Presurgical Use of Cenobamate for Adult and Pediatric Patients Referred for Epilepsy Surgery: Expert Panel Recommendations.

Cenobamate has demonstrated efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy, including patients who continued to have seizures after epilepsy surgery. This article provides recommendations for cenobamate use in patients referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. A panel of six senior epileptologists from the United States and Europe with experience in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy and in the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) was convened to provide consensus recommendations for the use of cenobamate in patients referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. Many patients referred for surgical evaluation may benefit from ASM optimization; both ASM and surgical treatment should be individualized. Based on previous clinical studies and the authors' clinical experience with cenobamate, a substantial proportion of patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy can become seizure-free with cenobamate. We recommend a cenobamate trial and ASM optimization in parallel with presurgical evaluations. Cenobamate can be started before phase two monitoring, especially in patients who are found to be suboptimal surgery candidates. As neurostimulation therapies are generally palliative, we recommend trying cenobamate before vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation, or responsive neurostimulation (RNS). In surgically remediable cases (mesial temporal sclerosis, benign discrete lesion in non-eloquent cortex, cavernous angioma, etc.), cenobamate use should not delay imminent surgery; however, a patient may decide to defer or even cancel surgery should they achieve sustained seizure freedom with cenobamate. This decision should be made on an individual, case-by-case basis based on seizure etiology, patient preferences, potential surgical risks (mortality and morbidity), and likely surgical outcome. The addition of cenobamate after unsuccessful surgery or palliative neuromodulation may also be associated with better outcomes.

Seriousness and outcomes of reported adverse drug reactions in old and new antiseizure medications: a pharmacovigilance study using EudraVigilance database.

Introduction: Epilepsy is a widespread disease requiring long-term drug treatment. The aim of this study was to collect information on reported suspected adverse drug reactions (sADRs) of antiseizure medications (ASMs) and study their seriousness and outcomes in various system organ classifications (SOCs). We intended to compare old and new ASMs' ADRs. Methods: Using EudraVigilance (EV) database, we extracted line listings of reported sADRs with different ASMs over the period from January 2012 to December 2021. The list of ASMs was compiled according to the Anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 24.0 was used for determining the SOCs of individual reported preferred terms (PTs) sADRs. In addition, we calculated the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), p-value (statistically significant if p< 0.05) and chi-square statistics. Results: A total of 276,694 reports were contained in the exported line listings which included 1,051,142 individual sADRs reported as PTs such as seizure (3.49%), drug ineffective (2.46%), somnolence (1.32%), dizziness (1.29%) and represented four SOCs: nervous system disorders (19.26%), general disorders and administration site conditions (14.39%), psychiatric disorders (11.29%) and injury, poisoning and procedural complications (9.79). Among patients, the age group between 18 and 64 years had the highest percentage (52.40%), followed by those aged over 64 years (18.75%). Of all the reported PTs, 882,706 (83.98%) had reported seriousness. Old ASMs had a significant positive association with "caused/prolonged hospitalisation", "congenital anomaly", "disabling", "life threatening" and "results in death", while new ASMS with 'other medically important condition'. There were 386 (0.04%) PTs related to Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Conclusion: In our study, we examined 10 years' reported sADRs of ASMs in the EV international database. The majority of PTs were serious. Old ASMs were generally more commonly associated with undesired outcomes and seriousness. Considering their expected seriousness and outcomes, the safety profile of the different ASMs, can play a cardinal role in the selection of ASMs.

Practical considerations for the use of fenfluramine to manage patients with Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in clinical practice.

