Clinical Benefits of Olaparib in Mexican Ovarian Cancer Patients With Founder Mutation BRCA1-Del ex9-12.

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is gynecologic cancer with the highest mortality rate. It is estimated that 13-17% of ovarian cancers are due to heritable mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The BRCA1 (BRCA1-Del ex9-12) Mexican founder mutation is responsible for 28-35% of the cases with ovarian cancer. The aim was to describe the PFS of OC patients treated with olaparib, emphasizing patients carrying the Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1-Del ex9-12). Methods: In this observational study, of 107 patients with BRCAm, 35 patients were treated with olaparib from November 2016 to May 2021 at the Ovarian Cancer Program (COE) of Mexico; patient information was extracted from electronic medical records. Results: Of 311 patients, 107 (34.4%) were with BRCAm; 71.9% (77/107) were with BRCA1, of which 27.3% (21/77) were with BRCA1-Del ex9-12, and 28.1% (30/107) were with BRCA2 mutations. Only 35 patients received olaparib treatment, and the median follow-up was 12.87 months. The PFS of BRCA1-Del ex9-12 was NR (non-reach); however, 73% of the patients received the treatment at 36 vs. 11.59 months (95% CI; 10.43-12.75) in patients with other BRCAm (p = 0.008). Almost 50% of patients required dose reduction due to toxicity; the most frequent adverse events were hematological in 76.5% and gastrointestinal in 4%. Conclusion: Mexican OC BRCA1-Del ex9-12 patients treated with olaparib had a significant increase in PFS regardless of the line of treatment compared to other mutations in BRCA.

Venous thromboembolism incidence in cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations.

BACKGROUND: Germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutations predispose to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer among other neoplasms. Recently, several genomic alterations such as ALK and ROS-1 rearrangements have been described as molecular drivers of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The association of gBRCA mutations and VTE is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective, single-center study to determine the VTE incidence in consecutive patients with gBRCA mutations and cancer diagnosis attended in the multidisciplinary heredofamiliar cancer unit (HFCU) of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Spain, from 2010 to 2019. RESULTS: One-hundred and forty-one patients were included in the analysis. The overall VTE incidence was 12.8%. The highest incidence was reported in ovarian cancer patients (20.0%), followed by patients with both ovarian and breast cancers (16.6%) and the lowest was found in breast cancer (4.9%). No difference in the type of gBRCA mutation (1 or 2) in terms of VTE rate was observed. Sixty one percent of the patients were receiving anti-cancer therapy at the time of VTE diagnosis and the majority of the events (83.3%) were diagnosed in ambulatory setting. Khorana score was of limited value to detect high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: The VTE incidence observed in our study is consistent with prior data described in general population of breast and ovarian cancer. The risk of VTE in these patients seems to be driven by the type of cancer. We have not observed any significant interaction of gBRCA mutation status and cancer-associated thrombosis.

Experiencia con el uso de olaparib en pacientes con cáncer de ovario.

