Preclinical efficacy of peanut-specific IgG4 antibody therapeutic IGNX001.

BACKGROUND: Existing therapeutic strategies are challenged by long times to achieve effect and often require frequent administration. Peanut allergic individuals would benefit from a therapeutic that provides rapid protection against accidental exposure within days of administration while carrying little risk of adverse reactions. OBJECTIVE: Guided by the repertoire of human IgE monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from allergic individuals, we sought to develop a treatment approach leveraging the known protective effects of allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies. METHODS: We applied our single-cell RNA sequencing SEQ SIFTER™ platform to whole blood samples from peanut allergic individuals to discover IgE mAbs. These were then class-switched by replacing the IgE constant region with IgG4 while retaining the allergen-specific variable regions. In vitro mast cell activation tests (MATs), basophil activation tests (BATs), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), and an in vivo peanut allergy mouse model were used to evaluate the specificity, affinity, and activity of these recombinant IgG4 mAbs. RESULTS: We determined that human peanut-specific IgE mAbs predominantly target immunodominant epitopes on Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 and that recombinant IgG4 mAbs effectively blocked these epitopes. IGNX001, a mixture of two such high-affinity IgG4 mAbs, provided robust protection against peanut-mediated mast cell activation in vitro as well as against anaphylaxis upon intragastric peanut challenge in a peanut allergy mouse model. CONCLUSION: We developed a peanut-specific IgG4 antibody therapeutic with convincing preclinical efficacy starting from a large repertoire of human monoclonal IgE antibodies from demographically and geographically diverse individuals. These results warrant further clinical investigation of IGNX001 and underscore the opportunity for the application of this therapeutic development strategy in other food and environmental allergies.

Longitudinal peanut and Ara h 2 specific-IgE, -IgG4, and -IgG4/-IgE ratios are associated with the natural resolution of peanut allergy in childhood.

BACKGROUND: There are no studies of longitudinal immunoglobulin measurements in a population-based cohort alongside challenge-confirmed peanut allergy outcomes. Little is known about biomarkers for identifying naturally resolving peanut allergy during childhood. OBJECTIVES: To measure longitudinal trends in whole peanut and component Ara h 2 sIgE and sIgG4 in the first 10 years of life, in a population cohort of children with challenge-confirmed peanut allergy, and to determine whether peanut-specific immunoglobulin levels or trends are associated with peanut allergy persistence or resolution by 10 years of age. METHODS: One-year-old infants with challenge-confirmed peanut allergy (n = 156) from the HealthNuts study (n = 5276) were prospectively followed at ages 4, 6, and 10 years with questionnaires, skin prick tests, oral food challenges, and plasma total-IgE, sIgE and sIgG4 to peanut and Ara h 2. RESULTS: Peanut allergy resolved in 33.9% (95% CI = 25.3%, 43.3%) of children by 10 years old with most resolving (97.4%, 95% CI = 86.5%, 99.9%) by 6 years old. Decreasing Ara h 2 sIgE (p = .01) and increasing peanut sIgG4 (p < .001), Ara h 2 sIgG4 (p = .01), peanut sIgG4/sIgE (p < .001) and Ara h 2 sIgG4/sIgE (p < .001) from 1 to 10 years of age were associated with peanut allergy resolution. Peanut sIgE measured at 1 year old had the greatest prognostic value (AUC = 0.75 [95% CI = 0.66, 0.82]); however, no single threshold produced both high sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: One third of infant peanut allergy resolved by 10 years of age. Decreasing sIgE and sIgG4 to peanut and Ara h 2 over time were associated with natural resolution of peanut allergy. However, biomarker levels at diagnosis were not strongly associated with the natural history of peanut allergy.