Fenfluramine (FFA), an antiseizure medication (ASM) with serotonergic and sigma-1 receptor activity, is used to manage patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). It is approved in the US for treating seizures associated with Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in patients ≥2 years old and as add-on therapy for seizures associated with DS and LGS in the EU, UK, and Japan in similarly aged patients. Consensus guidelines for treatment of DS have recommended FFA to be an early-line ASM, and it has also shown efficacy in managing seizures associated with LGS. DS and LGS are DEEs associated with a range of seizure types, developmental impairments, and multiple comorbidities. Here we provide case vignettes describing 4 patients (3 DS and 1 LGS) aged 4-29 years old in whom up to 14 ASMs had previously failed, to illustrate real-world practice issues encountered by neurologists. This review provides guidance on the use of FFA in the context of ASM polytherapy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), behavioral issues, dose titration, and adverse events. Along with data from the clinical trial program, these case vignettes emphasize the low risk of DDIs, a generally well-tolerated safety profile, and other seizure and nonseizure benefits (eg, improved cognition and sleep) associated with the use of FFA in DS or LGS. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Fenfluramine is used to treat seizures in individuals with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, but there are a range of issues that clinicians may face when treating patients. This review highlights four patients from the authors' everyday clinical work and offers guidance and practical considerations by neurologists with expertise in managing these complex conditions related to drug interactions, dosing, and side effects associated with fenfluramine.

Harnessing the power of natural alkaloids: the emergent role in epilepsy therapy.

The quest for effective epilepsy treatments has spotlighted natural alkaloids due to their broad neuropharmacological effects. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the antiseizure properties of various natural compounds, with an emphasis on their mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic benefits. Our findings reveal that bioactive substances such as indole, quinoline, terpenoid, and pyridine alkaloids confer medicinal benefits by modulating synaptic interactions, restoring neuronal balance, and mitigating neuroinflammation-key factors in managing epileptic seizures. Notably, these compounds enhance GABAergic neurotransmission, diminish excitatory glutamatergic activities, particularly at NMDA receptors, and suppress proinflammatory pathways. A significant focus is placed on the strategic use of nanoparticle delivery systems to improve the solubility, stability, and bioavailability of these alkaloids, which helps overcome the challenges associated with crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The review concludes with a prospective outlook on integrating these bioactive substances into epilepsy treatment regimes, advocating for extensive research to confirm their efficacy and safety. Advancing the bioavailability of alkaloids and rigorously assessing their toxicological profiles are essential to fully leverage the therapeutic potential of these compounds in clinical settings.

Did pediatric drug development advance epilepsy treatment in young patients? It is time for new research goals.

Modern drugs have changed epilepsy, which affects people of all ages. However, for young people with epilepsy, the framework of drug development has stalled. In the wake of the thalidomide catastrophe, the misconception emerged that for people < 18 years of age drugs, including antiseizure medications (ASMs), need separate proof of efficacy and safety, overall called "pediatric drug development". For ASMs, this has changed to some degree. Authorities now accept that ASMs are effective in < 18 years as well, but they still require "extrapolation of efficacy," as if minors were another species. As a result, some of the pediatric clinical epilepsy research over the past decades was unnecessary. Even more importantly, this has hampered research on meaningful research goals. We do not need to confirm that ASMs work before as they do after the 18th birthday. Instead, we need to learn how to prevent brain damage in young patients by preventing seizures and optimize ASMs' uses. Herein we discuss how to proceed in this endeavor.

Progress report on new medications for seizures and epilepsy: A summary of the 17th Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XVII). I. Drugs in preclinical and early clinical development.

For >30 years, the Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices has provided a forum for the discussion of advances in the development of new therapies for seizures and epilepsy. The EILAT XVII conference took place in Madrid, Spain, on May 5-8, 2024. Participants included basic scientists and clinical investigators from industry and academia, other health care professionals, and representatives from lay organizations. We summarize in this article information on treatments in preclinical and in early clinical development discussed at the conference. These include AMT-260, a gene therapy designed to downregulate the expression of Glu2K subunits of kainate receptors, in development for the treatment of drug-resistant seizures associated with mesial temporal sclerosis; BHV-7000, a selective activator of heteromeric Kv7.2/7.3 potassium channels, in development for the treatment of focal epilepsy; ETX101, a recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 9 designed to increase NaV1.1 channel density in inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) neurons, in development for the treatment of SCN1A-positive Dravet syndrome; GAO-3-02, a compound structurally related to synaptamide, which exerts antiseizure activity at least in part through an action on cannabinoid type 2 receptors; LRP-661, a structural analogue of cannabidiol, in development for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex; OV329, a selective inactivator of GABA aminotransferase, in development for the treatment of drug-resistant seizures; PRAX-628, a functionally selective potent sodium channel modulator with preference for the hyperexcitable state of sodium channels, in development for the treatment of focal seizures; RAP-219, a selective negative allosteric modulator of transmembrane α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor regulatory protein γ-8, in development for the treatment of focal seizures; and rozanolixizumab, a humanized anti-neonatal Fc receptor monoclonal antibody, in development for the treatment of LGI1 autoimmune encephalitis. Treatments in more advanced development are summarized in Part II of this report.

