic (0.9 vs. 4.7 %; p = 0.07), or ischemic events (2.6 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.27). Conclusions: Patients on VKA have a different clinical profile than those who receive DOACs. Patients on VKA have an inadequate control of the anticoagulation in quite the half of the cases. The VKA group presented more MACE than the DOACs group.

Introducción: La llegada de los anticoagulantes directos (ACD) ha supuesto un cambio en el tratamiento de la fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) en los últimos años. Los objetivos de este estudio son determinar el grado de control de la anticoagulación con antivitamina K (AVK) y su posible implicación en efectos cardiovasculares adversos mayores (ECAM) y evaluar las diferencias entre el grupo en tratamiento con AVK respecto del grupo con ACD. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo que incluyó a pacientes consecutivos diagnosticados con FANV valorados en el Servicio de Cardiología con un seguimiento de 18 meses. Se analizaron diferencias demográficas, clínicas y analíticas entre grupos, incluido el grado de control de la anticoagulación del grupo AVK y su posible relación con ECAM. Resultados: Se incluyó a 273 pacientes: 46.5% tratados con AVK, 42.5% con ACD y 11% sin tratamiento anticoagulante. El control de la anticoagulación con AVK fue del 62.1%, sin diferencias en ECAM en función de control. El grupo ACD presentó menos ECAM que el grupo de AVK (13.4 vs. 4.3%; HR, 0.90; 0.83-0.98; p = 0.01), con una menor mortalidad cardiovascular (0.0 vs. 5.5%; HR, 0.94; 0.90-0.98; p = 0.01) y total (0.9 vs. 12.6%; HR, 0.88; 0.82-0.94; p < 0,01), aunque sin diferencias significativas en eventos hemorrágicos (0.9 vs. 4.7%; p = 0.07) ni isquémicos (2.6 vs. 0.8%; p = 0.27). Discusión: Los pacientes con AVK poseen un perfil clínico diferente en comparación con los que reciben ACD. El control de anticoagulación del grupo de AVK fue inadecuado en casi la mitad de los casos. El grupo de AVK presentó más ECAM que el grupo de ACD.

Pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular tratados con antivitamina K o anticoagulantes directos: perfil de paciente y efectos a largo plazo / Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation on vitamin k antagonists or direct-acting oral anticoagulants: patients profile and long-term follow up outcomes

Resumen Introducción: La llegada de los anticoagulantes directos (ACD) ha supuesto un cambio en el tratamiento de la fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) en los últimos años. Los objetivos de este estudio son determinar el grado de control de la anticoagulación con antivitamina K (AVK) y su posible implicación en efectos cardiovasculares adversos mayores (ECAM) y evaluar las diferencias entre el grupo en tratamiento con AVK respecto del grupo con ACD. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo que incluyó a pacientes consecutivos diagnosticados con FANV valorados en el Servicio de Cardiología con un seguimiento de 18 meses. Se analizaron diferencias demográficas, clínicas y analíticas entre grupos, incluido el grado de control de la anticoagulación del grupo AVK y su posible relación con ECAM. Resultados: Se incluyó a 273 pacientes: 46.5% tratados con AVK, 42.5% con ACD y 11% sin tratamiento anticoagulante. El control de la anticoagulación con AVK fue del 62.1%, sin diferencias en ECAM en función de control. El grupo ACD presentó menos ECAM que el grupo de AVK (13.4 vs. 4.3%; HR, 0.90; 0.83-0.98; p = 0.01), con una menor mortalidad cardiovascular (0.0 vs. 5.5%; HR, 0.94; 0.90-0.98; p = 0.01) y total (0.9 vs. 12.6%; HR, 0.88; 0.82-0.94; p menor que 0,01), aunque sin diferencias significativas en eventos hemorrágicos (0.9 vs. 4.7%; p = 0.07) ni isquémicos (2.6 vs. 0.8%; p = 0.27). Discusión: Los pacientes con AVK poseen un perfil clínico diferente en comparación con los que reciben ACD. El control de anticoagulación del grupo de AVK fue inadecuado en casi la mitad de los casos. El grupo de AVK presentó más ECAM que el grupo de ACD.

Abstract Introduction: The arrival of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has led to a change in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in recent years. The objectives of this study are to determine the level of therapeutic control of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and its possible involvement in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and to evaluate differences between the group on VKA with respect to the group on DOACs. Patients and methods: Prospective cohort study that included consecutive patients diagnosed with NVAF in Cardiology Consultations with a clinical follow-up of 18 months. Demographic, clinical and analytical differences between groups were analyzed, including the level of therapeutic control of anticoagulation on the VKA group and its association with MACE. Results: Overall, 273 patients were included: 46.5% on VKA, 42.5% on DOACs, 11% without antithrombotic treatment. Patients on VKA spent 62.1% of their time within therapeutic range (TTR by the Rosendaal formule). There were no differences in MACE depending on anticoagulation control. The DOACs group presented lesser MACE rate than the VKA group (13.4 vs. 4.3%; 0.90; HR 0.90; 0.83-0.98 p = 0.01) with lower cardiovascular mortality (0.0 vs. 5.5%; HR, 0.94; 0.90-0.98; p = 0.01) and total mortality (0.9 vs. 12.6%; HR, 0.88; 0.82-0.94; p less 0.01) although without significant differences in hemorrhagic (0.9 vs. 4.7 %; p = 0.07), or ischemic events (2.6 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.27). Conclusions: Patients on VKA have a different clinical profile than those who receive DOACs. Patients on VKA have an inadequate control of the anticoagulation in quite the half of the cases. The VKA group presented more MACE than the DOACs group.

Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Valve Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Initiating Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Valvular heart disease in patients with atrial fibrillation included in clinical trials with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is common and is associated with worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of valvular heart disease and its influence on clinical events in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter registry including 2297 consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation initiating DOAC between January 2013 and December 2016. Valvular heart disease was defined as moderate or severe involvement. The primary study endopoint was the composite of death, stroke or transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism or major bleeding. A competing risks analysis was carried out using a Fine and Gray regression model, with death being the competing event. RESULTS: A total of 499 (21.7%) patients had significant valvular heart disease. The most common form was mitral regurgitation (13.7%). Patients with valvular heart disease were older and had more comorbidities. After multivariable analysis, valvular heart disease was associated with a higher risk for the primary endpoint (HR, 1.54; 95%CI, 1.22-1.94; P<.001), death (HR, 1.44; 95%CI, 1.09-1.91, P=.010), and major bleeding (HR, 1.85; 95%CI, 1.23-2.79, P=.003), but there was no association with thromboembolic events (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation initiating DOACs, valvular heart disease is common and increases the risk of mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism, and major bleeding complications. These findings confirm the results of clinical trials and expand them to a real-life clinical setting.