Neutralizing IgG4 antibodies are a biomarker of sustained efficacy after peanut oral immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Clinical efficacy of oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been associated with the induction of blocking antibodies, particularly those capable of disrupting IgE-allergen interactions. Previously, we identified mAbs to Ara h 2 and structurally characterized their epitopes. OBJECTIVE: We investigated longitudinal changes during OIT in antibody binding to conformational epitopes and correlated the results with isotype and clinical efficacy. METHODS: We developed an indirect inhibitory ELISA using mAbs to block conformational epitopes on immobilized Ara h 2 from binding to serum immunoglobulins from peanut-allergic patients undergoing OIT. We tested the functional blocking ability of mAbs using passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in mice with humanized FcεRI receptors. RESULTS: Diverse serum IgE recognition of Ara h 2 conformational epitopes are similar before and after OIT. Optimal inhibition of serum IgE occurs with the combination of 2 neutralizing mAbs (nAbs) recognizing epitopes 1.2 and 3, compared to 2 nonneutralizing mAbs (non-nAbs). After OIT, IgG4 nAbs, but not IgG1 or IgG2 nAbs, increased in sustained compared to transient outcomes. Induction of IgG4 nAbs occurs after OIT only in those with sustained efficacy. Murine passive cutaneous anaphylaxis after sensitization with pooled human sera is significantly inhibited by nAbs compared to non-nAbs. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IgE conformational epitope diversity remains unchanged during OIT. However, IgG4 nAbs capable of uniquely disrupting IgE-allergen interactions to prevent effector cell activation are selectively induced in OIT-treated individuals with sustained clinical efficacy. Therefore, the induction of neutralizing IgG4 antibodies to Ara h 2 are clinically relevant biomarkers of durable efficacy in OIT.

A novel IgE epitope-specific antibodies-based sandwich ELISA for sensitive measurement of immunoreactivity changes of peanut allergen Ara h 2 in processed foods.

Background: Peanut is an important source of dietary protein for human beings, but it is also recognized as one of the eight major food allergens. Binding of IgE antibodies to specific epitopes in peanut allergens plays important roles in initiating peanut-allergic reactions, and Ara h 2 is widely considered as the most potent peanut allergen and the best predictor of peanut allergy. Therefore, Ara h 2 IgE epitopes can serve as useful biomarkers for prediction of IgE-binding variations of Ara h 2 and peanut in foods. This study aimed to develop and validate an IgE epitope-specific antibodies (IgE-EsAbs)-based sandwich ELISA (sELISA) for detection of Ara h 2 and measurement of Ara h 2 IgE-immunoreactivity changes in foods. Methods: DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow anion-exchange chromatography combining with SDS-PAGE gel extraction were applied to purify Ara h 2 from raw peanut. Hybridoma and epitope vaccine techniques were employed to generate a monoclonal antibody against a major IgE epitope of Ara h 2 and a polyclonal antibody against 12 IgE epitopes of Ara h 2, respectively. ELISA was carried out to evaluate the target binding and specificity of the generated IgE-EsAbs. Subsequently, IgE-EsAbs-based sELISA was developed to detect Ara h 2 and its allergenic residues in food samples. The IgE-binding capacity of Ara h 2 and peanut in foods was determined by competitive ELISA. The dose-effect relationship between the Ara h 2 IgE epitope content and Ara h 2 (or peanut) IgE-binding ability was further established to validate the reliability of the developed sELISA in measuring IgE-binding variations of Ara h 2 and peanut in foods. Results: The obtained Ara h 2 had a purity of 94.44%. Antibody characterization revealed that the IgE-EsAbs recognized the target IgE epitope(s) of Ara h 2 and exhibited high specificity. Accordingly, an IgE-EsAbs-based sELISA using these antibodies was able to detect Ara h 2 and its allergenic residues in food samples, with high sensitivity (a limit of detection of 0.98 ng/mL), accuracy (a mean bias of 0.88%), precision (relative standard deviation < 16.50%), specificity, and recovery (an average recovery of 98.28%). Moreover, the developed sELISA could predict IgE-binding variations of Ara h 2 and peanut in foods, as verified by using sera IgE derived from peanut-allergic individuals. Conclusion: This novel immunoassay could be a user-friendly method to monitor low level of Ara h 2 and to preliminary predict in vitro potential allergenicity of Ara h 2 and peanut in processed foods.