Third generation antiseizure medications exposure during pregnancy and neonatal adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review.

Background: Third generation antiseizure medications (ASMs) are currently used for seizure control as well as several other indications, including pain management and psychiatric disorders. As a result, maternal exposure to third generation ASMs during pregnancy has become increasingly prevalent. The current systematic review aimed to summarize the published evidence on third generation ASMs and their effect on preterm birth, cesarean section (c-section) and fetal loss. Methods: The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Cochrane Library and Scopus until September 2022. Results: We screened 2987 studies, and identified 32 studies or case reports for inclusion, however only one study utilized a control group. Narrative systematic evidence synthesis was conducted for brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, fosphenytoin, lacosamide and perampanel. Conclusion: Due to the scarcity and quality of published studies, drawing clear-cut conclusions regarding third generation ASMs and the outcomes of interest is challenging. More comparative safety studies focusing on neonatal safety of third generation ASMs in pregnancy are essential.

An update on the novel methods for the discovery of antiseizure and antiepileptogenic medications: where are we in 2024?

INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of around 30 antiseizure medications, 1/3 of patients with epilepsy fail to become seizure-free upon pharmacological treatment. Available medications provide adequate symptomatic control in two-thirds of patients, but disease-modifying drugs are still scarce. Recently, though, new paradigms have been explored. AREAS COVERED: Three areas are reviewed in which a high degree of innovation in the search for novel antiseizure and antiepileptogenic medications has been implemented: development of novel screening approaches, search for novel therapeutic targets, and adoption of new drug discovery paradigms aligned with a systems pharmacology perspective. EXPERT OPINION: In the past, worldwide leaders in epilepsy have reiteratively stated that the lack of progress in the field may be explained by the recurrent use of the same molecular targets and screening procedures to identify novel medications. This landscape has changed recently, as reflected by the new Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program and the introduction of many in vitro and in vivo models that could possibly improve our chances of identifying first-in-class medications that may control drug-resistant epilepsy or modify the course of disease. Other milestones include the study of new molecular targets for disease-modifying drugs and exploration of a systems pharmacology perspective to design new drugs.

Investigation of the Effect of Antiseizure Medications on Cognition in Patients With Epilepsy.

Background. The effect of antiseizure medications (ASMs) on cognition varies depending on the type of ASM. We aimed to investigate the effects of ASMs on patients with epilepsy based on the conflicting findings in the literature. Methods. Patients diagnosed with epilepsy who were taking ASMs were included. All patients underwent a neuropsychiatric assessment, Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and general psychopathological tests. The patients were divided into polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Subgroups were categorized according to the type of ASMs, dosage, and duration of monotherapy. Results. Ninety-seven patients were included in this study. The polytherapy group showed a significant decrease in attention, total learning, and interpretation of proverbs compared to the monotherapy group. In the monotherapy group, carbamazepine use had a moderate positive correlation with working memory (r = .669; P = .034), and a strong negative correlation with maintaining attention (r = -.740; P = .014). The duration of levetiracetam monotherapy was negatively correlated with verbal memory (immediate recall r = -.436, P = .038; free recall r = .426, P = .043) and negatively weakly correlated with naming performance (r = -.488, P = .025). Conclusion. The study showed polytherapy may affect verbal and working memory. Carbamazepine may affect working memory and the maintenance of attention in a dose-dependent manner. Levetiracetam may cause impairments in verbal memory and naming, depending on the duration of usage.

Mechanisms of neurodevelopmental toxicity of topiramate.

