Mechanical or Biological Prosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 45 to 74 Years.

OBJECTIVE: The selection of valve prostheses for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remains controversial. In this study, we compared the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with biological or mechanical aortic valve prostheses. METHODS: We evaluated late results among 5,762 patients aged 45-74 years who underwent biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass from 1989 to 2019 at four medical centers. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare late survival; the age-dependent effect of prosthesis type on long-term survival was evaluated by an interaction term between age and prosthesis type. Incidences of stroke, major bleeding, and reoperation on the aortic valve following the index procedure were compared between prosthesis groups. RESULTS: Overall, 61% (n=3,508) of patients received a bioprosthesis. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.7% (n=58) in the bioprosthesis group and 1.5% (n=34) in the mechanical group (P=0.75). During a mean follow-up of 9.0 years, the adjusted risk of mortality was higher in the bioprosthesis group (HR=1.30, P<0.001). The long-term survival benefit associated with mechanical prosthesis persisted until 70 years of age. Bioprosthesis (vs mechanical prosthesis) was associated with a similar risk of stroke (P=0.20), lower risk of major bleeding (P<0.001), and higher risk of reoperation (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bioprostheses, mechanical aortic valves are associated with a lower adjusted risk of long-term mortality in patients aged 70 years or younger. Patients <70 years old undergoing SAVR should be informed of the potential survival benefit of mechanical valve substitutes.

Left versus right ventricular pacing during TAVR and balloon aortic valvuloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: While right ventricular pacing (RVP) is the conventional temporary pacing modality used for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), this approach possesses inherent risks and procedural challenges. We aim to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of left ventricular pacing (LVP) and RVP during TAVR and balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in four databases from inception to December 15th, 2023. We included observational studies and clinical trials comparing LVP with RVP during TAVR and BAV procedures. Primary outcomes included short-term mortality, mortality due to cardiac tamponade, and procedural complications including bleeding, vascular complications, and cardiac tamponade. Secondary outcomes comprised procedure duration and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Five studies involving 830 patients with RVP and 1577 with LVP were included. Short-term mortality was significantly higher in the RVP group (RR 2.32, 95% CI: [1.37-3.93], P = .002), as was the incidence of cardiac tamponade (RR 2.19, 95% CI: [1.11-4.32], P = .02). LVP demonstrated shorter hospital stays (MD = 1.34 d, 95% CI: [0.90, 1.78], P < .001) and reduced procedure duration (MD = 7.75 min, 95% CI: [5.08, 10.41], P < .00001) compared to RVP. New pacemaker implantation was higher in the RVP group (RR 2.23, 95% CI: [1.14, 4.39], P = .02). CONCLUSION: LVP during TAVR and BAV emerges a safer alternative to RVP, offering reduced mortality, hospital stays, and procedure durations.

Right anterior mini thoracotomy for redo cardiac surgery: case series from North America and Europe.

Background: Right anterior mini thoracotomy (RAMT) for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a minimally invasive procedure that avoids sternotomy. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients who underwent redo-cardiac via a RAMT approach for AVR. Methods: This case series reports the clinical outcomes of 14 consecutive redo operations, done in Calgary (Canada) and Gdansk (Poland) between 2020 and 2023. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and disabling stroke. Secondary outcomes included surgical times, hemodynamics, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), length of ICU and hospital stay, new post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF), post-operative blood transfusion, incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), rate of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and/or dialysis, and chest tube output in the first 12-hours after surgery. Results: Nine patients were male, and the mean age was 64.36 years. There were no deaths, while one patient had a disabling stroke postoperatively. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp-times were 136 min and 90 min, respectively. Three patients needed a PPM, 3 patients needed blood transfusions, and 2 developed new onset POAF. Median lengths of ICU and hospital stays were 2 and 12 days, respectively. There was no incidence of paravalvular leak greater than trace and the average transvalvular mean gradient was 12.23 mmHg. Conclusion: The number of patients requiring redo-AVR is increasing. Redo-sternotomy may not be feasible for many patients. This study suggests that the RAMT approach is a safe alternative to redo-sternotomy for patients that require an AVR.