High Degree of Desensitization After 1 Year of Early-Life Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Small Children Oral Immunotherapy (SmaChO) Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of peanut allergy is about 2% and mostly lifelong. Studies of oral immunotherapy (OIT) with peanut (the daily oral intake of an initially low and then increasing dose of peanut) often show problematic side effects, but there are indications of better safety and effect in younger children compared with older children and adults. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of peanut OIT with a slow up-dosing strategy and low maintenance dose in children aged 1 to 3 years who were allergic to peanut, through a 1-year interim analysis. METHOD: In a randomized controlled trial (2:1 ratio), 75 children, median age 31 months (interquartile range [IQR], 23-40 months) were assigned to receive peanut OIT (n = 50) or peanut avoidance (n = 25). RESULTS: In the OIT and avoidance groups, 43 of 50 and 20 of 25 children, respectively, performed the 1-year open oral peanut challenge. A cumulative dose of 750 mg peanut protein after 1 year was tolerated by 72% (36 of 50 children) in the OIT group compared with 4% (1 of 25) in the avoidance group (P < .001). Median tolerated cumulative dose was 2,750 mg (IQR, 275-5,000 mg) peanut protein in the OIT group compared with 2.8 mg (IQR, 0.3-27.8 mg) in the avoidance group (P < .001). Of the doses administered at home during the first year of OIT, 1.4% resulted in adverse events and 79% were mild, and three doses of epinephrine were given at home to two individuals. CONCLUSION: In children aged 1 to 3 years, peanut OIT with the combination of slow up-dosing and low maintenance dose seems safe and effective after 1 year.

Optimising the management of peanut allergy by targeting immune plasticity.

Randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy of oral tolerance induction to peanut have enabled detailed comparison of their clinical and immunological success. They have demonstrated that the regular consumption of peanut for at least 2 years by babies who are not allergic enables protection from developing peanut allergy. The LEAP study intervention tested the impact of regular peanut consumption for 4 years and demonstrated a sustained protection against the development of peanut allergy even after 12 months of peanut avoidance from 5 to 6 years of age. The PreventADALL trial introduced multiple allergens into babies' diets from early infancy and reduced the prevalence of food allergy at 3 years, especially by protecting against peanut allergy. Immunological studies from the LEAP cohort demonstrated that regular peanut consumption was associated with a prompt induction of peanut-specific IgG4 and reduced manufacture of peanut and Ara h 2-specific IgE. Even after stopping peanut consumption for 5 years, there continued to be a significant fall in peanut-specific Ara h 2 IgE in the consumption group from 5 to 6 years of age (p < .01). Children who developed peanut allergy by 5 years started to develop increasing sensitisation to linear sequential peanut epitopes from 2.5 years of age, suggesting that putative disease-modifying interventions should commence before 3 years. Data comparing clinical outcomes between children undergoing peanut immunotherapy from infancy suggest that younger children can consume higher portions of peanut without reaction on challenge whilst taking immunotherapy, have fewer side effects and are more likely to enjoy remission of PA. Peanut oral immunotherapy modulates T-cell populations in order to bring about hypo-responsiveness of allergy effector cells. Studies are now needed to characterise and compare different states of immunological tolerance. This will accelerate the design of interventions which can promote primary, secondary and tertiary levels of PA prevention across a range of age groups.

Defining the cross-reactivity between peanut allergens Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 using monoclonal antibodies.

In peanut allergy, Arachis hypogaea 2 (Ara h 2) and Arachis hypogaea 6 (Ara h 6) are two clinically relevant peanut allergens with known structural and sequence homology and demonstrated cross-reactivity. We have previously utilized X-ray crystallography and epitope binning to define the epitopes on Ara h 2. We aimed to quantitatively characterize the cross-reactivity between Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 on a molecular level using human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and structural characterization of allergenic epitopes. We utilized mAbs cloned from Ara h 2 positive single B cells isolated from peanut-allergic, oral immunotherapy-treated patients to quantitatively analyze cross-reactivity between recombinant Ara h 2 (rAra h 2) and Ara h 6 (rAra h 6) proteins using biolayer interferometry and indirect inhibitory ELISA. Molecular dynamics simulations assessed time-dependent motions and interactions in the antibody-antigen complexes. Three epitopes-conformational epitopes 1.1 and 3, and the sequential epitope KRELRNL/KRELMNL-are conserved between Ara h 2 and Ara h 6, while two more conformational and three sequential epitopes are not. Overall, mAb affinity was significantly lower to rAra h 6 than it was to rAra h 2. This difference in affinity was primarily due to increased dissociation of the antibodies from rAra h 6, a phenomenon explained by the higher conformational flexibility of the Ara h 6-antibody complexes in comparison to Ara h 2-antibody complexes. Our results further elucidate the cross-reactivity of peanut 2S albumins on a molecular level and support the clinical immunodominance of Ara h 2.