Prescriptions for antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been rapidly growing over the last several decades due, in part, to an expanding list of clinical indications for which they are now prescribed. This trend has raised concern for potential adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in ASM-exposed pregnancies. Recent large scale population studies have suggested that the use of topiramate (TOPAMAX, Janssen-Cilag), when prescribed for seizure control, migraines, and/or weight management, is associated with an increased risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in exposed offspring. Here, we critically review epidemiologic evidence demonstrating the neurobehavioral teratogenicity of topiramate and speculate on the neuromolecular mechanisms by which prenatal exposure may perturb neurocognitive development. Specifically, we explore the potential role of topiramate's pharmacological interactions with ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels, especially GABAergic signaling, its effects on DNA methylation and histone acetylation, whether topiramate induces oxidative stress, and its association with fetal growth restriction as possible mechanisms contributing to neurodevelopmental toxicity. Resolving this biology will be necessary to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by topiramate or other ASMs.

Risk of suicide and suicide-related events in subjects treated with antiseizure medications.

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, it is reported that 1.4% of the general population commits suicide. It has been postulated that antiseizure medications (ASMs) can lead to the development of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior; however, this risk is still very low and has yet to be precisely established. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review evaluates the risk of suicide-related events (SREs) in subjects taking ASMs for various neurological disorders. Screening tools for suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior are also discussed. References for this article were found using PubMed/MEDLINE. EXPERT OPINION: Although some ASMs can be associated with SREs, this is not yet clearly established. The mechanisms involved in suicide risk in subjects taking ASMs are multifactorial. The bidirectional relationship between depression and epilepsy, as well as other associations, should be kept in mind when interpreting any impact of ASMs in PWE. Screening for SREs, close monitoring of subjects taking ASMs are the most appropriate strategies to minimize suicide risk. More efforts should be made to achieve accurate risk stratification through prognostic models that could be applied to subjects taking ASMs. Studies exploring the association between ASMs and suicide should consider ASMs individually and control for prior SREs.

Models of care and relevance of territorial management in assisting persons with epilepsy.

Epilepsy is a widespread social disease that affects people of all ages and often involves both diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Beyond seizure control, it is necessary to ensure people with epilepsy a good quality of life and respect for human rights, seeking to increase self-management capacity and break down stigma. People with epilepsy should have privileged access to specialized epilepsy centers, where multidisciplinary care is possible. These centers, organized by different levels of complexity, should be uniformly distributed throughout the country and networked together. The scientific community and health care organizations must therefore design all necessary strategies so that knowledge about epilepsy improves among the general population and the most effective pathways of care are effectively implemented.

Authors reply.

(There is no abstract) for this article type.

Mammalian models of status epilepticus - Their value and limitations.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical and neurologic emergency that may lead to permanent brain damage, morbidity, or death. Animal models of SE are particularly important to study the pathophysiology of SE and mechanisms of SE resistance to antiseizure medications with the aim to develop new, more effective treatments. In addition to rodents (rats or mice), larger mammalian species such as dogs, pigs, and nonhuman primates are used. This short review describes and discusses the value and limitations of the most frequently used mammalian models of SE. Issues that are discussed include (1) differences between chemical and electrical SE models; (2) the role of genetic background and environment on SE in rodents; (3) the use of rodent models (a) to study the pathophysiology of SE and mechanisms of SE resistance; (b) to study developmental aspects of SE; (c) to study the efficacy of new treatments, including drug combinations, for refractory SE; (d) to study the long-term consequences of SE and identify biomarkers; (e) to develop treatments that prevent or modify epilepsy; (e) to study the pharmacology of spontaneous seizures; (4) the limitations of animal models of induced SE; and (5) the advantages (and limitations) of naturally (spontaneously) occurring SE in epileptic dogs and nonhuman primates. Overall, mammalian models of SE have significantly increased our understanding of the pathophysiology and drug resistance of SE and identified potential targets for new, more effective treatments. This paper was presented at the 9th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in April 2024.