Effect of Pulmonary Hypertension on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on survival in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1, 2015, to March 10, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included early and late all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Total 15 studies were integrated into the pooled analysis to assess the impact of PH on outcomes among patients undergoing TAVR, comprising a total sample size of 35,732 individuals. The pooled prevalence of PH stood at 52.57% (n=18,767). Predominantly, the studies were conducted in the United States (n=6), followed by Germany (n=3), with one study each from Japan, Italy, Switzerland, Brazil, Poland, and Australia. Pooled analysis showed that risk of short-term mortality was greater in patients with PH compared to patients without PH (risk ratio (RR): 1.46, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.80). Risk of long-term mortality was greater in patients with PH (RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.55). Risk of cardiovascular mortality was also greater in patients with PH compared to patients without PH (RR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.36 to 2.02). We advocate for further research to address gaps in understanding different types of PH and their impacts on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

Wearable device-measured moderate to vigorous physical activity and risk of degenerative aortic valve stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Physical activity has proven effective in preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but its role in preventing degenerative valvular heart disease (VHD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the dose-response association between moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) volume and the risk of degenerative VHD among middle-aged adults. METHODS: A full week of accelerometer-derived MVPA data from 87 248 UK Biobank participants (median age 63.3, female: 56.9%) between 2013 and 2015 were used for primary analysis. Questionnaire-derived MVPA data from 361 681 UK Biobank participants (median age 57.7, female: 52.7%) between 2006 and 2010 were used for secondary analysis. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of incident degenerative VHD, including aortic valve stenosis (AS), aortic valve regurgitation (AR), and mitral valve regurgitation (MR). The secondary outcome was VHD-related intervention or mortality. RESULTS: In the accelerometer-derived MVPA cohort, 555 incident AS, 201 incident AR, and 655 incident MR occurred during a median follow-up of 8.11 years. Increased MVPA volume showed a steady decline in AS risk and subsequent AS-related intervention or mortality risk, levelling off beyond approximately 300 min/week. In contrast, its association with AR or MR incidence was less apparent. The adjusted rates of AS incidence (95% confidence interval) across MVPA quartiles (Q1-Q4) were 11.60 (10.20, 13.20), 7.82 (6.63, 9.23), 5.74 (4.67, 7.08), and 5.91 (4.73, 7.39) per 10 000 person-years. The corresponding adjusted rates of AS-related intervention or mortality were 4.37 (3.52, 5.43), 2.81 (2.13, 3.71), 1.93 (1.36, 2.75), and 2.14 (1.50, 3.06) per 10 000 person-years, respectively. Aortic valve stenosis risk reduction was also observed with questionnaire-based MVPA data [adjusted absolute difference Q4 vs. Q1: AS incidence, -1.41 (-.67, -2.14) per 10 000 person-years; AS-related intervention or mortality, -.38 (-.04, -.88) per 10 000 person-years]. The beneficial association remained consistent in high-risk populations for AS, including patients with hypertension, obesity, dyslipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: Higher MVPA volume was associated with a lower risk of developing AS and subsequent AS-related intervention or mortality. Future research needs to validate these findings in diverse populations with longer durations and repeated periods of activity monitoring.

High prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in a surgical aortic valve replacement cohort: an observational study.

Study Objectives: A high prevalence of sleep apnea has been reported among transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients; however, the prevalence of sleep apnea in the younger and relatively healthier population of surgical AVR (SAVR) patients is unknown. Methods: We assessed the prevalence of sleep apnea and overall sleep quality in patients having SAVR. Participants aged 50-89 were eligible for recruitment. All participants completed type II HST before SAVR. Sleep apnea was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/hour. The current use of positive airway pressure was exclusionary. Results: The 46 participants (32 males/14 females) had a mean age of 66.6 years, body mass index of 30, AHI of 23.5, and obstructive AHI of 22.0. Only four participants had a prior sleep apnea diagnosis, yet all but one had sleep apnea on type II sleep testing. Two-thirds of sleep apnea was moderate or severe (AHI ≥ 15). A quarter of respiratory events were defined by arousals without desaturations. Whereas most sleep parameters resembled those of similarly aged community cohorts, mean percentage of N3 was reduced, accounting for only 3.8% of total sleep time. Conclusions: Type II home sleep testing (HST) revealed a 97.8% prevalence of sleep apnea in this sample, most of which was undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. Roughly two-thirds of sleep apnea was moderate or severe. Such a high impact of obstructive sleep apnea among patients with severe aortic valve disease deserves further investigation on potential underlying mechanisms and clinical implications.