Design of an Ara h 2 hypoallergen from conformational epitopes.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse reactions are relatively common during peanut oral immunotherapy. To reduce the risk to the patient, some researchers have proposed modifying the allergen to reduce IgE reactivity, creating a putative hypoallergen. Analysis of recently cloned human IgG from patients treated with peanut immunotherapy suggested that there are three common conformational epitopes for the major peanut allergen Ara h 2. We sought to test if structural information on these epitopes could indicate mutagenesis targets for designing a hypoallergen and evaluated the reduction in IgE binding via immunochemistry and a mouse model of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA). METHODS: X-ray crystallography characterized the conformational epitopes in detail, followed by mutational analysis of key residues to modify monoclonal antibody (mAb) and serum IgE binding, assessed by ELISA and biolayer interferometry. A designed Ara h 2 hypoallergen was tested for reduced vascularization in mouse PCA experiments using pooled peanut allergic patient serum. RESULTS: A ternary crystal structure of Ara h 2 in complex with patient antibodies 13T1 and 13T5 was determined. Site-specific mutants were designed that reduced 13T1, 13T5, and 22S1 mAbs binding by orders of magnitude. By combining designed mutations from the three major conformational bins, a hexamutant (Ara h 2 E46R, E89R, E97R, E114R, Q146A, R147E) was created that reduced IgE binding in serum from allergic patients. Further, in the PCA model where mice were primed with peanut allergic patient serum, reactivity upon allergen challenge was significantly decreased using the hexamutant. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate that prior knowledge of common conformational epitopes can be used to engineer reduced IgE reactivity, an important first step in hypoallergen design.

Widespread monoclonal IgE antibody convergence to an immunodominant, proanaphylactic Ara h 2 epitope in peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Despite their central role in peanut allergy, human monoclonal IgE antibodies have eluded characterization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to define the sequences, affinities, clonality, and functional properties of human monoclonal IgE antibodies in peanut allergy. METHODS: We applied our single-cell RNA sequencing-based SEQ SIFTER discovery platform to samples from allergic individuals who varied by age, sex, ethnicity, and geographic location in order to understand commonalities in the human IgE response to peanut allergens. Select antibodies were then recombinantly expressed and characterized for their allergen and epitope specificity, affinity, and functional properties. RESULTS: We found striking convergent evolution of IgE monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from several clonal families comprising both memory B cells and plasmablasts. These antibodies bound with subnanomolar affinity to the immunodominant peanut allergen Ara h 2, specifically a linear, repetitive motif. Further characterization of these mAbs revealed their ability to single-handedly cause affinity-dependent degranulation of human mast cells and systemic anaphylaxis on peanut allergen challenge in humanized mice. Finally, we demonstrated that these mAbs, reengineered as IgGs, inhibit significant, but variable, amounts of Ara h 2- and peanut-mediated degranulation of mast cells sensitized with allergic plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Convergent evolution of IgE mAbs in peanut allergy is a common phenomenon that can reveal immunodominant epitopes on major allergenic proteins. Understanding the functional properties of these molecules is key to developing therapeutics, such as competitive IgG inhibitors, that are able to stoichiometrically outcompete endogenous IgE for allergen and thereby prevent allergic cascade in cases of accidental allergen exposure.

Investigation of peanut allergen-procyanidin non-covalent interactions: Impact on protein structure and in vitro allergenicity.

Interactions between plant polyphenols and food allergens may be a new way to alleviate food allergies. The non-covalent interactions between the major allergen from peanut (Ara h 2) with procyanidin dimer (PA2) were therefore characterized using spectroscopic, thermodynamic, and molecular simulation analyses. The main interaction between the Ara h 2 and PA2 was hydrogen bonding. PA2 statically quenched the intrinsic fluorescence intensity and altered the conformation of the Ara h 2, leading to a more disordered polypeptide structure with a lower surface hydrophobicity. In addition, the in vitro allergenicity of the Ara h 2-PA2 complex was investigated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. The immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding capacity of Ara h 2, as well as the release of allergenic cytokines, decreased after interacting with PA2. When the ratio of Ara h 2-to-PA2 was 1:50, the IgE binding capacity was reduced by around 43 %. This study provides valuable insights into the non-covalent interactions between Ara h 2 and PA2, as well as the potential mechanism of action of the anti-allergic reaction caused by binding of the polyphenols to the allergens.

Corrigendum: Biological activity of human IgE monoclonal antibodies targeting Der p 2, Fel d 1, Ara h 2 in basophil mediator release assays.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1155613.].

Alanine Scanning of the Unstructured Region of Ara h 2 and of a Related Mimotope Reveals Critical Amino Acids for IgE Binding.