Perampanel as an Add-On Therapy in Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus and Postanoxic Encephalopathy: A Real-Life Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy of perampanel in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and postanoxic encephalopathy (PAE) are limited; its use in such conditions is currently off-label. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with RSE, including PAE, exhibiting electroencephalographic patterns indicative of status epilepticus who were treated at our center (January 2018 to December 2022) with assessment of clinical and electroencephalographic outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in the study, of whom 29 had nonanoxic RSE and 7 had PAE. Within the nonanoxic RSE subgroup, 45% (13 of 29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 27-63%) of study participants were responders, 34% (10 of 29; 95% CI 17-52%) were partial responders, and 21% (6 of 29; 95% CI 6-35%) were nonresponders. In the PAE subgroup (n = 7), no patients fully responded to perampanel; 43% (3 of 7; 95% CI 6-80%) were partial responders, and 57% (4 of 7; 95% CI 20-95%) were nonresponders. Responder and nonresponder study participants exhibited overlapping baseline characteristics. No significant differences in duration of hospitalization were observed between responders and nonresponders in both subgroups. Responders in the RSE subgroup had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 3 (interquartile range 3-4), and nonresponders had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 5 (interquartile range 5-6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations from the retrospective design and the small population size, this study suggests that perampanel use in nonanoxic RSE appears to yield promising results at moderate doses, including a tendency toward a better functional outcome at discharge, without significant adverse effects. However, in patients with PAE, the drug seems to show suboptimal performance. Perampanel appears to have promising efficacy as an add-on therapy in nonanoxic RSE. However, in patients with PAE, its efficacy seems to be lower. Further studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Do psychotropic drugs cause seizures?

Patients with epilepsy often present with concurrent psychiatric disorders, posing unique challenges for healthcare providers. This review explores the intricate relationship between psychiatric comorbidities, epilepsy, and psychotropic medications to inform clinical decision-making. The bidirectional association between epilepsy and psychiatric conditions complicates treatment, with psychiatric symptoms preceding or following seizure onset. The review discusses the seizure risks associated with antidepressants, CNS stimulants, and antipsychotics, shedding light on both historical perspectives and recent empirical evidence. Antidepressants, particularly tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), are known to pose seizure risks, while newer agents like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) exhibit lower incidences and even potential anticonvulsant effects. Contrary to common beliefs, CNS stimulants used in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment show efficacy without significantly increasing seizure risk. However, the association between ADHD and seizures warrants careful consideration. Among antipsychotics, clozapine stands out for its heightened seizure risks, especially during titration and at high doses, necessitating close monitoring and individualized approaches. Understanding the nuanced seizure risks associated with different psychotropic medications is crucial for optimizing patient care and minimizing iatrogenic seizures in this vulnerable population. By recognizing the complexities of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and considering the unique challenges they pose, healthcare providers can make informed decisions to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes. This review offers practical insights to guide clinicians in navigating the intricate landscape of managing psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy.

New valproate regulations, informed choice and seizure risk.

Valproate is the most effective medication for generalised epilepsies, and several specific epilepsy syndromes. For some people, it will be the only medication to establish seizure remission, and withdrawing it carries risks of seizure recurrence and Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). It is also of proven efficacy for bipolar disorder and migraine prevention. Guidelines based on observational and epidemiological studies stress that maternal valproate related teratogenicity and neurodevelopmental effects are significantly higher than for other antiseizure medications (ASMs). It should, therefore, only be used if other medications are ineffective and after balancing the teratogenicity risk. Regulatory restrictions have changed prescribing practices and reduced valproate use. The number of other medications that must be trialled in the different conditions for which valproate has effectiveness and the consequences of the lack of efficacy of those drugs leading to significant harm including death remains unexplored. Risk minimisation measures (RMMs) for valproate, chiefly Pregnancy Prevention practices (PPP), consider foetal risk and not risk to people living with epilepsy. In the United Kingdom (UK), limitations relating to valproate use in all people < 55 years commenced in January 2024. While the evidence in child-bearing women is not disputed, the data in males are based on animal models, case reports, and one commissioned, unpublished, non-peer reviewed report unavailable to the UK public, stakeholder charities or professionals. Evidence suggests that 30-40% of people switching from valproate have breakthrough seizures. Thus, an estimated 21,000-28000 people in the UK will imminently be exposed to the potential hazards of breakthrough seizures, including death. There is little government investment in monitoring the effects of these changes to valproate prescribing on patient health and quality of life. This review summarises the history of valproate regulation, evidence underpinning it and argues how the latest regulations in the UK do not align with the country's medical regulatory bodies ethical principles nor with the Montgomery principles of informed patient choice and autonomy. It dissects how such regulations infringe Common Law principles, nor give due regard for patient outcomes beyond reproduction. The paper looks to provide recommendations to redress these concerns while appreciating the core need for such governance to emerge in the first place.