Trial Designs A44002PZS Electronic Physician Notification to Facilitate the Recognition and Management of Severe Aortic Stenosis: Rationale, design, and methods of the randomized controlled DETECT AS Trial.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis causes substantial morbidity and mortality when left untreated, yet recent data suggest its undertreatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of electronic physician notification to facilitate the guideline-directed management of patients with severe aortic stenosis. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that patients with severe aortic stenosis who are in the care of physicians who receive the notification are more likely to undergo aortic valve replacement within 1-year. METHODS/DESIGN: The Electronic Physician Notification to Facilitate the Recognition and Management of Severe Aortic Stenosis (DETECT AS) trial is a randomized controlled trial and quality improvement initiative designed to evaluate the efficacy of electronic provider notification versus usual clinical care in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Providers ordering an echocardiogram with findings potentially indicative of severe aortic stenosis, defined by an aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2, are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive electronic notification (intervention) or usual care. Providers in the notification arm are sent a notification within the electronic health record inbox outlining customized guideline recommendations for the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis based on the 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Valvular Heart Diseases for the index and all subsequent echocardiograms. Providers in the control arm receive no notification. Randomization continues until 940 patients have been enrolled. SETTING: Multi-centered, academic health system OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with severe AS receiving an aortic valve replacement within 1-year of the index echocardiogram. Secondary endpoints include mortality, heart failure hospitalization, transthoracic echocardiogram utilization/surveillance, aortic stenosis billing code diagnosis, and cardiology/Heart Valve Team referral. CONCLUSION: The DETECT AS trial will provide insight into whether electronic notification of providers on the presence of severe aortic stenosis and associated clinical guideline recommendations will facilitate recognition and guideline-directed management of severe aortic stenosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05230225, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05230225.

Lipoprotein (a) and lipid-lowering treatment from the perspective of a cardiac surgeon. An impact on the prognosis in patients with aortic valve replacement and after heart transplantation.

Lipoprotein(a) is a recognized risk factor for ASCVD. There is still no targeted therapy for Lp(a), however, drugs such as pelacarsen, olpasiran, zerlasiran, lepodisiran and muvalaplin are in clinical trials and have been shown to be effective in significantly reducing Lp(a) levels. Moreover, elevated Lp(a) levels significantly affect the prognosis of patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and heart transplantation (HTx). Therefore, the assessment of Lp(a) concentration in these patients will allow for a more accurate stratification of their cardiovascular risk, and the possibility of lowering Lp(a) will allow for the optimization of this risk. In this article, we summarized the most important information regarding the role of Lp(a) and lipid-lowering treatment in patients after AVR and HTx.

Rothia dentocariosa endocarditis with brain abscess and splenic abscess: case report and brief review.

Rothia dentocariosa is a conditionally pathogenic bacterium that may cause infective endocarditis (IE) in selected patients and give rise to a variety of clinical complications, albeit it is not a common IE pathogen. We present the case of a patient diagnosed with Rothia dentocariosa-associated IE secondary to influenza B and thrombocytopenic purpura. The blood culture revealed Rochebacterium caries, cardiac ultrasound detected vegetation, while brain and spleen abscesses manifested and progressively deteriorated. Despite a suboptimal response to anti-infective therapy, the patient ultimately underwent aortic valve replacement. Discharge from the hospital was achieved upon control of the brain abscess and spleen abscess.

Savings associated with surgical aortic valve replacement with a RESILIA tissue valve based on seven-year COMMENCE trial results.