SCOPE: The unstructured region of Ara h 2, referred to as epitope 3, contains a repeated motif, DYPSh (h = hydroxyproline) that is important for IgE binding. METHODS AND RESULTS: IgE binding assays to 20mer and shorter peptides of epitope 3, defines a 16mer core sequence containing one copy of the DPYSh motif, DEDSYERDPYShSQDP. This study performs alanine scanning of this and a related 12mer mimotope, LLDPYAhRAWTK. IgE binding, using a pool of 10 sera and with individual sera, is greatly reduced when alanine is substituted for aspartate at position 8 (D8; p < 0.01), tyrosine at position 10 (Y10; p < 0.01), and hydroxyproline at position 12 (h12; p < 0.001). IgE binding to alanine-substituted peptides of a mimotope containing the DPY_h motif confirm the critical importance of Y (p < 0.01) and h (p < 0.01), but not D. Molecular modeling of the core and mimotope suggests an h-dependent conformational basis for the recognition of these sequences by polyclonal IgE. CONCLUSIONS: IgE from pooled sera and individual sera differentially bound amino acids throughout the sequences of Epitope 3 and its mimotope, with Y10 and h12 being most important for all sera. These results are highly significant for designing hypoallergenic forms of Ara h 2.

The combination of Ara h 2-sIgE and basophil activation test could be an alternative to oral food challenge in cases of suspected peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Most children with peanut sensitisation do not have a clinical peanut allergy (PA). Oral food challenge (OFC) is then necessary to diagnose PA and assess the reactive dose of the allergen. However, OFC is laborious to perform, expensive and stressful. We evaluated whether in vitro tests, such as basophil activation test (BAT), allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and their combination, could be used to replace OFC for the diagnosis of PA in children. METHODS: Ninety-one patients aged 6 months to 18 years with suspected PA were prospectively recruited. These patients then underwent an OFC to assess PA. Whole peanut-sIgE, Ara h 2-sIgE, Ara h 8-sIgE and %CD63+ basophils (CCR3+ /SCClow ) to peanut measured by BAT were investigated for PA diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-one patients had a positive peanut OFC, and the remaining 50 were only sensitised. All patients with Ara h 2-sIgE >7 kUA /L were allergic to peanut. A threshold of 6% for activated basophils yielded a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 54%. All patients with Ara h 2-sIgE ≤7 kUA /L and BAT ≤6% (n = 22) had a negative OFC except for one who presented an oral syndrome due to PR-10 sensitisation. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that Ara h 2-sIgE >7 kUA/L is a discriminating threshold for the diagnosis of PA. Furthermore, when Ara h 2-sIgE ≤7 kUA/L and BAT ≤6%, patients do not need to adjust their diet and, thus, do not need an OFC.

Ara h 2 Peptide Mix Improves the Diagnosis of Peanut Allergy and Is Relevant for Ara h 2-Induced Mast Cell Activation.

BACKGROUND: A precise diagnosis of peanut allergy is extremely important. We identified 4 Ara h 2 peptides that improved Ara h 2-specific IgE (sIgE) diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic utility of sIgE to the mixture of these peptides and their role in mast cell response to peanut allergens. METHODS: sIgE to the peptide mix was determined using ImmunoCAP. Its diagnostic utility was compared with Ara h 2-sIgE and sIgE to the individual peptides. The functional relevance of the peptides was tested on the mast cell activation test using laboratory of allergic diseases 2 cell line and flow cytometry. RESULTS: A total of 52 peanut-allergic (PA), 36 peanut-sensitized but tolerant, and 9 nonsensitized nonallergic children were studied. Peptide mix-sIgE improved the diagnostic performance of Ara h 2-sIgE compared with Ara h 2-sIgE alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve .92 vs .89, respectively; P = .056). The sensitivity and specificity of Ara h 2-sIgE combined with the peptide mix were 85% and 96%, respectively. sIgE to individual peptides had the highest specificity (91%-96%) but the lowest sensitivity (10%-52%) compared with Ara h 2-sIgE (69% specificity and 87% sensitivity) or with peptide mix-sIgE (82% specificity and 63% sensitivity). Peptide 3 directly induced mast cell activation, and the peptide mix inhibited Ara h 2-induced activation of mast cells sensitized with plasma from Ara h 2-positive PA patients. CONCLUSIONS: sIgE to the peptide mix improved the diagnostic performance of Ara h 2-sIgE similarly to sIgE to individual peptides. The peptides interfered with Ara h 2-induced mast cell activation, confirming its relevance in peanut allergy.