INTRODUCTION: More than the twenty percent of ovarian cancers are hereditary, and most have BRCA mutations. The 30% of Mexican patients with the BRCA1 mutation have the BRCA1 gene exon 9-12del deletion founder mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del). BRCA-mutated tumors are more sensitive to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib. OBJECTIVE: To show the clinical experience on the use of olaparib at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico. METHOD: Ovarian cancer patients treated with olaparib from November 2016 to December 2018 were studied, and their characteristics, clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities were described. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were assessed, with BRCA1 mutation being found in 78.9%, out of which 21.1% were carriers of the ex9-12del founder mutation. The median of PFS was 12 months; for patients treated on second and third line it was > 15 months, and for those treated with a fourth and subsequent line it was 8.3 months. Patients with the founder mutation had better results. Toxicities were like those reported in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib offers greater PFS benefit as maintenance therapy after a first and second relapse. Patients with founder mutation have had sustained PFS.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Más del 20 % de los cánceres de ovario puede ser hereditario y la mayoría tiene mutaciones BRCA. El 33 % de las pacientes mexicanas con mutación BRCA1 tiene la mutación fundadora deleción del exón 9-12del del gen BRCA1 (BRCA1 ex9-12del). Los tumores BRCA mutados son más sensibles a inhibidores PARP como olaparib. OBJETIVO: Mostrar la experiencia clínica del uso de olaparib en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México. MÉTODO: Se estudiaron las pacientes con cáncer de ovario tratadas con olaparib de noviembre de 2016 a diciembre de 2018 y se describieron sus características, respuesta clínica, supervivencia libre de progresión y toxicidades. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 19 pacientes, 78.9 % presentó mutación BRCA1, del cual 21.1 % era portador de la mutación fundadora ex9-12del. La mediana de supervivencia libre de progresión global fue de 12 meses, para las pacientes tratadas tratadas con olaparib de mantenimiento posterior a segunda y tercera línea fue de > 15 meses y para las de cuarta línea o más fue de 8.3 meses. Las pacientes con mutación fundadora presentaron mejores respuestas. Las toxicidades fueron similares a las de estudios con el uso de olaparib. CONCLUSIONES: Olaparib ofrece mayor beneficio en supervivencia libre de progresión como tratamiento de mantenimiento después de la primera y segunda recaída. Las pacientes con mutación fundadora han tenido respuesta sostenida.

Should platinum-based chemotherapy be preferred for germline BReast CAncer genes (BRCA) 1 and 2-mutated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide. Recent studies have shown that 4-20% of patients with PDAC have a germline BReast CAncer (gBRCA) genes 1 and 2 mutation (m). Because homologous recombination is impaired in patients with gBRCAm, some reports suggested that these tumors may be more sensitive to platinum compounds. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis focused on benefit of patients with gBRCAm receiving a platinum-based chemotherapy (PtCh) compared with those treated with a non-platinum-based chemotherapy (NPtCh). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following electronic databases were searched from inception to May 12, 2018: PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Abstracts from conferences were also reviewed for inclusion. Cohort, case-control and randomized studies of patients with PDAC and gBRCAm were eligible for inclusion if they provided data to compare patients receiving PtCh vs NPtCh. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the PtCh group vs the NPtCh group in patients with clinical stage III (locally advanced) or IV (metastatic) (CS III-IV) PDAC. RESULTS: Of 112 studies identified, 6 were included (total of 108 patients); of these, 4 provided sufficient data for meta-analysis. Half of the patients were males, with a mean age ranging from 58 to 63 years. The OS in the 85 patients with CS III-IV PDAC was higher in the PtCh group (23.7 vs 12.2 months; mean difference of 10.21 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.05-15.37; P < 0.001; very low quality of evidence). PtCh was associated with a lower mortality (62.3 vs 87.5%; relative risk of 0.80, 95%CI 0.66-0.97; P = 0.021; very low quality of evidence). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the hypothesis that patients with CS III-IV gBRCAm preferably benefit from a PtCh compared with NPtCh. However the very low quality of evidence should induce to be careful about the risk of potential biases. The generated hypothesis should be prospectively investigated in homogenous clinical settings.

Gynecological-endocrinological aspects in women carriers of BRCA1/2 gene mutations.

Women carriers of mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding for tumor suppressor proteins are at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers due to BRCA pathogenic mutations occur at earlier ages: mean age 43 years at diagnosis of breast cancer for BRCA1 mutations; onset of ovarian cancer up to 10-21% by age 50 years. Preventive strategies are then defined in the reproductive years. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines define that BRCA1/2 genetic testing should begin with the affected cancer individual (BRCA1/2 full sequencing); then, family members should be tested for the specific gene mutation found. A woman known to be a carrier needs a strict specific surveillance strategy to achieve early diagnosis. The NCCN proposes breast imageneological surveillance beginning at age 25 years; ovarian surveillance beginning at age 30-35 years. Concomitantly, risk-reducing strategies should be analyzed: surgical or pharmacological. When prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is performed before menopause, estrogen replacement therapy could be required. For BRCA, we review the risks of cancer in mutations carriers, criteria for genetic testing, surveillance and risk-reduction strategies, and the safety of prescribing hormone therapy when needed.