Introduction: Bioprostheses with RESILIA tissue demonstrate a reduction in calcification and improve health outcomes in pre-clinical and clinical studies. Prior economic analyses which relied on five years of evidence from the COMMENCE trial demonstrate financial savings for RESILIA tissue valves relative to mechanical valves after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Given the recent release of 7-year COMMENCE data, this economic evaluation updates the estimate for long-run savings of bioprosthetic valves with RESILIA.Methods: Simulation models estimated disease progression across two hypothetical SAVR cohorts (tissue vs. mechanical) of 10,000 patients each in the US. The primary comparison calculated the SAVR-related expenditures associated with each valve type ($US, 2023). Health outcome probabilities were based on the COMMENCE trial though Year 7 and projected for an additional 8 years based on prior studies of tissue and mechanical SAVR. Costs for key outcomes (mortality, reoperation, bleeding, thromboembolism, endocarditis) and anticoagulant monitoring were sourced from the literature. Incidence rates of health outcomes associated with mechanical valves relied on relative risks of tissue valve versus mechanical valve patients.Results: Seven-year savings are $13,415 (95% CI: $10,472-$17,321) per patient when comparing RESILIA versus mechanical SAVR. Projected 15-year savings were $23,001 ($US, 2023; 95% CI: $17,802-$30,421). Most of the 15-year savings are primarily attributed to lower anti-coagulation monitoring costs ($21,073 in ACM savings over 15 years), but lower bleeding cost (savings: $2,294) and thromboembolism-related expenditures (savings: $852) also contribute. Reoperation and endocarditis expenditures were slightly larger in the RESILIA cohort. If reoperation relative risk reverts from 1.1 to 2.2 (the level in legacy tissue valves) after year 7, savings are $18,064. RESILIA SAVR also reduce costs relative to legacy tissue valves.Conclusion: Patients receiving RESILIA tissue valves are projected to have lower SAVR-related health expenditures relative to mechanical and legacy tissue valves.

Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Low Flow Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Low-flow (LF) aortic stenosis (AS) is common among the elderly and associated with worse outcomes than AS with normal stroke volume. It is unknown whether left ventricular (LV) remodeling identifies patients with LF AS at higher risk of complications. LV remodeling was evaluated in 463 patients with severe LF AS referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and classified as adaptive (normal geometry and concentric remodeling) or maladaptive (concentric and eccentric hypertrophy) using American Society of Echocardiography sex-specific criteria. Of these, the 390 who underwent TAVR were followed for the endpoints of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The mean patients age was 79 (74.5-84) years. LV remodeling was adaptive in 57.4% (62 normal geometry, 162 concentric remodeling) and maladaptive in 42.6% (127 concentric hypertrophy, 39 eccentric hypertrophy). During a median follow-up of 3 years, 45 patients (11.5%) were hospitalized for HF and 73 (18.7%) died. After adjustment for widely used echocardiographic parameters, maladaptive remodeling was independently associated with HF hospitalization and death (adjusted HR 1.75, CI 1.03-3.00). There was no significant difference between men and women in the association of maladaptive LV remodeling with the composite outcome (p=0.40 for men and p=0.06 for women). In conclusion, in patients with LF AS, maladaptive LV remodeling prior to TAVR is independently associated with higher incidences of post-procedural HF rehospitalization and death in both men and women. Assessment of LV remodeling has prognostic value over and above LVEF and may improve risk stratification for patients with LF AS.

Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Severe Aortic Regurgitation.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been shown to be associated with worse outcomes in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) in small older studies. Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the prevalence of PH in patients with severe AR, its impact on mortality and symptoms, and regression after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: A total of 821 consecutive patients with chronic ≥ moderate-severe AR on echocardiography from 2004 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. PH was defined as right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) >40 mm Hg on transthoracic echocardiogram (mild-moderate PH: RVSP 40-59 mm Hg, severe PH: RVSP > 60 mm Hg). Clinical and echocardiographic data were extracted from the electronic medical record and echocardiographic reports. The diastolic function and filling pressures were manually assessed and checked, and the left ventricular (LV) volumes were traced by a level 3-trained echocardiographer. The primary objectives were prevalence of PH in patients with ≥ moderate-severe AR, its risk associations and impact on all-cause mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were impact of PH on symptoms and change in RVSP at discharge post-AVR. Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze these outcomes. Results: The mean age was 61.2 ± 17 years, and 162 (20%) were women. Mild-moderate PH was present in 91 (11%) patients and severe PH in 27 (3%). Larger LV size, elevated LV filling pressures, and ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation were associated with PH. During follow-up of 7.3 (6.3-7.9) years, 188 patients died. Compared to those without PH, risk of mortality was higher in mild-moderate PH (adjusted HR: 1.59 (95% CI: 1.07-2.36) (P = 0.021)) and severe PH (adjusted HR: 2.90 (95% CI: 1.63-5.15) (P < 0.001)). Symptoms were also more prevalent in those with PH (P = 0.004). Of 396 patients who underwent AVR during the study period, 57 had PH. AVR similarly improved survival in patients without and with PH (P for interaction = 0.23), and there was regression in RVSP (≥8 mm Hg drop) at discharge post-AVR in 35/57 (61%) patients with PH. Conclusions: PH was present in 14% of patients with AR and was associated with higher mortality and symptoms. The survival benefit of AVR was similar in patients without and with PH.

Cardiac Damage Staging Predicts Outcomes in Aortic Valve Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis.

Background: The prognostic value of cardiac damage staging classification based on the extent of extravalvular damage has been proposed in moderate/severe aortic stenosis (AS). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the association of cardiac damage staging with mortality across the spectrum of patients with AS following aortic surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: We conducted a pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived reconstructed time-to-event data from studies published through February 2023. Results: In total, 16 studies (n = 14,499) met our eligibility criteria and included 12,282 patients with symptomatic severe AS and 2,217 patients with asymptomatic severe/moderate AS. For patients with symptomatic severe AS, all-cause mortality was 24.0%, 27.7%, 38.0%, 56.3%, and 57.3% at 5 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (stage 0 as reference; HR in stage 1: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.03-1.64]; P = 0.029; stage 2: 1.74 [95% CI: 1.41-2.16]; P < 0.001; stage 3: 2.92 [95% CI: 2.35-3.64]; P < 0.001, and stage 4: 3.51 [95% CI: 2.79-4.41]; P < 0.001). For patients with asymptomatic moderate/severe AS, all-cause mortality was 19.3%, 36.9%, 51.7%, and 67.8% at 8 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 to 4, respectively (HR in stage 1: 1.70 [95% CI: 1.21-2.38]; P = 0.002; stage 2: 2.20 [95% CI: 1.60-3.02]; P < 0.001; and stage 3 to 4: 3.90 [95% CI: 2.79-5.47]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients undergoing AVR across the symptomatic and severity spectrum of AS, cardiac damage staging at baseline has important prognostic implications. This pooled meta-analysis in patients undergoing AVR suggests that staging of baseline cardiac damage could be considered for timing and selection of therapy in patients with moderate or severe AS to determine the need for earlier AVR or adjunctive pharmacotherapy to prevent irreversible cardiac damage and improve the long-term prognosis.

Aortic Stenosis Management in Patients With Acute Hip Fracture.

The treatment of severe aortic stenosis (SAS) has evolved rapidly with the advent of minimally invasive structural heart interventions. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has allowed patients to undergo definitive SAS treatment achieving faster recovery rates compared to valve surgery. Not infrequently, patients are admitted/diagnosed with SAS after a fall associated with a hip fracture (HFx). While urgent orthopedic surgery is key to reduce disability and mortality, untreated SAS increases the perioperative risk and precludes physical recovery. There is no consensus on what the best strategy is either hip correction under hemodynamic monitoring followed by valve replacement or preoperative balloon aortic valvuloplasty to allow HFx surgery followed by valve replacement. However, preoperative minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement may represent an attractive strategy for selected patients. We provide a management pathway that emphasizes an early multidisciplinary approach to optimize time for hip surgery to improve orthopedic and cardiovascular outcomes in patients presenting with HFx-SAS.