Biological activity of human IgE monoclonal antibodies targeting Der p 2, Fel d 1, Ara h 2 in basophil mediator release assays.

Background: Human Immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibodies (hIgE mAb) are unique tools for investigating IgE responses. Here, the biological activity of hIgE mAb, derived from immortalized B cells harvested from the blood of allergic donors, targeting three allergens (Der p 2, Fel d 1 and Ara h 2) was investigated. Methods: Three Der p 2-, three Fel d 1- and five Ara h 2-specific hIgE mAb produced by human B cell hybridomas, were combined in pairs and used to passively sensitize humanized rat basophilic leukemia cells and compared with sensitization using serum pools. Sensitized cells were stimulated with corresponding allergens (recombinant or purified), allergen extracts or structural homologs, having 40-88% sequence similarity, and compared for mediator (ß-hexosaminidase) release. Results: One, two and eight pairs of Der p 2-, Fel d 1- and Ara h 2-specific hIgE mAb, respectively, produced significant mediator release (>50%). A minimum hIgE mAb concentration of 15-30 kU/L and a minimum antigen concentration between 0.01-0.1 µg/mL were sufficient to induce a pronounced mediator release. Individual sensitization with one Ara h 2-specific hIgE mAb was able to induce crosslinking independently of a second specific hIgE mAb. Der p 2- and Ara h 2-specific mAb showed a high allergen specificity when compared to homologs. Mediator release from cells sensitized with hIgE mAb was comparable to serum sensitization. Conclusion: The biological activity of hIgE mAb reported here provides the foundation for novel methods of standardization and quality control of allergen products and for mechanistic studies of IgE-mediated allergic diseases, using hIgE mAb.

Soy Gly m 8 sIgE Has Limited Value in the Diagnosis of Soy Allergy in Peanut Ara h 2-Sensitized Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, specific IgE (sIgE) sensitization against Gly m 8 (soy 2S albumin) has been described as a good diagnostic marker for soy allergy (SA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Gly m 8 by determining the sensitization profiles based on the homologues soy allergens Bet v 1, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3. METHODS: Thirty soy-allergic adults were included; sIgE to total soy extract, Gly m 8, Gly m 4, Gly m 5, Gly m 6, Bet v 1, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 were determined. Sensitization patterns were analyzed and determined. The clinical relevance of sIgE of Gly m 8 sensitization was measured by assessing its capacity to degranulate basophils in Gly m8-sensitized patients by an indirect basophil activation test (iBAT). RESULTS: Based on the sIgE patterns of sensitization, two groups of SA patients were identified: (i) peanut-associated SA group (all patients were sensitized to one or more of the peanut compounds) and (ii) non-peanut/PR-10-associated SA group (22 patients were sensitized to Gly m 4 and Bet v 1 but not to any of the peanut compounds). A high and significant correlation between total soy extract and Gly m 6 (R2 = 0.97), Gly m 5 (R2 = 0.85), and Gly m 8 (R2 = 0.78) was observed. A nonsignificant correlation was observed between the levels of sIgE of Gly m 8 versus Ara h2. The iBAT results showed that Gly m 8 did not induce basophil degranulation in any of the peanut-associated patients, indicating that the Gly m8 sensitizations were not clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Gly m 8 was not a major allergen in the selected soy-allergic population. The iBAT results indicated that Gly m 8 was not able to induce basophil degranulation in sIgE Gly m 8-sensitized soy-allergic patients. Thus, Gly m 8 would have no added value in the diagnosis of SA in the present study population.

IgE cross-inhibition between Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 is explained by complex formation of both major peanut allergens.