The Challenge of Evaluating Adnexal Masses in Patients With Breast Cancer.

This narrative literature review addresses the problem of an adnexal mass discovered during the course of breast cancer (BC) care, which may represent a benign condition, a metastatic process, or a primary ovarian cancer (OC), clinical scenarios associated with distinct physiopathology and prognosis. Furthermore, the coexistence of BC and OC in the same patient may be owing to a hereditary disorder, deserving specific management strategies and counseling. The initial detection and evaluation of an adnexal mass in a patient with BC requires a high index of suspicion, and the initial workup should include a thorough medical history and physical examination, measurement of tumor markers, complete blood count, and imaging tests. Transvaginal ultrasonography remains the standard tool, and findings suggestive of malignancy include bilateral tumors, thick septations, predominance of a solid component, Doppler flow to the solid component, and ascites. From the pathology point of view, features that are suggestive of metastatic disease include bilaterality, mild ovarian enlargement, vascular emboli, no omental deposits, and the absence of transition from benign to malignant epithelium. Although there is a considerable overlap in OC and BC immunohistochemical profiles, BC usually stain positive for GCDFP-15 and negative for vimentine, PAX8, and WT1, and OC often stain positive for CK7, PAX8, WT1, and to mesothelin. Genetic counselling should always be indicated in this clinical scenario. In conclusion, diagnostic spectrum of an ovarian mass in a patient with BC is broad, and a systematic multi-professional strategy is necessary to conduct these challenging cases.

Homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer: a review of its epidemiology and management

Ovarian cancer patients with homologous recombination deficiencies exhibit specific clinical behaviors, and improved responses to treatments, such as platinum-based chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, have been observed. Germline mutations in the BRCA 1/2 genes are the most well-known mechanisms of homologous recombination deficiency. However, other mechanisms, such as germline and somatic mutations in other homologous recombination genes and epigenetic modifications, have also been implicated in homologous recombination deficiency. The epidemiology and implications of these other mechanisms need to be better understood to improve the treatment strategies for these patients. Furthermore, an evaluation of various diagnostic tests to investigate homologous recombination deficiency is essential. Comprehension of the role of homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer also allows the development of therapeutic combinations that can improve the efficacy of treatment. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology and management of homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer patients.

Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC): A comprehensive review.

OBJECTIVE. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is currently considered the precursor lesion of pelvic (i.e., ovarian or peritoneal) high-grade serous carcinoma. The incidence of STIC has been reported to range from 0.6% to 7% in BRCA mutations carriers. However, the clinical outcome of patients with 'isolated' STIC remains elusive. The aim of this study is to review the published literature on isolated STIC to determine outcomes of these ients and present a summary of management strategies. METHODS. A systematic English-language literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE-Ovid, Scopus, EBSCO host, Cochrane Library of articles published from February 2006 to April 2015. Study inclusion criteria for review were the following: risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), BRCA mutation carriers, non-BRCA mutation carriers, and benign surgical indication. Exclusion criteria were as follows: the presence of synchronous gynecological cancers, concurrent non-gynecological malignancies, the presence of ovarian intraepithelial lesions, and articles that did not include any clinical information and were restricted to pathology information only. RESULTS. A total of 78 patients with isolated STIC were included in our analysis. The median age for all patients was 53.7 years (range; 37-83). Surgical indication was RRSO in 67 patients with BRCA mutations or high-risk personal or family history. In the other 11 patients, an incidental STIC was detected after surgery for non-cancerous indications. Eleven (16.4%) patients received chemotherapy after the diagnosis of STIC. The follow-up time ranged from 2 to 150 months. Three (4.5%) patients with BRCA mutations were diagnosed with primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) during the follow-up at 43, 48 and 72 months after RRSO. CONCLUSIONS. The rate of primary peritoneal carcinoma in patients with BRCA mutations and isolated STIC is 4.5%. The role of adjuvant therapy remains elusive and routine surveillance with tumor markers and imaging is not warranted.