BACKGROUND: Surprisingly, IgE cross-reactivity between the major peanut allergens Ara h 1, 2, and 3 has been reported despite very low sequence identities. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the unexpected cross-reactivity between peanut major allergens. METHODS: Cross-contamination of purified natural Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6 was assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), Western blot test, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). IgE cross-reactivity was studied with sera of peanut-allergic patients (n = 43) by ELISA and ImmunoCAP inhibition using both intact natural and recombinant allergens and synthetic peptides representing postulated Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 cross-reactive epitopes. RESULTS: Both purified nAra h 1 and nAra h 3 were demonstrated to contain small but significant amounts of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 (<1%) by sandwich ELISA, SDS-PAGE/Western blot analysis, and LC-MS/MS. IgE cross-inhibition between both 2S albumins and Ara h 1 and Ara h 3 was only observed when using natural purified allergens, not recombinant allergens or synthetic peptides. Apparent cross-reactivity was lost when purified nAra h 1 was pretreated under reducing conditions, suggesting that Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 contaminations may be covalently bound to Ara h 1 via disulfide interactions. CONCLUSION: True cross-reactivity of both peanut 2S albumins with Ara h 1 and Ara h 3 could not be demonstrated. Instead, cross-contamination with small quantities was shown to be sufficient to cause significant cross-inhibition that can be misinterpreted as molecular cross-reactivity. Diagnostic tests using purified nAra h 1 and nAra h 3 can overestimate their importance as major allergens as a result of the presence of contaminating 2S albumins, making recombinant Ara h 1 and Ara h 3 a preferred alternative.

Ara h 2-specific IgE epitope-like peptides inhibit the binding of IgE to Ara h 2 and suppress lgE-dependent effector cell activation.

BACKGROUND: Clinical and experimental analyses indicate a pathognomonic role for allergen IgE crosslinking through epitope-paratope interactions as a major initial step in the cascade leading to effector cell activation and clinical manifestations of lgE-mediated food allergies. We aimed to undertake the initial development and assessment of Ara h 2-specific IgE epitope-like peptides that can bind to allergen-specific IgE paratopes and suppress effector cell activation. METHODS: We performed biopanning, screening, IgE binding, selection and mapping of peptides. We generated synthetic peptides for use in all functional experiments. ImmunoCAP inhibition, basophil and mast cell activation tests, with LAD2 cells, a human mast cell line were performed. Twenty-six children or young adults who had peanut allergy were studied. RESULTS: We identified and selected three linear peptides (DHPRFNRDNDVA, DHPRYGP and DHPRFST), and immunoblot analyses revealed binding to lgE from peanut-allergic individuals. The peptide sequences were aligned to the disordered region corresponding to the loop between helices 2 and 3 of Ara h 2, and conformational mapping showed that the peptides match the surface of Ara h 2 and h 6 but not other peanut allergens. In ImmunoCAP inhibition experiments, the peptides significantly inhibit the binding of IgE to Ara h 2 (p < .001). In basophil and mast cell activation tests, the peptides significantly suppressed Ara h 2-induced effector cell activation (p < .05) and increased the half-maximal Ara h 2 effective concentration (p < .05). Binding of the peptides to specific IgEs did not induce activation of basophils or mast cells. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that the indicated peptides reduce the allergenic activity of Ara h 2 and suppress lgE-dependent basophil and mast cell activation. These observations may suggest a novel therapeutic strategy for food allergy based on epitope-paratop blocking.

Strain matters in mouse models of peanut-allergic anaphylaxis: Systemic IgE-dependent and Ara h 2-dominant sensitization in C3H mice.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy accounts for the majority of food-induced hypersensitivity reactions and can lead to lethal anaphylaxis. Animal models can provide an insight into the immune mechanisms responsible for sensitization and allergic anaphylaxis. However, different mouse strains and sensitization protocols can influence the successful development of a peanut allergic mouse model. OBJECTIVE: We aimed at developing a systemic anaphylaxis model of peanut allergy that resembles human anaphylaxis. We compared the immunological and clinical responses in genetically different mouse strains. METHODS: Female BALB/c, C57BL/6, and C3H mice were intraperitoneally sensitized and later challenged with peanut proteins. Allergen-specific serology was done by ELISA, and anaphylaxis was evaluated by monitoring changes in body temperature upon systemic challenge. RESULTS: Sensitization to peanut was successful in C3H mice and triggered production of allergen-specific antibodies, cytokines and anaphylaxis. Allergic reactions were characterized by the release of allergic mediators and by changes in leukocyte populations in blood and in the peritoneal cavity. Among the identified major peanut allergens, Ara h 2 showed the strongest anaphylactic potential. Much lower or no trigger of peanut-specific antibodies was observed in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, which experienced no hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Mouse strain matters for testing of peanut protein allergens. We identified C3H mice as a suitable strain for the development of a mouse model of peanut-allergic anaphylaxis. Pre-clinical, humoural and cellular responses resembled the responses observed in human patients. The described model can be useful for further studies on peanut allergy and for the development of new therapeutic strategies.